The effects of genotype, sex and feeding regimen on pig carcass development: 1. Primary components, tissues and joints

1979 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Evans ◽  
A. J. Kempster

SUMMARYDissection data for 1006 pig carcasses taken from the first 2 years of the Meat and Livestock Commission's (MLC) Commercial Pig Evaluation (CPE) were used to examine the relationships between carcass components and carcass weight over the growth period from 46 to 92 kg carcass weight. Alternative models were tested and parameters examined for different genotypes (pigs from different companies in CPE), sexes (barrows and gilts), feeding regimens (ad libitumand restricted feeding) and years.Generally, linear allometry provided an acceptable description of carcass development, although some curvilinearity was indicated for the head, kidneys, rump back joint, M. psoas and total dissected lean. Growth coefficients conformed to the generally accepted pattern of carcass development in pigs. Using linear allometry, proportional weight increases were comparable for all genotypes and sexes, but dissected fat increased relatively faster on the restricted feeding regimen.At a constant carcass weight of 66·5 kg, all tissue weights and the weights of primary components and most joints differed by genotype. The ratio of carcass lean weights for the two extreme genotypes was 1·04; comparable ratios for carcass fat weights were 1·13 (restricted-fed pigs) and 1·07 (ad libitum-fed pigs).Significant differences were recorded between sexes and between feeding regimens, largely reflecting differences in fatness. Some important year differences were also found.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbi R. Hernandez ◽  
Quinten P. Federico ◽  
Sara N. Burke

AbstractDeclining health and cognition are hallmarks of advanced age that reduce both the quality and length of the lifespan. While caloric restriction has been highlighted as a dietary intervention capable of improving the healthspan by restoring metabolic function in late life, time-restricted feeding and changes in dietary macronutrient composition may be more feasible alternatives with similar health outcomes. To investigate the potential of these two interventions, a pilot cohort of fully mature adult rats were placed on a time-restricted feeding regimen of a ketogenic or micronutrient and calorically matched control diet from 8 to 21 months of age. A third group of rats was permitted to eat standard chow ad libitum. At 22 months, all rats were then placed on time-restricted feeding and tested on a biconditional association task. While the data presented here are preliminary (small sample size of 3-4/diet group), additional animals are currently undergoing the feeding regimen, and will be added into the behavioral studies at a later date. For the current data, regardless of dietary composition, time-restricted-fed rats performed significantly better than ad libitum-fed rats. This observation could not be accounted for by differences in motivation, procedural or sensorimotor impairments, indicating that mid-life dietary interventions capable of preventing metabolic impairments may also serve to prevent age-related cognitive decline.


Author(s):  
N.D. Cameron ◽  
M.K. Curran

This paper examined a genotype with feeding regime interaction by performance testing pigs, selected for lean growth on ad-libitum or restricted feeding, on both the normal and the alternative feeding regime.Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs from divergent selection lines were for four generations for lean growth either on an ad-libitum (LGA) or a restricted (LGS) feeding regime. In each selection group, there were high, low and control lines, which consisted of 10 sires and 20 dams. On average, 3 boars and 3 gilts were tested per litter, with one boar and one gilt per litter tested on the alternative feeding regime. On ad-libitum feeding, there were 181 LGA and 94 LGS LW pigs and 162 LGA and 67 LGS LR pigs. On restricted feeding, 92 LGA and 212 LGS LW and 53 LGA and 135 LGS LR pigs were tested.Performance test. The performance test was over a fixed weight range of 30±3 kg to 85±5 kg for ad-libitum fed pigs and for a fixed time of 84 days for restricted fed pigs. Restricted feeding was equal to 0.75 g/g of daily food intake of ad-libitum fed pigs. All pigs were individually penned and fed a high energy (13.8 MJ DE/kg DM) and high protein (210 g/kg DM crude protein) pelleted ration.


