scholarly journals Chances for Earth-Like Planets and Life Around Metal-Poor Stars

2004 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Hans Zinnecker
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Early Universe ◽  
Galactic Halo ◽  
Magellanic Clouds ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
Lower Mass ◽  
Solar Metallicity ◽  
Earth Like Planets ◽  
The Universe

We discuss the difficulties of forming earth-like planets in metal-poor environments, such as those prevailing in the Galactic halo (Pop II), the Magellanic Clouds, and the early universe. We suggest that, with fewer heavy elements available, terrestrial planets will be smaller size and lower mass than in our solar system (solar metallicity). Such planets may not be able to sustain life as we know it. Therefore, the chances of very old lifeforms in the universe are slim, and a threshold metallicty (90% solar?) may exist for life to originate on large enough earth-like planets.

scholarly journals Dust Production around Carbon-Rich Stars: The Role of Metallicity

Universe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Ambra Nanni ◽  
Sergio Cristallo ◽  
Jacco Th. van Loon ◽  
Martin A. T. Groenewegen
Keyword(s):  
Wind Speed ◽  
Galactic Halo ◽  
Magellanic Clouds ◽  
Asymptotic Giant Branch ◽  
Agb Stars ◽  
Circumstellar Envelopes ◽  
Chemical Enrichment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Universe

Background: Most of the stars in the Universe will end their evolution by losing their envelope during the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) phase, enriching the interstellar medium of galaxies with heavy elements, partially condensed into dust grains formed in their extended circumstellar envelopes. Among these stars, carbon-rich TP-AGB stars (C-stars) are particularly relevant for the chemical enrichment of galaxies. We here investigated the role of the metallicity in the dust formation process from a theoretical viewpoint. Methods: We coupled an up-to-date description of dust growth and dust-driven wind, which included the time-averaged effect of shocks, with FRUITY stellar evolutionary tracks. We compared our predictions with observations of C-stars in our Galaxy, in the Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) and in the Galactic Halo, characterised by metallicity between solar and 1/10 of solar. Results: Our models explained the variation of the gas and dust content around C-stars derived from the IRS Spitzer spectra. The wind speed of the C-stars at varying metallicity was well reproduced by our description. We predicted the wind speed at metallicity down to 1/10 of solar in a wide range of mass-loss rates.

scholarly journals The s-process in stellar sites

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 01004
Author(s):  
Sergio Cristallo
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Neutron Capture ◽  
Slow Neutron ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Capture Process ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Pollution Episodes

Stars are marvellous caldrons where all the elements of the Universe (apartfrom hydrogen and helium) have been synthesized. The solar system chemical distri-butionis the result of many pollution episodes from already extinct stellar generations, occurred at different epochs before the Sun formation. Main nucleosynthesis channels re-sponsiblefor the formation of heavy elements are the rapid neutron capture process (ther-process) and the slow neutron capture process (the s-process). Hereafter, I will describethe theory of the s-process and the stellar sites where it is active.

4. What are planets made of?

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-75
Author(s):  
Raymond T. Pierrehumbert
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Solar System ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Planetary Systems ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Milky Way Galaxy ◽  
First Stars ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe

‘What are planets made of?’ assesses what planets are made of, beginning by looking at the life cycle of stars, and the kinds of stars which populate the Universe. Although the first stars of the Universe could not have formed planetary systems, the process did not take long to get under way. The Milky Way galaxy formed not long after the Big Bang and has been building its stock of heavy elements ever since. Thus, our Solar System incorporates ingredients from a mix of myriad expired stars, most of which have been processed multiple times through short-lived stars.

scholarly journals Terrestrial Planet Formation: The Solar System and Other Systems

2004 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Shigeru Ida ◽  
Eiichiro Kokubo
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Extrasolar Planets ◽  
Planet Formation ◽  
Terrestrial Planet ◽  
The Other ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
Giant Impacts ◽  
Earth Like Planets ◽  
Jovian Planet

Accretion of terrestrial planets and solid cores of jovian planets is discussed, based on the results of our N-body simulations. Protoplanets accrete from planetesimals through runaway and oligarchic growth until they become isolated. The isolation mass of protoplanets in terrestrial planet region is about 0.2 Earth mass, which suggests that in the final stage of terrestrial planet formation giant impacts between the protoplanets occur. On the other hand, the isolation mass in jovian planet region is about a few to 10 Earth masses, which may be massive enough to form a gas giant. Extending the above arguments to disks with various initial masses, we discuss diversity of planetary systems. We predict that the extrasolar planets so far discovered may correspond to the systems formed from disks with large initial masses and that the other disks with smaller masses, which are the majority of the disks, may form Earth-like planets.

scholarly journals Scenarios of giant planet formation and evolution and their impact on the formation of habitable terrestrial planets

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2014) ◽  
pp. 20130072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Morbidelli
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Giant Planet ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
Evolutionary Patterns ◽  
Eccentric Orbits ◽  
Earth Like Planets ◽  
Large Eccentricity ◽  
Formation And Evolution ◽  
Orbital Instability

