Palliative treatment of brain metastases with gamma knife

2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Siegfried ◽  
G. Wellis ◽  
S. Scheib ◽  
D. Haller ◽  
A. M. Landolt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychische Belastung ◽  
Performance Rating ◽  
Wird Eine

Das Gamma Knife ist ein stereotaktisch-radiochirurgisches Gerät, das erlaubt, radiologisch scharf begrenzte Hirntumore (oder arteriovenöse Missbildungen) mit einem Durchmesser von maximal 3,5 cm und einem Volumen von höchstens 25 cm3 zu behandeln. Diese Methode ist eine echte Alternative zur klassischen Behandlung von Hirnmetastasen mit operativer Entfernung und/oder Ganzhirnbestrahlung. Die Vorteile dieser Technik sind klar: die Methode ist nicht invasiv, die Behandlung benötigt nur eine Sitzung mit einer kurzen Hospitalisation von höchstens zwei bis drei Tagen, die physische und psychische Belastung ist gering, der Kopf wird weder rasiert noch verliert der Patient durch die Behandlung seine Haare; für eine befriedigende Überlebenszeit wird eine gute Lebensqualität erreicht und im Kostenvergleich mit alternativen Methoden (Operation und/oder anschließender Ganzhirnbestrahlung) wirtschaftlich günstiger. Von September 1994 bis Dezember 2000 wurden am Gamma Knife Zentrum in Zürich 140 an Hirnmetastasen leidende Patienten mit dieser Methode behandelt. Mit einer Überlebenszeit von durchschnittlich 263 Tagen und einem Maximum von drei Jahren entsprechen unsere Resultate denjenigen der Literatur mit weltweit über 30000 behandelten Patienten. Günstige Prognosen sind ein Karnofsky Performance Rating Scale Score zwischen 70 und 100, kleine Volumina der Metastasen, kontrollierter Primärtumor und fehlende oder stabile extrakranielle Metastasen.

Radiosurgery alone for 5 or more brain metastases: expert opinion survey

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. S. Knisely ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Cary P. Gross ◽  
William A. Castrucci ◽  
Hidefumi Jokura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale Score ◽  
Performance Scale

Object Oligometastatic brain metastases may be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone, but no consensus exists as to when SRS alone would be appropriate. A survey was conducted at 2 radiosurgery meetings to determine which factors SRS practitioners emphasize in recommending SRS alone, and what physician characteristics are associated with recommending SRS alone for ≥ 5 metastases. Methods All physicians attending the 8th Biennial Congress and Exhibition of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society in June 2007 and the 18th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in July 2009 were asked to complete a questionnaire ranking 14 clinical factors on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1 = not important to 5 = very important) to determine how much each factor might influence a decision to recommend SRS alone for brain metastases. Results were condensed into a single dichotomous outcome variable of “influential” (4–5) versus “not influential” (1–3). Respondents were also asked to complete the statement: “In general, a reasonable number of brain metastases treatable by SRS alone would be, at most, ___.” The characteristics of physicians willing to recommend SRS alone for ≥ 5 metastases were assessed. Chi-square was used for univariate analysis, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Results The final study sample included 95 Gamma Knife and LINAC-using respondents (54% Gamma Knife users) in San Francisco and 54 in Sendai (48% Gamma Knife users). More than 70% at each meeting had ≥ 5 years experience with SRS. Sixty-five percent in San Francisco and 83% in Sendai treated ≥ 30 cases annually with SRS. The highest number of metastases considered reasonable to treat with SRS alone in both surveys was 50. In San Francisco, the mean and median numbers of metastases considered reasonable to treat with SRS alone were 6.7 and 5, while in Sendai they were 11 and 10. In the San Francisco sample, the clinical factors identified to be most influential in decision making were Karnofsky Performance Scale score (78%), presence/absence of mass effect (76%), and systemic disease control (63%). In Sendai, the most influential factors were the size of the metastases (78%), the Karnofsky Performance Scale score (70%), and metastasis location (68%). In San Francisco, 55% of respondents considered treating ≥ 5 metastases and 22% considered treating ≥ 10 metastases “reasonable.” In Sendai, 83% of respondents considered treating ≥ 5 metastases and 57% considered treating ≥ 10 metastases “reasonable.” In both groups, private practitioners, neurosurgeons, and Gamma Knife users were statistically significantly more likely to treat ≥ 5 metastases with SRS alone. Conclusions Although there is no clear consensus for how many metastases are reasonable to treat with SRS alone, more than half of the radiosurgeons at 2 international meetings were willing to extend the use of SRS as an initial treatment for ≥ 5 brain metastases. Given the substantial variation in clinicians' approaches to SRS use, further research is required to identify patient characteristics associated with optimal SRS outcomes.