Author(s):  
M.K. Curran ◽  
N.D. Cameron ◽  
J.C. Kerr

Divergent selection lines for lean growth on a restricted feeding regime, in Large White and Landrace pigs, were established to complement the lean growth selection lines on ad-libitum feeding. This study estimated the direct and correlated responses after four generations of selection and the corresponding genetic and phenotypic parameters.The selection objective for lean growth on restricted or scale (LGS) feeding was to obtain equal correlated responses in growth rate and carcass lean content, measured in phenotypic s.d. The selection criterion included measurements of growth rate and ultrasonic backfat depth.Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) boars and gilts were purchased from eight British nucleus herds and boars from national artificial insemination centres in 1982. Homozygous or heterozygous halothane positive pigs were not included in the experiment. The base populations consisted of 31 LW and 19 LR sires and 57 LW and 67 LR dams. Within each population, there were high and low selection lines with a control line, each consisting of 10 boars and 20 gilts, with a generation interval of 13.5 and 12 months for LW and LR pigs. Animals were performance tested in individual pens from 30±3 kg for a period of 84 days and fed a high energy (13.8 MJ DE/kg DM) and high protein (210 g/kg DM crude protein) pelleted ration. Daily food intake was equal to 0.75 g/g of the daily food intake for ad-libitum fed pigs and the total food intake was 134 kg for LW pigs and 150 kg for LR pigs. On average, 3 boars and 3 gilts were tested per litter. The total number of pigs tested per line and average inbreeding coefficients at generation four, by population are given below.


1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Forbes ◽  
Wendy B. Brown ◽  
A. G. M. Al-Banna ◽  
R. Jones

ABSTRACTFour experiments, each with 24 growing sheep, were carried out to investigate the effects of 8- or 16-h daylengths on growth and carcass characteristics. In the first two experiments, with 6- to 9-month-old castrated males, and 3- to 5-month-old female and castrated male animals, pair feeding of a concentrate feed was adopted. Live-weight gains were significantly greater under 16-h daylength, but carcass weights were not significantly increased because most of the live-weight difference was due to gut-fill. Carcass weights and measurements suggested that long daylength stimulated the growth of non-fat tissues at the expense of fat.The third experiment compared castrated males fed either ad libitum or restricted to a daily ration proportional to each animal's own weight from 6 to 9 months of age. Food intake was higher in the ad libitum sheep but not significantly so. Weight gains were, however, significantly greater with ad libitum feeding and long daylength, compared with restricted feeding and short daylength, respectively. Gut-fill was greater in those kept in 16 h daylength and the small advantage in carcass weight was not significant. Carcass characteristics were not markedly affected by daylength, while carcass weight and fatness were higher following ad libitum feeding than restricted feeding.In the fourth experiment 12 female sheep, aged 9 months, were individually rationed according to live weight and slaughtered after 4 weeks exposure to 16- or 8-h daylengths; another 12 were slaughtered after 7 weeks of treatment. Gut-fill was significantly greater in long daylength at both slaughter times, showing that the effect of daylength on gut fill has occurred within 4 weeks of the start of treatment, while live weight has not been observed to be affected at this stage in any experiment in this series.Overall these experiments show little stimulating effect of long daylength on growth, and a large effect on gut-fill.


2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 867-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Clapperton ◽  
S.C. Bishop ◽  
E.J. Glass

