On Variations in the Chandler Frequency

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 77-85
Author(s):  
H.J.M. Abraham ◽  
J.N. Boots

This paper suggests that some of the reported changes in the Chandler frequency are associated with inelastic changes in the Earth. There has been controversy as to how much of the apparent secular polar drift is due to actual motion of the axis of rotation within the Earth, and how much it is merely the reflection of movements by certain observatories. Therefore, when more southern data are available it will be interesting to see whether similar results are obtained.

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.


The Bermuda Triangle is located in the area of the archipelago between North and South America and the Dragon Triangle is located in the area of the archipelago in Southeast Asia. There is a great resemblance between these two triangular areas; both were formed following special geological and tectonic conditions. It is herein proposed that their creation stems from the change in location of the axis of rotation of the earth and, accordingly, the change in the location of the equator.


2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (530) ◽  
pp. 203-215
Author(s):  
Michael Jewess

The Earth (more precisely, the ‘geoid’ thereof) is known to approximate closely to a slightly oblate spheroid whose unique axis coincides with the Earth's axis of rotation [1,2]. (By ‘spheroid’ is meant is an ellipsoid of revolution, i.e. one with two semi-axes equal; a slightly oblate one has these two semi-axes slightly longer than the unique one.) To the nearest km, the diameter of the ‘geoid’ pole-to-pole is 43 km less than the equatorial diameter of 12756 km. There is a reduction of practical significance (0.527%) in the acceleration of free fall" at sea level between the poles and the equator, and therefore in the weight of objects. Of this, 0.345% derives directly from the rotation of the Earth; the balance of 0.182% results from the purely gravitational effect of the Earth's deviation from sphericity.


In a paper published in 'Acta Mathematica,’ vol. 16, M. Folie announces the fact that the latitude of places on the earth’s surface is undergoing periodic changes in a period considerably in excess of that which theory has hitherto been supposed to require. This result has been confirmed in a remarkable manner by Dr. S. C. Chandler, in America ( vide ‘ Astronomical Journal,’ vols. 11, 12), who, as the result of an exhaustive examination of almost all the available records of latitude observations for the last half-century, has assigned 427 days as the true period in which the changes are taking place. The old theory, based on the assumption that the earth was rigid throughout, led to a period of 305 days, and M. Folie proposes to account for the extension of this period by attributing a certain amount of freedom to the internal portions of the earth. The earth he supposes to be composed of “a solid shell moving more or less freely on a nucleus consisting of fluid at least at its surface.” The argument advanced by M. Folie in favour of this constitution of the earth, namely, the independence of the motions of the shell and the nucleus, appeared to me to be unsatisfactoiy, and I therefore proposed to myself to test the validity of it by examining a particular case which lent itself to mathematical analysis, namely, that in which the internal surface of the shell is ellipsoidal and the nucleus consists entirely of homogeneous fluid. The principal axes of the shell and of the cavity occupied by fluid are assumed to be coincident, and the oscillations are considered about a state of steady motion in which the axis of rotation coincides with one of these axes. It is clear that a steady motion will be possible in this case, and that such a motion will be secularly stable in the event of the axis of rotation being the axis of greatest moment for both the shell and the cavity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Islami

Earth Physics is a course at the Physics Education Program Study, University of Riau, Indonesia. The problem facing by students were the student commonly not able to imagine the rotation effect and the tilt of rotation axis to some phenomenon. Furthermore the students were difficult to imagine the subduction zone of two tectonic plates. This study was demonstrate some assignments to the student regarding the use Google Earth in the learning the earth physically. In this study, a total of 38 students were chosen to use the Google Earth as an interactive learning media. To demonstrate the Google Earth in the learning process, several assignments have been given to the students. The first was to compare the distance measurement manually and through Google Earth. The second demonstration was to define some selected areas. The third was to demonstrate the tilt axis of rotation effect on the earth. The last was a mini project to demonstrate the use of Google Earth in imagine of the subduction of two tectonic plates. The result shows that mostly students (92%) were able to reconstruction the process involved in the assignment although a few of them cannot explain well. Whilst, 8% of the student were still difficult to reconstruction the process involved in the assignment, although they can submit all the assignments with fairly well. Finally, the Google Earth is generally success used in the demonstration of earth physics subject learning media.


