Design of an Objective Lens with Minimum Chromatic Aberration Coefficient

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1083-1084
Author(s):  
K. Tsuno ◽  
D. A. Jefferson

The Schelzer resolution is defined as the highest spatial frequency which is transferred into the image with the same phase as all lower frequencies. The resolution of the information limit is, however, determined by the information from the specimen which is equal to the degree of noise. The Schelzer resolution is determined by the wave length and the spherical aberration coefficient Cs of the objective lens. It reached 0.1 nm at 1250 kV. The limit of the resolution has been calculated numerically and it is written as d = 4.65(BsVr)−1/4 (nm), where Bs (in T) is the saturation magnetic flux density of the pole-piece material and Vr the relativistically corrected accelerating voltage. The resolution of the information limit is determined by the axial chromatic aberration coefficient Cc and incoherent effects such as the finite size of the source, beam divergence, energy spread, instabilities of the high voltage and lens current. The limit of the resolution is not clear. Most of the objective lenses of commercial microscopes are designed to optimize Cs rather than Cc. In this investigation, however, we describe the limit of Cc for 200 kV microscopes.

Author(s):  
T. Miyokawa ◽  
H. Kazumori ◽  
S. Nakagawa ◽  
C. Nielsen

We have developed a strongly excited objective lens with a built-in secondary electron detector to provide ultra-high resolution images with high quality at low to medium accelerating voltages. The JSM-6320F is a scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) equipped with this lens and an incident beam divergence angle control lens (ACL).The objective lens is so strongly excited as to have peak axial Magnetic flux density near the specimen surface (Fig. 1). Since the speciien is located below the objective lens, a large speciien can be accomodated. The working distance (WD) with respect to the accelerating voltage is limited due to the magnetic saturation of the lens (Fig.2). The aberrations of this lens are much smaller than those of a conventional one. The spherical aberration coefficient (Cs) is approximately 1/20 and the chromatic aberration coefficient (Cc) is 1/10. for accelerating voltages below 5kV. At the medium range of accelerating voltages (5∼15kV). Cs is 1/10 and Cc is 1/7. Typical values are Cs-1.lmm. Cc=l. 5mm at WD=2mm. and Cs=3.lmm. Cc=2.9 mm at WD=5mm. This makes the lens ideal for taking ultra-high resolution images at low to medium accelerating voltages.


Author(s):  
J. S. Lally ◽  
R. Evans

One of the instrumental factors often limiting the resolution of the electron microscope is image defocussing due to changes in accelerating voltage or objective lens current. This factor is particularly important in high voltage electron microscopes both because of the higher voltages and lens currents required but also because of the inherently longer focal lengths, i.e. 6 mm in contrast to 1.5-2.2 mm for modern short focal length objectives.The usual practice in commercial electron microscopes is to design separately stabilized accelerating voltage and lens supplies. In this case chromatic aberration in the image is caused by the random and independent fluctuations of both the high voltage and objective lens current.


Author(s):  
David A. Ansley

The coherence of the electron flux of a transmission electron microscope (TEM) limits the direct application of deconvolution techniques which have been used successfully on unmanned spacecraft programs. The theory assumes noncoherent illumination. Deconvolution of a TEM micrograph will, therefore, in general produce spurious detail rather than improved resolution.A primary goal of our research is to study the performance of several types of linear spatial filters as a function of specimen contrast, phase, and coherence. We have, therefore, developed a one-dimensional analysis and plotting program to simulate a wide 'range of operating conditions of the TEM, including adjustment of the:(1) Specimen amplitude, phase, and separation(2) Illumination wavelength, half-angle, and tilt(3) Objective lens focal length and aperture width(4) Spherical aberration, defocus, and chromatic aberration focus shift(5) Detector gamma, additive, and multiplicative noise constants(6) Type of spatial filter: linear cosine, linear sine, or deterministic


