scholarly journals PTSD or not PTSD? Comparing the proposed ICD-11 and the DSM-5 PTSD criteria among young survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks and their parents

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1283-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Hafstad ◽  
S. Thoresen ◽  
T. Wentzel-Larsen ◽  
A. Maercker ◽  
G. Dyb
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Diagnostic Systems ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Reaction Index ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Young Survivors

BackgroundThe conceptualization of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the upcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 differs in many respects from the diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5). The consequences of these differences for individuals and for estimation of prevalence rates are largely unknown. This study investigated the concordance of the two diagnostic systems in two separate samples at two separate waves.MethodYoung survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks (n = 325) and their parents (n = 451) were interviewed at 4–6 months (wave 1) and 15–18 months (wave 2) after the shooting. PTSD was assessed with the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-IV adapted for DSM-5, and a subset was used as diagnostic criteria for ICD-11.ResultsIn survivors, PTSD prevalence did not differ significantly at any time point, but in parents, the DSM-5 algorithm produced significantly higher prevalence rates than the ICD-11 criteria. The overlap was fair for survivors, but amongst parents a large proportion of individuals met the criteria for only one of the diagnostic systems. No systematic differences were found between ICD-11 and DSM-5 in predictive validity.ConclusionsThe proposed ICD-11 criteria and the DSM-5 criteria performed equally well when identifying individuals in distress. Nevertheless, the overlap between those meeting the PTSD diagnosis for both ICD-11 and DSM-5 was disturbingly low, with the ICD-11 criteria identifying fewer people than the DSM-5. This represents a major challenge in identifying individuals suffering from PTSD worldwide, possibly resulting in overtreatment or unmet needs for trauma-specific treatment, depending on the area of the world in which patients are being diagnosed.

Classification and descriptive psychopathology of post-traumatic stress disorder and other stressor-related disorders

2020 ◽  
pp. 819-828
Author(s):  
Dean G. Kilpatrick ◽  
Matthew J. Friedman ◽  
Amanda K. Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Post Traumatic

This chapter addresses the new section in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) called ‘Trauma and stressor-related disorders’. All diagnoses within this category have two things in common: (1) a discrete traumatic/adverse event or experience that preceded the onset or aggravation of symptoms; and (2) a wide range of cognitions, emotions, and behaviours embedded within DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each disorder. The chapter also discusses the comparable proposed diagnostic criteria for the eleventh edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Current considerations and challenges regarding the classification of stressor-related disorders are reviewed.

Comparison of Alcohol Use Disorders in DSM and ICD

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
Jessica W. M. Wong ◽  
Friedrich M. Wurst ◽  
Ulrich W. Preuss
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Diagnostic Systems ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Historical Developments

Abstract. Introduction: With advances in medicine, our understanding of diseases has deepened and diagnostic criteria have evolved. Currently, the most frequently used diagnostic systems are the ICD (International Classification of Diseases) and the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) to diagnose alcohol-related disorders. Results: In this narrative review, we follow the historical developments in ICD and DSM with their corresponding milestones reflecting the scientific research and medical considerations of their time. The current diagnostic concepts of DSM-5 and ICD-11 and their development are presented. Lastly, we compare these two diagnostic systems and evaluate their practicability in clinical use.

scholarly journals Clinical implications of the proposed ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna C. Barbano ◽  
Willem F. van der Mei ◽  
Richard A. Bryant ◽  
Douglas L. Delahanty ◽  
Terri A. deRoon-Cassini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Traumatic Events ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Case Identification ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Post Traumatic ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Moderate Range

AbstractBackgroundProjected changes to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria in the upcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 may affect the prevalence and severity of identified cases. This study examined differences in rates, severity, and overlap of diagnoses using ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria during consecutive assessments of recent survivors of traumatic events.MethodsThe study sample comprised 3863 survivors of traumatic events, evaluated in 11 longitudinal studies of PTSD. ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnostic rules were applied to the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) to derive ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnoses at different time intervals between trauma occurrence and 15 months.ResultsThe ICD-11 criteria identified fewer cases than the ICD-10 across assessment intervals (range −47.09% to −57.14%). Over 97% of ICD-11 PTSD cases met concurrent ICD-10 PTSD criteria. PTSD symptom severity of individuals identified by the ICD-11 criteria (CAPS total scores) was 31.38–36.49% higher than those identified by ICD-10 criteria alone. The latter, however, had CAPS scores indicative of moderate PTSD. ICD-11 was associated with similar or higher rates of comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Individuals identified by either ICD-10 or ICD-11 shortly after traumatic events had similar longitudinal course.ConclusionsThis study indicates that significantly fewer individuals would be diagnosed with PTSD using the proposed ICD-11 criteria. Though ICD-11 criteria identify more severe cases, those meeting ICD-10 but not ICD-11 criteria remain in the moderate range of PTSD symptoms. Use of ICD-11 criteria will have critical implications for case identification in clinical practice, national reporting, and research.

