scholarly journals Germline and somatic mutations of homologous recombination-associated genes in Japanese ovarian cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Sugino ◽  
Ryo Tamura ◽  
Hirofumi Nakaoka ◽  
Nozomi Yachida ◽  
Manako Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Mmr Genes ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractWe explored the frequency of germline and somatic mutations in homologous recombination (HR)-associated genes in major histological types of ovarian cancer. We performed targeted sequencing to assess germline and somatic mutations of 16 HR-associated genes and 4 mismatch repair (MMR) genes among 207 ovarian cancer patients (50 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 99 clear cell carcinomas (CCC), 39 endometrioid carcinomas (EC), 13 mucinous carcinomas (MC), and 6 low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSC)). Germline or somatic mutations of HR-associated genes were detected in 44% of HGSC, 28% of CCC, 23% of EC, 16% of MC, and 17% of LGSC patients. The profile of HR-associated gene mutations was remarkably different among each histological type. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were frequently detected in HGSC and were rarely observed in CCC, EC, and MC patients. ATM somatic mutation was more frequently detected in CCC (9%) and EC patients (18%) than in HGSC patients (4%). There was a positive correlation between MMR gene mutations and HR-associated gene mutations (p = 0.0072). Our findings might be useful in selection of ovarian cancer patients that should be treated with PARP inhibitors.

scholarly journals Arsenic compound sensitizes homologous recombination proficient ovarian cancer to PARP inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junfen Xu ◽  
Yuanming Shen ◽  
Conghui Wang ◽  
Sangsang Tang ◽  
Shiyuan Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cells ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Arsenic Compound ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Sequential Administration

AbstractThe poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors show survival benefits in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutation or homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, but only limited efficacy in HR-proficient ones. Another drug, arsenic trioxide (ATO) or arsenic drug (RIF), exerts antitumor effects via inducing DNA damage. Here, we investigated the combined therapeutic effects of the PARP inhibitors and the arsenic compound in HR-proficient ovarian cancer. The combined treatment of niraparib, olaparib, or fluazolepali with ATO showed a significant suppression in tumor cell viability and colony formation. The drug treatment also induced synergistic inhibition of cell proliferation and DNA damage, and acceleration of cell apoptosis in two HR-proficient ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and CAOV3, either by simultaneous or sequential administration. The mechanism underlying these synergistic effects were reflected by the significantly increased ratio of cleaved-PARP/total PARP and decreased ratio of p-AKT/total AKT. Consistently, the combination of olaparib with RIF synergistically reduced the tumor growth in mouse xenograft models. In conclusion, the arsenic compound greatly sensitizes HR-proficient ovarian cancer cells to the PARP inhibitors, and our findings provide an evidence for the clinical treatment development of this combination in HR-proficient ovarian cancer patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Literature-Based Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 01-18
Author(s):  
Vikas Goswami ◽  
Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala ◽  
Sumit Goyal ◽  
Manish Sharma ◽  
Varun Goel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Repair Mechanism ◽  
Selection Of

AbstractPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a unique class of therapeutic agents that focus on tumors with deficiencies in the homologous recombination DNA repair mechanism. Genomic instability outlines high-grade serous ovarian cancer, with 50% of all tumors displaying defects in the important DNA repair mechanism of homologous recombination. Earlier research studies have demonstrated considerable efficiency for PARP inhibitors in patients with germ line breast-related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA-1/BRCA-2) mutations. It has also been observed that BRCA wild-type patients with other defects in the homologous recombination repair mechanism get benefited from this therapy. Companion homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores are being developed to guide the selection of patients that are most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition. The selection of PARP inhibitor is mainly dependent upon the number of prior therapies and the presence of a BRCA mutation or HRD. The identification of cases which are most likely to get benefited from PARP inhibitor therapy in view of HRD and other biomarker assessments is still challenging. The purpose of this review is to focus and describe the current evidences for PARP inhibitors in ovarian malignancy, their mechanism of action, and the outstanding issues, including the rate of long-term toxicities and the evolving resistance.

Prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency among all tumor types.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1502-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle Lutterman Heeke ◽  
Tabari Baker ◽  
Filipa Lynce ◽  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
Claudine Isaacs
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Read Depth ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Molecular Profiles ◽  
Head Neck

1502 Background: Triple negative breast and ovarian cancer are known to have a high frequency of homologous recombination deficiencies (HRDef). The prevalence of HRDef among all tumors is unknown. Methods: Molecular profiles of 48,733 tumors obtained from pts with bladder, breast, ovarian, pancreas, prostate, thyroid, cervical, hepatobiliary, colorectal (CRC), endometrial, gastric/esophageal (GE), head/neck, renal, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), small cell lung (SCLC), GIST, glioma, melanoma, sarcoma and unknown 1° cancers were reviewed to identify somatic pathogenic mutations (mut) in HR genes ATM, ATRX, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, FANCA/C/D2/E/F/G/L, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, or WRN. Molecular profiles were generated from tumors submitted to Caris Life Sciences using multiple technologies including next generation sequencing (average read depth 500X). Results: Overall frequency of HR mut among all tumors is 11.61% (5658/48733). Cancer lineages with highest frequency of HR mut are endometrial (38.08%, 1956/5137), glioma (15.90%, 265/1667), ovarian (12.99%, 1151/8862), prostate (11.21%, 77/687), cervix (10.06%, 79/785) & breast (9.66%, 562/5818). Least commonly mutated lineages include GIST (1.50%, 3/200), sarcoma (3.12%, 55/1763), head/neck (3.70%, 24/648), hepatobiliary (4.72%, 39/827) & pancreas (5.05%, 102/2022). Frequencies of HR gene mutations are depicted in Table 1. Conclusions: HR mutations were seen in 11.61% of tumors. While the percentage of HRDef in pancreatic cancer pts is lower than what has been seen in other datasets, the percentage in breast and ovarian cancer, as well as the percentage of other tumors with HRDef, provide a path to employ HRDef-directed therapies such as platinums, but especially PARP inhibitors and newer agents such as ATRX inhibitors. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A MOLECULAR-BASED APPROACH TO INVESTIGATE BREAST CANCER 1 AND BREAST CANCER 2 STATUS IN OVARIAN CANCER AMONG IRAQI WOMEN

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Muhannad Shweash ◽  
Saddam Jumaa Naseer ◽  
Maisam Khider Al-anii ◽  
Thulfiqar Fawwaz Mutar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Brca Gene ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations

Objective: Cancer ovary is one of the fatal gynecologic malignancies worldwide. Since breast cancer (BRCA) genes are considered tumor suppressor genes and play important roles in cancer by repairing of chromosomal damage with the error repair of DNA breaks. Therefore, breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) gene mutations strongly enhance the development of ovarian cancer risk among women. Here, we report that both genes are an essential mediator of progress ovarian cancer, to determine the influence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the improvement of ovarian cancer.Methods: A total of 25 subjects were chosen for the genetic studies, and three groups were recruited: fifteen ovarian cancer patients group, five healthy controls, and five first-degree relatives to a known case of ovarian cancer patients.Results: A genetic analysis revealed that a strong correlation exists between both gene mutations’ status in ovarian cancer, and BRCA gene mutations (185delAG, 5382insC, and 4153delA in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2) remained to establish to have a relatively high frequency among people in this study among ovarian cancer patients. Furthermore, seven patients with ovarian cancer carried all of the four investigated mutations, and five had three mutations.Conclusion: Otherwise, BRCA gene frequency showed low prevalence among first-degree relatives, and to a lesser extent among healthy controls, with only a few had all of the mutations combined. These data demonstrate for the first time a molecular link between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer progression in Iraq.

Frequency of homologous recombination associated gene mutations in Japanese patients with ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S163-S164
Author(s):  
Kosuke Yoshihara ◽  
Tsukasa Baba ◽  
Mueaki Shimada ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshida ◽  
Aikou Okamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Japanese Patients

