Measuring Disease Modification in Alzheimer's Disease

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Cummings
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Immunoglobulin A ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Disease Modification ◽  
Amyloid Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Disease Modifying

AbstractWe appear to be on the brink of a new epoch of treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compelling evidence suggests that Aβ42 secretion is the triggering event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, and that tau aggregation may be an important secondary event linked to neurodegeneration. Prophylactic administration of anti-amyloid agents designed to prevent Aβ accumulation in persons with subclinical disease is likely to be more effective than therapeutic interventions in established Alzheimer's disease. Drug development programs in Alzheimer's disease focus primarily on agents with anti-amyloid disease-modifying properties, and many different pharmacologic approaches to reducing amyloid pathology and tauopathy are being studied. Classes of therapeutic modalities currently in advanced-stage clinical trial testing include forms of immunotherapy (active β -amyloid immunoconjugate and human intravenous immunoglobulin), a γ-secretase inhibitor, the selective Aβ42-lowering agent R-flurbiprofen, and the anti-aggregation agent tramiprosate. Non-traditional dementia therapies such as the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), valproate, and lithium are now being assessed for clinical benefit as anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments. Positive findings of efficacy and safety from clinical studies are necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate that a drug has disease-modifying properties. Definitive proof of disease-modification requires evidence from validated animal models of Alzheimer's disease; rigorously controlled clinical trials showing a significantly improved, stabilized, or slowed rate of decline in cognitive and global function compared to placebo; and prospectively obtained evidence from surrogate biomarkers that the treatment resulted in measurable biological changes associated with the underlying disease process.

Introduction: Amyloid-Based Interventions in Alzheimer's Disease

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 2-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Immunoglobulin A ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Amyloid Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Modifying

AbstractWe appear to be on the brink of a new epoch of treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compelling evidence suggests that Aβ secretion is the triggering event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, and that tau aggregation may be an important secondary event linked to neurodegeneration. Prophylactic administration of anti-amyloid agents designed to prevent Aβ accumulation in persons with subclinical disease is likely to be more effective than therapeutic interventions in established Alzheimer's disease. Drug development programs in Alzheimer's disease focus primarily on agents with anti-amyloid disease-modifying properties, and many different pharmacologic approaches to reducing amyloid pathology and tauopathy are being studied. Classes of therapeutic modalities currently in advanced-stage clinical trial testing include forms of immunotherapy (active β-amyloid immunoconjugate and human intravenous immunoglobulin), a γ-secretase inhibitor, the selective Aβ42-lowering agent R-flurbiprofen, and the anti-aggregation agent tramiprosate. Non-traditional dementia therapies such as the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), valproate, and lithium are now being assessed for clinical benefit as anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments. Positive findings of efficacy and safety from clinical studies are necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate that a drug has disease-modifying properties. Definitive proof of disease-modification requires evidence from validated animal models of Alzheimer's disease; rigorously controlled clinical trials showing a significantly improved, stabilized, or slowed rate of decline in cognitive and global function compared to placebo; and prospectively obtained evidence from surrogate biomarkers that the treatment resulted in measurable biological changes associated with the underlying disease process.

The Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease and the Role of Aβ42

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd E. Golde
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Immunoglobulin A ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Amyloid Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Modifying

AbstractWe appear to be on the brink of a new epoch of treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compelling evidence suggests that Aβ42 secretion is the triggering event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, and that tau aggregation may be an important secondary event linked to neurodegeneration. Prophylactic administration of anti-amyloid agents designed to prevent Aβ accumulation in persons with subclinical disease is likely to be more effective than therapeutic interventions in established Alzheimer's disease. Drug development programs in Alzheimer's disease focus primarily on agents with anti-amyloid disease-modifying properties, and many different pharmacologic approaches to reducing amyloid pathology and tauopathy are being studied. Classes of therapeutic modalities currently in advanced-stage clinical trial testing include forms of immunotherapy (active β-amyloid immunoconjugate and human intravenous immunoglobulin), a γ-secretase inhibitor, the selective Aβ42-lowering agent R-flurbiprofen, and the anti-aggregation agent tramiprosate. Non-traditional dementia therapies such as the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), valproate, and lithium are now being assessed for clinical benefit as anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments. Positive findings of efficacy and safety from clinical studies are necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate that a drug has disease-modifying properties. Definitive proof of disease-modification requires evidence from validated animal models of Alzheimer's disease; rigorously controlled clinical trials showing a significantly improved, stabilized, or slowed rate of decline in cognitive and global function compared to placebo; and prospectively obtained evidence from surrogate biomarkers that the treatment resulted in measurable biological changes associated with the underlying disease process.

