ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF INTRAVENOUS IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIA IN ITALY

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is defined as a deterioration in renal function after administration of radiologic iodinated contrast media (CM). Iodixanol, showed a lower CI-AKI incidence than low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing iodixanol and LOCM in intravenous (IV) setting in Italy.Methods: A Markov model was developed. Patients moved across four health states: CI-AKI free, CI-AKI, myocardial infarction, and death. The simulation horizon was lifetime with 1-month cycles. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5 percent rate. CI-AKI incidence was considered from published literature across different definitions. Cost-effectiveness of iodixanol was assessed in terms of incremental cost per life-year gained. Net monetary benefit (NMB) was also calculated. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: Base-case results showed an average survival increase of 0.51 life-years and a savings of €7.25 for iodixanol versus LOCM. The cost-effectiveness of iodixanol was confirmed when other scenarios were explored, such as varying CI-AKI definition, sub-populations with specified risk factors, CM hospital bids prices, and inclusion of adverse drug reactions of allergic nature. An NMB ranging between €6,007.25 and €30,007.25 was calculated.Conclusion: Base-case results show that IV iodixanol is cost-effective compared with LOCM in the Italian clinical setting of a hospital computed tomography radiology practice. However, some caution is due, mainly linked to inherent limitations of the modeling technique and to the lack of agreement on CI-AKI incidence data in the clinical literature.

Download Full-text

Cost-effectiveness of novel antiandrogens (AAs) for treatment of nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.5583 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5583-5583

Author(s):

Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽

Abdulaali Almutairi ◽

Daenielle K. Lang ◽

Noureen Asghar ◽

Anum Riaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Lifetime Cost ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Cost Utility ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Health States ◽

Support Unit ◽

Medication Costs ◽

Life Years

5583 Background: FDA has approved three novel AAs [Apalutamide(A), Darolutamide(D) and Enzalutamide(E)] in combination with Androgen deprivation therapy ( ADT) for treatment of (nmCRPC) patients (pts). We report the cost-effectiveness of these drugs from the US perspective to help facilitate the choice of these agents for clinical practice. Methods: A life time Markov state-transition model was constructed with three health states (Metastasis-Free Survival[MFS], Metastatic disease, and Death) to compare cost-effectiveness of AA therapies for treatment of nmCRPC based on US healthcare payer perspective. A network meta-analysis of MFS and OS was conducted due to the lack of head to head trials. An approximation of the original individual-level patient time-to-event data were derived from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and MFS. Weibull distributions was selected as the best fitted model fitted and extrapolated as per the NICE decision support unit recommendations. Medication costs were based on wholesale acquisition cost. Adverse event (AE) grades 3/4 management costs were incorporated in the model. Discount rate of 3% per year was applied to costs and effects. Life years (LYs) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for each treatment as well as the incremental cost effectiveness (ICER) and cost utility (ICUR) ratios were estimated. Base case analyses (BCA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were estimated. Results: The table summarizes the results form BCA analyses. A+ADT offers best gain in LYs (8.37yrs) and QALYs (5.30 yrs) but at higher cost. Conclusions: Apalutamide was associated with gains in LYs and QALYs traded off with higher lifetime cost relative to other AA alternatives. ADT was associated with lower gains in LYs and QALYs traded off with lower lifetime cost relative to other alternatives. Based on a $150,000/QALY threshold pay off, A+ADT is likely more cost effective compared to E+ADT or ADT alone; while E+ ADT may be more cost effective compared to D+ ADT. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Cost-effectiveness of mobile health-based integrated care for atrial fibrillation: Model development and data analysis (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.29408 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Xueyan Luo ◽

Wei Xu ◽

Quan Yuan ◽

Han Lai ◽

Chunji Huang

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Sensitivity Analysis ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Integrated Care ◽

