Psychosocial Outcomes Among Women Referred to Different Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Models

BACKGROUND Globally, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death. Cardiovascular mortality can be decreased by participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Researchers are exploring the use of mHealth technology in cardiac rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to examine the effectiveness of randomized controlled trials that use a mHealth intervention as a part of an outpatient and/or home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on improving physical activity and physical fitness outcomes. METHODS For this systematic review, mHealth interventions were limited to text messaging, mobile apps, and use of a mobile phone network for data transmission, used to deliver cardiac rehabilitation program. Using six databases, the search strategy included published English language studies through 2016. Data was extracted independently by two reviewers, and then synthesized. RESULTS The initial search yielded 149 articles, of which 15 articles that represented nine studies met inclusion criteria. Articles were published from 2010 to 2016 and came from two continents. The majority (84%) of participants were male. Generally, the participant mean age was late 50s to early 60s. Text messaging was the most frequently used intervention. The results of the physical activity and physical fitness findings were mixed. Effect sizes for intervention as measured by the 6-minute walk test ranged from 0.46 to 0.58 and peak VO2 ranged from 0.03 to 1.35. CONCLUSIONS Globally, use of mHealth in outpatient and/or home-based cardiac rehabilitation is being studied with greater attention. However, these studies are limited by geography, gender, and age. Therefore, further research in the area of cardiac rehabilitation and mHealth is recommended, especially in developing countries, among women, and older adults.

Download Full-text

SP37 Self-Management Support in a Women-Only Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Are we Empowering our Patients?

European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing ◽

10.1016/s1474-5151(09)60148-1 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 8 (1_suppl) ◽

pp. S47-S47

Author(s):

J. Price ◽

D. Rolfe ◽

M. Landry ◽

E. Sutton ◽

D. Childerhose ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Rehabilitation Program ◽

Self Management ◽

Management Support ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Download Full-text

Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation program as a potential enhancer of adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in smoking patients with coronary heart disease - a retrospective single-centre analysis

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology ◽

10.1093/eurjpc/zwab061.347 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

M Cabral ◽

R Santos ◽

F Januario ◽

A Antunes ◽

R Fonseca-Pinto

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Smoking Status ◽

Rehabilitation Program ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation Program ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group 2 ◽

Group 1

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has well known beneficial effects on physical capacity, health-related quality of life, morbidity and mortality following an acute cardiac event. It is also known that smoking status is a powerful predictor of recurrent cardiovascular disease events. However, it has been noted that smoker patients may be less likely to access or complete CR. The aim of this study was to determine the levels of anxiety and depression and its improvement, depending on the smoking status of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on phase 2 of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (CRP). Additionally, we intend to investigate the mental health impact on smoker patients" group in conventional CR versus telemonitored CR. A retrospective study was conducted and patients in CRP between 2017 and 2020 were included. Patient selection and information collection were obtained through medical records. The outcomes of anxiety and depression were evaluated through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 for non-smokers or ex-smokers and group 2 for smokers. For group 2 patients, a sub-analysis was performed for patients following the conventional CR versus the telemonitored CR, with the use of MOVIDA mobile application. Variables were analysed in the beginning (T0) and in the end (T1) of phase 2, around 3 months after. Group comparisons tests and statistical analysis were performed using SPSS software v25.0. A p-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant. We analysed 107 patients, which 93 of these were assiduous and 69 concluded the phase 2 of CRP: 39 patients in group 1 and 30 patients in group 2. Two groups have similar baseline characteristics, except for the higher presence of diabetes (p = 0.02) in group 1. It was noted an improvement in both anxiety and depression items for group 1 (p < 0.01 for both), but only for anxiety item for group 2 (p = 0.03). In subgroup analysis, we observed no improvement for smoking patients following the conventional CR for both anxiety and depression items (p = 0.60 and p = 0.71, respectably) versus a significant difference in telemonitored CR patients (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04). We hypothesise that, when compared to conventional CR, cardiac telemonitored exercise using modern communication methods may result in an improved mental health state among smoking patients, which can lead to a better adherence for CRP. Further studies including more patients and phase 3 of CRP are needed to confirm these results.

Download Full-text

Cardiac rehabilitation via telerehabilitation in COVID-19 pandemic situation

The Egyptian Heart Journal ◽

10.1186/s43044-021-00156-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 73 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Dian M. Sari ◽

Laurentia C. G. Wijaya

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Rehabilitation Program ◽

Lifestyle Changes ◽

Second Phase ◽

Main Body ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation Program ◽

Care Providers ◽

Adherence To Medication ◽

Home Based

Abstract Background Adherence to medication and lifestyle changes are very important in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. One of the ways is by doing a cardiac rehabilitation program. Main body of the abstract Cardiac rehabilitation program is divided into three phases. The cardiac rehabilitation program’s implementation, especially the second phase, center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR), has many barriers not to participate optimally. Therefore, the third phase, known as home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR), can become a substitute or addition to CBCR. On the other hand, this phase is also an essential part of the patients’ functional capacity. During the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic, HBCR has become the leading solution in the cardiac rehabilitation program’s sustainability. Innovation is needed in its implementation, such as telerehabilitation. So, the cardiac rehabilitation program can be implemented by patients and monitored by health care providers continuously. Short conclusion Physicians play an essential role in motivating patients and encouraging their family members to commit to a sustainable CR program with telerehabilitation to facilitate its implementation.

Download Full-text

Impact of exercise based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology ◽

10.1093/eurjpc/zwab061.357 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

LE Estrada Martinez ◽

JA Lara Vargas ◽

JA Pineda Juarez ◽

JD Morales Portano ◽

JB Gomez Alvarez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Rate ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Rehabilitation Program ◽

Control Group ◽

Cardiac Rehabilitation Program ◽

Double Product ◽

Oxygen Pulse ◽

Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽

Cardiopulmonary Performance

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Due to the increase in global prevalence of degenerative valve disease, aortic stenosis (AS) has played a preponderant role in the cardiovascular scenario, especially in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). An alternative management for this patients are the cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP); however, their effect has not been completely understood, both in exercise capacity and quality of life, but neither in the improvement of cardiopulmonary performance and other cardiovascular outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the CRP on exercise tolerance and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with AS undergoing TAVR. Methods: A cohort study was conducted including 26 patients with AS undergoing TAVR and divided into an intervention group who performed a 4-week supervised training program in the Cardiac Rehabilitation Service and a control group to whom instructions and recommendations to performed unsupervised exercise at home were given. Demographic and clinical data (VO2Max, METS12, oxygen pulse, heart rate, double product, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index) were collected at baseline and after a 4-week follow-up. Results: 15 patients were included in the intervention group and 11 patients in the control group. There were no baseline significant differences between groups. After the intervention, significant differences were observed in the METS 12 final gain variable between the control and intervention group (4.55 vs 3.1 p = 0.01). Intergroup analysis showed significant differences (percentage changes) in the intervention group with an increase of METS12 (67.4%, p = 0.001), oxygen pulse (18.21%, p = 0.01), final METS (39.47% p = 0.001) and a decrease in VO2 recovery time (-12.5%, p = 0.05), in the ergometric performance index by heart rate (-38.17%, p = 0.001) and by double product (-38.1%, p = 0.001). Conclusions A 4-week cardiac rehabilitation program is effective to improve exercise tolerance and cardiopulmonary response in patients with AS undergoing TAVR; improvement was statistically significant in METS12, oxygen pulse, VO2 recovery time, METS-load and ergometric performance index for heart rate and double product. METS12 final gain was statistically significant in intervention group in comparison with the control group. Abstract Figure. Control vs Intervention Group (METS12)

Download Full-text