Gamma Knife surgery as sole treatment for multiple brain metastases: 2-center retrospective review of 1508 cases meeting the inclusion criteria of the JLGK0901 multi-institutional prospective study

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Serizawa ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Yasunori Sato ◽  
Yoshinori Higuchi ◽  
Osamu Nagano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Object The authors retrospectively reviewed the results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) used as the sole treatment for brain metastases in patients who met the eligibility criteria for the ongoing JLGK0901 multi-institutional prospective trial. They also discuss the anticipated results of the JLGK0901 study. Methods Data from 1508 consecutive cases were analyzed. All of the patients were treated at the Gamma Knife House of Chiba Cardiovascular Center or the Mito Gamma House of Katsuta Hospital between 1998 and 2007 and met the following JLGK0901 inclusion criteria: 1) newly diagnosed brain metastases, 2) 1–10 brain lesions, 3) less than 10 cm3 volume of the largest tumor, 4) no more than 15 cm3 total tumor volume, 5) no findings of CSF dissemination, and 6) no impairment of activities of daily living (Karnofsky Performance Scale score < 70) due to extracranial disease. At the initial treatment, all visible lesions were irradiated with GKS without upfront whole-brain radiation therapy. Thereafter, gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging was performed every 2–3 months, and new distant lesions were appropriately retreated with GKS. Patients were divided into groups according to numbers of tumors: Group A, single lesions (565 cases); Group B, 2–4 tumors (577 cases); and Group C, 5–10 tumors (366 cases). The differences in overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range 19–96 years). There were 963 men and 545 women. The primary tumors were in the lung in 1114 patients, gastrointestinal tract in 179, breast in 105, urinary tract in 66, and other sites in 44. The overall mean survival time was 0.78 years (0.99 years for Group A, 0.68 years for Group B, and 0.62 years for Group C). The differences between Groups A and B (p < 0.0001) and between Groups B and C (p = 0.0312) were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed significant prognostic factors for OS to be sex (poor prognostic factor: male, p < 0.0001), recursive partitioning analysis class (Class I vs Class II and Class II vs III, both p < 0.0001), primary site (lung vs breast, p = 0.0047), and number of tumors (Group A vs Group B, p < 0.0001). However, no statistically difference was detected between Groups B and C (p = 0.1027, hazard ratio 1.124, 95% CI 0.999–1.265). Conclusions The results of this retrospective analysis revealed an upper CI of 1.265 for the hazard ratio, which was lower than the 1.3 initially set by the JLGK0901 study. The JLGK0901 study is anticipated to show noninferiority of GKS as sole treatment for patients with 5–10 brain metastases compared with those with 2–4 in terms of OS.

Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator–based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 1473-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Han ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Dershan Luo ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Xin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Normal Brain ◽  
Large Brain ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEFor patients with multiple large brain metastases with at least 1 target volume larger than 10 cm3, multifractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (MF-SRS) has commonly been delivered with a linear accelerator (LINAC). Recent advances of Gamma Knife (GK) units with kilovolt cone-beam CT and CyberKnife (CK) units with multileaf collimators also make them attractive choices. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetry of MF-SRS plans deliverable on GK, CK, and LINAC and to discuss related clinical issues.METHODSTen patients with 2 or more large brain metastases who had been treated with MF-SRS on LINAC were identified. The median planning target volume was 18.31 cm3 (mean 21.31 cm3, range 3.42–49.97 cm3), and the median prescribed dose was 27.0 Gy (mean 26.7 Gy, range 21–30 Gy), administered in 3 to 5 fractions. Clinical LINAC treatment plans were generated using inverse planning with intensity modulation on a Pinnacle treatment planning system (version 9.10) for the Varian TrueBeam STx system. GK and CK planning were retrospectively performed using Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1 and Accuray Precision version 1.1.0.0 for the CK M6 system. Tumor coverage, Paddick conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and normal brain tissue receiving 4, 12, and 20 Gy were used to compare plan quality. Net beam-on time and approximate planning time were also collected for all cases.RESULTSPlans from all 3 modalities satisfied clinical requirements in target coverage and normal tissue sparing. The mean CI was comparable (0.79, 0.78, and 0.76) for the GK, CK, and LINAC plans. The mean GI was 3.1 for both the GK and the CK plans, whereas the mean GI of the LINAC plans was 4.1. The lower GI of the GK and CK plans would have resulted in significantly lower normal brain volumes receiving a medium or high dose. On average, GK and CK plans spared the normal brain volume receiving at least 12 Gy and 20 Gy by approximately 20% in comparison with the LINAC plans. However, the mean beam-on time of GK (∼ 64 minutes assuming a dose rate of 2.5 Gy/minute) plans was significantly longer than that of CK (∼ 31 minutes) or LINAC (∼ 4 minutes) plans.CONCLUSIONSAll 3 modalities are capable of treating multiple large brain lesions with MF-SRS. GK has the most flexible workflow and excellent dosimetry, but could be limited by the treatment time. CK has dosimetry comparable to that of GK with a consistent treatment time of approximately 30 minutes. LINAC has a much shorter treatment time, but residual rotational error could be a concern.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for renal cell carcinoma brain metastases

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 489-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Hernandez ◽  
Lucia Zamorano ◽  
Andrew Sloan ◽  
James Fontanesi ◽  
Simon Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) in achieving a partial or complete remission of so-called radioresistant metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to propose guidelines for optimal treatment Methods. During a 5-year period, 29 patients (19 male and 10 female) with 92 brain metastases from RCC underwent GKS. The median tumor volume was 4.7 cm3 (range 0.5–14.5 cm3). Fourteen patients (48%) also underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before GKS, and two patients (6.8%) after GKS. The mean GKS dose delivered to the 50% isodose at the tumor margin was 16.8 Gy (range 13–30 Gy). All cases were categorized according to the Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) classification for brain metastases. Univariate analysis was performed to determine significant prognostic factors and survival. The overall median survival was 7 months after GKS treatment. Age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and controlled primary disease were not predictors of survival. Combined WBRT/GKS resulted in median survival of 18, 8.5, and 5.3 months for RPA Classes I, II, and III, respectively, compared with the median survival 7.1, 4.2, and 2.3 months for patients treated with WBRT alone. Conclusions. These results suggest that WBRT combined with GKS may improve survival in patients with brain metastases from RCC. Furthermore, this improvement in survival was seen in all RPA classes.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors

2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 118-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Serizawa ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Osamu Nagano ◽  
Yoshinori Higuchi ◽  
Shinji Matsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Treatment Result ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Patient Selection Criterion

Object The authors compared results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases obtained at 2 institutions in Japan. Methods They analyzed a consecutive series of 2390 patients with brain metastases who underwent GKS from 1998 through 2005 in 2 institutes (1181 patients in Chiba; 1209 in Mito). In the 2 facilities, 1 neurosurgeon each was responsible for diagnosis, patient selection, GKS procedures, and follow-up (T.S. in Chiba, M.Y. in Mito). Even if tumor numbers exceeded 4, all visible lesions were irradiated with a total skull integral dose (TSID) of ≤ 10–12 J. No prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was applied. If new distant lesions were detected, salvage GKS was appropriately performed. Results The distributions of patient and treatment factors did not differ between institutes. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (1572 patients), followed by gastrointestinal tract (316), breast (211), kidney (113), and other cancers (159). The median survival periods were 7.7 months in Chiba and 7.0 months in Mito (p = 0.0635). The significant poor prognostic factors for overall survival were active extracranial disease status, male sex, and low initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score on multivariate analysis (all p < 0.0001). The neurological survival rates at 1 year were 86.6% in Chiba and 84.2% in Mito (p = 0.3310). Conclusions This 2-institute study demonstrated no significant institutional differences in any of the treatment result items. Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases without prophylactic WBRT prevents neurological death and allows a patient to maintain good brain condition. However, there is 1 important patient selection criterion: regardless of how many tumors there are, all lesions can be irradiated with a TSID of ≤12 J.

