The Relationship between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings in China

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki Waye ◽  
Ping Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Political Elite ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court System ◽  
Legal Process ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractAfter a period of decline, judicial mediation has been recently revived in China. The revival has occurred as a result of a combination of political and juridical forces. China's courts have been struggling to meet demand for access to justice and the revival of judicial mediation is part of a broader policy to promote mediation as a mainstream dispute resolution mechanism. At the same time, the revival of judicial mediation also reflects the disaffection of China's political elite with an emphasis upon adversarial, western style legal process. China's establishment appears to be seeking a more responsive multi-door style of court system. This article traces recent developments in China which track the rise, fall and rise of judicial mediation.

scholarly journals Online Courts: Bridging the Gap Between Access and Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Oltra Gras
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Digital Technology ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
Intrinsic Efficiency ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Opening Up

This article analyses the introduction of online court proceedings through the prism of access to justice. It distinguishes between the two major recent developments in terms of justice and court accessibility – ie the institutionalisation of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and the expansion of online dispute resolution within public courts. Whilst both movements appear to be driven by similar theoretical forces, the practical adoption of fully online judicial proceedings constitutes a step towards a different direction, opening up new opportunities for attenuating the apparently intrinsic efficiency-fairness trade-off. Due to the unique features of digital technology, the emergence of state-provided online courts and tribunals for the resolution of minor civil disputes could significantly improve the efficiency of formal adversarial litigation processes, without the risk of sacrificing proper procedural protections. Overall, this article advocates that the balanced combination offered by online court systems, albeit not a panacea, may be translated into a potential enhancement of both ‘access’ and ‘justice’.

The Past, Present, and Future of Online Dispute Resolution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orna Rabinovich-Einy
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court System ◽  
Current Application ◽  
Online Systems ◽  
Form And Function ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
And Function ◽  
Ongoing Evaluation ◽  
Careful Design

Abstract This article chronicles the evolution of the field of online dispute resolution from its inception in the mid-1990s to its current application in and outside the court system. While originally ODR played a modest role in the limited domain of e-commerce, over the years its application has expanded significantly, as have its form and function: from processes that have sought to replicate online equivalents to ones that reimagine the design of procedures to better fit party needs and to address the justice system’s longstanding problems. The article predicts that the future of ODR lies in increased automation, which includes artificial intelligence and various forms of structured negotiation, and, consequently, a reduced role for human third parties. This will require a rethinking of the ways in which access to justice, procedural justice and substantive justice can be realized. The key for realizing the values and goals of the justice system lies in the careful design and ongoing evaluation of online systems, activities that have themselves been transformed by technology and the availability of big data.

Integrated Justice in Pakistan: From Legal Pluralism to Normative Convergence

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 805-820
Author(s):  
Tahir Mahmood ◽  
Sajjad Ali Khan ◽  
Shahab Sarwar
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
Court System ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
Legal Legitimacy ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Alternate Dispute Resolution ◽  
Parting Ways

Legal pluralism, throughout most of developing countries, has been extant since the onset of colonial era. Manifested in a variety of forms, legal pluralism is inherently characterized by both promises as well as limitations. In Pakistan, legal pluralism is epitomized by the prevalence and functioning of parallel systems of justice such as formal courts and Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADRM), such as “Jirga. Poor coordination and tenuous enforcement mechanisms, however, render the formal justice system in Pakistan one of poorest performers in terms of judicial efficacy world-wide. This article seeks to explore the possibility of a convergence between traditional and modern models of dispute resolution, i.e. Jirga and court system and the resultant efficacy thereof through devising a conceptual framework. The framework reveals that both formal courts and Jirga demonstrate marked discrepancies concerning their efficacy with respect to the provision of justice and dispute resolution. Findings from the field, however, evince that Jirga stand out to be a relatively more effective mechanism of dispute resolution than formal courts. The conceptual framework, however, implies that by converging both systems it is possible to cope with the limitations of each of the two systems such that while courts could provide legal legitimacy to the Jirga by improving its decency and accountability through regulations, Jirga could enhance the legitimacy of courts by improving its accessibility and transparency through feedback mechanisms. The article concludes by way of arguing that instead of parting ways with each other, both courts and jirga shall seek to go hand in hand in order avoid delays in the  provision of justice.

scholarly journals Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Colombia and Russia: Conciliation and Mediation

Justicia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (40) ◽  
pp. 128-142
Author(s):  
Milton Arrieta López ◽  
Abel Meza Godoy ◽  
Ilya Vladimirovich Afanasiev ◽  
Vladimir Dmitriyevich Sekerin ◽  
Sara Noli
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Russian Constitution ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

In this article, the authors compare alternative conflict resolution mechanisms in Colombia and Russia. In the former, conciliation is the most developed alternative dispute resolution mechanism, while in the latter, mediation is the most developed. In order to deepen this comparison, a qualitative research of interpretative nature has been developed with the support of bibliographic-documentary material. The main conclusion is that access to justice is a human right that has been positivized as a fundamental right in the constitutions of both Colombia and Russia. However, the Colombian Constitution allows individuals to exercise their jurisdictional functions on a temporary basis, unlike the Russian Constitution, which only authorizes judges from the Federation to exercise their jurisdictional functions. While conciliation in Colombia is developed and implemented through State-supervised Conciliation and Arbitration Centers, mediation in Russia is in its initial phase and has gradually gained acceptance in society. In both states, the implementation of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms has been driven by the need to decongest the courts and tribunals of ordinary justice. Therefore, it is useful to insist on the massive use of these instruments to make possible a justice that comes from the parties in conflict, that can repair the relations of the subjects in dispute and that tends towards the construction of more peaceful societies.