Genetic selection is well established as a means of improving productivity in pigs, but the effects of continued selection for increased performance on immunity are not well understood, nor are genetic relationships between performance and immunity. This study compared differences in the levels of a range of immune traits between lines of Large White pigs divergently selected for a number of productivity traits. Selection lines compared were highv. low lean growth under restricted feeding (31 high linev. 10 controlv. 38 low line pigs), high v. low lean growth underad libitumfeeding (18 high line v. 10 controlv. 19 low line pigs), and highv. low food intake (24 high linev. 26 low line pigs). Immune traits measured were total white blood cell numbers (WBC), and the numbers of leukocyte subsets: neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, lymphocytes, CD4+cells, CD8α+cells, B cells, γδ T cells and CD11R1+Natural killer (NK) cells. CD4+, γδ T cells and CD11R1+cells were subdivided into subpopulations that were positive or negative for the CD8α marker, and conventional CD8αhigh+cytotoxic T cells were also determined. Pigs were tested underad libitumfeeding conditions from 14 to 24 weeks, and immune traits were assessed at ages 18 and 24 weeks. Line differences were estimated using residual maximum likelihood techniques. Consistent differences in immune trait levels were evident between pigs previously selected for high and low lean growth under restricted feeding: at age 24 weeks, high line pigs had higher basal levels of WBC (39·6v. 27·8×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 2·09, for highv. low line pigs) mainly explained by higher levels of lymphocytes (25·5v. 17·3×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 1·54, for highv. low line pigs) with increased numbers of CD8α+cells (8·19v. 5·15×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 0·14) and CD11R1+cells (5·23v. 2·46×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 0·43), predominantly the CD11R1+CD8α?subpopulation ((3·20v. 1·64×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 0·11). High line pigs also had increased numbers of monocytes (2·64v. 1·83×106cells per ml, s.e.d. 0·35). Similar results were obtained at age 18 weeks. There were no consistent differences between divergent lines in pigs selected for lean growth underad libitumfeeding or food intake. This is the first report to demonstrate that selection for some aspects of performance can influence WBC and leukocyte subset numbers in pigs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractCarcass composition was measured after six generations of divergent selection for lean growth rate on ad-libitum and restricted feeding, lean food conversion and daily food intake in populations of Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs. There were 161 half-carcass dissections in LW pigs and for LR pigs, a double sampling procedure combined information from 53 half-carcass and 53 hand joint dissections. The performance test started at 30 kg and finished at 85 kg with ad-libitum feeding and after 84 days with restricted feeding, and pigs were slaughtered at the end of the test.In the LR population, selection for lean growth on restricted feeding increased carcass lean content (605 v. 557 (s.e.d. 19) g/kg), but there were no significant responses in carcass lean content with the selection strategies on adlibitum feeding. Selection for lean food conversion and high lean growth on restricted feeding reduced carcass fat content (201 v. 241 (s.e.d. 14) and 150 v. 218 (s.e.d. 18) g/kg), but selection for high lean growth rate with adlibitum increased carcass fat content (212 v. 185 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg). Responses in carcass composition were not significant with selection on daily food intake.In the LW population, selection for high lean food conversion or low daily food intake increased carcass lean content (539 v. 494 and 543 v. 477 (s.e.d. 11) g/kg) to a greater extent than selection on lean growth rate (509 v. 475 g/kg). Responses in carcass fat content were equal and opposite to those in carcass lean content. Selection on lean growth rate with ad-libitum feeding increased lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) (491 v. 422 (s.e.d. 23) g/day), but there was no change in fat tissue growth rate (FTGR) (206 v. 217 (s.e.d. 15) g/day). In contrast, FTGR was reduced with selection on lean food conversion (169 v. 225 g/day), but LTGR was not significantly increased (520 v. 482 g/day). Selection for lean growth rate with restricted feeding combined the desirable strategies of lean growth rate on adlibitum feeding and lean food conversion, as LTGR was increased (416 v. 359 (s.e.d. 12) g/day) and FTGR decreased (126 v. 156 (s.e.d. 7) g/day). The preferred selection strategy may be lean growth rate on restricted feeding, which simultaneously emphasizes rate and efficiency of lean growth.For ad-libitum fed LW pigs, coheritabilities for growth rate, daily food intake and backfat depth with carcass lean content were negative (-0·12, -0·22 and -0·50 (s.e. 0·05), but positive with carcass subcutaneous fat content (0·22, 0·24 and 0·50), when estimated from six generations of performance test data and carcass dissection data in generations 2, 4 and 6.


1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Cameron ◽  
M. K. Curran

AbstractThe genotype with feeding regime interaction was examined by testing pigs from four selection groups on both ad libitum and restricted feeding regimes. Within each selection group, there were high, low and control lines, which had been selected for lean food conversion ratio (LFC), daily food intake (DFI) or lean growth rate on ad libitum (LGA) or on restricted (LGS) feeding, in Large White-Edinburgh (LW) and Landrace-Wye (LR) populations. There were 1187 LW pigs and 768 LR pigs in the study, with 344 LW and 133 LR pigs tested on the alternative feeding regime.In the LW population, pigs in the high LGS line grew significantly faster than the high LGA and LFC lines with ad libitum feeding (919 v. 847 and 786 (s.e.d. 31) g/day), but had similar food conversion ratios and backfat depths. The high LGS and high DFI lines were similar for growth rate, daily food intake and food conversion ratio, but backfat depth was significantly lower in the high LGS line than in the high DFI line (12·0 v. 25·9 (s.e.d. 0·7) mm). On restricting feeding, the rankings of the selection lines for growth rate, food conversion ratio and mid-back fat depth were broadly similar to those with ad libitum feeding, except for the high LFC line. In the LR population, the high LGS, LGA and LFC lines did not differ significantly in growth rate, daily food intake, food conversion ratio and backfat depth within either the ad libitum or restricted feeding regimes. Growth rate of the high LGS line was similar to the high DFI line on ad libitum feeding (828 v. 836 (s.e.d. 40) g/day), but significantly higher on restricted feeding (704 v. 636 (s.e.d. 23) g/day). On both feeding regimes, food conversion ratio and backfat depth were significantly lower in the high LGS line compared with the high DFI line.In the LW population, the genetic correlation between feeding regimes for growth rate was significantly less than one (0·4 (s.e. 0·20)), but was not significantly different from unity (0·8 (s.e. 0·14)) for backfat depths. Based on the performance test results, selection for lean growth with testing on a restricted feeding regime may be preferable to testing animals on an ad libitum feeding regime.


