Understanding submucosal electrosurgery for the treatment of nasal turbinate enlargement

2006 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
S E J Farmer ◽  
R Eccles

The surgical management of inferior turbinate enlargement is controversial. Submucosal electrosurgical techniques for turbinate reduction include conventional diathermy, radiofrequency tissue reduction and coblation. All electrosurgical techniques use radiofrequency electricity to damage turbinate tissue but differ in the control and delivery of energy. This review will examine the history of submucosal electrosurgery and clarify the various techniques. This review will also examine the evidence for the efficacy and safety of electrosurgery for the treatment of nasal turbinate enlargement, and will make a case that no progress will be made in clinical trials on the safety and efficacy unless there is standardisation of equipment and techniques in nasal electrosurgery.

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CGM.S7526
Author(s):  
Julien Edeline ◽  
Elodie Vauléon ◽  
Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Christophe Perrin ◽  
Cécile Vigneau Karim Bensalah ◽  
...  

This article reviews data on sorafenib use in renal cell carcinoma. Mechanisms of actions and pharmacokinetics are briefly described. Major clinical trials are presented, summarizing efficacy and safety of sorafenib. Its place in current treatment of renal cell carcinoma is discussed. Sorafenib is likely to remain one of the mainstays of RCC treatment in coming years.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 800-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bindu M. Bennet ◽  
Jayanthi Wolf ◽  
Rodrigo Laureano ◽  
Rani S. Sellers

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak that started in Wuhan, China, in 2019 resulted in a pandemic not seen for a century, and there is an urgent need to develop safe and efficacious vaccines. The scientific community has made tremendous efforts to understand the disease, and unparalleled efforts are ongoing to develop vaccines and treatments. Toxicologists and pathologists are involved in these efforts to test the efficacy and safety of vaccine candidates. Presently, there are several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in clinical trials, and the pace of vaccine development has been highly accelerated to meet the urgent need. By 2021, efficacy and safety data from clinical trials are expected, and potentially a vaccine will be available for those most at risk. This review focuses on the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development efforts with emphasis on the nonclinical safety assessment and discusses emerging preliminary data from nonclinical and clinical studies. It also provides a brief overview on vaccines for other coronaviruses, since experience gained from these can be useful in the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This review will also explain why, despite this unprecedented pace of vaccine development, rigorous standards are in place to ensure nonclinical and clinical safety and efficacy. [Box: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Shibata ◽  
Terumasa Hashimoto ◽  
Takuro Miyazaki ◽  
Akira Miyazaki ◽  
Koji Nobe

Background: Thromboembolic ischemic stroke, which is mainly caused by hypertension, as well as plasma dyslipidemia, arterial fibrillation and diabetes, is a leading cause of death in the US and other countries. Numerous clinical trials for thrombolytic drugs, which aimed to pharmacologically dissolve thrombi, were conducted in the 1950s, when the first thrombolytic therapy was performed. Methods: In this study, we summarize the pathophysiologic features of ischemic stroke, and the history of thrombolytic therapy, and discuss the recent progress that has been made in the ongoing development of thrombolytic drugs. Conclusion: Thrombolytic therapy is sometimes accompanied by harmful hemorrhagic insults; accordingly, a window of time wherein therapy can safely be performed has been established for this approach. Several basic and clinical studies are ongoing to develop next-generation thrombolytic drugs to expand the time window


