Description of the use of a risk estimation model to assess the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer among outdoor workers in Central Queensland, Australia

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Vishvakarman ◽  
J. C. F. Wong
2020 ◽  
pp. 239936932097212
Author(s):  
Davide Viggiano ◽  
Michael W Lee ◽  
Mariadelina Simeoni ◽  
Giovambattista Capasso ◽  
Anna Capasso

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have an increased risk for specific types of cancer. Some forms of incident cancer are similarly present in other diseases where T-cells are depleted, such as HIV-infection: specifically, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Kaposi’s sarcoma. Conversely, other forms of highly incident cancers in KT patients, primarily non-melanoma skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma), are specific to this condition. By comparing HIV-related cancers, general cancer incidence, and the association of immunotherapy with cancer incidence, we suggest that the high incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer seen in KT patients is mediated by off-target effects of calcineurin inhibitors in the skin, combined with a “permissive” cancer microinflammatory environment.


Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Montastruc ◽  
Christel Renoux ◽  
Sophie Dell’Aniello ◽  
Teresa A Simon ◽  
Laurent Azoulay ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To assess whether abatacept as initial biological DMARD (bDMARD) in the treatment of RA, when compared with other bDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of cancer overall and by specific cancer sites (breast, lung, lymphoma, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer). Methods We performed a population-based cohort study among patients newly treated with bDMARDs within the US-based Truven MarketScan population and Supplemental US Medicare from 2007 to 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs of any cancer (and specific cancers) associated with initiation of abatacept, compared with initiation of other bDMARDs, adjusted for age and deciles of the propensity score. Results The cohort included 4328 patients on abatacept and 59 860 on other bDMARDs, of whom 409 and 4197 were diagnosed with any cancer during follow-up (incidence rates 4.76 per 100 per year and 3.41 per 100 per year, respectively). Compared with other bDMARDs, the use of abatacept was associated with an increased incidence of cancer overall (hazard ratioadjusted 1.17; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Analyses by specific cancer sites showed a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (hazard ratioadjusted 1.20; 95% CI 1.03, 1.39), but no significant difference for other specific cancer sites. Conclusion The use of abatacept as first bDMARD in the treatment of RA was associated with a slight increased risk of cancer overall and particularly non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with other bDMARDs. This potential signal needs to be replicated in other settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
P. M. Garrido ◽  
J. Borges-Costa ◽  
L. Soares-Almeida ◽  
P. Filipe

Introduction: Patients with previous non-melanoma skin cancer have an increased risk of developing another skin cancer and some studies suggest that the histological type of the incident tumour can predict the one of the subsequently diagnosed. The aim of this study was to assess a correlation between the histological type of the first and the subsequent non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosed in immunocompetent patients and in different settings of immunosuppression. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients without previous skin cancer, with the diagnosis of two or more non-melanoma skin cancer between January 1st, 2008 and December 31th, 2017. Results: A total of 413 patients were included. Fifty-one individuals (12.4%) were immunosuppressed. There was a significative association between the histological type of the first and the subsequent non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosed both in immunocompetent and in immunosuppressed patients, with a higher probability of developing a tumour of the same histological type (p<0.001). This association was also significative in patients with the diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy. The mean interval between the two diagnoses was 30 months (range 7-111). Forty-three patients (10.4%) presented a subsequent tumour after more than five years of follow-up. Conclusion: The histological type of the incident non-melanoma skin cancer predicted the risk of developing another tumour of the same type. For the first time, we showed this correlation in patients with a hematologic malignancy. High-risk individuals may benefit from a long-lasting follow-up of at least ten years.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Millie D. Long ◽  
Hans H. Herfarth ◽  
Clare A. Pipkin ◽  
Carol Q. Porter ◽  
Robert S. Sandler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 291.1-291
Author(s):  
R. Seror ◽  
A. Lafourcade ◽  
Y. De-Rycke ◽  
B. Fautrel ◽  
X. Mariette ◽  
...  

