Higher Oxidative Balance Score Is Associated with Better Glycemic Control among Iranian Adults with Type-2 Diabetes

Author(s):  
Mona Golmohammadi ◽  
Pravin Ayremlou ◽  
Rasoul Zarrin

Abstract. The oxidative balance score (OBS) is a measure of combined pro- and anti-oxidant exposure status, with a higher OBS representing a predominance of anti- over pro-oxidant exposures. We aimed to examine the association of OBS and glycemic control among Iranian adults with type-2 diabetes. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 476 adults with type-2 diabetes (mean age 56.2 y; 66.6% female). Fasting glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum glucose (FSG) levels were measured as markers of glycemic control. The OBS was calculated by combining information from a total of 18 a priori selected pro- and anti-oxidant components. These components were comprised of the following four categories: dietary anti-oxidants (i.e., dietary intakes of selenium, fiber, retinol, α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, lycopene, vitamin D, vitamin E, folate, and vitamin C); dietary pro-oxidants (i.e., dietary intakes of iron, saturated fatty acid, and poly-unsaturated fatty acid); non-dietary anti-oxidants (i.e., physical activity); and non-dietary pro-oxidants (i.e., smoking and obesity). After adjusting for several potential confounders in the analysis of covariance models, multivariable adjusted means of HbA1c and FSG of subjects in the highest tertile of OBS were significantly lower than those in the lowest tertile (for HbA1c: mean difference –0.73%; and for FSG: mean difference –10.2 mg/dL; both P < 0.050). The findings suggest that a higher OBS, indicating a predominance of anti- over pro-oxidant exposures, is associated with a better glycemic control among Iranian adults with type-2 diabetes. However, future prospective studies of adequate methodological quality are warranted to confirm these findings.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eri Wada ◽  
Takeshi Onoue ◽  
Tomoko Kobayashi ◽  
Tomoko Handa ◽  
Ayaka Hayase ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe present study aimed to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) and conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsIn this 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1), parallel-group study, patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes at five hospitals in Japan were randomly assigned to the FGM (n=49) or SMBG (n=51) groups and were provided each device for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, and was compared using analysis of covariance model that included baseline values and group as covariates.ResultsForty-eight participants in the FGM group and 45 in the SMBG group completed the study. The mean HbA1c levels were 7.83% (62.1 mmol/mol) in the FGM group and 7.84% (62.2 mmol/mol) in the SMBG group at baseline, and the values were reduced in both FGM (−0.43% (−4.7 mmol/mol), p<0.001) and SMBG groups (−0.30% (−3.3 mmol/mol), p=0.001) at 12 weeks. On the other hand, HbA1c was significantly decreased from baseline values in the FGM group, but not in the SMBG group at 24 weeks (FGM: −0.46% (−5.0 mmol/mol), p<0.001; SMBG: −0.17% (−1.8 mmol/mol), p=0.124); a significant between-group difference was also observed (difference −0.29% (−3.2 mmol/mol), p=0.022). Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire score was significantly improved, and the mean glucose levels, SD of glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and time in hyperglycemia were significantly decreased in the FGM group compared with the SMBG group.ConclusionsGlycemic control was better with FGM than with SMBG after cessation of glucose monitoring in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.Trial registration numberUMIN000026452, jRCTs041180082.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Yotsapon Thewjitcharoen ◽  
Phawinpon Chotwanvirat ◽  
Annapann Jantawan ◽  
Nantaporn Siwasaranond ◽  
Sunee Saetung ◽  
...  

Introduction. Most nutritional guidelines for diabetes management emphasize the importance of having individualized goals, away from a one-size-fits-all approach. However, there is a dearth of information on the dietary intakes and nutritional knowledge of Thai patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study is aimed at clarifying dietary intakes in relationship to glycemic control and at examining nutritional knowledge among Thai patients with T2DM. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional study of outpatients with T2DM at Theptarin Hospital and Ramathibodi Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) was performed to assess dietary intakes by food records. Diabetes nutritional knowledge and dietary self-care behavior was also evaluated. Results. A total of 304 Thai patients with T2DM (female 52.6%, mean age 57.4 ± 10.9 years, body mass index (BMI) 27.3 ± 4.8 kg/m2, and baseline A1C 7.2 ± 1.3%) participated in the study. The mean daily calorie intake was 1427 ± 425 kcal, and mean intake for each macronutrient was acceptable (carbohydrate 52%, protein 17%, and fat 31%). However, the intake of free sugar was much higher (12.1 ± 5.8% of total daily energy intake) and dietary fiber intake (9 grams per day) was much lower than recommended. There were no correlations between dietary intake and glycemic control. A subset of patients (N=213) completed the diabetes nutritional knowledge survey. There was no association between diabetes nutritional knowledge and the actual dietary self-care behavior. Conclusion. These results indicate that compliance of Thai patients with T2DM to dietary recommendations is not completely satisfactory, especially for free sugar and dietary fiber intakes. Addressing the reality of how patients with T2DM eat in their daily lives and their knowledge gaps would enable them to adhere to medical nutrition therapy.


Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 504-P
Author(s):  
YINGYING LI ◽  
MI ZHOU ◽  
XINGHAI XIA ◽  
HUI SHEN ◽  
YIKE LI ◽  
...  