Mobile Health ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Life Years ◽

Mhealth Technology

BACKGROUND Mobile health (mhealth) technology is increasingly used in disease management. Using mhealth tools to integrate and streamline care was found to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) patients’ clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical and health economic outcomes of mhealth-based integrated care for AF from the perspective of a public healthcare provider in China. METHODS A Markov model was designed to compare outcomes of mhealth-based care and usual care in a hypothetical cohort of AF patients in China. The time horizon was 30 years with monthly cycles. Model outcomes measured were direct medical cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of base-case results. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, mhealth-based care gained higher QALYs of 0.0818 with an incurred cost of USD1,778. Using USD33,438 per QALY (three times gross domestic product) as the willingness-to-pay threshold, mhealth-based care was cost-effective, with an ICER of USD21,739 per QALY. The one-way sensitivity analysis found compliance to mhealth-based care had the greatest impact on the ICER. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, mhealth-based care was accepted as cost-effective in 80.91% of 10,000 iterations. CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that the use of mhealth technology in streamlining and integrating care for AF patients was cost-effective in China.

Download Full-text

Milk Powder Fortified with Potassium and Phytosterols to Decrease the Risk of Cardiovascular Events among the Adult Population in Malaysia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu11061235 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. 1235

Author(s):

Anita E. Gandola ◽

Livia Dainelli ◽

Diane Zimmermann ◽

Maznah Dahlui ◽

Patrick Detzel

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Adult Population ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Milk Powder ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Discounted Cost ◽

Life Years ◽

The Impact

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the consumption of a milk powder product fortified with potassium (+1050.28 mg/day) and phytosterols (+1200 mg/day) to lower systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively, and, therefore, the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke among the 35–75-year-old population in Malaysia. A Markov model was created against a do-nothing option, from a governmental perspective, and with a time horizon of 40 years. Different data sources, encompassing clinical studies, practice guidelines, grey literature, and statistical yearbooks, were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of uncertainty on the base case estimates. With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio equal to international dollars (int$) 22,518.03 per quality-adjusted life-years gained, the intervention can be classified as very cost-effective. If adopted nationwide, it would help prevent at least 13,400 MIs, 30,500 strokes, and more than 10,600 and 17,100 MI- and stroke-related deaths. The discounted cost savings generated for the health care system by those who consume the fortified milk powder would amount to int$8.1 per person, corresponding to 0.7% of the total yearly health expenditure per capita. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Together with other preventive interventions, the consumption of milk powder fortified with potassium and phytosterols represents a cost-effective strategy to attenuate the rapid increase in cardiovascular burden in Malaysia.

Download Full-text

P14.12 The cost-effectiveness of tumor-treating fields in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noz126.247 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽

pp. iii68-iii69

Author(s):

X Armoiry ◽

P Auguste ◽

C Dussart ◽

J Guyotat ◽

M Connock

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Survival Model ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Tumor Treating Fields ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Life Years ◽

Secondary Analyses ◽

The Cost

Abstract BACKGROUND The addition of novel therapy “Tumor-Treating fields” (TTF) to standard radio-chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) has recently shown superiority over conventional TMZ regimen in patients with glioblastoma. Despite the clinical benefit of TTF, there is a strong concern regarding the cost of this new treatment. A first cost-effectiveness analysis, which was published in 2016, was based on effectiveness outcomes from an interim analysis of the pivotal trial and used a “standard” Markov model. Here, we aimed to update the cost-effectiveness evaluation using a partitioned survival model design and using the latest effectiveness data. MATERIAL AND METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed with three mutually exclusive health states: stable disease, progressive disease, and dead. Parametric models were fitted to the Kaplan-Meier data for overall and progression-free survival. These generated clinically plausible extrapolations beyond the observed data. The perspective of the French national health insurance was adopted and the time horizon was 20 years. Base case results were expressed as cost/life-years (LY) gained (LYG). Secondary analyses were undertaken, with the results presented as cost/per quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Last, we undertook deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS After applying 4% annual discounting of benefits and costs, the base case model generated incremental benefit of 0.507 LY at a incremental cost of €258,695 yielding an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €510,273 / LYG. Secondary analyses yielded an ICER of €667,173/QALY. Sensitivity analyses and bootstrapping methods showed the model was relatively robust. The model was sensitive to TTF device costs and the parametric model fitted to the Kaplan-Meier data for overall survival. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed TTF has 0% of being cost-effective under conventional thresholds. CONCLUSION Using a partitioned survival model, uprated costs and more mature survival outcomes, TTF when compared to standard radio-chemotherapy with TMZ is not likely to be cost-effective. This has major implications in terms of access of newly eligible patients

