Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information.

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Reed ◽  
Larry Chan ◽  
Joseph A. Mikels
Keyword(s):  
Age Differences ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Negative Information ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Age Related

scholarly journals Adult age differences in subjective responses to dynamic socioemotional incentives

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sade J Abiodun ◽  
Galen McAllister ◽  
Gregory Russell Samanez-Larkin ◽  
Kendra Leigh Seaman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Emotional Valence ◽  
Incentive Motivation ◽  
Social Signals ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Adult Age ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Adult Age Differences

Facial expressions are powerful communicative social signals that motivate feelings and action in the observer. However, research on incentive motivation has overwhelmingly focused on money and points and the limited research on social incentives has been mostly focused on responses in young adulthood. Previous research on the age-related positivity effect and adult age differences in social motivation suggest that older adults might experience higher levels of positive arousal to socioemotional stimuli than younger adults. Affect ratings following dynamic emotional expressions (anger, happiness, sadness) varying in magnitude of expression showed that higher magnitude expressions elicited higher arousal and valence ratings. Older adults did not differ significantly in levels of arousal when compared to younger adults, however their ratings of emotional valence were significantly higher as the magnitude of expressions increased. The findings provide novel evidence that socioemotional incentives may be relatively more reinforcing as adults age. More generally, these dynamic socioemotional stimuli that vary in magnitude are ideal for future studies of more naturalistic affect elicitation, studies of social incentive processing, and use in incentive-driven choice tasks.

scholarly journals Inhibitory control and its relationship to positivity biases in older adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caoimhe McManus ◽  
David McGovern
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Inhibitory Control ◽  
Negative Information ◽  
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory ◽  
Positive Information ◽  
Active Suppression ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Socioemotional Selectivity ◽  
Age Related

Older adults tend to focus on positive information over negative information; a phenomenon commonly referred to as the ‘positivity effect’. Socioemotional Selectivity Theory posits that this effect stems from age-related shifts in goals and relies heavily on the active suppression of negative information. The current study tested the hypothesis that inhibitory control is a key determinant of positivity biases in older adults using anti-saccade and recognition memory tasks. Results indicated a significant correlation between levels of inhibitory control and the positivity effect. These findings highlight the key role played by inhibitory control in determining positivity biases amongst older adults.

Evidence for an Age-Related Positivity Effect in Metacognitive Judgments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edie C Sanders ◽  
Jane M Berry
Keyword(s):  
Age Differences ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Late Life ◽  
Affective States ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Metacognitive Judgments ◽  
Memory Monitoring

Abstract Objectives If older adults (OAs) are focused on emotionally meaningful goals in late life, they should demonstrate memory biases for positive stimuli over neutral and negative stimuli and, arguably, these cognitive biases should be reflected in their metacognitive judgments of learning (JOLs). To address this question, we examined age differences in metacognitive monitoring of emotionally valenced stimuli. Method Younger adults (YAs) and OAs (N = 85) studied positive, neutral, and negative words and made immediate JOLs, followed by a 2-alternative forced choice (2AFC) recognition memory task. Results Analyses of JOLs revealed evidence for a positivity effect in metacognitive judgments for OAs and an emotional salience effect in YAs. YAs recognized more words than OAs, but valence did not affect number of words recognized and did not moderate age differences in memory (p = .055). Memory monitoring as measured by resolution accuracy was equivalent in YAs and OAs. Positive affect was higher and negative affect was lower in OAs relative to YAs, lending additional evidence to the emergence of a positive orientation in older adulthood. Discussion These results provide intriguing and novel support for the positivity effect in the domain of metacognitive aging, adding to what is known in memory, attention, and emotion domains. Our findings fall squarely within socioemotional and metacognitive theoretical frameworks from which they were derived. We discuss research directions that might identify mechanisms by which affective states and stimuli interact to produce metacognitive outcomes in late life.

Looking at the Sunny Side of Life

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 838-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Kisley ◽  
Stacey Wood ◽  
Christina L. Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Life Span ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Negative Information ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Negativity Bias ◽  
Positive Information ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Wide Range

Studies of the negativity bias have demonstrated that negative information has a stronger influence than positive information in a wide range of cognitive domains. At odds with this literature is extensive work now documenting emotional and motivational shifts that result in a positivity effect in older adults. It remains unclear, however, whether this age-related positivity effect results from increases in processing of positive information or from decreases in processing of negative information. Also unknown is the specific time course of development from a negative bias to an apparently positive one. The present study was designed to investigate the negativity bias across the life span using an event-related potential measure of responding to emotionally valenced images. The results suggest that neural reactivity to negative images declines linearly with age, but responding to positive images is surprisingly age invariant across most of the adult life span.

scholarly journals Evidence for an Age-Related Positivity Effect in Metacognitive Confidence Judgments

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 363-364
Author(s):  
Edie Sanders ◽  
Jane Berry
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Judgments Of Learning ◽  
Memory Biases ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Older Adulthood ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Memory Monitoring

