Naming of igneous and metamorphic rock units in Antarctica: recommendation by the SCAR Working Group on Geology

1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Alberto Ricci ◽  
Francisco Hervé ◽  
Johan R. Krynauw ◽  
Wesley E. Lemasurier

Geologists from many countries have worked in Antarctica since the turn of the twentieth century and during the past thirty years the level of research activity on the continent has increased annually. As a result there has been a proliferation of stratigraphical names and lithostratigraphical schemes (Thomson, 1990). Furthermore, geologists from different nations are familiar with different standards and codes of nomenclature, which has resulted in a number of inconsistencies in Antarctic stratigraphical names. The SCAR Working Groups on Geology and Solid Earth Geophysics therefore recommended at their meeting in 1990 with SCAR XXII in São Paulo that, for sedimentary rocks, geologists working in Antarctica should adhere to the stratigraphical principles and recommendations proposed by Hedberg (1976). It was recognized, however, that igneous and metamorphic rocks present special problems of nomenclature. An ad hoc group of the SCAR Working Group on Geology for naming igneous and metamorphic rock units, constituted by the authors of this note, was therefore established to consider and discuss these problems and to formulate recommendations for suitable schemes that may be used internationally for Antarctica.

2012 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
John WONG

NEAT is a loosely constituted regional scheme under the ASEAN plus Three (APT) framework. Its main objectives are to promote exchange among APT scholars and research institutes in the region, and to promote relevant research that can facilitate the APT regional cooperation process. Research is done through organising Working Groups. NEAT has made important progress in the past 10 years. To grow and expand in future, it will have to improve on its networking function and strengthen its Working Group mechanism.


1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C. Cox ◽  
Andrew H. Allibone

Recently Ricci et al. (1993) proposed a series of general guidelines for the naming of igneous and metamorphic rocks in Antarctica, based on discussions held by the SCAR Working Group on Geology. Ricci et al. (1993) suggested that names for igneous and metamorphic rock units should comprise an appropriate geographic name and simple lithological field term. However, they also suggest that names should not include terms that indicate the form or structure of a rock unit, such as dyke, pluton or batholith.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-88
Author(s):  
Cut Yulia Rizky ◽  
Eddy Purnama ◽  
Mujibussalim Mujibussalim

Menurut Perpres Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 dan Gubernur Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pembentukan Unit Layanan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Aceh, di dalam pasal 17 disebutkan untuk menjadi pokja harus Aparatur Negeri Sipil (ASN), Sedangkan di dalam Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Unit Layanan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Aceh tidak diatur tentang hak-hak pegawai pokja, Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui implementasi struktur dan kedudukan kelompok kerja pada unit layanan pengadaan Aceh sudah sesuai dengan Perpres No 54 tahun 2010 berserta perubahannya, untuk mengetahui konsekuensi yuridis jika penempatan kelompok kerja dalam struktur dan kedudukan unit layanan pengadaan Aceh belum sesuai sebagaimana yang diamanahkan oleh Perpres No 54 tahun 2010 berserta perubahannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dan penelitian hukum empiris (yuridis empiris). Penelitian ini mengunakan data skunder, data primer dan data tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukan Pejabat Unit Layanan Pengadaan atau Pokja ULP seringkali menghadapai permasalahan diantaranya tugas dan tanggung jawab ditempat ASN berkerja dengan pekerjaannya sebagai Pokja ULP yang bersifat ad-hoc (sementara), kuatnya arus intervensi dari pihak-pihak tertuntu yang mengatasnamakan tempat porsenil Pokja selaku ASN bekerja, tidak mendapatkan penilaian kinerja dari ULP sebagaimana yang ditentukan oleh Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 Tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil bahwa di dalam pasal 1 ayat (3) menyebutkan Prestasi kerja adalah hasil kerja yang dicapai oleh setiap PNS pada satuan organisasi sesuai dengan Sasaran Kerja Pegawai (SKP) dan perilaku kerja.According to Presidential Regulation Number . 54, 2010 and Governor Number 4, 2015 on the Establishment of Aceh Government Goods / Services Procurement Unit, in Article 17 it is mentioned to be a working group for Apparatus Civil Nation (ASN), while in Aceh Governor Regulation Number 4, 2015 The Aceh Government Goods / Service Procurement Unit is not regulated on the rights of the working groups This system is having a lot of weaknesses and it causes the group is at the governmental institutions either in regional or central. This research aims to know the implementation of structure and the position of working group at the unit of Aceh Procurements whether has been in according with the Presidential Regulation Number 54, 2010 together its changes, to know the juridical consequences if the imposition of the working group in the structure and the Aceh’s Service Procurement has not been in accordance with the Presidential Regulation Number 54, 2010 together its changes. This is juridical normative legal research. This research applies secondary, primary and tertiary data. The research shows that Official Procurement Unit or the Group of ULP is often facing problems that are their duties and responsibilities at civil servant units with the job on the ULP Group Unit that is temporary, the strengths of intervention from certain parties of the official as the servants do not have the working reviews  from ULP as determined by the Indonesian governmental regulation Number 46, 2011 on the Review of Civil Servants Working as started in Article 1 (3) stating that Working Reward is a reward obtained by the civil servants at a organization with the aim of the servant and the working behave and dutie.


