scholarly journals Long term prognosis and quality of life following intensive care for life-threatening complications of haematological malignancy

1991 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 938-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Yau ◽  
AZS Rohatiner ◽  
TA Lister ◽  
CJ Hinds
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Haematological Malignancy ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Post–Intensive Care Syndrome in Family Decision Makers of Long-term Acute Care Hospital Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Petrinec
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Summary Score ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Family Decision ◽  
Post Intensive Care Syndrome

Background Family members of critically ill patients experience indications of post–intensive care syndrome, including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Despite increased use of long-term acute care hospitals for critically ill patients, little is known about the impact of long-term hospitalization on patients’ family members. Objectives To examine indications of post–intensive care syndrome, coping strategies, and health-related quality of life among family decision makers during and after patients’ long-term hospitalization. Methods A single-center, prospective, longitudinal descriptive study was undertaken of family decision makers of adult patients admitted to long-term acute care hospitals. Indications of post–intensive care syndrome and coping strategies were measured on the day of hospital admission and 30 and 60 days later. Health-related quality of life was measured by using the Short Form-36, version 2, at admission and 60 days later. Results The sample consisted of 30 family decision makers. On admission, 27% reported moderate to severe anxiety, and 20% reported moderate to severe depression. Among the decision makers, 10% met criteria for a provisional diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. At admission, the mean physical summary score for quality of life was 47.8 (SD, 9.91) and the mean mental summary score was 48.00 (SD, 10.28). No significant changes occurred during the study period. Problem-focused coping was the most frequently used coping strategy at all time points. Conclusion Family decision makers of patients in long-term acute care hospitals have a significant prevalence of indications of post–intensive care syndrome.

scholarly journals Adrenal Insufficiency - Aetiology, Diagnosis and Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-47
Author(s):  
Nazma Akter ◽  
Nazmul Kabir Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Diagnostic Work ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Term Management

Adrenal insufficiency is caused by either primary adrenal failure or by hypothalamic-pituitary impairment of the corticotropic axis. Adrenal insufficiency, first codified in 1855 by Thomas Addison, remains relevant in 2014 because of its lethal nature. Though, it is a rare disease but is life threatening when overlooked. Main presenting symptoms such as fatigue, anorexia and weight loss are nonspecific, thus diagnosis is often delayed. The diagnostic work-up is well established but some pitfalls remain. The diagnosis is adequately established by the 250 ?g ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) stimulation test in most cases. Glucocorticoids provide life saving treatment but long-term quality of life is impaired, perhaps because therapy is not given in a physiologic way. Dehydroepiandrosterone-replacement therapy has been introduced that could help to restore quality of life. It may be useful in pubertal girls, but not in adults. Monitoring of glucocorticoid-replacement is difficult due to lack of objective methods of assessment and is therefore largely based on clinical grounds. Thus, long-term management of patients with adrenal insufficiency remains a challenge, requiring an experienced specialist. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v3i1.22238 Delta Med Col J. Jan 2015; 3(1): 36-47

scholarly journals Long-term prognosis in Crohn's disease: factors that affect quality of life

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. CANAVAN ◽  
K. R. ABRAMS ◽  
B. HAWTHORNE ◽  
D. DROSSMAN ◽  
J. F. MAYBERRY
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Effects of prolonged intensive care unit stay on quality of life and long-term survival after transthoracic esophageal resection

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
H A. Cense ◽  
J B. F. Hulscher ◽  
A G. E. M. de Boer ◽  
D A. Dongelmans ◽  
H W. Tilanus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Stay ◽  
Esophageal Resection ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Palliative Care

2015 ◽  
pp. 105-123
Author(s):  
May Hua
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
Potential Benefits

Palliative care is a specialty of medicine that focuses on improving quality of life for patients with serious illness and their families. As the limitations of intensive care and the long-term sequelae of critical illness continue to be delimited, the role of palliative care for patients that are unable to achieve their original goals of care, as well as for survivors of critical illness, is changing and expanding. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce readers to the specialty of palliative care and its potential benefits for critically ill patients, and to present some of the issues related to the delivery of palliative care in surgical units.