Classification in Psychiatry

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Black
Keyword(s):  
World War Ii ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
World War ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Research Findings

Classification in psychiatry has ancient roots but mainly took form in the 19th and 20th centuries. European and American psychiatrists brought to the fore careful observation and description of clinical course. Formal attempts to classify patients took root after World War II based on the exigencies of the time. The DSM-I was published in 1952 and summarized all the diagnoses in psychiatry. Diagnostic criteria were introduced in the DSM-III in 1980 to introduce reliability to the diagnostic process, and a multiaxial system was introduced to aid in the comprehensive assessment of patients, later dropped in the DSM-5. Dimensional measures were introduced to aid with patient assessment, although many categories were reformulated based on research findings. In the DSM-5, the diagnoses are listed in order of clinical importance. Residual categories exist for those who do not meet the criteria for a more specific disorder. Although the DSM-5 has been criticized, criteria-based diagnoses will persist until a system can be created based on etiology.  This review contains 2 tables, and 23 references. Key words: classification in psychiatry, diagnostic criteria, DSM-5, Feighner criteria, International Classification of Diseases, Kraepelin

scholarly journals The status of prolonged grief disorder in the international classification of diseases (ICD-11)

TIMS Acta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Radomir Belopavlović ◽  
Zdenka Novović
Keyword(s):  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Diagnostic Systems ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Prolonged Grief Disorder ◽  
Prolonged Grief ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
The Status ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10

Grief due to loss of a significant other is a universal experience. However, within a small, but a significant group of individuals, this process can last longer than the culturally expected period, and it can be associated with the intense distress, dysfunction, and higher rates of mortality and morbidity. Grief has been observed in the scientific literature as an adaptive reaction to loss, but also as a factor associated with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Previous versions of diagnostic systems, namely DSM-IV and ICD-10, have allocated the phenomenon of prolonged grief as a condition that requires further research, or the condition that requires care. There is a recommendation not to give a diagnosis of a depressive episode because of the normative nature of the reaction to loss. In the new iterations of classification manuals, the ICD-11, this condition is classified as the Prolonged grief disorder. The rationale for change is found in the studies which suggest that this disorder is phenomenologically different from similar states. It aggregates different risk factors and consequences, as well as different treatment solutions. This paper will focus on the criteria of the disorder in the ICD-11 space, researches which mention diagnosis validity, implications, and a broader frame for conceptual and clinical utility of this disorder.

Angststörungen – von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Timo D. Vloet ◽  
Marcel Romanos
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Nach 12 Jahren Entwicklung wird die 11. Version der International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) im Januar 2022 in Kraft treten. Methodik: Im Rahmen eines selektiven Übersichtsartikels werden die Veränderungen im Hinblick auf die Klassifikation von Angststörungen von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11 zusammenfassend dargestellt. Ergebnis: Die diagnostischen Kriterien der generalisierten Angststörung, Agoraphobie und spezifischen Phobien werden angepasst. Die ICD-11 wird auf Basis einer Lebenszeitachse neu organisiert, sodass die kindesaltersspezifischen Kategorien der ICD-10 aufgelöst werden. Die Trennungsangststörung und der selektive Mutismus werden damit den „regulären“ Angststörungen zugeordnet und können zukünftig auch im Erwachsenenalter diagnostiziert werden. Neu ist ebenso, dass verschiedene Symptomdimensionen der Angst ohne kategoriale Diagnose verschlüsselt werden können. Diskussion: Die Veränderungen im Bereich der Angsterkrankungen umfassen verschiedene Aspekte und sind in der Gesamtschau nicht unerheblich. Positiv zu bewerten ist die Einführung einer Lebenszeitachse und Parallelisierung mit dem Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Schlussfolgerungen: Die entwicklungsbezogene Neuorganisation in der ICD-11 wird auch eine verstärkte längsschnittliche Betrachtung von Angststörungen in der Klinik sowie Forschung zur Folge haben. Damit rückt insbesondere die Präventionsforschung weiter in den Fokus.

scholarly journals Re-evaluating DSM-I

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cooper ◽  
R. K. Blashfield
Keyword(s):  
World War Ii ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
World War ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Mental Diseases ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
The Military

The DSM-I is currently viewed as a psychoanalytic classification, and therefore unimportant. There are four reasons to challenge the belief that DSM-I was a psychoanalytic system. First, psychoanalysts were a minority on the committee that created DSM-I. Second, psychoanalysts of the time did not use DSM-I. Third, DSM-I was as infused with Kraepelinian concepts as it was with psychoanalytic concepts. Fourth, contemporary writers who commented on DSM-I did not perceive it as psychoanalytic. The first edition of the DSM arose from a blending of concepts from the Statistical Manual for the Use of Hospitals of Mental Diseases, the military psychiatric classifications developed during World War II, and the International Classification of Diseases (6th edition). As a consensual, clinically oriented classification, DSM-I was popular, leading to 20 printings and international recognition. From the perspective inherent in this paper, the continuities between classifications from the first half of the 20th century and the systems developed in the second half (e.g. DSM-III to DSM-5) become more visible.