Homologous recombination deficiency associated with response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer patients: The first real-word data from China.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17543-e17543
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Chen ◽  
Jing Ni ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
Wenwen Guo ◽  
Xianzhong Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Homologous Recombination Deficiency ◽  
Polymerase Inhibitors

e17543 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is the first phenotypically defined predictive biomarker for Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer. However, the proportion of HRD positive in real world and the relationship of HRD status with PARPi in Chinese ovarian cancer patients remains unknown. Methods: A total of sixty-four ovarian cancer patients underwent PARPi, both Olaparib and Niraparib, were enrolled from August 2018 to January 2021 in Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Hospital. HRD score which was the sum of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI) and large-scale state transitions (LST) events were calculated using tumor DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS) assays. HRD-positive was defined by either BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation or HRD score ≥42. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed with a log-rank test using HRD status and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Univariate and multiple cox-regression analysis were conducted to investigate all possible clinical factors. Results: 71.9% (46/64) patients were HRD positive and the rest 28.1% (18/64) were HRD negative, which was higher than the HRD positive proportion reported in Western countries. The PFS among HRD positive patients was significantly longer than those HRD negative patients (medium PFS 8.9 m vs 3.6 m, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.22, p < 0.001). Among them, 23 patients who were BRCA wild type but HRD positive had longer PFS than those with BRCA wild type and HRD negative (medium PFS 9.2 m vs 3.6 m, HR: 0.20, p < 0.001). Univariate cox-regression analysis found that HRD status, previous treatment lines, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) were significantly associated with PFS after PARPi treatment. After multiple regression correction, HRD status (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: [0.20-0.76], p = 0.006), ECOG score (HR: 2.53, 95% CI: [1.24-5.17], p = 0.011) and SCS (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: [1.09-4.48], p = 0.028) were the independent factors. Subgroup analysis in ECOG = 0 subgroup (N = 36), HRD positive patients had significant longer PFS than HRD negative patients (medium PFS 10.3 m vs 5.8 m, HR: 0.14, p < 0.001). Also in the subgroup of patients without SCS, PFS in patients with HRD was longer than patients without HRD (medium PFS 10.2 m vs 5.7 m, HR: 0.29, p = 0.003). Conclusions: This is the first real-world data of HRD status in ovarian cancer patients from China and demonstrate that HRD is a valid biomarker for PARP inhibitors in Chinese ovarian cancer patients.

Laboratory cross-comparison of homologous recombination repair mutation analysis in tumor in a multicenter epithelial ovarian cancer series: The BORNEO GEICO 60-0 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17550-e17550
Author(s):  
Ignacio Romero ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Zaida Garcia-Casado ◽  
Raul Marquez ◽  
Alfonso Yubero Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Uncertain Significance

e17550 Background: In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the identification of mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes on tumor is prognostic, predictive of response to PARP inhibitors, and a tool to identify individuals at genetic cancer risk. The aim of this study is to compare the concordance between two laboratories in identifying and classifying genetic variants in HRR genes. Methods: In a multicentre ambispective series of unselected, non mucinous EOC of all stages formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumors were collected. These samples underwent the same mutational analysis of 15 HRR genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L) in two different Laboratories (Lab1, Lab2) that used their own validated multi-gene NGS panels. Variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was 5% for single nucleotide polymorphism and 10% for indels. Large rearrangements were not analyzed. Variants were classified into three categories based on ACMG criteria: non-mutated (class 1-2), Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS: class 3) and likely pathogenic/pathogenic (class 4-5). Results: A total of 81 cases were sent for the analysis. One had low DNA quality and therefore 80 cases were finally studied (85% high grade serous and 74% FIGO stage III-IV). Results reported by Lab1 and Lab2 (lab1/Lab2) were the following: 21/19 (26%/24%) cases had BRCA1/2 mutations, 7/8 (8.7%/10%) mutations on other HRR genes including two in ATM and RAD51D, one in CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL and one RAD51C reported in Lab2 only while the rest were either VUS 23/27 (29%/34%) or non-mutated 29/26 (36%/33%). Concordance between laboratories in classifying patients was 93.75% (kappa coefficient 0.86). Discrepancies (DC) on variants were classified into arbitrary categories, namely 0= complete concordance, category 1 meaning DC in detection assumed to be due to tumor heterogeneity (VAF nearby the threshold) or technique (1A), or caused by laboratories performance and avoidable (1B) and the category 2 identified DC in interpretation without clinical relevance (2A) or clinically relevant (2B), the results of total number of variants are shown in table. Overall, regarding clinically relevant DC in HRR genes, 9 DC in variants were observed including six 2B, two 1A and one 1B and they affect 5 (6.3%) patients since some were overlapping. Conclusions: In our EOC series the concordance of two Laboratories in the identification of clinically relevant HRR mutations on tumor is high but discrepancies in interpretation remain a challenge that needs further harmonization.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document