Black Parenting Strengths and Strategies Program Development Process: Fidelity Versus Cultural Specificity

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie I. Coard
Keyword(s):  
Program Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Cultural Specificity ◽  
Black Parenting

Using the principles and approaches of flexible methodology (agile) in the planning and implementation of the educational process

2020 ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
TING ZHU
Keyword(s):  
Labor Market ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Project Manager ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Large Complex ◽  
Complex Projects ◽  
Quality Risk ◽  
The Government

The educatonal program development process is challenging with many stakeholders: students, teachers, parents, administrators, employers, and the government. Each stakeholder has compettve priorites; Quality, risk, resources and costs limitaton. Large complex projects require the management of a skilled and experienced project manager. It is the preparaton of curricula for joint internatonal educatonal programs with the use of Agile tools and technologies. The main "customer" in this program is a student, and the ultmate goal of each project within the program-the competence of the student in the labor market afer receiving the diploma. Therefore, this program can be considered difcult, and it is constantly evolves, because the demands of the labor market of China is constantly changing and developing.

scholarly journals Special issue on ‘Program development’

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 423-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAURICE BRUYNOOGHE ◽  
KUNG-KIU LAU
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Real World ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Future Challenge ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Logical Foundations ◽  
The Past ◽  
Specification Synthesis

This special issue marks the tenth anniversary of the LOPSTR workshop. LOPSTR started in 1991 as a workshop on Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation, but later it broadened its scope to logic-based Program Development in general.The motivating force behind LOPSTR has been a belief that declarative paradigms such as logic programming are better suited to program development tasks than traditional non-declarative ones such as the imperative paradigm. Specification, synthesis, transformation or specialisation, analysis, verification and debugging can all be given logical foundations, thus providing a unifying framework for the whole development process.In the past ten years or so, such a theoretical framework has indeed begun to emerge. Even tools have been implemented for analysis, verification and specialisation. However, it is fair to say that so far the focus has largely been on programming-in-the-small. So the future challenge is to apply or extend these techniques to programming-in-the-large, in order to tackle software engineering in the real world.

From Need to Policy: Community Supported Development and Implementation of the South Carolina Vulnerable Adult Guardian Ad Litem (SC VAGAL) Program

2020 ◽  
pp. 073346482097880
Author(s):  
M. Aaron Guest ◽  
Brenda Stalzer ◽  
Maria Patton
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
The South ◽  
Pilot Testing ◽  
Abuse And Neglect ◽  
Guardian Ad Litem

Adult guardian ad litem programs are a necessary public service to protect adults from abuse and neglect. This article describes the development and implementation of an adult guardian ad litem program. We discuss the program’s impetus, pilot testing, evaluation, and implementation of the program. Our experience highlights the vital role of diverse inter-sectoral stakeholders. Furthermore, the development process highlights the need for flexibility in program development, tension negotiation among stakeholders, and engagement of aging stakeholders in nontraditional arenas.

scholarly journals The Impact of the earlySTEM Program on Teacher and Student Outcomes: The Role of Teachers’ Involvement in the Program Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-405
Author(s):  
Zerrin Doganca Kucuk ◽  
Defne Yabas ◽  
Hayriye Sinem Boyaci ◽  
Mehmet Sencer Corlu
Keyword(s):  
Program Development ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Development Process ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Professional Outcomes ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Academic Year

This research aimed to investigate and compare teachers’ conceptualizations of their students’ and their own outcomes of our earlySTEM program at the K4 level in two distinct roles: practitioners only and practitioners and program developers jointly. The study group included 66 teachers, 26 of whom had actively contributed to the development of the earlySTEM program. Teachers in both roles were supported by teacher guides, student books and workshops throughout the 8-month long academic year. Data was collected at the end of the academic year through an open-ended survey. The program developer teachers identified more student outcomes under more diverse categories while the practitioner teachers mainly concentrated on cognitive outcomes and limited their conceptualizations to the national curriculum. In addition, the program developer teachers valued their involvement in the program development process and expressed more diverse professional outcomes referring to different types of teacher knowledge.

scholarly journals Conducting the Needs Assessment #1: Introduction

EDIS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (5) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Matthew Benge ◽  
Amy Harder ◽  
Laura Warner
Keyword(s):  
Needs Assessment ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Agricultural Education ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Community Or ◽  
Planning Implementation ◽  
The Right

An integral step in the program development process is identifying the needs of a community. Educators seeking to develop and deliver an educational program must first be informed of what their audience lacks in order to develop the right curriculum or training. This initial publication in the Conducting the Needs Assessment series provides a brief introduction to the planning, implementation, and prioritization of needs within a community or specific clientele group. This new 4-page publication of the UF/IFAS Department of Agricultural Education and Communication was written by Matthew Benge, Amy Harder, and Laura Warner. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc340

scholarly journals Automation in Testing with Jenkins for Software Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 746-755
Author(s):  
Shridhar Prabhu ◽  
◽  
Manoj Naik ◽  
Firdosh A D ◽  
Sohan S A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Development System ◽  
Continuous Integration ◽  
Software Program ◽  
Automated Test ◽  
Software Development System ◽  
Real Scenario

Continuous Integration (CI) is a practice in the software program development process where software program builders combine code into a shared repository frequently, more than one instance throughout the day. Jenkins is a continuous integration tool which assists developer and testers by using automating the entire test, on the way to reduce their work with the aid of tracking the development at each and every stage in software development, each integration push is then tested by means of automated test cases, and an easy way to make CI quicker and accelerate. CI procedure is to automate the testing of a recent build. In this paper, a real scenario is taken into consideration, how the software program trying out is performed in corporate sectors and how Jenkins can save developers/testers important valuable hours by automating the whole software development system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document