1990 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kanis

ABSTRACTFrom each of 159 litters, between one and three pigs were fed ad libitum and between one and four pigs were fed at several restricted feeding levels from about 27 to 107 kg live weight. Effects of litter by feeding regimen (ad libitumv. restricted feeding) interactions (L × F) and sex by feeding regimen interactions (S × F) on production traits were investigated. In experimental groups where restrictedly fed animals received an amount of food based on their estimated voluntary food intake capacity (FIC), interactions were non-significant. In groups where restricted feeding was independent of FIC, significant L × F or S × F interactions were found for daily food intake (FI), daily gain, lean tissue growth rate and fatty tissue growth rate, but not for body composition and food conversion traits.Because of between-animal variation in FIC, restricted feeding according to a fixed scale restricted intake of some animals to a higher degree than others and degree of food intake restriction (DFR) was calculated from actual FI and FIC for animals fed at a restricted level. After correction of FI and production traits of restrictedly fed animals for differences in DFR, L × F and S × F interactions were not significant.It was concluded that the poor relationships often found between test-station results of boars and results of their progeny in practical environments may be caused, to an important extent, by differences in DFR in each environment. To overcome these genotype by environment interactions it is recommended that animals be fed ad libitum in both test and commercial environments.


1991 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Planella ◽  
G. L. Cook

AbstractCommercial carcass grading measurements and sample joint dissection were evaluated as predictors of carcass lean concentration using a data set of 1320 pig carcasses from four breeding companies. Entire males, castrated males and gilts from White-type and Meat-type populations were reared on ad libitum or restricted feeding regimens and slaughtered to achieve a carcass weight of either 52·5 kg or 72·5 kg. A model was fitted which examined the accuracy and stability of regression equations for different populations, sexes and feeding regimens, and different values of P2 and carcass weight. The regression slope of lean concentration on P2 differed by sex and population. Lean concentration decreased faster with increases in P2 among gilts than among entire or castrated males. At the same level of P2 and carcass weight, pigs fed ad libitum contained 5 g/kg less lean in the carcass than pigs fed at a restricted level. Biases among populations, sexes and feeding regimens were also found when carcass lean concentration was predicted from additional measurements: muscle depth at P2, fat thickness and muscle depth at 3/4 last ribs, and eye-muscle area. The regression slope of lean concentration on sample joints showed little evidence of variation among populations (except for the hand joint), sexes or feeding regimens. There were important differences in the intercept for different populations. The ham was the most accurate (residual s.d. = 11 g/kg) and least biased joint.


1993 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine G. Gebhardt-Henrich ◽  
Henry L. Marks

SummaryThis study investigated genetic variation in growth and final size in relationship to differences in heritabilities under good and poor feeding conditions. Heritabilities of growth and final size were estimated for several traits underad libitumand restricted feeding conditions. A 30% feed restriction from hatching to 44 days of age in Japanese quail chicks decreased body weight and tarsus length at 44 days of age and the length of the third primary covert feather at 24 days of age relative to controls fedad libitum. Wing length at 44 days of age was not significantly different forad libitumfed and restricted quail. Genetic variances for body weight and tarsus length were very large throughout growth which resulted in heritability estimates close to one for these traits. The genetic correlations among feeding treatments were low, indicating that different genes were affecting growth under the two treatments. Growth was described by the components: asymptote, growth period, and shape of the growth curve following the modified Richards growth curve model (Brisbinet al.1986). Tarsus length, which had high heritability of the parameter ‘growth period’ of the model, tended to display a higher heritability under the restriction than underad libitumfeeding. Body weight and feather length, which had either no heritable or low heritable ‘growth periods’ estimates, tended to be more heritable underad libitumfeeding. The shape parameter of the growth curve was not heritable for any trait, except tarsus length under restricted feeding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document