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1082-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott Vichinsky ◽  
Marcela Torres ◽  
Jonathan Glass ◽  
Caterina P Minniti ◽  
Stéphane Barrette ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1082 Background: Long-term efficacy and safety of the iron chelator deferasirox in SCD patients has been previously reported (Vichinsky et al. BJH 2011). Hydroxyurea (HU), a common treatment for SCD, is associated with adverse events (AEs) such as bone marrow depression. However, long-term data for iron chelation and concomitant HU are limited. This study provides further efficacy and safety data for deferasirox including PK and safety data + HU. Methods: SCD patients aged ≥2 yrs and iron overload from blood transfusions were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to deferasirox (DFX; 20 mg/kg/day) or deferoxamine (DFO; 175 mg/kg/week [wk]) for 24 wks (24-wk DFX or DFO cohort). DFO patients then crossed over to DFX; all patients received DFX up to Wk 52. Patients entered a 52-wk extension receiving DFX (DFX up to 2 yrs cohort). PK sampling was carried out pre- and 2 hrs post-dose in patients on DFX at Wk 12. Plasma concentrations of DFX and iron-complex Fe-[DFX]2 were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Dose adjustments were implemented for changes in patient weight, serum ferritin, serum creatinine, liver function tests and rash. Primary objective was DFX safety compared with DFO during 24 wks. Secondary objectives included DFX safety and efficacy for up to 2 yrs and DFX safety in patients with concomitant HU. Results: 24-weeks, DFX (n=135) vs DFO (n=68). Patients were severely iron overloaded at baseline (BL); 37% had serum ferritin ≥4000 ng/mL (median 3385 ng/mL). In the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively, 93 and 78% of patients completed 24 wks of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 0 and 1 (1.8%) patient in the DFX and DFO cohorts, respectively. Investigator-assessed drug-related AEs were reported in 27 and 29% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively; most common (>5%) were gastrointestinal (DFX vs DFO cohort: diarrhea 10.4 vs 3.6%; nausea 5.2 vs 3.6%). Serious AEs (any causality) were reported in 30 and 36% of patients in the DFX vs DFO cohort, respectively. One death occurred in the DFX cohort, not considered drug-related (patient had past history of multi-organ failure). At the 3–6 month timepoint, median change from BL in serum ferritin was –196 (range –4029 to 10,168) and –400 (range –10,001 to 3908) ng/mL for DFX (n=130) and DFO (n=58) cohorts, respectively. Up to 2 years DFX (n=188). 135 (72%) patients who received DFX completed the study; 5 (3%) patients discontinued due to AEs. Average actual dose was 21.2 ± 3.6 mg/kg/day. Most common investigator-assessed drug-related AEs (>5%) were diarrhea (11.7%), nausea (6.9%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). Drug-related serious AEs were reported in 8 (4.3%) patients; most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and abnormal liver function test (n=2, for each). One additional death occurred; not considered drug-related (patient had history of congestive heart failure with worsening pulmonary hypertension). 4 patients had 2 consecutive serum creatinine increases >33% above BL and >upper limit of normal; increases were transient and resolved with dose adjustment or temporary interruption. Mean ± SE change from BL in serum ferritin (per-protocol, adjusted for amount of transfused blood) was –683 ± 205 ng/mL (n=87). PK, safety and efficacy of DFX + HU (n=28) and DFX (n=160). Mean DFX concentration (μmol/L) pre- and 2-hr post-dose were similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=81); pre-dose 13.3 vs 19.8, post-dose 74.2 vs 79.4. Mean Fe-[DFX]2 concentration (μmol/L) pre- and post-dose was similar in patients receiving DFX + HU (n=14) vs DFX (n=85); pre-dose 0.9 vs 0.6, post-dose 1.9 vs 1.7. One of 5 patients discontinuing DFX due to AEs was receiving concomitant HU. Overall the type and incidence of AEs in patients receiving DFX + HU vs DFX were similar (Table). At the 21–24 month time-point, mean change in serum ferritin was –593 ng/mL (n=15) and –721 ng/mL (n=81) for DFX + HU vs DFX cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Consistent with previous studies, this study confirms that deferasirox has a clinically manageable safety profile, and is comparable overall with DFO in SCD patients, with many AEs related to the underlying condition (eg, sickle cell anemia with crisis, pyrexia, infections). This study confirms the long-term efficacy of deferasirox with clinically meaningful reductions in serum ferritin over 2 years. PK, efficacy and overall safety of deferasirox were not influenced by concomitant HU. Disclosures: Vichinsky: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Habr:Novartis: Employment. Lynch:Novartis: Employment. Zhang:Novartis: Employment. Files:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Medical University of South Carolina: Research contract agreement.


