scholarly journals Race reporting and diversity in US food and drug administration (FDA) registration trials for prostate cancer; 2006–2020

Author(s):  
M. P. Lythgoe ◽  
J. Krell ◽  
P. Savage ◽  
V. Prasad

Abstract Background There is significant racial disparity in prostate cancer (PCa) in terms of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. Racial diversity and compliance with FDA race reporting guidelines in PCa drug registration trials are unknown. We analyzed racial diversity and race reporting in drug licensing trials for PCa. Methods New drug authorizations for PCa from 2006 to 2020 were identified. The corresponding licensing trial publications were analyzed to check compliance with current FDA recommendations for race reporting. If race was unreported, the clinical trial report was analyzed to determine participant recruitment by race and lead the recruiting country. Results During the study period, 17 new drug registrations for the management of PCa involving ten unique drugs were identified. In total, 18,455 participants were included in FDA registration trials, of which 76.3% were white or Caucasian, 7.9% Asian, 2.9% Black or African American, 0.5% American Indian or Alaskan Native, 0.1% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 1.8% other or multiple races and 10.5% unknown. 53% of trials reported race in the licensing publication, however of this only 55% met current FDA recommendations. When the race was unreported in the licensing publication, 88% of studies had further information in the clinical study report. Conclusion We found a significant under-representation of non-white participants in FDA drug registration trials for PCa. Race reporting in licensing publication is inconsistent and both FDA and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines are not being universally followed. Given the disproportionality of the disease burden of PCa, recruitment of Black and other minority participants to trials should be a research priority.

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirin Saranyutanon ◽  
Sachin Kumar Deshmukh ◽  
Santanu Dasgupta ◽  
Sachin Pai ◽  
Seema Singh ◽  
...  

We have witnessed noteworthy progress in our understanding of prostate cancer over the past decades. This basic knowledge has been translated into efficient diagnostic and treatment approaches leading to the improvement in patient survival. However, the molecular pathogenesis of prostate cancer appears to be complex, and histological findings often do not provide an accurate assessment of disease aggressiveness and future course. Moreover, we also witness tremendous racial disparity in prostate cancer incidence and clinical outcomes necessitating a deeper understanding of molecular and mechanistic bases of prostate cancer. Biological research heavily relies on model systems that can be easily manipulated and tested under a controlled experimental environment. Over the years, several cancer cell lines have been developed representing diverse molecular subtypes of prostate cancer. In addition, several animal models have been developed to demonstrate the etiological molecular basis of the prostate cancer. In recent years, patient-derived xenograft and 3-D culture models have also been created and utilized in preclinical research. This review is an attempt to succinctly discuss existing information on the cellular and molecular progression of prostate cancer. We also discuss available model systems and their tested and potential utility in basic and preclinical prostate cancer research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1343-1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Mahran ◽  
Kirtishri Mishra ◽  
Laura Bukavina ◽  
Fredrick Schumacher ◽  
Anna Quian ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e1073-e1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Aminsharifi ◽  
Thomas J. Polascik ◽  
Matvey Tsivian ◽  
Ariel Schulman ◽  
Efrat Tsivian ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Hashimoto ◽  
Masrisa Shiina ◽  
Taku Kato ◽  
Soichiro Yamamura ◽  
Yuichiro Tanaka ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dev Karan ◽  
Seema Dubey ◽  
Jo Wick ◽  
Ossama Tawfik ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ballington L. Kinlock ◽  
Roland J. Thorpe ◽  
Daniel L. Howard ◽  
Janice V. Bowie ◽  
Louie E. Ross ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Beltran ◽  
D. Rickman ◽  
K. Park ◽  
A. Sboner ◽  
T. Macdonald ◽  
...  

19 Background: NEPC is an aggressive variant of prostate cancer that can arise de novo or from existing prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA). We sought to better understand the molecular transformation of NEPC and identify new drug targets. Methods: We used Next Generation RNA sequencing and oligonucleotide arrays to profile 7 NEPC, 30 PCA, 5 benign prostate (BEN), and validated findings on tumors from a large cohort of patients (30 NEPC, 118 PCA, 30 BEN) using IHC and FISH. Functional studies were performed using NCI-H660 (NEPC), VCaP and LnCaP (PCA), RWPE (BEN). Results: ERG rearrangement was present in 47% of NEPC, but ERG protein expression was absent and corresponded directly with lack of AR expression. 936/25932 genes were differentially expressed in NEPC versus PCA (P<0.001). Aurora kinases (AURKA, AURKB) and N-myc (MYCN) were overexpressed in NEPC (P<0.001) and AURKA and MYCN amplified. Using IHC and FISH, we validated these findings on a large cohort and found majority (>80%) of NEPC showed Aurora overexpression, 35% had AURKA and MYCN amplification. A small subset of PCA (5%) and no BEN were positive. Transfection of MYCN induced AURKA expression and kinase activity in vitro, and MYCN or AURKA could induce expression of neuroendocrine (NE) markers (SYP, NSE). After validating NCI-H660 as model of NEPC, we observed dramatic and enhanced in vitro and in vivo sensitivity to the Aurora kinase inhibitor PHA-739358 in NCI-H660 compared to minimal to no effect in LnCaP and VCaP. Phospho-H3 expression, a downstream marker of Aurora kinase activity, was inhibited in the treated NCI-H660 and not in PCA. Notably, NE marker expression was also suppressed in the treated NCI-H660 xenografts, again supporting a role of Aurora kinase in modulating the NE phenotype. Conclusions: There is likely clonal origin of NEPC from PCA (with ERG fusion positivity seen in both), but ERG expression is limited to PCA and driven by AR signaling. We discovered significant overexpression and gene amplification of Aurora kinases and N-myc in NEPC and a small subset of PCA, and evidence that that they cooperate and induce a NE phenotype in prostate cells. In vitro and in vivo data confirms that these are novel drug targets for NEPC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11037-11037
Author(s):  
Mark Bilinyi Ulanja ◽  
Mohit Rishi ◽  
Bryce Beutler ◽  
Kenneth Konam ◽  
Mokshya Sharma ◽  
...  

