Enhanced disinfection leads to reduction of microbial contamination and a decrease in patient colonization and infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1118-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Rutala ◽  
Hajime Kanamori ◽  
Maria F. Gergen ◽  
Lauren P. Knelson ◽  
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Microbial Contamination ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Standard Practice ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Subsequent Patient

AbstractIn this prospective study, we monitored 4 epidemiologically important pathogens (EIPs): methicillin-resistane Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Clostridium difficile, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter to assess the effectiveness of 3 enhanced disinfection strategies for terminal room disinfection against standard practice. Our data demonstrated that a decrease in room contamination with EIPs of 94% was associated with a 35% decrease in subsequent patient colonization and/or infection.

scholarly journals Differences in Hospital-Associated Multidrug-Resistant Organisms and Clostridium difficile Rates Using 2-Day versus 3-Day Definitions

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1417-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrijana Gombosev ◽  
Salah E. Fouad ◽  
Eric Cui ◽  
Chenghua Cao ◽  
Leah Terpstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

We surveyed infection prevention programs in 16 hospitals for hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum β-lactamase, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter acquisition, as well as hospital-associated MRSA bacteremia and Clostridium difficile infection based on defining events as occurring >2 days versus >3 days after admission. The former resulted in significantly higher median rates, ranging from 6.76% to 45.07% higherInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(11):1417–1420

scholarly journals High Colonization Rate and Heterogeneity of ESBL- and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Gull Feces in Lisbon, Portugal

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1487
Author(s):  
Marta Aires-de-Sousa ◽  
Claudine Fournier ◽  
Elizeth Lopes ◽  
Hermínia de Lencastre ◽  
Patrice Nordmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Encoding Genes

In order to evaluate whether seagulls living on the Lisbon coastline, Portugal, might be colonized and consequently represent potential spreaders of multidrug-resistant bacteria, a total of 88 gull fecal samples were screened for detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and for vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). A large proportion of samples yielded carbapenemase- or ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (16% and 55%, respectively), while only two MRSA and two VRE were detected. Mating-out assays followed by PCR and whole-plasmid sequencing allowed to identify carbapenemase and ESBL encoding genes. Among 24 carbapenemase-producing isolates, there were mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae (50%) and Escherichia coli (33%). OXA-181 was the most common carbapenemase identified (54%), followed by OXA-48 (25%) and KPC-2 (17%). Ten different ESBLs were found among 62 ESBL-producing isolates, mainly being CTX-M-type enzymes (87%). Co-occurrence in single samples of multiple ESBL- and carbapenemase producers belonging to different bacterial species was observed in some cases. Seagulls constitute an important source for spreading multidrug-resistant bacteria in the environment and their gut microbiota a formidable microenvironment for transfer of resistance genes within bacterial species.

Contamination of Hospital Curtains With Healthcare-Associated Pathogens

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1074-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floyd Trillis ◽  
Elizabeth C. Eckstein ◽  
Rachel Budavich ◽  
Michael J. Pultz ◽  
Curtis J. Donskey
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated

In a culture survey, we found that 42% of hospital privacy curtains were contaminated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, 22% with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and 4% with Clostridium difficile. Hand imprint cultures demonstrated that these pathogens were easily acquired on hands. Hospital curtains are a potential source for dissemination of healthcare-associated pathogens.

Can alternative anatomical sites and environmental surveillance replace perianal screening for multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Kyle J. Gontjes ◽  
Kristen E. Gibson ◽  
Bonnie Lansing ◽  
Marco Cassone ◽  
Lona Mody
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Environmental Surveillance ◽  
Healthy Participant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Abstract Perianal screening can be intrusive. The sensitivities of multianatomical, nonperianal surveillance were 92.3% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 58.7% for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 54.9% for resistant Gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB). Sensitivities improved upon adding environmental surveillance (95.5%, 82.9%, and 67.9%, respectively). Multianatomical, nonperianal screening and room environment surveillance may replace perianal screening and reduce healthy participant bias in nursing homes.

scholarly journals Oritavancin Combinations with β-Lactams against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 2352-2358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
Juwon Yim ◽  
Animesh Raut ◽  
Michael J. Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Complex Models ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Time Kill

ABSTRACTOritavancin possesses activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA).In vitrodata suggest synergy between beta-lactams (BLs) and vancomycin or daptomycin, agents similar to oritavancin. We evaluated the activities of BLs combined with oritavancin against MRSA and VRE. Oritavancin MICs were determined for 30 strains, 5 each of MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis, and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium. Oritavancin MICs were determined in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of BLs. Oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, cefazolin, or nafcillin was evaluated for lethal synergy against MRSA, and oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, ampicillin, or ertapenem was evaluated for lethal synergy against VRE in 24-h time-kill assays. Oritavancin at 0.5× the MIC was combined with BLs at 0.5× the MIC or the biological free peak concentration, whichever one was lower. Synergy was defined as a ≥2-log10-CFU/ml difference between the killing achieved with the combination and that achieved with the most active single agent at 24 h. Oritavancin MICs were ≤0.125 μg/ml for all MRSA isolates except three VISA isolates with MICs of 0.25 μg/ml. Oritavancin MICs for VRE ranged from 0.03 to 0.125 μg/ml. Oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline was synergistic against all MRSA phenotypes and statistically superior to all other combinations against DNS MRSA, hVISA, and MRSA isolates (P< 0.02). Oritavancin in combination with cefazolin and oritavancin in combination with nafcillin were also synergistic against all MRSA strains. Synergy between oritavancin and all BLs was revealed against VRE strain 8019, while synergy between oritavancin and ampicillin or ertapenem but not ceftaroline was demonstrated against VRE strain R7164. The data support the potential use of oritavancin in combination with BLs, especially oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline, for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. The data from the present study are not as strong for oritavancin in combination with BLs for VRE. Further study of both MRSA and VRE in more complex models is warranted.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activities of the Rx-01 Oxazolidinones against Hospital and Community Pathogens

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1653-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lawrence ◽  
Paul Danese ◽  
Joe DeVito ◽  
Francois Franceschi ◽  
Joyce Sutcliffe
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Moraxella Catarrhalis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
The Family ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms

ABSTRACT Rx-01_423 and Rx-01_667 are two members of the family of oxazolidinones that were designed using a combination of computational and medicinal chemistry and conventional biological techniques. The compounds have a two- to eightfold-improved potency over linezolid against serious gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant streptococci, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This enhanced potency extends to the coverage of linezolid-resistant gram-positive microbes, especially multidrug-resistant enterococci and pneumococci. Compounds from this series expand the spectrum compared with linezolid to include fastidious gram-negative organisms like Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Like linezolid, the Rx-01 compounds are bacteriostatic against MRSA and enterococci but are generally bactericidal against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document