Author(s):  
Hannes Lichte

Generally, the electron object wave o(r) is modulated both in amplitude and phase. In the image plane of an ideal imaging system we would expect to find an image wave b(r) that is modulated in exactly the same way, i. e. b(r) =o(r). If, however, there are aberrations, the image wave instead reads as b(r) =o(r) * FT(WTF) i. e. the convolution of the object wave with the Fourier transform of the wave transfer function WTF . Taking into account chromatic aberration, illumination divergence and the wave aberration of the objective lens, one finds WTF(R) = Echrom(R)Ediv(R).exp(iX(R)) . The envelope functions Echrom(R) and Ediv(R) damp the image wave, whereas the effect of the wave aberration X(R) is to disorder amplitude and phase according to real and imaginary part of exp(iX(R)) , as is schematically sketched in fig. 1.Since in ordinary electron microscopy only the amplitude of the image wave can be recorded by the intensity of the image, the wave aberration has to be chosen such that the object component of interest (phase or amplitude) is directed into the image amplitude. Using an aberration free objective lens, for X=0 one sees the object amplitude, for X= π/2 (“Zernike phase contrast”) the object phase. For a real objective lens, however, the wave aberration is given by X(R) = 2π (.25 Csλ3R4 + 0.5ΔzλR2), Cs meaning the coefficient of spherical aberration and Δz defocusing. Consequently, the transfer functions sin X(R) and cos(X(R)) strongly depend on R such that amplitude and phase of the image wave represent only fragments of the object which, fortunately, supplement each other. However, recording only the amplitude gives rise to the fundamental problems, restricting resolution and interpretability of ordinary electron images:


Author(s):  
M. Haider ◽  
P. Hartel ◽  
H. Müller ◽  
S. Uhlemann ◽  
J. Zach

The achievable resolution of a modern transmission electron microscope (TEM) is mainly limited by the inherent aberrations of the objective lens. Hence, one major goal over the past decade has been the development of aberration correctors to compensate the spherical aberration. Such a correction system is now available and it is possible to improve the resolution with this corrector. When high resolution in a TEM is required, one important parameter, the field of view, also has to be considered. In addition, especially for the large cameras now available, the compensation of off-axial aberrations is also an important task. A correction system to compensate the spherical aberration and the off-axial coma is under development. The next step to follow towards ultra-high resolution will be a correction system to compensate the chromatic aberration. With such a correction system, a new area will be opened for applications for which the chromatic aberration defines the achievable resolution, even if the spherical aberration is corrected. This is the case, for example, for low-voltage electron microscopy (EM) for the investigation of beam-sensitive materials, for dynamic EM or for in-situ EM.


Author(s):  
M. G. R. Thomson

One of the problems associated with building any aberration-corrected electron microscope objective lens lies in the difficulty of obtaining a sufficiently short focal length. A number of systems have focal lengths in the 1cm. range, and these are more suitable for microprobe work. If the focal length can be made short enough, the chromatic aberration probably does not need to be corrected, and the design is much simplified. A corrector device which can be used with a conventional magnetic objective lens of short focal length (Fig. 1) must either have dimensions comparable to the bore and gap of that lens, or have very large magnetic or electric field gradients. A successful approach theoretically has been to use quadrupoleoctopole corrector units, although these suffer from very large fifth order aberrations and a limited field of view.


Author(s):  
Tsutomu Komoda

Electron microscope images of crystal lattices have been observed by many authors since the first achievement by Menter in 1956. During these years, the optimum operating conditions with electron microscopes have been investigated for the high resolution lattice imaging. Finally minute lattice spacings around 1 Å have been resolved by several authors by using contemporary instruments. The major lattice planes with low index in crystals are almost within a range of spacing capable to be resolved by electron microscopy (1-3 Å). Therefore, the observing techniques are now essential for practical studies in the area of crystallography as well as metal physics.Although the point to point resolution of the electron microscope is restricted due to the spherical aberration of the objective lens in addition to the diffraction, the lattice resolution is mainly limited due to the chromatic aberration under the normal illumination.


Author(s):  
S. Suzuki ◽  
K. Akashi ◽  
H. Tochigi

Recently the image quality of the electron microscope has been highly improved, because of technical advances made for the exclusion of mechanical and electrical instabilities in the instrument itself. To further improve the resolution, it is important to minimize the chromatic aberration, as well as the spherical aberration. This is true, even though the accelerating voltage has excellent stability; because of the unavoidable velocity fluctuations of electrons, resulting from thermal emission from the cathode, and the energy-loss in the specimen.Therefore, the specimen should be immersed deeply into the lens field, to make these aberrations small. The result will be very high lens excitation. In 1962, Professor E. Ruska and Dr. W. Riecke had investigated the single field condenser-objective lens at the center of which the specimen is placed. Prior to that, in 1960, Dr. S. Suzuki, one of the authors, had pointed out that this new objective lens, in which the specimen is placed at the image side from the center of the lens field,(of the condenser-objective lens: but no special illuminating system is necessary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document