Download Full-text

Cost effectiveness of carfilzomib (CAR), ixazomib (IXA), elotuzumab (ELO), or daratumumab (DAR) with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (LEN+DEX) vs LEN+DEX in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.8030 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8030-8030 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Nimer Alsaid ◽

Ali McBride ◽

Amit Balkrishna Agarwal ◽

Abdulaali Mutairi ◽

Faiz Anwer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cost Utility ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Health States ◽

Chemotherapy Administration ◽

Life Years

8030 Background: CAR, IXA, ELO, and DAR in triplet combination with LEN+DEX have shown superior efficacy over LEN+DEX in R/R MM, but their comparative efficacy and cost effectiveness has not been estimated. Methods: Network meta-analysis [NMA] and Bücher method were used to indirectly estimate comparative progression-free survival (PFS) efficacy. A 2-state Markov model (progression-free, progressed or death) was specified. Inputs included: cost of chemotherapy, administration, adverse events (AE) management, disease monitoring; utilities for health states; and disutilities for AEs. Incremental cost effectiveness (ICER) and cost utility ratios (ICUR) were calculated for resp. PFS life years (PFS LY) and quality adjusted life years (PFS QALY) gained in base case and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). Results: NMA and Bücher indirect comparison methods yielded similar PFS hazard ratios (HR), revealing superiority of DAR+LEN+DEX over other triplets in terms of PFS (Table). Using the exponential distribution to fit PFS data, our cost effectiveness analysis indicated that all 4 triplet regimens were associated with additional PFS LY and QALY gained over LEN+DEX at additional cost. DAR+LEN+DEX was associated with the greatest PFS LY and QALY gained at the lowest relative cost, yielding superior ICER and ICUR estimates compared to other triplet regimens. Conclusions: The superior PFS efficacy of DAR+LEN+DEX is associated with positive cost effectiveness and cost utility in the setting of R/R MM. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

PD30 Cost-Effectiveness Of Stereo-Electroencephalography For Refractory Epilepsy

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care ◽

10.1017/s0266462318003033 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 34 (S1) ◽

pp. 139-140

Author(s):

Borja Garcia-Lorenzo ◽

Tasmania del Pino-Sedeño ◽

Maria M. Trujillo-Martin ◽

Rodrigo Alberto Rocamora Zuniga ◽

Juan Erviti López ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Refractory Epilepsy ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Epileptogenic Zone ◽

Lifetime Horizon ◽

Life Years ◽

Definition Of ◽

Meta Analyses

Introduction:Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been shown to be a valuable tool for the anatomo-electroclinic definition of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in some patients with medically refractory epilepsy considered for surgery. In Spain, many of those patients are not offered this diagnostic procedure. The objective of our health technology assessment (HTA) report was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of SEEG to define the EZ in patients with refractory epilepsy considered for surgery compared to no SEEG intervention (i.e. remaining with further antiepileptic drugs).Methods:We undertook a systematic review with meta-analyses on the effectiveness and safety of SEEG. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a Markov model which simulates the costs and health outcomes of individuals for a lifetime horizon from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service (NHS). The effectiveness measure was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We ran extensive sensitivity analyses, including a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.Results:The EZ was found in 92 percent of patients who underwent SEEG, 72 percent were eligible for epilepsy surgery and 33 percent were free of seizures after surgery (47 percent of those who received surgery). Any complications related to insertion and monitoring of SEEG and the subsequent intervention occurred in 1.3 percent of patients. In the base case analysis, SEEG led to higher QALYs and healthcare costs with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 10,368 (USD 12,217) per QALY. The sensitivity analyses showed that the results of the study were robust.Conclusions:SEEG is a cost-effective technology in patients with refractory epilepsy considered for surgery when compared to no SEEG intervention.