Gamma Knife surgery for multiple brain metastases from a malignant schwannoma of the penis

2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 238-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albertus T. C. J. van Eck ◽  
Gerhard A. Horstmann
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Malignant Schwannoma ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Single Brain Metastasis ◽  
Therapy Option

✓The occurrence of brain metastases from a malignant schwannoma of the penis is extremely rare. In patients with a single brain metastasis, microsurgical extirpation is the treatment of choice and verifies the diagnosis. In cases of multiple or recurrent metastases, radiosurgery is an effective and safe therapy option. Gamma Knife surgery was performed in a patient who had previously undergone tumor resection and who presented with recurrence of the lesion and three de novo brain metastases. This first report on brain metastasis from a malignant penile schwannoma illustrates the efficacy and safety of radiosurgical treatment for these tumors.

Tumor recurrence and survival following gamma knife surgery for brain metastases

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 287-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mindermann
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors evaluated prognostic factors for tumor recurrence and patient survival following gamma knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastasis. Methods. A retrospective review of 101 patient charts was undertaken for those patients treated with GKS for brain metastases from 1994 to 2001. Recurrence rates of brain metastasis following GKS depended on the duration of patient survival. Long-term survival was associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence and shorter-term survival was associated with a lower risk. The duration of survival following GKS for brain metastases seems to be characteristic of the primary disease rather than the cerebral disease. Conclusions. Recurrence rates of brain metastasis following GKS are related to duration of survival, which is in turn mostly dependent on the nature and course of the primary tumor.

Prolonged survival in a subgroup of patients with brain metastases treated by gamma knife surgery

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 262-265
Author(s):  
C. P. Yu ◽  
Joel Y. C. Cheung ◽  
Josie F. K. Chan ◽  
Samuel C. L. Leung ◽  
Robert T. K. Ho
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Prolonged Survival ◽  
Organ Involvement ◽  
Lesion Volume ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors analyzed the factors involved in determining prolonged survival (≥ 24 months) in patients with brain metastases treated by gamma knife surgery (GKS). Methods. Between 1995 and 2003, a total of 116 patients underwent 167 GKS procedures for brain metastases. There was no special case selection. Smaller and larger lesions were treated with different protocols. The mean patient age was 56.9 years, the mean number of initial lesions was 3.15, and the mean lesion volume was 10.45 cm.3 The mean follow-up time was 9.2 months. The median patient survival was 8.68 months. One-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 31.8%, 19.8%, 14.6%, 7.7%, and 6.9%, respectively. Patient age, number of lesions at presentation, and lesion volume had no influence on patient survival. Twenty-three (19.8%) patients survived for 24 months or more. Certain factors were associated with increased survival time. These were stable primary disease (21 of 23 patients), a long latency between diagnosis of the primary tumor and the occurrence of brain metastases (mean 28.4 months, median 16 months), absence of third-organ involvement, and repeated local procedures. Ten patients underwent repeated GKS (mean 3.4 per patient). Seven patients required open surgery for local treatment failures (recurrence or radiation necrosis). Two patients had both. Fifteen patients underwent repeated procedures. Conclusions. Aggressive local therapy with GKS, repeated GKS, and GKS plus surgery can achieve increased survival in a subgroup of patients with stable primary disease, no third-organ involvement, and long primary-brain secondary intervals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document