scholarly journals Drift Analysis and Evolutionary Algorithms Revisited

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. LENGLER ◽  
A. STEGER
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Random Search ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Simple Algorithm ◽  
Linear Functions ◽  
Search Point ◽  
Drift Analysis ◽  
Fixed Constant ◽  
Greedy Optimization

One of the easiest randomized greedy optimization algorithms is the following evolutionary algorithm which aims at maximizing a function f: {0,1}n → ℝ. The algorithm starts with a random search point ξ ∈ {0,1}n, and in each round it flips each bit of ξ with probability c/n independently at random, where c > 0 is a fixed constant. The thus created offspring ξ' replaces ξ if and only if f(ξ') ≥ f(ξ). The analysis of the runtime of this simple algorithm for monotone and for linear functions turned out to be highly non-trivial. In this paper we review known results and provide new and self-contained proofs of partly stronger results.

scholarly journals Multiplicative Up-Drift

Algorithmica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Doerr ◽  
Timo Kötzing
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Random Process ◽  
Linear Dependence ◽  
Random Processes ◽  
Hitting Time ◽  
Rigorous Analysis ◽  
Drift Analysis ◽  
Run Time ◽  
First Time

Abstract Drift analysis aims at translating the expected progress of an evolutionary algorithm (or more generally, a random process) into a probabilistic guarantee on its run time (hitting time). So far, drift arguments have been successfully employed in the rigorous analysis of evolutionary algorithms, however, only for the situation that the progress is constant or becomes weaker when approaching the target. Motivated by questions like how fast fit individuals take over a population, we analyze random processes exhibiting a $$(1+\delta )$$ ( 1 + δ ) -multiplicative growth in expectation. We prove a drift theorem translating this expected progress into a hitting time. This drift theorem gives a simple and insightful proof of the level-based theorem first proposed by Lehre (2011). Our version of this theorem has, for the first time, the best-possible near-linear dependence on $$1/\delta$$ 1 / δ (the previous results had an at least near-quadratic dependence), and it only requires a population size near-linear in $$\delta$$ δ (this was super-quadratic in previous results). These improvements immediately lead to stronger run time guarantees for a number of applications. We also discuss the case of large $$\delta$$ δ and show stronger results for this setting.

scholarly journals Optimization Algorithms for Detection of Social Interactions

Algorithms ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Cutello ◽  
Georgia Fargetta ◽  
Mario Pavone ◽  
Rocco A. Scollo
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Local Search ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Community Detection ◽  
Experimental Analysis ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Random Search ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
Greedy Optimization

Community detection is one of the most challenging and interesting problems in many research areas. Being able to detect highly linked communities in a network can lead to many benefits, such as understanding relationships between entities or interactions between biological genes, for instance. Two different immunological algorithms have been designed for this problem, called Opt-IA and Hybrid-IA, respectively. The main difference between the two algorithms is the search strategy and related immunological operators developed: the first carries out a random search together with purely stochastic operators; the last one is instead based on a deterministic Local Search that tries to refine and improve the current solutions discovered. The robustness of Opt-IA and Hybrid-IA has been assessed on several real social networks. These same networks have also been considered for comparing both algorithms with other seven different metaheuristics and the well-known greedy optimization Louvain algorithm. The experimental analysis conducted proves that Opt-IA and Hybrid-IA are reliable optimization methods for community detection, outperforming all compared algorithms.

scholarly journals GMBO: Group Mean-Based Optimizer for Solving Various Optimization Problems

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190
Author(s):  
Mohammad Dehghani ◽  
Zeinab Montazeri ◽  
Štěpán Hubálovský
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Random Search ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Grey Wolf Optimizer ◽  
Whale Optimization

There are many optimization problems in the different disciplines of science that must be solved using the appropriate method. Population-based optimization algorithms are one of the most efficient ways to solve various optimization problems. Population-based optimization algorithms are able to provide appropriate solutions to optimization problems based on a random search of the problem-solving space without the need for gradient and derivative information. In this paper, a new optimization algorithm called the Group Mean-Based Optimizer (GMBO) is presented; it can be applied to solve optimization problems in various fields of science. The main idea in designing the GMBO is to use more effectively the information of different members of the algorithm population based on two selected groups, with the titles of the good group and the bad group. Two new composite members are obtained by averaging each of these groups, which are used to update the population members. The various stages of the GMBO are described and mathematically modeled with the aim of being used to solve optimization problems. The performance of the GMBO in providing a suitable quasi-optimal solution on a set of 23 standard objective functions of different types of unimodal, high-dimensional multimodal, and fixed-dimensional multimodal is evaluated. In addition, the optimization results obtained from the proposed GMBO were compared with eight other widely used optimization algorithms, including the Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), the Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), the Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and the Genetic Algorithm (GA). The optimization results indicated the acceptable performance of the proposed GMBO, and, based on the analysis and comparison of the results, it was determined that the GMBO is superior and much more competitive than the other eight algorithms.

scholarly journals An automated system analysis and design tool for spacecrafts ceas space journal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Ehresmann ◽  
Georg Herdrich ◽  
Stefanos Fasoulas
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Propulsion System ◽  
Optimal System ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Processing Unit ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Analysis And Design

AbstractIn this paper, a generic full-system estimation software tool is introduced and applied to a data set of actual flight missions to derive a heuristic for system composition for mass and power ratios of considered sub-systems. The capability of evolutionary algorithms to analyse and effectively design spacecraft (sub-)systems is shown. After deriving top-level estimates for each spacecraft sub-system based on heuristic heritage data, a detailed component-based system analysis follows. Various degrees of freedom exist for a hardware-based sub-system design; these are to be resolved via an evolutionary algorithm to determine an optimal system configuration. A propulsion system implementation for a small satellite test case will serve as a reference example of the implemented algorithm application. The propulsion system includes thruster, power processing unit, tank, propellant and general power supply system masses and power consumptions. Relevant performance parameters such as desired thrust, effective exhaust velocity, utilised propellant, and the propulsion type are considered as degrees of freedom. An evolutionary algorithm is applied to the propulsion system scaling model to demonstrate that such evolutionary algorithms are capable of bypassing complex multidimensional design optimisation problems. An evolutionary algorithm is an algorithm that uses a heuristic to change input parameters and a defined selection criterion (e.g., mass fraction of the system) on an optimisation function to refine solutions successively. With sufficient generations and, thereby, iterations of design points, local optima are determined. Using mitigation methods and a sufficient number of seed points, a global optimal system configurations can be found.