Download Full-text

An economic evaluation of nivolumab for the treatment of squamous and non-squamous NSCLC in the Swedish setting

Nordic Journal of Health Economics ◽

10.5617/njhe.5453 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Caitlin Smare ◽

Meena Venkatachalam ◽

Emma Medin ◽

Marcus Hultberg ◽

John R Penrod ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Incremental Cost ◽

Scenario Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Health States ◽

Treatment Data

The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was estimated in a cohort-based, partitioned survival model with three health states (progression-free, progressed disease, and death) and a time horizon of 15 years. The base-case model was developed using extrapolations of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data from the CheckMate 017 and 057 randomized trials, and 2015 Swedish unit costs. An annual discount rate of 3% was applied. Base-case time-on-treatment was based on PFS (CheckMate 017) or time-to-treatment discontinuation (CheckMate 057), depending on whether PFS was a close proxy for time-on-treatment. Data extrapolations from CheckMate 017 and 057 were validated against external trial and registry data. Model utilities were derived from CheckMate 017 and 057 with UK weights (base-case) and Swedish weights (scenario analysis). Uncertainty was assessed using sensitivity analyses adjusted for clinical, utility, and cost data. Outcomes included incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The base-case model showed that nivolumab was associated with QALY gains of 0.72 (squamous) and 0.81 (non-squamous) versus docetaxel at an incremental cost of 734,573 SEK (€69,174) and 999,032 SEK (€94,078), respectively. This resulted in an incremental cost per QALY gained for nivolumab versus docetaxel of 1,013,697 SEK (€95,459) and 1,231,664 SEK (€115,985) in squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, respectively. Scenario analysis utilizing Swedish utility weights resulted in slightly lower incremental cost per QALY gained of 855,505 SEK (€80,562) (squamous) and 1,165,401 SEK (€109,745) (non-squamous). Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that utility weights, treatment costs, discount rates, and body weight were key drivers of cost-effectiveness. Overall, the model showed that cost-effectiveness was driven by nivolumab price, but nivolumab remained cost-effective in squamous and non-squamous NSCLC in accordance with previous appraisals by the Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverket) and New Therapies Council in Sweden. Published: Online December 2019.

Download Full-text

Additional MRI for initial M-staging in pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

European Radiology ◽

10.1007/s00330-021-08356-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Felix G. Gassert ◽

Sebastian Ziegelmayer ◽

Johanna Luitjens ◽

Florian T. Gassert ◽

Fabian Tollens ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Tnm Classification ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Contrast Enhanced ◽

Life Years ◽

Input Parameters ◽

Initial Staging

Abstract Objective Pancreatic cancer is portrayed to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death within the next years. Potentially complicating surgical resection emphasizes the importance of an accurate TNM classification. In particular, the failure to detect features for non-resectability has profound consequences on patient outcomes and economic costs due to incorrect indication for resection. In the detection of liver metastases, contrast-enhanced MRI showed high sensitivity and specificity; however, the cost-effectiveness compared to the standard of care imaging remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze whether additional MRI of the liver is a cost-effective approach compared to routinely acquired contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in the initial staging of pancreatic cancer. Methods A decision model based on Markov simulation was developed to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs of the diagnostic modalities. Model input parameters were assessed based on evidence from recent literature. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. To evaluate model uncertainty, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results In the base-case analysis, the model yielded a total cost of $185,597 and an effectiveness of 2.347 QALYs for CE-MR/CT and $187,601 and 2.337 QALYs for CE-CT respectively. With a net monetary benefit (NMB) of $49,133, CE-MR/CT is shown to be dominant over CE-CT with a NMB of $46,117. Deterministic and probabilistic survival analysis showed model robustness for varying input parameters. Conclusion Based on our results, combined CE-MR/CT can be regarded as a cost-effective imaging strategy for the staging of pancreatic cancer. Key Points • Additional MRI of the liver for initial staging of pancreatic cancer results in lower total costs and higher effectiveness. • The economic model showed high robustness for varying input parameters.