What did it mean to be a man in Scotland over the past nine centuries? Scotland, with its stereotypes of the kilted warrior and the industrial ‘hard man’, has long been characterised in masculine terms, but there has been little historical exploration of masculinity in a wider context. This interdisciplinary collection examines a diverse range of the multiple and changing forms of masculinities from the late eleventh to the late twentieth century, exploring the ways in which Scottish society through the ages defined expectations for men and their behaviour. How men reacted to those expectations is examined through sources such as documentary materials, medieval seals, romances, poetry, begging letters, police reports and court records, charity records, oral histories and personal correspondence. Focusing upon the wide range of activities and roles undertaken by men – work, fatherhood and play, violence and war, sex and commerce – the book also illustrates the range of masculinities that affected or were internalised by men. Together, the chapters illustrate some of the ways Scotland’s gender expectations have changed over the centuries and how, more generally, masculinities have informed the path of Scottish history


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
Marjorie Perloff

This essay offers a critical re-assessment of Hugh Kenner's The Pound Era. It argues that Kenner's magisterial survey remains important to our understanding of Modernism, despite its frankly partisan viewpoint. Kenner's is an insider's account of the Anglo-American Modernist writing that he takes to have been significant because it sought to invent a new language consonant with the ethos of the twentieth century. The essay suggests that Kenner's impeccable attention to the Modernist renovation of language goes beyond formalism, since, for him, its ‘patterned energies’ (a term derived from Buckminster Fuller's theory of knots) relate Modernism to the larger complex of artefacts within which it functions and, beyond these, to what he takes to be the great works of the past and to the scientific-technological inventions of the present. But the essay also points out that Kenner's is an eccentric canon, which makes no room for Forster, Frost, Lawrence, or Stevens. Furthermore, Kenner's emphasis on the First World War as a great cultural rupture, while plausible, works less well for Joyce and Williams than it does for Pound and Eliot.


Author(s):  
VICTOR BURLACHUK

At the end of the twentieth century, questions of a secondary nature suddenly became topical: what do we remember and who owns the memory? Memory as one of the mental characteristics of an individual’s activity is complemented by the concept of collective memory, which requires a different method of analysis than the activity of a separate individual. In the 1970s, a situation arose that gave rise to the so-called "historical politics" or "memory politics." If philosophical studies of memory problems of the 30’s and 40’s of the twentieth century were focused mainly on the peculiarities of perception of the past in the individual and collective consciousness and did not go beyond scientific discussions, then half a century later the situation has changed dramatically. The problem of memory has found its political sound: historians and sociologists, politicians and representatives of the media have entered the discourse on memory. Modern society, including all social, ethnic and family groups, has undergone a profound change in the traditional attitude towards the past, which has been associated with changes in the structure of government. In connection with the discrediting of the Soviet Union, the rapid decline of the Communist Party and its ideology, there was a collapse of Marxism, which provided for a certain model of time and history. The end of the revolutionary idea, a powerful vector that indicated the direction of historical time into the future, inevitably led to a rapid change in perception of the past. Three models of the future, which, according to Pierre Nora, defined the face of the past (the future as a restoration of the past, the future as progress and the future as a revolution) that existed until recently, have now lost their relevance. Today, absolute uncertainty hangs over the future. The inability to predict the future poses certain challenges to the present. The end of any teleology of history imposes on the present a debt of memory. Features of the life of memory, the specifics of its state and functioning directly affect the state of identity, both personal and collective. Distortion of memory, its incorrect work, and its ideological manipulation can give rise to an identity crisis. The memorial phenomenon is a certain political resource in a situation of severe socio-political breaks and changes. In the conditions of the economic crisis and in the absence of a real and clear program for future development, the state often seeks to turn memory into the main element of national consolidation.