scholarly journals Online courts and Online Dispute Resolution in terms of the international standard of access to justice: international experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-79
Author(s):  
Тетяна Андріївна Цувіна
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
International Standard ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Third ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Recent Developments

The article is devoted to the analysis of the problem issues of the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) through the prism of international standard of access to justice in civil matters. The first part of the article refers to terminological inconsistency, which is connected with using of three synonyms refering to IT-technologies in the area of civil justice, in particular cyberjustice, digital justice and e-justice. The author proposes to use term “e-justice”, which involves e-filing, electronic systems of assignment of cases, e-case-management, eDiscovery, ODR, electronic systems of court practice, using of Artificial Intelligence in civil proceedings. In the second part of the article the narrow and wide approach to the ODR are described. According to narrow approach ODR is described as online ADR. Wide approach to ODR includes online ADR as well as online courts. Today wide approach is more valid taking into account recent developments in the field of online courts in foreign countries. The third part of the article describes different types of online courts, in particular, online Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia, Canada), Online Solutions Court (Great Britain) etc. The author analyzes current innovations in the structure of online courts, connected with integration of information systems and online ADR into the online courts platforms. Special attention is paid to the use of Artificial Legal Intelligence in courts with references to advantages and challenges of such innovations.

scholarly journals Online reconciliation as a means of improving the access to justice

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-45
Author(s):  
Elena Vladimirovna Burdina ◽  
Oleg Aleksandrovich Kapustin
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Integrated Model ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Digital Services ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
Current Context ◽  
The Subject

The subject of this research is the problem of improving the effectiveness of conciliation procedures, their relevance to the citizens, and increasing the role and importance of the forms of pacific settlement of the dispute within the Russian system of justice in the conditions of digitalization of judicial activity. The goal of this article is to prove online reconciliation as a method for improving access to justice, as well as substantiate the integrated model of reconciliation in judicial activity using digital services and platforms. Leaning on the works of the Russian and foreign researchers (V. M. Zhuykov, S. K. Zagaynova, V. V. Yarkov, and others), the conclusion is made that the institution of reconciliation, including mediation, is historically built around the judicial system. Hindsight analysis of the judicial and non-judicial forms of dispute settlement indicates their coherent development. The implementation of the digital platform “Justice Online” in judicial activity allows improving citizens’ access to dispute resolution in or without judicial proceedings using pacific means. In the current context, reconciliation is viewed within the structure of judicial activity and consists in implementation of reconciliation procedures, including online reconciliation, in the courthouse or with the involvement of court, or via digital judicial platforms. The application of comparative legal analysis substantiates the integrated mod el of reconciliation, which has the following characteristics: access to mediation services in the courthouse; granting authorities to the court staff for elucidation of the possible methods of dispute settlement; accretion of power of reconciliation judges; integration of technological services of online reconciliation with the digital judicial platform; merger between the website of the court and the websites of mediation organizations.

scholarly journals Harmonization of Arbitration Laws in some Asian and European Countries

Pro Futuro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gauri Nirwal
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
European Countries ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
The Public ◽  
The World ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
The Relationship

The present paper studies the relationship between domestic and international arbitration laws and the harmonization factor amongst some Asian and European jurisdictions. During the last decades, there has been a significant change and globalization in the world and with the expansion of businesses and trade a better dispute resolution mechanism is required in order to maintain the harmony in international trade. It has become a necessity to balance the domestic arbitration laws with the international ones. This brief paper identifies and comments on some of the areas where differences remain including differences in recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in various jurisdictions over the public policy defence, and where further examination and research to reach and solve disputes amicably might be useful.

scholarly journals Changing perspectives in Legal Education: competence-based learning and the possibilities to improve access to justice via mediation skills

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Loussia P. Musse Felix ◽  
André Gomma de Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Major Change ◽  
Formal Training ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court System ◽  
New Professionals ◽  
Law Schools ◽  
The University ◽  
Improve Access

As one of the major Brazilian Law Schools, the University of Brasilia School of Law is at the forefront of a competence-based dispute resolution programme to be used in legal education and within the Brazilian Court system. Changes in Legal Education around the world obviate the need to integrate theoretical and practical perspectives at all levels in the formal training of new professionals in the field of Law. The University of Brasilia School of Law has participated in Tuning Latin America since 2006 and has recently adopted a Curriculum that embraces competence-based learning as part of a major change geared to bringing social, cultural and political effectiveness into the teaching of Law. This paper outlines the challenges facing the adoption of collaborative approaches to dispute resolution in the legal arena and the meta-competences and competences it entails.

scholarly journals In Chancery: The Genesis of Micro Caseflow Management

Amicus Curiae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-200
Author(s):  
Michael Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Court System ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Informal Justice ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Justice System ◽  
The Relationship

This article explores an early example of subordinate judicial practice in England and Wales in which we may see some issues that later appear in the relationship between informal justice initiatives (especially alternative dispute resolution) and the civil justice system. Broadly speaking, the paper looks first at the symptoms of systemic failure in the pre-1873 system which led to the creation of the Official Referee’s office. It then considers the relevant recommendations of the Judicature Commissioners and the reasoning behind such recommendation, looking at both the macro- and the micro-levels, before exploring the referees’ diverse jurisdiction which provided a creative foundation for the evolution of interlocutory innovation. The article argues that structural realignment of the court system by the Judicature Commissioners was not sufficient in itself to eradicate all its encumbrances, but it indirectly empowered the referees to eventually bring about revolutionary procedural changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document