The Ethics of Decision Making for the Critically Ill Elderly

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
Madelyn Anne Iris

The ethics of decision making for the critically ill elderly is an area of concern for all those involved in the decision-making process. The number of participants involved in decision making around end-of-life issues may be many: treatment and care decisions often bring together not only the patient and the physician, but the family, an extended medical care team, and impartial members of a hospital or institutional ethics committee. In addition, treatment and care decisions made at the end of life occur in a variety of settings, not just the acute care hospital. Elderly patients who are critically ill, or in the final days or weeks of life, are found in intensive care or medical units of hospitals, in hospital and nursing home based hospice programs, in long-term care settings such as skilled nursing facilities, or at home, where they are tended by family caregivers. Differences in patterns of decision making regarding the care and treatment of critically ill older adults can be found across these settings, and decisions often vary according to the roles of the participants.

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 256 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. DeCaria ◽  
D. Dudgeon ◽  
E. Green ◽  
R. Shaw Moxam ◽  
R. Rahal ◽  
...  

Acute care hospitals have a role in managing the health care needs of people affected by cancer when they are at the end of life. However, there is a need to provide end-of-life care in other settings, including at home or in hospice, when such settings are more appropriate. Using data from 9 provinces, we examined indicators that describe the current landscape of acute care hospital use at the end of life for patients who died of cancer in hospital in Canada.Interprovincial variation was observed in acute care hospital deaths, length of stay in hospital, readmission to hospital, and intensive care unit use at the end of life. High rates of acute care hospital use near the end of life might suggest that community and home-based end-of-life care might not be suiting patient needs.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e047247
Author(s):  
Emily J Tomlinson ◽  
Helen Rawson ◽  
Elizabeth Manias ◽  
Nicole (Nikki) M Phillips ◽  
Peteris Darzins ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo explore factors associated with decision-making of nurses and doctors in prescribing and administering as required antipsychotic medications to older people with delirium.DesignQualitative descriptive.SettingTwo acute care hospital organisations in Melbourne, Australia.ParticipantsNurses and doctors were invited to participate. Semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews were conducted between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsParticipants were 42 health professionals; n=25 nurses and n=17 doctors. Themes relating to decisions to use antipsychotic medication were: safety; a last resort; nursing workload; a dilemma to medicate; and anticipating worsening behaviours. Nurses and doctors described experiencing pressures when trying to manage hyperactive behaviours. Safety was a major concern leading to the decision to use antipsychotics. Antipsychotics were often used as chemical restraints to ‘sedate’ a patient with delirium because nurses ‘can’t do their job’. Results also indicated that nurses had influence over doctors’ decisions despite nurses being unaware of this influence. Health professionals’ descriptions are illustrated in a decision-making flowchart that identifies how nurses and doctors navigated decisions regarding prescription and administration of antipsychotic medications.ConclusionsThe decision to prescribe and administer antipsychotic medications for people with delirium is complex as nurses and doctors must navigate multiple factors before making the decision. Collaborative support and multidisciplinary teamwork are required by both nurses and doctors to optimally care for people with delirium. Decision-making support for nurses and doctors may also help to navigate the multiple factors that influence the decision to prescribe antipsychotics.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kristy Xinghan Fu ◽  
Yee Keow Chiong ◽  
Nicola Ngiam

Abstract Objective To explore parents’ perspectives regarding end-of-life (EOL) decisions, factors and possible barriers that influence the EOL decision making process, and to understand parental preferences for communication about EOL care in an Asian population. Method A prospective questionnaire cohort study conducted in a university-based tertiary care hospital. 30 parents of children who had been admitted to general pediatric wards for acute ailments and/or were being followed up in general pediatric outpatient clinics after inpatient admissions or emergency department visits completed 30 interviewer-administered questionnaires. With the first 10 completed questionnaires, we sought feedback on the design of the four case vignettes and related questions. Responses to specific questions related to each case vignette were rated on a Likert scale. Results The majority of parents were able to comprehend and identify with the issues in the case vignettes, which allowed them to respond appropriately. Parents tended to avoid active withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment. The top three priorities for parents making EOL decisions for their children were: the chance of improvement, the presence of pain or discomfort, and information provided by healthcare staff. Parents reported that they would prefer to know immediately if their child is at risk of dying; they also preferred to get as much information as possible from the healthcare team and thought that meeting with the healthcare team before making EOL decisions was pivotal. Significance of results Parents place highest priorities on their child's likelihood of improvement, perception of their child's pain, and information provided by healthcare professionals in making EOL decisions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Badger