It is well known that, if a rigid body whose principal moments of inertia are A, A, C be set rotating about its axis of symmetry, and then be subjected to a slight disturbance, it will execute oscillations about its mean position, in consequence of which the axis of rotation will undergo periodic displacements relatively to the body in a period which bears to the period of rotation the ratio A : C — A. The object of the present investigation is to determine to what extent this period will be modified if the body, instead of being perfectly rigid, is capable of elastic deformations. The problem has important bearings in connection with the theory of the Earth’s rotation. The remarkable researches of Dr. S. C. Chandler, published in a series of papers in the ‘Astronomical Journal,' have placed it almost beyond a doubt that the axis of rotation of the Earth is subject to a series of displacements, the most important of which consists of a periodic motion in all respects similar in character to the oscillation mentioned above, but having a period considerably in excess of that which theory would require if the Earth could be regarded as perfectly rigid. It is natural to suppose that this motion has its origin in the same cause, but that the theory by which the period has previously been assigned is in some respects defective. The most plausible attempt which has yet been made to correct this theory is that given by Newcomb, who shows, by an elegant geometrical method, that the elasticity of the solid portions of the Earth and the mobility of the ocean will each have the effect of prolonging the period. He then proceeds to obtain a numerical estimate of this extension, basing his calculations on certain results given by Thomson and Tait with reference to the deformation of an elastic sphere. In order to make these results applicable, several assumptions have to be made which do not appear to me to be well founded; and it is with a view to examining these assumptions that I have attempted to exhibit the solution of the problem in an analytical form.


The object of this memoir is similar to that of Laplace’s celebrated investigation of the great inequality of Jupiter and Saturn, announced in the Memoirs of the Academy of Sciences for 1784, and given in the volume for the succeeding year. The occasion of that investigation was an acceleration of the mean motion of Jupiter and a retardation of that of Saturn,—which inequalities in the motions of the two planets Halley had discovered by a comparison of ancient and modern observations: and Laplace showed, in the Memoirs just referred to, that inequalities like those thus noticed would arise from the action of gravitation; that they would reach a considerable amount in consequence of twice the mean motion of Jupiter being very nearly equal to five times the mean motion of Saturn; and that their period would be nearly 900 years. The occasion of the investigation of Professor Airy was an inequality in the sun’s actual motion, as compared with Delambre’s Solar Tables, which appeared to result from a comparison of late observations with those of the last century,—as Professor Airy has explained in a memoir published in the Philosophical Transactions for 1828. This comparison having convinced him of the necessity of seeking for some inequality of long period in the earth’s motion, it was soon perceived that such an inequality would arise from the circumstance that 8 times the mean motion of Venus is very nearly equal to 13 times the mean motion of the earth. The difference is 1,675 centesimal degrees in a year,—from which it follows, that if any such inequality exist, its period will be about 240 years. To determine whether such an inequality arising from the action of gravitation, amounts to an appreciable magnitude, is a problem of great complexity and great labour. The coefficient of the term will be of the order 13 minus 8, or 5, when expressed in terms of the excentricities of the orbits of the Earth and Venus, and their mutual inclination; all which quantities are small; and the result would therefore, on this account, be very minute. But in the integrations by which the inequality is found, the small fraction expressing the difference of the mean motions of the planets enters twice as a divisor; and by the augmentation arising from this and other parts of the process, the term receives a multiplier of about 2,200,000. In the corresponding step of the investigation of the great inequality of Jupiter and Saturn, it was only necessary to take terms of the 3rd order of smallness, and the multiplier by which the terms are augmented has 30 2 instead of 240 2 for its factor.


1968 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-86
Author(s):  
I.D. Johnston ◽  
N.C. Wareing

The stellar interferometer at Narrabri Observatory measures the angular diameter of hot, bright stars. It does this by matching the observed intensity correlation from two detectors, as a function of separation between the detectors, with that from a uniform disk (see Hanbury Brown et al.). When this measurement is taken in conjunction with experimental determinations of the monochromatic flux received at the Earth, the effective temperature of the star, Te, can be determined. However, if the star being observed is rotating rapidly, comparison with a uniform disk is of doubtful validity. Owing to its rotation the shape of the star will be distorted, and its effective temperature will vary over the surface (being apparently hotter at the poles). Therefore the measured angular diameter of the star will be different, and will change with the orientation of the star’s axis of rotation in the sky.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
A. L. Dmitriev ◽  
N. N. Chesnokov ◽  
E. M. Nikushchenko

Concise description of results of exact weighing of mechanical rotor with the horizontal axis of rotation during "spinning" - with slowly diminishing speed of rotation. Reduction of the weight of a rotor with frequency of rotation of 350-375 Hz is in line with earlier noted oscillations of acceleration of such rotor's freefall. Observed effect of weight loss is probably defined by characteristics of interactions of accelerated moving bodies with variable gravitational field of the Earth


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document