Download Full-text

Abstract 15622: Cost-Effectiveness of Pediatric Heart Transplantation Across a Positive Crossmatch

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.130.suppl_2.15622 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Brian Feingold ◽

Steven A Webber ◽

Cindy L Bryce ◽

Heather E Tomko ◽

Seo Y Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Heart Transplantation ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Lower Probability ◽

Base Case ◽

Model Parameters ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Life Years ◽

Pediatric Heart Transplantation

Introduction: Allosensitized children listed with a requirement for a negative prospective crossmatch (XM) have a high risk of death awaiting heart transplantation (HTx). Previously we found that acceptance of the first suitable organ offer for these patients, regardless of the possibility of a +XM, results in a survival benefit at all times after listing, including post-HTx. The cost-effectiveness of this strategy is unknown. Methods: We used a Markov-state transition model with a 10 yr time horizon to compare survival, costs, and utility (i.e. quality of life) for 2 waitlist strategies for sensitized candidates: requiring a negative prospective XM (WAIT) vs. accepting the first suitable organ offer (TAKE). Model data were derived from OPTN status 1A pediatric HTx listings from 1999-2009, the PHTS and HCUP KIDS databases, and other published sources. We assumed no possibility of a +XM in the wait strategy and that the probability of a +XM in the take strategy was equal to the pre-transplant PRA. Results: At base case, TAKE was dominant; it cost less ($122,856) and gained more (1.04) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than WAIT. In sensitivity analyses varying all model parameters individually over clinically plausible ranges, TAKE remained dominant or favored (using a $100,000/QALY cost-effectiveness threshold) except when the probability of HTx for TAKE was <55% over 2 years (base case value 67%). After adjustment of the model so that waitlist probabilities of death and delisting were equal in both strategies (while maintaining the lower probability of HTx associated with WAIT), TAKE remained dominant. WAIT was no longer dominated if mortality after HTx across a +XM was >30%/year (equivalent to median post-HTx survival of <3 yrs); yet even at the extreme assumption of 100% 1-year mortality after HTx across a +XM for TAKE, the wait strategy was not cost effective ($350,097/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Among sensitized status 1A pediatric HTx candidates, we found that taking the first suitable organ offer is less costly and results in greater survival than awaiting HTx across a negative prospective XM. This suggests that HTx should not be denied based on sensitization status alone.

Download Full-text

Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumours of gastrointestinal or lung origin in Canada

Current Oncology ◽

10.3747/co.25.3532 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 25 (1) ◽

pp. 32 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A. Chua ◽

A. Perrin ◽

J.F. Ricci ◽

M.P. Neary ◽

M. Thabane

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Best Supportive Care ◽

Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Base Case ◽

Health States ◽

The Cost

Background In 2016, everolimus was approved by Health Canada for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, well-differentiated, non-functional, neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of gastrointestinal (GI) or lung origin in adult patients with progressive disease. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of everolimus in this setting from a Canadian societal perspective.Methods A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost per life-year (LY) gained and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of everolimus plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced or metastatic NET of GI or lung origin. Model health states included stable disease, disease progression, and death. Efficacy inputs were based on the RADIANT-4 trial and utilities were mapped from quality-of-life data retrieved from RADIANT-4. Resource utilization inputs were derived from a Canadian physician survey, while cost inputs were obtained from official reimbursement lists from Ontario and other published sources. Costs and efficacy outcomes were discounted 5% annually over a 10-year time horizon, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the base case results.Results Everolimus had an incremental gain of 0.616 QALYs (0.823 LYs) and CA$89,795 resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CA$145,670 per QALY gained (CA$109,166 per LY gained). The probability of cost-effectiveness was 52.1% at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of CA$150,000 per QALY.Conclusions Results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicate that everolimus has a 52.1% probability of being cost-effective at a WTP threshold of CA$150,000 per QALY gained in Canada.

Download Full-text