Clinical Trials of Amyloid-Based Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre N. Tariot
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immunoglobulin A ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Amyloid Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Disease Modifying

AbstractWe appear to be on the brink of a new epoch of treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compelling evidence suggests that Aβ42 secretion is the triggering event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, and that tau aggregation may be an important secondary event linked to neurodegeneration. Prophylactic administration of anti-amyloid agents designed to prevent Aβ accumulation in persons with subclinical disease is likely to be more effective than therapeutic interventions in established Alzheimer's disease. Drug development programs in Alzheimer's disease focus primarily on agents with anti-amyloid disease-modifying properties, and many different pharmacologic approaches to reducing amyloid pathology and tauopathy are being studied. Classes of therapeutic modalities currently in advanced-stage clinical trial testing include forms of immunotherapy (activeβ-amyloid immunoconjugate and human intravenous immunoglobulin), a γ-secretase inhibitor, the selective Aβ42-lowering agent R-flurbiprofen, and the anti-aggregation agent tramiprosate. Non-traditional dementia therapies such as the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), valproate, and lithium are now being assessed for clinical benefit as anti-amyloid disease-modifying treatments. Positive findings of efficacy and safety from clinical studies are necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate that a drug has disease-modifying properties. Definitive proof of disease-modification requires evidence from validated animal models of Alzheimer's disease; rigorously controlled clinical trials showing a significantly improved, stabilized, or slowed rate of decline in cognitive and global function compared to placebo; and prospectively obtained evidence from surrogate biomarkers that the treatment resulted in measurable biological changes associated with the underlying disease process.

Taking the Next Steps in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Disease-Modifying Agents

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (S3) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Stephen Salloway
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
The United States ◽  
Disease Modification ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Disease Modifying Agents ◽  
Disease Modifying Treatment

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder in the United States and the number of AD patients is increasing at an alarming rate. There is no cure for AD and the currently available treatments are symptomatic, providing only limited effects on disease pathophysiology and progression. An overwhelming need exists for therapies that can slow or halt this debilitating disease process. Disease modification in AD has been defined from patient-focused, regulatory, and neurobiological perspectives. The latter two of these perspectives rely largely on an interruption of the disease process and a clear demonstration of this interruption. As defined by Cummings, a disease-modifying treatment is a “pharmacologic treatment that retards the underlying process of AD by intervening in the neurobiological processes that constitute the pathology and pathophysiology of the disease and lead to cell death or dysfunction.” By this definition, the burden of confirmatory study is placed on any new treatment for which the claim of “disease modification” is to be made (Slide 1).

scholarly journals Tau and TDP-43 synergy: a novel therapeutic target for sporadic late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

GeroScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin S. Latimer ◽  
Nicole F. Liachko
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Hippocampal Sclerosis ◽  
Model Organism ◽  
Amyloid Β ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Disease Biology ◽  
Rapid Cognitive Decline

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is traditionally defined by the presence of two types of protein aggregates in the brain: amyloid plaques comprised of the protein amyloid-β (Aβ) and neurofibrillary tangles containing the protein tau. However, a large proportion (up to 57%) of AD patients also have TDP-43 aggregates present as an additional comorbid pathology. The presence of TDP-43 aggregates in AD correlates with hippocampal sclerosis, worse brain atrophy, more severe cognitive impairment, and more rapid cognitive decline. In patients with mixed Aβ, tau, and TDP-43 pathology, TDP-43 may interact with neurodegenerative processes in AD, worsening outcomes. While considerable progress has been made to characterize TDP-43 pathology in AD and late-onset dementia, there remains a critical need for mechanistic studies to understand underlying disease biology and develop therapeutic interventions. This perspectives article reviews the current understanding of these processes from autopsy cohort studies and model organism-based research, and proposes targeting neurotoxic synergies between tau and TDP-43 as a new therapeutic strategy for AD with comorbid TDP-43 pathology.

scholarly journals BIOMARKER AND CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN SUPPORT FOR DISEASE-MODIFYING THERAPIES: REPORT OF A SURVEY OF THE EU/US: ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE TASK FORCE

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
J. Cummings ◽  
N. Fox ◽  
B. Vellas ◽  
P. Aisen ◽  
G. Shan
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Trial Design ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Clinical Trial Design ◽  
Disease Modification ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
The Eu

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying therapies are urgently needed for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The European Union/United States (EU/US) Task Force represents a broad range of stakeholders including biopharma industry personnel, academicians, and regulatory authorities. OBJECTIVES: The EU/US Task Force represents a community of knowledgeable individuals who can inform views of evidence supporting disease modification and the development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We queried their attitudes toward clinical trial design and biomarkers in support of DMTs. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIANTS: A survey of members of the EU/US Alzheimer’s Disease Task Force was conducted. Ninety-three members (87%) responded. The details were analyzed to understand what clinical trial design and biomarker data support disease modification. MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Task Force members favored the parallel group design compared to delayed start or staggered withdrawal clinical trial designs to support disease modification. Amyloid biomarkers were regarded as providing mild support for disease modification while tau biomarkers were regarded as providing moderate support. Combinations of biomarkers, particularly combinations of tau and neurodegeneration, were regarded as providing moderate to marked support for disease modification and combinations of all three classes of biomarkers were regarded by a majority as providing marked support for disease modification. Task Force members considered that evidence derived from clinical trials and biomarkers supports clinical meaningfulness of an intervention, and when combined with a single clinical trial outcome, nearly all regarded the clinical trial design or biomarker evidence as supportive of disease modification. A minority considered biomarker evidence by itself as indicative of disease modification in prevention trials. Levels of evidence (A,B,C) were constructed based on these observations. CONCLUSION: The survey indicates the view of knowledgeable stakeholders regarding evidence derived from clinical trial design and biomarkers in support of disease modification. Results of this survey can assist in designing clinical trials of DMTs.

Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Chinthapalli
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Global Function ◽  
Glutamate Antagonist ◽  
The Brain

Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease is an important part of management of the condition. There are only four drugs available for treatment of the disease and none halt the disease process, however they have a benefit on cognition, behaviour, activities of daily living, and global function. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are thought to work by enhancing cholinergic transmission in the brain and are particularly effective in mild and moderate AD, with recent evidence suggesting donepezil is also effective in severe AD. Memantine is the only glutamate antagonist that is available for AD and is limited for use in moderate or severe AD. The choice of drug depends on route of administration, adverse effects, and medical comorbidities. There is intense research on alternative treatments especially those that may stop the underlying disease process.

A Clinical Overview of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (S1) ◽  
pp. 93-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Farlow
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Lewy Body Dementia ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Behavioral Disturbances ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Che Inhibitors

This review provides an overview of the three most widely used cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors: donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine. Differences in pharmacologic profiles will be discussed, and consideration will be given to how such differences may relate to and influence the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the various agents. In addition to providing cognitive benefits in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), growing clinical evidence also suggests that ChE inhibitors can produce favorable and clinically relevant effects on neuropsychiatric/behavioral disturbances and activities of daily living. Furthermore, recent data indicate that these agents may be effective at all levels of disease severity and for all rates of disease progression. The clinical utility of ChE inhibitors in a wider spectrum of dementias which share a common cholinergic deficit, such as Lewy body dementia, Parkinson's disease dementia, and vascular dementia, is currently under investigation. Beyond symptomatic relief, data suggest that ChE inhibitors may also slow the underlying disease process. As clinical and research experience with these agents continues to accumulate, the differences in their effects will become more apparent and will help physicians tailor ChE inhibition treatment to the needs of the individual patient.

Current insights into the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease: selecting targets for early therapeutic intervention

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. S10-S17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Hampel
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Drug Candidates ◽  
Surrogate Outcome ◽  
Models Of Disease

ABSTRACTThe development of therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents numerous challenges for physicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry, with many drug candidates showing promise at one stage of clinical research only to fall at the next hurdle. A great number of drugs with a variety of targets and clusters of mechanisms are currently in various stages of basic and clinical investigation. However, these hypothesis-derived agents may be tested much too late in the chronically progressive disease process to demonstrate meaningful effects or outcomes, mirroring the clinical syndromal scenario in which the underlying pathophysiological disease condition is frequently diagnosed extremely late. Moreover, the complexity of the disease calls for developments and improvements in study designs and methods modeled for different target populations and disease stages (e.g. asymptomatic to prodromal to syndromal). New integrated concepts and models of disease pathophysiology, use of validated and qualified biomarkers, outcomes and endpoints, particularly the development of a surrogate outcome, may allow targeting of characteristic mechanism-derived therapies of specifically affected biological systems at different time-points in the disease process, providing increasing opportunities for early and preventative intervention. A core set of feasible diagnostic and predictive biomarkers is already validated and in the process of standardization; however, continued and intensified research efforts will likely reveal a variety of novel biomarkers that grasp the complexity of the underlying disease process. In the future, trials of drugs to modify and prevent AD may embrace enrichment strategies and maybe be stratified by disease stage, genetic factors as well as by disease endophenotypes.

Alzheimer's Disease: Progress in the Development of Anti-amyloid Disease-Modifying Therapies

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Christensen
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Amyloid Β ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Amyloid Disease ◽  
Aβ Aggregation ◽  
Disease Modifying

ABSTRACTThe amyloid hypothesis—the leading mechanistic theory of Alzheimer's disease—states that an imbalance in production or clearance of amyloid β (Aβ) results in accumulation of Aβ and triggers a cascade of events leading to neurodegeneration and dementia. The number of persons with Alzheimer's disease is expected to triple by mid-century. If steps are not taken to delay the onset or slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease, the economic and personal tolls will be immense. Different classes of potentially disease-modifying treatments that interrupt early pathological events (ie, decreasing production or aggregation of Aβ or increasing its clearance) and potentially prevent downstream events are in phase II or III clinical studies. These include immunotherapies; secretase inhibitors; selective Aβ42-lowering agents; statins; anti-Aβ aggregation agents; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists; and others. Safety and serious adverse events have been a concern with immunotherapy and γ-secretase inhibitors, though both continue in clinical trials. Anti-amyloid disease-modifying drugs that seem promising and have reached phase III clinical trials include those that selectively target Aβ42 production (eg, tarenflurbil), enhance the activity of α-secretase (eg, statins), and block Aβ aggregation (eg, transiposate).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document