Predatory and reproductive responses of the estuarine whelk Thais gradata (Caenogastropoda: Muricidae) to novel colonization by Musculista senhousia (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 1387-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Marshall

Novel predator–prey interactions are becoming increasingly relevant to investigate in the context of current geographical range expansions and biological invasions. This study describes a vigorous attack by a muricid whelk, Thais gradata on a mud-inhabiting mytilid mussel, Musculista senhousia, following new colonization of the mussel in the Brunei estuarine system (Borneo, South-East Asia). This represents only the second reported attack by a gastropod on this globally important invasive mussel species, and the first such attack in its native environment. Whelks migrated from their typical hard surface habitat and barnacle feeding to the sediment, where they aggregated and fed on the mussels. Field data suggest no selection by the whelks of the part of the mussel bed colonized or of the prey size attacked (median shell length = 21 mm). In addition to forming feeding aggregations, the whelks formed non-feeding resting aggregations off the mussel bed (sometimes of more than 80 individuals). These apparently facilitated synchronized mating and consequently the formation of large communal nests of egg capsules (involving approximately 3500 contributing females). During the investigation, the newly-formed mussel colony underwent mass mortality, and the whelks either redistributed on the sediment or returned to feeding on barnacles. The population-level response by the whelks described here maximizes energy transfer from prey resource to whelk propagation. In addition to the whelk's generality of habitat use and feeding behaviour, this is likely to contribute to sustaining populations in a system where prey abundance and distribution is limited by highly variable and extreme physicochemical conditions.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien M. J. Portalier ◽  
Gregor F. Fussmann ◽  
Michel Loreau ◽  
Mehdi Cherif

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blaire Van Valkenburgh ◽  
Matthew W. Hayward ◽  
William J. Ripple ◽  
Carlo Meloro ◽  
V. Louise Roth

Large mammalian terrestrial herbivores, such as elephants, have dramatic effects on the ecosystems they inhabit and at high population densities their environmental impacts can be devastating. Pleistocene terrestrial ecosystems included a much greater diversity of megaherbivores (e.g., mammoths, mastodons, giant ground sloths) and thus a greater potential for widespread habitat degradation if population sizes were not limited. Nevertheless, based on modern observations, it is generally believed that populations of megaherbivores (>800 kg) are largely immune to the effects of predation and this perception has been extended into the Pleistocene. However, as shown here, the species richness of big carnivores was greater in the Pleistocene and many of them were significantly larger than their modern counterparts. Fossil evidence suggests that interspecific competition among carnivores was relatively intense and reveals that some individuals specialized in consuming megaherbivores. To estimate the potential impact of Pleistocene large carnivores, we use both historic and modern data on predator–prey body mass relationships to predict size ranges of their typical and maximum prey when hunting as individuals and in groups. These prey size ranges are then compared with estimates of juvenile and subadult proboscidean body sizes derived from extant elephant growth data. Young proboscideans at their most vulnerable age fall within the predicted prey size ranges of many of the Pleistocene carnivores. Predation on juveniles can have a greater impact on megaherbivores because of their long interbirth intervals, and consequently, we argue that Pleistocene carnivores had the capacity to, and likely did, limit megaherbivore population sizes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul F. D. Sales ◽  
Leonardo B. Ribeiro ◽  
Jaqueiuto S. Jorge ◽  
Eliza M. X. Freire

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1834-1841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T Anderson ◽  
Joseph M Kiesecker ◽  
Douglas P Chivers ◽  
Andrew R Blaustein

Abiotic factors may directly influence community structure by influencing biotic interactions. In aquatic systems, where gape-limited predators are common, abiotic factors that influence organisms' growth rates potentially mediate predator–prey interactions indirectly through effects on prey size. We tested the hypothesis that temperature influences interactions between aquatic size-limited insect predators (Notonecta kirbyi) and their larval anuran prey (Hyla regilla) beyond its indirect effect on prey size. Notonecta kirbyi and H. regilla were raised and tested in predator–prey trials at one of three experimentally maintained temperatures, 9.9, 20.7, or 25.7°C. Temperature strongly influenced anuran growth and predator success; mean tadpole mass over time was positively related to temperature, while the number of prey caught was negatively related. At higher temperatures tadpoles attained greater mass more quickly, allowing them to avoid capture by notonectids. However, the probability of capture is a function of both mass and temperature; temperature was a significant explanatory variable in a logistic regression equation predicting prey capture. For a given prey mass, tadpoles raised in warmer water experienced a higher probability of capture by notonectids. Thus, rather than being static, prey size refugia are influenced directly by abiotic factors, in this case temperature. This suggests that temperature exerts differential effects on notonectid and larval anurans, leading to differences in the probability of prey capture for a given prey mass. Therefore, temperature can influence predator–prey interactions via indirect effects on prey size and direct effects on prey.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document