Background:Objectives:To estimate the incidence rate of malignancies in csDMARD-treated RA patients and to compare it to that of general population and to biologic-treated RA patientsMethods:We conducted an historical cohort study within the national claim database that prospectively records individual health resource use of 86% of the French population (65 million inhabitants). RA adult patients were identified based on ICD-10 code (M05 or M06) between 2007-2016. Patients with previous cancer history were excluded. Treatment exposures were incident first use of any treatment: csDMARD (methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine) or biologics (anti-TNF, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, anakinra). To identify incident treatment periods, only patients who did not receive any treatment in the 1-year period before the index date were selected. Exposure was defined with a 90-day latency after treatment initiation and a 180-day carry-over period after drug discontinuation.To compare the risk of malignancies between csDMARD-treated patients and general population, standardized incidence ratio (SIR [95%CI]) were calculated using FRANCIM (“France Cancer Incidence et Mortalité”) estimations as reference.To compare the risk of malignancies between csDMARD and biologics treated patients, a dynamically propensity score (including age, sex, year of first occurrence of RA code, date of treatment initiation, number of previous DMARDs, Charlson’s comorbidity index, diagnosis of tobacco and/or alcohol-associated disorders, number of hospitalizations for RA, cumulative corticosteroid dose) was constructed using pooled logistic regression. Hazard Ratios (HRs) for risk of cancer were estimated using Cox proportional hazards model after dynamically propensity score matching. Exposure was considered as a time-dependent variable.Results:Between 2007 and 2016, 83,706 RA patients exposed to csDMARD (n=63,837) and/or biologics (n=19,727) were identified.As compared to the general population, csDMARDs treated patients had an increased risk of lung cancer (SIR=1.29 [1.14; 1.45]), invasive melanoma (SIR=1.52 [1.24; 1.86]) and a borderline increased risk of breast cancer (SIR=1.11 [1.01;1.22]). By contrast, they had a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer (SIR=0.68[0.51-0.9]) and liver cancer (SIR=0.43 [0.27; 0.67]). This later is due to a protopathic bias.After propensity score matching, analyses the risk of malignancies between csDMARD and biologics treated patients were conducted on 19727 patients in each group (mean age: 51 ±14 yrs; female: 74.6%). Malignancies occurred in 435 patients exposed to biologics and 332 patients exposed to csDMARD. The overall risk of malignancies (figure), risk of solid cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), lymphoma, and other hematologic malignancies did not differ significantly between csDMARD and all biologics (table). Regarding organ specific cancer, no difference was observed. Results were similar for biologic in monotherapy or associated with csDMARD.Type of malignanciesHR [95%CI] csDMARD (ref) vs. all biologicsp-valueAll malignancies (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer)0.99 [0.86;1.14]p=0.9Solid cancer (excl. non-melanoma skin cancer)0.95 [0.82;1.11]p=0.5Lymphoma1.35 [0.72;2.53]p=0.3Other hematologic malignancies1.18 [0.56;2.49]p=0.7Conclusion:Using a large nationwide representative healthcare database, the overall risk of malignancies and the risk of organ-specific cancers and hematologic malignancies in biologic treated RA patients did not differ from that of patients treated with csDMARD. Compared to general population, patients treated with csDMARD had an increased risk of lung cancer and melanoma, but a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer.Disclosure of Interests:Raphaèle Seror Consultant of: BMS, Medimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, GSK, Lilly, Alexandre Lafourcade: None declared, yann de-rycke: None declared, Bruno Fautrel Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Medac MSD France, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, SOBI and UCB, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: BMS, Gilead, Medimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, UCB, Florence Tubach Grant/research support from: Florence TUBACH is head of the Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi) of the Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris and of the Clinical Research Unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, both these structures have received research funding, grants and fees for consultant activities from a large number of pharmaceutical companies, that have contributed indiscriminately to the salaries of its employees. Florence Tubach didn’t receive any personal remuneration from these companies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruolin Liu ◽  
Qianyi Wan ◽  
Rui Zhao ◽  
Haitao Xiao ◽  
Ying Cen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Most previous studies compared the risk for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in biologic-treated common inflammatory diseases with the general population. Whether the increased NMSC risk is caused by the disease itself, the biologics, or both remains unknown. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to May 2021. Studies were included if they assessed the risk of NMSC for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or psoriasis patients treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model. Results The current meta-analysis included 12 studies. Compared with patients with the inflammatory disease without biologics, patients receiving biological therapy were associated with an increased risk for NMSC (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.37), especially in patients with RA (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.36) and psoriasis (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.52), but not in patients with IBD (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.91). The risks for squamous cell skin cancer and basal cell skin cancer were both increased for patients receiving biologics. However, the risk of NMSC did not increase in patients treated with biologics less than 2 years. Conclusions Current evidence suggests that increased risk of NMSC was identified in RA and psoriasis treated with biologics compared with patients not receiving biologics, but not in patients with IBD. The inner cause for the increased risk of NMSC in IBD patients should be further discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document