Author(s):  
Seva Gunitsky

Over the past century, democracy spread around the world in turbulent bursts of change, sweeping across national borders in dramatic cascades of revolution and reform. This book offers a new global-oriented explanation for this wavelike spread and retreat—not only of democracy but also of its twentieth-century rivals, fascism, and communism. The book argues that waves of regime change are driven by the aftermath of cataclysmic disruptions to the international system. These hegemonic shocks, marked by the sudden rise and fall of great powers, have been essential and often-neglected drivers of domestic transformations. Though rare and fleeting, they not only repeatedly alter the global hierarchy of powerful states but also create unique and powerful opportunities for sweeping national reforms—by triggering military impositions, swiftly changing the incentives of domestic actors, or transforming the basis of political legitimacy itself. As a result, the evolution of modern regimes cannot be fully understood without examining the consequences of clashes between great powers, which repeatedly—and often unsuccessfully—sought to cajole, inspire, and intimidate other states into joining their camps.


Author(s):  
James Tweedie

This chapter introduces the concept of the “archaeomodern” and its connection to the aging of the quintessential modern medium of film. It sketches the historical and cultural background of the archaeomodern turn in the late twentieth century, including the development of an obsession with the past in the heritage industry and the rise of postmodernism. It then discusses two phenomena from the 1980s and 1990s—a mannerist or baroque revival, and the development of media archaeology—that complicate the habitual association between tradition and the past or modernity and the future. The introduction suggests that archaeomodern cinema was characterized by the return to failed or abandoned modern experiments and other relics from the modern past.


Author(s):  
Rachel Crossland

Chapter 1 explores Woolf’s writings up to the end of 1925 in relation to scientific ideas on wave-particle duality, providing the ‘retrospect of Woolf’s earlier novels’ which Michael Whitworth has suggested shows that she was working ‘in anticipation of the physicists’. The chapter as a whole challenges this idea of anticipation, showing that Woolf was actually working in parallel with physicists, philosophers, and artists in the early twentieth century, all of whom were starting to question dualistic models and instead beginning to develop complementary ones. A retrospect on wave-particle duality is also provided, making reference to Max Planck’s work on quanta and Albert Einstein’s development of light quanta. This chapter pays close attention to Woolf’s writing of light and her use of conjunctions, suggesting that Woolf was increasingly looking to write ‘both/and’ rather than ‘either/or’. Among other texts, it considers Night and Day, Mrs Dalloway, and ‘Sketch of the Past’.


Author(s):  
John Carman ◽  
Patricia Carman

What is—or makes a place—a ‘historic battlefield’? From one perspective the answer is a simple one—it is a place where large numbers of people came together in an organized manner to fight one another at some point in the past. But from another perspective it is far more difficult to identify. Quite why any such location is a place of battle—rather than any other kind of event—and why it is especially historic is more difficult to identify. This book sets out an answer to the question of what a historic battlefield is in the modern imagination, drawing upon examples from prehistory to the twentieth century. Considering battlefields through a series of different lenses, treating battles as events in the past and battlefields as places in the present, the book exposes the complexity of the concept of historic battlefield and how it forms part of a Western understanding of the world. Taking its lead from new developments in battlefield study—especially archaeological approaches—the book establishes a link to and a means by which these new approaches can contribute to more radical thinking about war and conflict, especially to Critical Military and Critical Security Studies. The book goes beyond the study of battles as separate and unique events to consider what they mean to us and why we need them to have particular characteristics. It will be of interest to archaeologists, historians, and students of modern war in all its forms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document