Abstract We examined age differences in metacognitive monitoring of emotionally-valenced stimuli. If older adults (OAs) are more focused on emotionally meaningful goals in late life (Carstensen, 2006), then they should demonstrate attentional and memory biases for positive stimuli over neutral and negative stimuli and, arguably, these cognitive biases should be reflected in their metacognitive judgments of learning. Judgments of learning (JOLs) for memory of positive, negative, and neutral words were collected. Younger adults (YAs) aged 18-23 years and OAs aged 65-90 years (N = 85) studied words in each valence category and made immediate JOLs, followed by a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) recognition memory task. Analyses of JOLs revealed evidence for a positivity effect (Mather & Carstensen, 2005) in metacognitive confidence for OAs and an emotional salience effect in YAs (Tauber & Dunlosky, 2012; Zimmerman & Kelley, 2010). Predictably, YAs recognized more words than OAs, but valence did not affect number of words recognized and valence did not moderate age differences in recognition memory (p = .055). Memory monitoring as measured by resolution accuracy was equivalent in YAs and OAs (Hertzog & Dunlosky, 2011). Positive affect was higher and negative affect was lower in OAs relative to YAs (Gallant, Spaniol, & Yang, 2019), lending additional evidence to an orientation toward the positive in older adulthood. These results are novel in that they demonstrate an age-related positivity effect that extends beyond the domains of memory and emotion to the domain of metacognitive aging. Discussion will focus on theoretical, methodological, and applied implications.

scholarly journals Impact of Instructions on the Positivity Effect in Younger and Older Adults’ Autobiographical Memories

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 502-503
Author(s):  
Karen Siedlecki ◽  
Jillian Minahan ◽  
Neshat Yazdani
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Specific Time ◽  
Positivity Effect ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract The positivity effect (PE) refers to age-related enhancement in memory for positive information or decreased memory for negative information. The PE is thought to be the result of age-associated shifts in motivational goals towards enhancing well-being. Research has demonstrated the PE in laboratory settings, and a meta-analysis showed that the PE was most robust in conditions with fewer instructions/constraints (Reed et al., 2014). Findings related to the PE in autobiographical memory (AM) are mixed. Goals of the current study include examining 1) whether the PE was evident across four increasingly restrictive AM conditions (involuntary AMs, voluntary AM with no constraints, voluntary AM within a specific time frame, voluntary AM within a specific time frame and related to a specific cue word), and 2) whether available cognitive resources (assessed with the Stroop task and a trail-making test) influence the PE, since cognitive control is essential for achieving goals. Participants (N=126) completed the shortened Memory Experiences Questionnaire for each memory, which assesses several phenomenological characteristics, including memory valence. There were no significant differences in memory valence between the younger (n=69, ages 18-34) and older adult (n=57; ages 60-85) groups for involuntary AMs or the less constrained voluntary AMs, but there was a significant difference for the most constrained AM wherein older adults rated their AMs as more positive than younger adults. Performance on cognitive control measures did not influence the AM valence. These results highlight the importance of considering the effects of type of stimuli and instructions when studying the PE.

scholarly journals Adult age differences in the effects of processing on storage in working memory: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka J Jaroslawska ◽  
Stephen Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Working Memory ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Adult Age ◽  
Age Related

Normal adult aging is known to be associated with lower performance on tasks assessing the short-term storage of information. However, whether or not there are additional age-related deficits associated with concurrent storage and processing demands within working memory remains unclear. Methodological differences across studies are considered critical factors responsible for the variability in the magnitude of the reported age effects. Here we synthesized comparisons of younger and older adults' performance on tasks measuring storage alone against those combining storage with concurrent processing of information. We also considered the influence of task-related moderator variables. Meta-analysis of effect sizes revealed a small but disproportionate effect of processing on older adults' memory performance. Moderator analysis indicated that equating single task storage performance across age groups (titration) and the nature of the stimulus material were important determinants of memory accuracy. Titration of storage task difficulty was found to lead to smaller, and non-significant, age-differences in dual task costs. These results were corroborated by supplementary Brinley and state-trace analyses. We discuss these findings in relation to the extant literature and current working memory theory as well as possibilities for future research to address the residual heterogeneity in effect sizes.

scholarly journals Age-Related Differences in Recall and Recognition: A Meta Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Rhodes ◽  
Nathaniel R. Greene ◽  
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Item Recognition ◽  
Age Difference ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Standardized Effect Sizes ◽  
Retrieval From Memory

Relative to younger adults, older adults tend to perform more poorly on tests of both free recall and item recognition memory. The age difference in performance is typically larger for recall tasks relative to those involving recognition. However, there have been reports of comparable age-related differences in free recall and item recognition performance. Further, a differential performance cost does not necessarily mean that processes involved in recall are specifically affected by age. Here we present a meta-analysis of 36 articles reporting 89 direct comparisons of free recall and item recognition in younger and older groups of participants. Standardized effect sizes reveal that age differences are larger for recall tasks (Hedges' g = 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [0.75, 1.03]) than for recognition tasks (0.54, [0.37, 0.72]). Further, Brinley analyses of the data suggest that distinct functions are needed to relate younger and older performance for the two tasks. These functions differ in intercept pointing to a disproportionate age difference in recall relative to recognition. This is in line with theories of memory and aging which posit specific deficits in processes related to search and retrieval from memory.

scholarly journals Characterizing age-related positivity effects in situation selection

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Sands ◽  
Kimberly M. Livingstone ◽  
Derek M. Isaacowitz
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Emotional Information ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Emotion Regulation Strategy ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Existing Data

Situation selection – choosing to enter or avoid situations based on how they will likely make you feel – is theorized to be a useful emotion regulation strategy, especially in older age. However, research on the use of situation selection for emotion regulation is limited, and the existing findings about age differences are mixed, with some studies finding age differences and others not. We investigated whether there are overall age differences in the types of emotional situations people select by conducting a “mini” meta-analysis to synthesize all existing data from a situation selection paradigm used in our laboratory. We also explored potential moderators of age differences in situation selection, including properties of the stimuli options and information available to participants. We did not find overall age differences in the emotional situations younger and older adults select, though age differences are larger in contexts in which emotional information is more relevant or highly arousing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document