11037 Background: Gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. There has been limited data on GISTs incidence and survival disparities between ethnic groups. We assess disparities in incidence and survival among race in the United States in the era of available GIST histologic codes and treatment. Methods: We queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for GIST from 2002 to 2015, with diagnostic code 8936. Results: Of the 7,204 patients identified, 4,928 (68.4%) were White; 1,308 (18.2%) African American (AA) and 968 (13.4%) were classified as Other (American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander). The overall incidence rate (IR) was 0.753 per 100,000. IR was highest among AA at 1.372/100,000, but 0.648/100,000 for Whites, 1.075/100,000 for Asians/Pacific Islanders and 0.276/100,000 for American Indians/Alaskan Natives. The GIST incidence was twice as high for AA as for Whites (Rate ratio [RR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.98-2.26; p<0.001). Lower proportion of AA underwent surgery as compared to white and Other. Median overall survival (OS) [116 months] and GIST specific survival (GSS) was significantly lower in AA as compared to White and Other. In multivariate Cox model, belonging to Other had better OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]; 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.95, P=0.011) for GIST, but no difference in prognosis and OS for AA and White [(aHR for whites; 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83-1.04, P=0.187), AA=reference]. Conclusions: Significant racial disparity in incidence and survival for GIST exists, and efforts should be made to bridge this gap and improve outcomes for all races. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14580-e14580
Author(s):  
Felipe G. Gercovich ◽  
Ernesto Gil Deza ◽  
Eduardo L. Morgenfeld ◽  
Marcelo Muino ◽  
Marvin Albert Mizrahi ◽  
...  

e14580 Background: It has been consistently proven that pivotal clinical trials (PCT) for drug registration or new drug indications (NDI), sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, obtain better results than independent confirmatory studies (ICS). The interplay between PCT and ICS has supported better treatment selections and more realistic expectations: hope vs hype.The aim of this paper is to analyze the amount of ICS publications in Oncology within the last decade. Methods: All new FDA approved oncological drugs or NDI for solid tumors between 2005 and 2017 were taken into account. The PCT that led to their approval were identified, and between October and November 2019 a thorough search for related ICS (published or ongoing) was conducted on MEDLINE, ASCO Abstracts, NEJM, Lancet Oncology, JAMA, JCO, Cancer, PLOS ONE, PLOS Medicine and www.Clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Fifty-five new drugs or NDI were analyzed (Abemaciclib, Abiraterone, Ado-trastuzumab emtasine, Afatinib, Alectinib, Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Axitinib, Bendamustine, Bevacizumab, Brigatinib, Cabozantinib, Ceritinib, Cobimetinib, Crizotinib, Dabrafenib, Degarelix, Denosumab, Durvalumab, Eribuline mesylate, Everolimus, Ipilimumab, Irinotecan liposome, Ixabepilone, Lapatinib, Lenvatinib, Necitumumab, Neratinib, Nilotinib, Niraparib, Nivolumab, Olaparib, Osimertinib, Paclitaxel protein bound, Palbociclib, Panitumumab, Pazopanib, Pembrolizumab, Pertuzumab, Ramucirumab, Regorafenib, Ribociclib, Rucaparib, SipuleucelT, Sonidegib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Topotecan, Trabectedin, Trametinib, Trastuzumab, Vandetanib, Vemurafenib, Vismodegib, Ziv-afilbercept). Until November 30, 2019, no published or ongoing ICS were found in any of the cases. Conclusions: a) For the past decade, none of the PCT used for approval of new oncological drugs or NDI were replicated by ICS (without pharmaceutical industry sponsorship). b) We ignore the reasons for these approval methods but they raise suspicion and unnecessary discomfort. c) From an ethical point of view, patients’ Informed Consent must specify that expected results for the new drug or NDI are based exclusively on trials sponsored by the selling pharmaceutical company, unless other ICS are published. d) The current state of affairs can only be reverted if regulatory agencies and the scientific community demand ICS as part of the drug approval process or post-marketing duties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document