• Background Nurses in medical intensive care units are routinely involved in negotiations to maintain or withdraw life support. How nurses move from aggressively attempting to extend life to letting life end is not well understood. • Objective To explore nurses’ experiences of moving from cure- to comfort-oriented care and to describe factors that inhibit or facilitate such transitions. • Method A descriptive qualitative research design with brief observation of participants and focus group interviews was used. Participants were 19 female and 5 male nurses in an 18-bed medical intensive care unit in a 719-bed acute care hospital in the northeastern United States. • Results The transition point between cure- and comfort-oriented care was unclear. Nurses reported that the patient’s age, misunderstanding of the illness by the patient’s family, family discord, and shifting medical care decisions made end-of-life transitions difficult. Conversely, developing a consensus among patients, patients’ families, and staff about the direction of medical therapy; exhausting treatment options; and patients’ lack of response to aggressive medical interventions helped nurses move toward comfort care. • Conclusions The most distressing situations for staff were dealing with younger patients with an acute life-threatening illness and performing futile care on elderly patients. End-of-life transitions were difficult when patients’ families had conflicts or were indecisive about terminating treatment and when physicians kept offering options that were unlikely to change patients’ prognosis. The most important factor enabling nurses to move from cure- to comfort-oriented care was developing a consensus about the treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S526-S526
Author(s):  
Chelsea Lynch ◽  
Andrea Appleby-Sigler ◽  
Jacqueline Bork ◽  
Rohini Dave ◽  
Kimberly C Claeys ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Urine cultures are often positive in the absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) leading to unnecessary antibiotics. Reflex culturing decreases unnecessary urine culturing in acute care settings but the benefit in other settings is unknown. Methods This was a quasi-experimental study performed at a health system consisting of an acute care hospital, an emergency department (ED), and two long-term care (LTC) facilities. Reflex urine criterion was a urine analysis with > 10 white blood cells/high-power field. Urine cultures performed per 100 bed days of care (BDOC) were compared pre- (August 2016 to July 2017) vs. post-intervention (August 2017 to August 2018) using interrupted time series regression. Catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) rates were reviewed to determine potential CAUTIs that would have been prevented. Results In acute care, pre-intervention, 894 cultures were performed (3.6 cultures/100 BDOC). Post-intervention, 965 urine cultures were ordered and 507 cultures were performed (1.8 cultures/100 BDOC). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 49% decrease in cultures performed (P < 0.001). The CAUTI rate 2 years pre-intervention was 1.8/1000 catheter days and 1.6/1000 catheter days post-intervention. Reflex culturing would have prevented 4/14 CAUTIs. In ED, pre-intervention, 1393 cultures were performed (5.4 cultures/100 visits). Post-intervention, 1959 urine cultures were ordered and 917 were performed (3.3 cultures/100 visits). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 47% decrease in cultures performed (P = 0.0015). In LTC, pre-intervention, 257 cultures were performed (0.4 cultures/100 BDOC). Post-intervention, 432 urine cultures were ordered and 354 were performed (0.5 cultures/100 BDOC). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 75% increase in cultures performed (P < 0.001). The CAUTI rate 2 years pre-intervention was 1.0/1000 catheter days vs. 1.6/1,000 catheter days post-intervention. Reflex culturing would have prevented 1/13 CAUTIs. Conclusion Reflex culturing canceled 16%-51% of cultures ordered with greatest impact in acute care and the ED and a small absolute increase in LTC. CAUTI rates did not change although reflex culturing would have prevented 29% of CAUTIs in acute care and 8% in LTC. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Alonso-Babarro ◽  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
María Varela-Cerdeira ◽  
María Jesús Boya-Cristia ◽  
Rosario Madero ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with at-home death among patients with advanced cancer and create a decision-making model for discharging patients from an acute-care hospital. Patients and Methods We conducted an observational cohort study to identify the association between place of death and the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with advanced cancer who received care from a palliative home care team (PHCT) and of their primary caregivers. We used logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of at-home death. Results We identified 380 patients who met the study inclusion criteria; of these, 245 patients (64%) died at home, 72 (19%) died in an acute-care hospital, 60 (16%) died in a palliative care unit, and three (1%) died in a nursing home. Median follow-up was 48 days. We included the 16 variables that were significant in univariate analysis in our decision-making model. Five variables predictive of at-home death were retained in the multivariate analysis: caregiver's preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, caregiver's perceived social support, number of hospital admission days, and number of PHCT visits. A subsequent reduced model including only those variables that were known at the time of discharge (caregivers' preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, and caregivers' perceived social support) had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 81% in predicting place of death. Conclusion Asking a few simple patient- and family-centered questions may help to inform the decision regarding the best place for end-of-life care and death.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Eggmann ◽  
Angela Kindler ◽  
Andrea Perren ◽  
Natalie Ott ◽  
Frauke Johannes ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of this case series was to describe the experience of Swiss physical therapists in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 during their acute care hospital stay and to discuss challenges and potential strategies in the clinical management of these patients. Methods We report 11 cases of patients with COVID-19 from five Swiss hospitals that illustrate the various indications for physical therapy, clinical challenges, potential treatment methods and short-term response to treatment. Results Physical therapists actively treated patients with COVID-19 on wards and in the ICU. Interventions ranged from patient education, to prone positioning, to early mobilization and respiratory therapy. Patients were often unstable with quick exacerbation of symptoms and a slow and fluctuant recovery. Additionally, many patients who are critically ill developed severe weakness, post-extubation dysphagia, weaning failure or presented with anxiety or delirium. In this setting, physical therapy was challenging and required specialized and individualized therapeutic strategies. Most patients adopted the proposed treatment strategies and lung function and physical strength improved over time. Conclusion Physical therapists clearly have a role in the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on our experience in Switzerland, we recommend that physical therapists routinely screen and assess patients for respiratory symptoms and exercise tolerance on acute wards. Treatment of patients who are critically ill should start as soon as possible to limit further sequelae. More research is needed for awake prone positioning, early breathing exercises as well as post-COVID rehabilitation. Impact To date there are few data on the physical therapist management of patients with COVID-19. This article is among the first to describe the role of physical therapists in the complex pandemic environment and to describe the potential treatment strategies for countering the various challenges in the treatment of these patients.