Author(s):  
Beth Borowsky ◽  
Cristina Sampaio

Bringing safe and effective treatments to patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) will require evaluation in properly designed and conducted clinical trials. Such clinical trials will require appropriate tools and practices, including therapeutics, patient registries, biomarkers, endpoints, trial design, and analysis tools. This chapter provides insight into the advances being made in each of these areas and highlights the challenges remaining. Lessons learned from prior HD trials as well as from trials in other neurodegenerative diseases affect our view of future HD clinical development. With much interest from both pharmaceutical companies and academic researchers, this final chapter of the book actually opens a new chapter in the history of HD drug development.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevan R. Komshian ◽  
Michael B. Cohen ◽  
Christopher Brook ◽  
Jessica R. Levi

Background Historically, there has been uncertainty in the treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH) in children. Although management always begins with medical therapy, the decision to offer surgery in resistant cases is becoming more widely practiced. In the pediatric population, turbinate reduction can be achieved with turbinectomy, electrocautery, lasers, submucous microdebridement, and radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction (RVTR). However, there remains a lack of consensus on the preferred approach to treatment. Objective To compare how the efficacy, duration, and complications of different surgical methods has changed the management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in children over time. Methods In March 2018, a comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed for all inferior turbinate hypertrophy management-related studies in children. Inclusion criteria included children (age, 1–17 years). Exclusion criteria included reviews and abstracts. Results Each technique has experienced a period of popularity over the last 30 years in parallel with the technology available at the time as well as evidence from studies in adults. The literature for ITH management in children has largely followed these trends, with a recent improvement in the quality of studies mirroring the overall increase in surgical practice. Of all methods currently used, RVTR and submucous microdebridement offer the least invasive and most efficacious relief of nasal obstruction. Conclusion This review provides an overview of the evolution of ITH management in children and, based on historic and current evidence, proposes the following graduated recommendation to treatment: (1) a 3-month trial of medical management, (2) evaluation for adenoid hypertrophy for consideration of concurrent adenoidectomy, and (3) RVTR or submucous microdebridement as the first-line surgical approach.


Author(s):  
J.W.A.S. Sander

ABSTRACT:Clinical trials are important in determining the relative efficacy and safety of a new antiepileptic drug (AED); however, experience acquired in clinical practice will eventually determine its position in the antiepileptic armamentarium. Topiramate (TPM), a new AED has been available in the United Kingdom since mid-1995 and a considerable number of patients have being treated. As a result of this experience, a number of changes have being made in the way TPM is used, particularly in the starting doses and titration rates. This seems to have improved patients' tolerability of treatment, an important consideration if a drug is to be used to its optimum level. In this article, practical tips for the use of TPM are given and these include starting doses, titration rates, options for managing side effects occurring early in treatment, advice concerning the withdrawal of concomitant AEDs and indications for discontinuation of TPM. The need for adequate patient counseling regarding potential side effects and expectations of treatment is also reviewed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Lourencetti ◽  
Marida Morgado de Abreu

SUMMARY Objective: The objective of this study was to analyse the existing bibliographic production on clinical trials related to the use of vitamin D for oral treatment of psoriasis. Method: A literature review of clinical trials related to the use of vitamin D for oral treatment of psoriasis, published in the LILACS, Scielo, Medline, PubMed and Cochrane Library from 1986 to 2013. The search included the following terms: “Psoriasis and oral Vitamin D”; “psoríase e vitamina D oral”. Results: After analysing the titles and summaries, 10 articles met the eligibility criteria. Discussion: According to the literature, most tests were made in moderate psoriasis with doses ranging from 0.25 to 2μg, demonstrating improvement with this treatment modality. Some studies suggest the use of high doses, but the biggest concern is hypercalciuria as a side effect. Conclusion: The use of active metabolites of vitamin D orally for the treatment of psoriasis showed efficacy and safety.


Author(s):  
Joshua C. Anderson ◽  
Braden C. McFarland ◽  
Candece L. Gladson

Antiangiogenesis approaches have the potential to be particularly effective in the treatment of glioblastoma tumours. These tumours exhibit extremely high levels of neovascularisation, which may contribute to their extremely aggressive behaviour, not only by providing oxygenation and nutrition, but also by establishing a leaky vasculature that lacks a blood–brain barrier. This leaky vasculature enables migration of tumour cells, as well as the build up of fluid, which exacerbates tissue damage due to increased intracranial pressure. Here, we discuss the considerable progress that has been made in the identification of the pro- and antiangiogenic factors produced by glioblastoma tumours and the effects of these molecules in animal models of the disease. The safety and efficacy of some of these approaches have now been demonstrated in clinical trials. However, the ability of tumours to overcome these therapies and to re-establish angiogenesis requires further clinical research regarding potential multimodality therapies, as well as basic research into the regulation of angiogenesis by as yet unidentified factors. Optimisation of noninvasive procedures for monitoring of angiogenesis would greatly facilitate such research.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1652-1652
Author(s):  
Alessandra Iurlo ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
Francesco Albano ◽  
Luigia Luciano ◽  
Raffaele Spadano ◽  
...  