Clinical and psychopathological characteristics of sexual dysfunctions and non-psychotic mental disorders in women

2021 ◽  
Vol LIII (2) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Martusenko ◽  
Elena O. Boyko ◽  
Olga G. Zaitseva
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Inpatient Treatment ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Sexual Disorders ◽  
Sexual Dysfunctions ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
The Third ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

Aim. Study of clinical and psychopathological characteristics in women with sexual dysfunctions and mental disorders of the psychotic level. Material and methods. Clinical-psychopathological and sexological methods were used in the work. The results were processed using the licensed program Statistica 10.0 for Windows. At the first stage, 134 women (mean age 43.115.3 years) were examined who had inpatient treatment in the department for persons with non-psychotic mental disorders. At the second stage, the study involved 89 women (mean age 35.212.2 years), who were diagnosed with sexual dysfunctions. Results. Clinical and psychopathological indicators were studied, clinical, psychopathological and sexological analysis of sexual dysfunctions in women with non-psychotic mental disorders was carried out, taking into account the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Diseases-10. Three groups of patients were identified: (1) a group of women with sexual dysfunctions caused by non-psychotic mental disorders; (2) a group of patients in whom non-psychotic mental disorders were formed against the background of primary sexual pathology; (3) a group of patients in whom non-psychotic mental disorders accompany sexual dysfunctions. Conclusions. Sexual disorders in the studied groups are characterized by the predominance of libido disorder in the first group and the second group, as well as the predominance of dyspareunia in the third. There were no significant differences in the duration of sexual dysfunctions in the groups, which must be taken into account when choosing therapeutic and rehabilitation measures.

How is Schizophrenia Diagnosed?

Schizophrenia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Glatt ◽  
Stephen V. Faraone ◽  
Ming T. Tsuang
Keyword(s):  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
World Health ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Disorganized Speech ◽  
The Individual

The diagnosis of schizophrenia cannot be made based on the results of an ob­jective diagnostic test or laboratory measure, though we and others are working towards this. Instead, clinicians diagnose schizophrenia based on behaviour and psychopathology (including the symptoms described in the previous chapter). These require the subjective interpretation of clinicians, but they can be as­sessed reliably. The definitions of major mental illnesses used by clinicians are presented in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association (in the United States) and the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in other countries. These def­initions are updated from time to time to reflect gains in knowledge, or to reflect modern thinking on the similarities and differences between certain disorders. From one edition to the next, some diagnoses are revised, some are added, and some vanish altogether, only to be replaced or absorbed under other diagnoses. The diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia as defined by the most recent version of the DSM (DSM- 5) include the presence of two or more of the following symptoms: delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, disorganized or cata­tonic behaviour, and negative symptoms. At least one of the two must be delu­sions, hallucinations, or disorganized speech, while the second symptom type required for diagnosis could be any of the remaining four criteria. The require­ment of delusions, hallucinations, or disorganized speech maintains the resem­blance of the modern- day diagnosis to that first described by the clinician Emil Kraepelin over a century ago. Kraepelin’s discovery that schizophrenia is marked by a chronic and gradually worsening course is seen in modern- day criteria as well. A DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia requires continuous signs of illness for at least 6 months, during which the individual must show at least 1 month of active symptoms (less if well treated). The diagnosis also requires social or work deterioration over a signifi­cant amount of time. Lastly, the diagnosis requires that the observed symptoms are not due to some other medical condition, including other psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder.

Voyeuristic Disorder

2019 ◽  
pp. 209-216
Author(s):  
J. Paul Fedoroff
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Sexual Activity ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Sexual Arousal ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

Abstract: Voyeuristic disorder is defined as a condition in which a person experiences persistent (at least 6 months), recurrent, and intense sexual arousal from observing an unsuspecting person who is naked, disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors. The prevalence of true voyeuristic disorder is estimated to be as high as 12% in men and 4% in women. This chapter discusses the Fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and International Classification of Diseases diagnostic criteria for voyeuristic disorder, in addition to its diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The recent literature on these topics is reviewed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document