Characterization of Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 938-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Feng ◽  
Yu-Hang Ai ◽  
Hua Gong ◽  
Long Wu ◽  
Mei-Lin Ai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Background: Sepsis and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) are common intensive care unit (ICU) diseases; the morbidity and mortality are high. The present study analyzed the sensitivity of different diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, epidemiological characteristics of sepsis and SAE, and explored its risk factors for death, short-term, and long-term prognosis. Methods: The retrospective study included patients in ICU from January 2015 to June 2016. After excluding 58 patients, 175 were assigned to either an SAE or a non-SAE group (patients with sepsis but no encephalopathy). The sensitivity of the diagnostic criteria was compared between sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, respectively. Between-group differences in baseline data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (APACHE II score), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA score), etiological data, biochemical indicators, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were analyzed. Survival outcomes and long-term prognosis were observed, and risk factors for death were analyzed through 180-day follow-up. Results: The sensitivity did not differ significantly between the diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0 ( P = .286). The 42.3% incidence of SAE presented a significantly high APACHE II and SOFA scores as well as 28-day mortality and 180-day mortality (all P < .001). The incidence of death was 37.1%. The multivariate stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of death in SAE group was significantly higher than the non-SAE group ( P < .001). Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a risk factor for sepsis-related death (relative risk [RR] = 2.868; 95% confidence interval: 1.730-4.754; P < .001). Although males showed a significantly high rate of 28-day and 180-day mortality ( P = .035 and .045), it was not an independent risk factor for sepsis-related death ( P = .072). The long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor with decreased quality of life. No significant difference was observed in prognosis between the SAE and non-SAE groups ( P > .05). Conclusion: Both diagnostic criteria cause misdiagnosis, and the sensitivity did not differ significantly. The incidence of SAE was high, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those without SAE. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a risk factor for poor outcome. The overall long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor, and the quality of life decreased.

scholarly journals Considerations for Continuing Semielective and Emergency Otolaryngological Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Sarina K. Mueller ◽  
Maximilian Traxdorf ◽  
Konstantinos Mantsopoulos ◽  
Antoniu-Oreste Gostian ◽  
Matti Sievert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Transmission Rate ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Life Threatening

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, worldwide over 600,000 human beings died due to the cause of the disease. In order to deescalate the transmission rate and to avoid crush loading the countries medical health systems social distancing, face masks, and lockdowns have been considered essential by the majority of governments. Whereas some countries have highly reduced or completely stopped otorhinolaryngological procedures, other countries have continued selected surgeries. The objective of this study was to analyze procedures and outcomes of continuing semielective and emergency surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Retrospective analysis of n = 750 patients who received semi-elective or emergency surgery between March 26 and June 16, 2020, in the Otolaryngology Department of the Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg. All patients were screened for COVID symptoms and swabbed for SARS-CoV-2 prior to surgery. Results: Of the n = 750 patients, n = 699 patients received semielective surgery and n = 51 emergency surgery. For 27 patients, the swab result could not be awaited due to a life-threatening condition. In these cases, surgery was performed in full protective equipment. No patient was tested positive during or after the surgery (follow-up 45 to 127 days). No member of the medical personnel showed symptoms or was tested positive after contact with patients. Due to the continuation of surgeries, patients’ lives were saved and improvement of long-term quality-of-life and outcomes is anticipated. Conclusions: Continuing selected otorhinolaryngological surgeries is crucial for patients’ health, survival, and long-time quality of life, yet, the protection of the medical personnel has to be granted.

Patients’ Characteristics Associated With Readmission to a Surgical Intensive Care Unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. e120-e128 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Timmers ◽  
M. H. J. Verhofstad ◽  
K. G. M. Moons ◽  
L. P. H. Leenen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Term Survival

Background Readmission within 48 hours is a leading performance indicator of the quality of care in an intensive care unit. Objective To investigate variables that might be associated with readmission to a surgical intensive care unit. Methods Demographic characteristics, severity-of-illness scores, and survival rates were collected for all patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit between 1995 and 2000. Long-term survival and quality of life were determined for patients who were readmitted within 30 days after discharge from the unit. Quality of life was measured with the EuroQol-6D questionnaire. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to calculate the independent association of expected covariates. Results Mean follow-up time was 8 years. Of the 1682 patients alive at discharge, 141 (8%) were readmitted. The main causes of readmission were respiratory decompensation (48%) and cardiac conditions (16%). Compared with the total sample, patients readmitted were older, mostly had vascular (39%) or gastrointestinal (26%) disease, and had significantly higher initial severity of illness (P = .003, .007) and significantly more comorbid conditions (P = .005). For all surgical classifications except general surgery, readmission was independently associated with type of admission and need for mechanical ventilation. Long-term mortality was higher among patients who were readmitted than among the total sample. Nevertheless, quality-of-life scores were the same for patients who were readmitted and patients who were not. Conclusion The adverse effect of readmission to the intensive care unit on survival appears to be long-lasting, and predictors of readmission are scarce.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document