In our Solar System, there is a clear divide between the terrestrial and giant planets. These two categories of planets formed and evolved separately, almost in isolation from each other. This was possible because Jupiter avoided migrating into the inner Solar System, most probably due to the presence of Saturn, and never acquired a large-eccentricity orbit, even during the phase of orbital instability that the giant planets most likely experienced. Thus, the Earth formed on a time scale of several tens of millions of years, by collision of Moon- to Mars-mass planetary embryos, in a gas-free and volatile-depleted environment. We do not expect, however, that this clear cleavage between the giant and terrestrial planets is generic. In many extrasolar planetary systems discovered to date, the giant planets migrated into the vicinity of the parent star and/or acquired eccentric orbits. In this way, the evolution and destiny of the giant and terrestrial planets become intimately linked. This paper discusses several evolutionary patterns for the giant planets, with an emphasis on the consequences for the formation and survival of habitable terrestrial planets. The conclusion is that we should not expect Earth-like planets to be typical in terms of physical and orbital properties and accretion history. Most habitable worlds are probably different, exotic worlds.

scholarly journals The Earth's Gold: Where Did It Really Come From?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth P. Tito ◽  
Vadim I. Pavlov
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Early Solar System ◽  
Reaction Channels

Why is it that in the neighborhood of a calm ordinary star (the Sun) located at the quiet periphery of its galaxy (the Milky Way), non-native heavy elements are abundant in such concentrated form? Where did these elements really come from? Where did Earth's gold come from? Our analysis of the known data offers a fact-reconciling hypothesis: What if, in the early solar system, an explosive collision occurred -- of a traveling from afar giant-nuclear-drop-like object with a local massive dense object (perhaps a then-existent companion of the Sun) -- and the debris, through the multitude of reaction channels and nuclei transformations, was then responsible for (1) the enrichment of the solar system with the cocktail of all detected exogenous chemical elements, and (2) the eventual formation of the terrestrial planets that pre-collision did not exist, thus offering a possible explanation for their inner position and compositional differences within the predominantly hydrogen-helium rest of the solar system.

scholarly journals Asynchronous rotation of Earth-mass planets in the habitable zone of lower-mass stars

Science ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 347 (6222) ◽  
pp. 632-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémy Leconte ◽  
Hanbo Wu ◽  
Kristen Menou ◽  
Norman Murray
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
Habitable Zone ◽  
Lower Mass ◽  
Solar Mass ◽  
Simple Scaling ◽  
Earth Like Planets ◽  
Thermal Tides

Planets in the habitable zone of lower-mass stars are often assumed to be in a state of tidally synchronized rotation, which would considerably affect their putative habitability. Although thermal tides cause Venus to rotate retrogradely, simple scaling arguments tend to attribute this peculiarity to the massive Venusian atmosphere. Using a global climate model, we show that even a relatively thin atmosphere can drive terrestrial planets’ rotation away from synchronicity. We derive a more realistic atmospheric tide model that predicts four asynchronous equilibrium spin states, two being stable, when the amplitude of the thermal tide exceeds a threshold that is met for habitable Earth-like planets with a 1-bar atmosphere around stars more massive than ~0.5 to 0.7 solar mass. Thus, many recently discovered terrestrial planets could exhibit asynchronous spin-orbit rotation, even with a thin atmosphere.

scholarly journals Chemical Properties and Age of the Components of the Galactic Halo

1977 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 133-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Castellani
Keyword(s):  
Galactic Halo ◽  
Dwarf Galaxies ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Elliptical Galaxies ◽  
Magellanic Clouds ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Present Universe ◽  
Ursa Minor

What we call Population II is composed by the stars populating the halo of our Galaxy, for which one finds evidences for an underabundance in the heavy elements and/or for an evolutionary age as large as (roughly) 1010years. Similar star populations are at present recognized in the halo of other spyral galaxies, in elliptical galaxies as well as in smaller systems, such as the Magellanic Clouds and the so-called Dwarf Galaxies as the ones in Draco and in Ursa Minor. Then Population II looks like representing a very general constituent of present Universe.

Distribution of R- and S-Process Elements in the Galactic Halo

1988 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 501-506
Author(s):  
C. Sneden ◽  
C. A. Pilachowski ◽  
K. K. Gilroy ◽  
J. J. Cowan
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Element ◽  
Galactic Halo ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Process Synthesis ◽  
Element Abundances ◽  
Halo Stars ◽  
Abundance Patterns ◽  
R Process ◽  
Process Elements

Current observational results for the abundances of the very heavy elements (Z>30) in Population II halo stars are reviewed. New high resolution, low noise spectra of many of these extremely metal-poor stars reveal general consistency in their overall abundance patterns. Below Galactic metallicities of [Fe/H] Ã −2, all of the very heavy elements were manufactured almost exclusively in r-process synthesis events. However, there is considerable star-to-star scatter in the overall level of very heavy element abundances, indicating the influence of local supernovas on element production in the very early, unmixed Galactic halo. The s-process appears to contribute substantially to stellar abundances only in stars more metal-rich than [Fe/H] Ã −2.

Exploring the Solar System

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Schrijver
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Planetary Systems ◽  
Interplanetary Dust ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
The Moon ◽  
System P ◽  
Asteroids And Comets

In this chapter, the author summarizes the properties of the Solar System, and how these were uncovered. Over centuries, the arrangement and properties of the Solar System were determined. The distinctions between the terrestrial planets, the gas and ice giants, and their various moons are discussed. Whereas humans have walked only on the Moon, probes have visited all the planets and several moons, asteroids, and comets; samples have been returned to Earth only from our moon, a comet, and from interplanetary dust. For Earth and Moon, seismographs probed their interior, whereas for other planets insights come from spacecraft and meteorites. We learned that elements separated between planet cores and mantels because larger bodies in the Solar System were once liquid, and many still are. How water ended up where it is presents a complex puzzle. Will the characteristics of our Solar System hold true for planetary systems in general?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document