The application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or an immunofluorescent assay test leads to different estimates of seroprevalence ofCoxiella burnetiiin the population
2011 ◽
Vol 140
(1)
◽
pp. 36-41
◽
Keyword(s):
Q Fever
◽
SUMMARYThe diagnosis and epidemiological studies of Q fever depend on serology. Among the main methods employed are the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the immunofluorescent assay test (IFAT). We show that two commercial assays representing the two methods with two different cut-off titres can lead to significant differences in diagnostic and seroprevalence estimates. This in turn emphasizes the need for a standardized gold method to compare the various assays; whether this standard is ‘in-house’ or commercially obtained.
1994 ◽
Vol 32
(6)
◽
pp. 1560-1565
◽
1988 ◽
Vol 26
(10)
◽
pp. 1978-1982
◽
1998 ◽
Vol 36
(3)
◽
pp. 777-782
◽
2003 ◽
Vol 10
(5)
◽
pp. 910-916
◽
1998 ◽
Vol 5
(5)
◽
pp. 717-720
◽