Background. Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for adult patients with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or for those carrying the T315I mutation. In the real-world setting, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of ponatinib. The goal of the Observational study of Iclusig® (ponatinib) Treatment in patients with CML in Italy (OITI) is to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes, including the safety and efficacy of ponatinib, in patients with CML treated in hematology centers in Italy since January 2015, when ponatinib became commercially available. Methods. This ongoing, non-interventional study includes patients aged ≥18 years with CP, AP or BP CML who initiated ponatinib treatment in routine clinical practice across 40 centers (academic and hospital settings) as of October 2018. The study population consists of a prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib after site activation during the ongoing enrolment period; a retrospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib but who died or were lost to follow-up prior to site activation; and a retrospective/prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib prior to site activation and are still on treatment. Demographic, efficacy and safety data are collected from patient medical charts at study entry and at routine care visits. The primary endpoint is complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate in patients with CP CML 6 months after starting ponatinib treatment. Here, the first interim analysis after ≥6 months' observation is presented for the retrospective and retrospective/prospective cohorts. Results. At time of data analysis (02 July 2019), 56 patients (53 CP, 1 AP and 2 BP CML) had been enrolled across 21 Italian centers. Twenty-eight (50.0%) patients had received ponatinib as second-line (2L) treatment and 33.9% received ponatinib in third-line (3L). Twenty (35.7%) patients had a history of cardiovascular events and 23 (41.1%) had a history of hypertension. Among patients with CP, AP and BP CML, median age at study entry was 59.1, 33.7 and 48.5 years, respectively; among 37 evaluable patients, 12 (32.4%), 1 (2.7%) and 1 (2.7%) patient(s) had a confirmed BCR-ABL1 mutation. Of evaluable patients, 4 (10.8%) had the T315I mutation. The starting dose of ponatinib for patients with CP CML was 45 mg once daily in 41.5% of patients, 30 mg in 39.6% of patients and 15 mg in 17.0% of patients; 1 (1.9%) patient started ponatinib at another dose. Median treatment duration was 23.9 months (range, 3.3-49.9 months) at the time of analysis. At Month 6, 88.6% of patients with CP CML achieved a CCyR. Additionally, 37.5% and 15.0% of evaluable patients with CP CML achieved a major molecular response (MMR; MR3.0) and a deep molecular response (MR4.5), respectively (Table 1). Estimated progression-free survival rates for patients with CP CML at Months 12 and 24 were 86.6% (95% CI, 77.8-96.4%) and 83.7% (95% CI, 73.8-94.9%), respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates were 96.2% (95% CI, 91.1-100.0%) and 93.1% (95% CI, 85.6-100.0%), respectively. Thirty (53.6%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most frequent TRAEs were hypertension (n=6), skin lesion (n=2), increased lipase (n=2), rash (n=2) and pain in extremity (n=2). The only hematologic TRAE reported was thrombocytopenia (n=1). Dose interruptions occurred in 13 patients: for TRAEs (n=5, 38.5%), medical decision (n=4, 30.8%) or other causes (n=4, 30.8%; comprising death in 3 cases and 1 attempt at treatment-free remission). Conclusions. Data show that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with CML treated in standard clinical practice in Italy. By Month 6, most patients had achieved CCyR and 44% of patients achieved MMR in 2/3L. Furthermore, the probability of survival at 2 years was more than 90%. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment than those previously reported. The early use of ponatinib (84% of patients received it as 2/3L treatment) as well as careful dose selection appear key to the safety and efficacy outcomes observed in this preliminary study evaluation. Disclosures Iurlo: Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Annunziata:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Albano:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spadano:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Bonifacio:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Pellegrino:Inycte Biosciences Italy S.R.L: Employment. Galimberti:Inycte Biosciences Italy S.R.L: Employment. Foà:Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document