OCL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Guillocheau ◽  
Philippe Legrand ◽  
Vincent Rioux

Natural trans fatty acids are trans fatty acids that naturally occur in ruminant-derived foods: milk (derived from cow, ewe, goat), dairy products (yoghurt, cheese) and ruminant meat (beef, lamb). Because natural trans fatty acids are part of the trans fatty acid family, they have been compared for decades to their industrial counterparts on a cardiovascular outcome’s basis. At current dietary intakes, it is now well recognized that natural trans fatty acids are neutral towards cardiovascular health. Still, the negative connotation remains. It is usually taken for granted in the scientific community that natural trans fatty acids have no known physiological function and therefore no particular nutritional interest. This prevailing view has totally hidden several studies, which pointed out unsuspected benefits of natural trans fatty acids on inflammation, type 2 diabetes and obesity. Some supplementation studies dealt with pure trans-vaccenic acid (trans-C18:1 n-7) and pure rumenic acid (cis-9, trans-11 C18:2), but remained somewhat aside as they were carried out on rodents. However, recent epidemiological data reached considerable impact, highlighting a protective effect of trans-palmitoleic acid (trans-C16:1 n-7) towards the risk of type 2 diabetes. Bearing in mind that natural trans fatty acids do not just consist of rumenic acid, this review is the opportunity to sum up scientific knowledge about each of these three fatty acids. We shall therefore, review their occurrence in foods, and their physiological impacts. An overlooked aspect of natural trans fatty acids is that they are metabolically connected. The second aim of this review is to underline these metabolic connections. In fact, combining physiological impacts and metabolic pathways unravel shared mechanisms of action of trans-palmitoleic, trans-vaccenic and rumenic acids, that might be explained by their common n-7 trans double bond.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinithi Vidanage ◽  
Shamini Prathapan ◽  
Priyadarshika Hettiarachchi ◽  
Sudharshani Wasalathanthri

Abstract Background Regular exercise is a key element in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although the importance of regular exercises on glycemic control in people with diabetes is studied extensively, evidence is lacking on its impact on sweet taste perception. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the impact of aerobic exercises on taste perception for sucrose in people with diabetes. Methods A sample of 225 people with diabetes aged 35-60 years was assigned randomly into 3 groups; aerobic exercise, combined exercise and a control group. The outcomes of the combined exercise group is not reported. The aerobic exercise group performed brisk walking 30min/day, 4-5days/week for 6 months. The primary outcome measures were supra-threshold intensity ratings and preference for sucrose assessed at baseline, at 3 and 6 months using ‘general Labeled Magnitude Scale’ and ‘Monell 2-series-forced choice method’ respectively. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level was assessed at baseline and at 6 months to determine glycemic control. Results Aerobic exercise group showed significantly increased ratings (mm) for higher sucrose concentrations at 3 months (mean difference for 2.02M; +6.63±2.50, p=0.048 and for 0.64M; +7.26±2.76, p=0.026) and at 6 months (mean difference for 0.64M; +7.79±4.49, p= 0.044) compared to baseline and also when compared to controls (mean difference for 2.02M between baseline and 3 months; intervention: +6.63±2.50, control: -4.01±1.79, p=0.02 and between baseline and 6 months for 2.02M; intervention: +3.15±0.57, control: -7.96±0.40, p=0.022 and for 0.64M; intervention: +7.79±4.49, control: -8.98±0.99, p=0.003). A significantly reduced preference (mol/L) was seen both at 3 (mean difference; -0.03±0.02, p= 0.037) and at 6 months (mean difference; -0.05±0.12, p=0.011) compared to baseline within the intervention group. Also, a significant reduction was seen in the intervention group compared to controls at 6 months (mean difference; intervention: -0.05±0.12, control: 0.01±0.03, p=0.044). HbA1c was significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to controls at 6 months (mean difference; intervention -0.43±1.6%, control +0.33±1.8%, p=0.018). Conclusion Regular aerobic exercises increase the sweet taste sensitivity, especially for higher concentrations of sucrose and decrease sweet taste preference in people with diabetes . These alterations in sweet taste perception, are likely to contribute to a better glycemic control in people with diabetes. Trial registration This trial was registered at the Sri Lanka Clinical Trial registry on 16/12/2015. (Trial registration number- SLCTR/2015/029, https://slctr.lk/trials/slctr-2015-029).


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Eberle ◽  
Stefanie Stichling

Abstract Background In 2019, a new virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic in a short period of time. In order to reduce the spread of COVID-19, many countries have imposed a lockdown with movement restrictions, social distancing and home confinement, which has affected routine healthcare activities and everyday life. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods We systematically identified studies by searching the databases Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and CINAHL until April 2021. We included n = 33 observational studies of which n = 25 investigated T1D and n = 8 T2D. Results Overall, we analyzed n = 2881 T1D patients and n = 1823 T2D patients. Glycemic values in patients with T1D improved significantly during lockdown. Overall, n = 18 (72%) T1D studies indicated significant improvements in glycemic outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference in HbA1c of − 0.05% (95% CI − 0.31 to 0.21) due to lockdown, and in time in range (TIR) of + 3.75% (95% CI 2.56 to 4.92). Lockdown determined a short-term worsening in glycemic values in patients with T2D. Overall, n = 4 (50%) publications observed deteriorations in glycemic control. Meta-analysis demonstrated a mean difference in HbA1c of + 0.14 (95% CI − 0.13 to 0.40) through the lockdown. Moreover, n = 3 (75%) studies reported a not significant deterioration in body weight. Conclusions Glycemic values in people with T1D significantly improved during COVID-19 lockdown, which may be associated with positive changes in self-care and digital diabetes management. In contrast, lockdown rather determined a short-term worsening in glycemic parameters in patients with T2D. Further research is required, particularly into the causes and effective T2D management during lockdown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document