Civic Education Study of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)

Author(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Munck ◽  
Carolyn Barber ◽  
Judith Torney-Purta

This study applies the alignment method, a technique for assessing measurement equivalence across many groups, to the analysis of adolescents’ support for immigrants’ rights in a pooled data set from the 1999 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Civic Education Study and the 2009 IEA International Civics and Citizenship Education Study. We examined measurement invariance across 92 groups (country by cohort by gender), finding that a five-item scale was statistically well-grounded for unbiased group comparisons despite the presence of significant noninvariance in some groups. Using the resulting group mean scores, we compared European youth’s attitudes finding that female students had more positive attitudes than did male students across countries and cohorts. An analysis of countries participating in both studies revealed that students in most countries demonstrated more positive attitudes in 2009 than in 1999. The alignment methodology makes it feasible to comprehensively assess measurement invariance in large data sets and to compute aligned factor scores for the full sample that can update existing databases for more efficient further secondary analysis and with metainformation concerning measurement invariance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Husfeldt ◽  
Roumiana Nikolova

In addition to assessing the civic knowledge and skills of adolescents, examining students' concepts of democracy was an important aspect of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Civic Education Study. Based on theories and previous research with adults and youth in this area, a set of survey items was developed to cover several models of democracy. In the 1999 IEA Civic Education Study of 14 year olds, the confirmatory factor analysis showed one factor with items relating to the generic or rule of law model. A second factor, participatory democracy, did not meet IEA scaling standards. In contrast, confirmatory factor analysis of upper secondary school students' data revealed a three-factor solution for the democracy items, suggesting that they have more differentiated concepts of democracy than 14 year olds.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinrich Mintrop

Using the representative database of the Second International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Civic Education Study, this article takes a look at civic education through the lens of expert scholars, teachers, and students. The data reveals that, as some of the experts reported, political interest is not pervasive among students and classrooms are not places where a culture of debate, controversy, and critical thinking flourishes for students. But things have changed if civic education was primarily an imparting of facts about national history and the workings of the political system. As for teachers, now the discourse of rights and the social movements associated with it top the list of curricular concerns. Large majorities of teachers share with national scholars a conceptualization of civic education as critical thinking and value education, repudiating knowledge transformation as ideal, and they recognize the wide gulf that exists between these ideals and reality. As for many students, political disinterest notwithstanding, forms of participation born out of social movements and community organizing are the preferred channels of political activity. And yet, it seems the experts have a point: the field is not where it should be.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Menezes

The articles assembled in this issue of EERJ represent a considerable amount of consistent knowledge on civic education across Europe. They were produced as a variety of particular studies developed by some of the 20 countries that participated in the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) International Civic Education Project, initiated in 1994. This set of studies followed, re-examined or expanded the results of the second phase of the general study, looking at particular dimensions, combining or expanding aspects worked within the study, now focused on more restricted universes, or confined to more specific dimensions


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Menezes

This article considers participation experiences of 14 year-old and upper secondary students in six European countries that were involved in the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Civic Education Study: the Czech Republic, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Sweden and Switzerland, countries that vary in their history of institution of democratic regimes. Participation has been considered as a crucial dimension of citizenship, and experiences within civil society are viewed as a relevant opportunity for developing personal and social resources essential for the survival and expansion of democracy. Additionally, participation experiences in adolescence seem to be a good predictor of political engagement during adult life. Results show that participation is most evident in organisations that provide enrichment activities (sports, music, computers), but both 14 year-old and upper secondary students are involved in voluntary activities, in some civic-related organisations (mainly Scouts, religious affiliated and environmental), and in experiences within the school (with student councils and school newspapers at the top). However, cross-national and cross-age variations are significant. Overall, there seems to be a positive impact of the frequency of students' involvement on civic concepts, attitudes and engagement, but results also reveal that more is not necessarily better. The most relevant implication for the development of citizenship education projects is that ‘action’ can be a powerful learning tool but only if it is intentionally designed and systematically supported: the quality of participation experiences, both in terms of meaningful involvement, of interaction with (different) others, and opportunities for personal integration, is therefore crucial if the goal is to promote the personal empowerment and social pluralism on which the essence of democracy relies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-212
Author(s):  
Anneke Meester-van Laar ◽  
GD Bertram-Troost ◽  
J Hoogland ◽  
DJ de Ruyter

Based on the findings of the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study, the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement notes in 2010 that the development of citizenship education is stagnating. In response to this stagnation, some countries, including the Netherlands, are tempted to act more prescriptively in matters of citizenship education. Prior to and in the interest of the search for a solution, we think it is first and foremost important to gain insight into the extent to which the Dutch policy on citizenship education itself contributes to the stagnation. Reconstruction of the policy theory (as a part of document analysis) is used as a method to analyse the various policy statements. Our analysis demonstrates that there are sufficient indications to state that what the Dutch government wants and why is unclear and that there are specific normative beliefs underlying the policy which may conflict with beliefs of the implementers. We assume that the indicators found are not conducive to enable or motivate school leaders to implement the policy as desired by the government.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-96
Author(s):  
Carolyn Barber ◽  
Jessica Ross

The purpose of this study is to examine profiles of students’ attitudes toward citizenship norms and inclusiveness in the political process, focusing on changes in the frequency of particular profiles and in the strength of predictors across a decade. Using data from 16 countries participating in the 1999 and 2009 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement civic education studies, we identified five attitudinal profiles. Profiles defined by negative attitudes toward diverse social groups decreased over time, whereas profiles defined by very positive attitudes toward diverse groups increased, particularly in western Europe. Although some post-Communist countries demonstrated trends toward more positive attitudinal profiles, others trended toward profiles defined by weaker citizenship norms. Across countries and cohorts, more positive profiles were associated with stronger school climates and expectations of civic participation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roumiana Nikolova ◽  
Rainer H. Lehmann

The second International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Civic Education Study was designed to measure dimensions of civic knowledge among 14 year-old and upper secondary students across diverse educational systems. One of the major aims of the study on upper secondary students was to attain sufficient commonality with the test instrument for the 14 year-olds in order to facilitate meaningful cross-population references. This requirement could be successfully achieved by including a substantial number of (anchor) items from the test for the younger group, yet leaving room for more difficult items. In addition, the test for the upper secondary students included the newly introduced domain of economic literacy. The quality of the test has been assured through confirmatory factor analysis; analysis of item-by-country interaction and Item Response Theory (IRT) based analyses of item fit within and across countries. Preceded by a short review of previous research on civic knowledge as well as a brief description of the IEA test for the 14 year-olds, this article then focuses more explicitly on some methodological aspects of the test of civic knowledge and economic literacy in the IEA Civic Education Study for upper secondary students. It describes the structure of the test, including three examples of items covering different levels of civic knowledge. Furthermore, the quality of the test is discussed in some detail, referring to the main test analysis procedures. Finally, the test analysis results are briefly discussed, followed by a note of caution, as well as some insights into the relationship of civic knowledge and gender among adolescents.


Author(s):  
Renate Schulz-Zander ◽  
Annabell Preussler

Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt Ergebnisse zum selbstregulierten und kooperativen Lernen aus zwei vom Institut für Schulentwicklungsforschung der Universität Dortmund durchgeführten Studien vor. Es handelt sich um die deutschen Ergebnisse der Second Information Technology in Education Study – Module 2 (SITES M2) der International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) und der Evaluation des Modellversuchs „Selbstlernen in der gymnasialen Oberstufe – Mathematik (SelMa)“.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document