2020 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106222
Author(s):  
Joseph Dimech ◽  
Emmanuel Agius ◽  
Julian C Hughes ◽  
Paul Bartolo

BackgroundDecision-making in end-stage dementia (ESD) is a complex process involving medical, social, legal and ethical issues. In ESD, the person suffers from severe cognitive problems leading to a loss of capacity to decide matters regarding health and end-of-life issues. The decisional responsibility is usually passed to clinicians and relatives who can face significant difficulty in making moral decisions, particularly in the presence of life-threatening swallowing problems.AimThis study aimed to understand the decision-making processes of clinical teams and relatives in addressing life-threatening swallowing difficulties in ESD in long-term care in Malta.MethodThe study followed a qualitative approach where six case studies, involving six different teams and relatives of six different patients, were interviewed retrospectively to understand their decision-making in connection with the management of swallowing difficulties in ESD. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with each stakeholder. All data were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis.ResultsFour themes were identified: the vulnerability of patients in dementia decision-making; the difficult role of relatives in decision-making; the decisional conflict between aggressive care through tube feeding versus oral comfort feeding; a consensus-building decision-making process as ideal to facilitate agreement and respect for patient’s dignity.ConclusionDecision-making to manage swallowing difficulties in ESD is a challenging process, which involves an interpretation of personal values, beliefs, patient preferences, care needs and clinical practice. Better communication between clinicians and relatives in dementia helps promote agreement between stakeholders leading to a care plan that respects the dignity of patients at their end of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document