Evolutionary Algorithms In Architecture

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Peter Schwehr
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Working Model ◽  
Constant Change ◽  
Buckminster Fuller ◽  
High Level

Change is a reliable constant. Constant change calls for strategies in managing everyday life and a high level of flexibility. Architecture must also rise to this challenge. The architect Richard Buckminster Fuller claimed that “A room should not be fixed, should not create a static mood, but should lend itself to change so that its occupants may play upon it as they would upon a piano (Krausse 2001).” This liberal interpretation in architecture defines the ability of a building to react to (ever-) changing requirements. The aim of the project is to investigate the flexibility of buildings using evolutionary algorithms characterized by Darwin. As a working model for development, the evolutionary algorithm consists of variation, selection and reproduction (VSR algorithm). The result of a VSR algorithm is adaptability (Buskes 2008). If this working model is applied to architecture, it is possible to examine as to what extent the adaptability of buildings – as an expression of a cultural achievement – is subject to evolutionary principles, and in which area the model seems unsuitable for the 'open buildings' criteria. (N. John Habraken). It illustrates the significance of variation, selection and replication in architecture and how evolutionary principles can be transferred to the issues of flexible buildings. What are the consequences for the building if it were to be designed and built with the help of evolutionary principles? How can we react to the growing demand for flexibilization of buildings by using evolutionary principles?

scholarly journals Heliostat Field Layout Optimization with Evolutionary Algorithms

10.29007/7p6t ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Richter ◽  
David Laukamp ◽  
Levin Gerdes ◽  
Martin Frank ◽  
Erika Ábrahám
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Convex Optimization ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Convergence Rate ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Energy Supply ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Convex Optimization Problem ◽  
New Genotype

The exploitation of solar power for energy supply is of increasing importance. While technical development mainly takes place in the engineering disciplines, computer science offers adequate techniques for optimization. This work addresses the problem of finding an optimal heliostat field arrangement for a solar tower power plant.We propose a solution to this global, non-convex optimization problem by using an evolutionary algorithm. We show that the convergence rate of a conventional evolutionary algorithm is too slow, such that modifications of the recombination and mutation need to be tailored to the problem. This is achieved with a new genotype representation of the individuals.Experimental results show the applicability of our approach.

scholarly journals Implementation of new hybrid evolutionary algorithm with fuzzy logic control approach for optimization problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4 (114)) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
Maan Afathi
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Fuzzy Logic Control ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Hybrid Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Function Optimization ◽  
Evolutionary Computations ◽  
Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Logic Control

The main purpose of using the hybrid evolutionary algorithm is to reach optimal values and achieve goals that traditional methods cannot reach and because there are different evolutionary computations, each of them has different advantages and capabilities. Therefore, researchers integrate more than one algorithm into a hybrid form to increase the ability of these algorithms to perform evolutionary computation when working alone. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) with fuzzy logic control (FLC) approach for function optimization. Fuzzy logic is applied to switch dynamically between evolutionary algorithms, in an attempt to improve the algorithm performance. The HEF hybrid evolutionary algorithms are compared to GA, PSO, GAPSO, and PSOGA. The comparison uses a variety of measurement functions. In addition to strongly convex functions, these functions can be uniformly distributed or not, and are valuable for evaluating our approach. Iterations of 500, 1000, and 1500 were used for each function. The HEF algorithm’s efficiency was tested on four functions. The new algorithm is often the best solution, HEF accounted for 75 % of all the tests. This method is superior to conventional methods in terms of efficiency

Genetic Diversity as an Objective in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Toffolo ◽  
Ernesto Benini
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Selection Pressure ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Diversity Evaluation

A key feature of an efficient and reliable multi-objective evolutionary algorithm is the ability to maintain genetic diversity within a population of solutions. In this paper, we present a new diversity-preserving mechanism, the Genetic Diversity Evaluation Method (GeDEM), which considers a distance-based measure of genetic diversity as a real objective in fitness assignment. This provides a dual selection pressure towards the exploitation of current non-dominated solutions and the exploration of the search space. We also introduce a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, the Genetic Diversity Evolutionary Algorithm (GDEA), strictly designed around GeDEM and then we compare it with other state-of-the-art algorithms on a well-established suite of test problems. Experimental results clearly indicate that the performance of GDEA is top-level.

Differential Evolution Dynamic Analysis in the Form of Complex Networks

2016 ◽  
pp. 285-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka Skanderova ◽  
Ivan Zelinka
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Differential Evolution ◽  
Complex Networks ◽  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Complex Network ◽  
Novel Method

In this work, we investigate the dynamics of Differential Evolution (DE) using complex networks. In this pursuit, we would like to clarify the term complex network and analyze its properties briefly. This chapter presents a novel method for analysis of the dynamics of evolutionary algorithms in the form of complex networks. We discuss the analogy between individuals in populations in an arbitrary evolutionary algorithm and vertices of a complex network as well as between edges in a complex network and communication between individuals in a population. We also discuss the dynamics of the analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document