scholarly journals Factors associated with unplanned readmissions and costs following resection of brain metastases in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raees Tonse ◽  
Alexandra Townsend ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Vitaly Siomin ◽  
Michael W. McDermott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
The United States ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to critically analyze the risk of unplanned readmission following resection of brain metastasis and to identify key risk factors to allow for early intervention strategies in high-risk patients. We analyzed data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2010–2014, and included patients who underwent craniotomy for brain metastasis, identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis (198.3) and procedure (01.59) codes. The primary outcome of the study was unplanned 30-day all-cause readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included reasons and costs of readmissions. Hierarchical logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with 30-day readmission following craniotomy for brain metastasis. During the study period, 44,846 index hospitalizations occurred for patients who underwent resection of brain metastasis. In this cohort, 17.8% (n = 7,965) had unplanned readmissions within the first 30 days after discharge from the index hospitalization. The readmission rate did not change significantly during the five-year study period (p-trend = 0.286). The median per-patient cost for 30-day unplanned readmission was $11,109 and this amounted to a total of $26.4 million per year, which extrapolates to a national expenditure of $269.6 million. Increasing age, male sex, insurance status, Elixhauser comorbidity index, length of stay, teaching status of the hospital, neurological complications and infectious complications were associated with 30-day readmission following discharge after an index admission for craniotomy for brain metastasis. Unplanned readmission rates after resection of brain metastasis remain high and involve substantial healthcare expenditures. Developing tools and interventions to prevent avoidable readmissions could focus on the high-risk patients as a future strategy to decrease substantial healthcare expense.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric and Adult Tumor Lysis Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 2767-2778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Arnold Altman ◽  
Ching-Hon Pui ◽  
Anas Younes ◽  
Mitchell S. Cairo
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
The United States ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

PurposeTumor lysis syndrome (TLS) has recently been subclassified into either laboratory TLS or clinical TLS, and a grading system has been established. Standardized guidelines, however, are needed to aid in the stratification of patients according to risk and to establish prophylaxis and treatment recommendations for patients at risk or with established TLS.MethodsA panel of experts in pediatric and adult hematologic malignancies and TLS was assembled to develop recommendations and guidelines for TLS based on clinical evidence and standards of care. A review of relevant literature was also used.ResultsNew guidelines are presented regarding the prevention and management of patients at risk of developing TLS. The best management of TLS is prevention. Prevention strategies include hydration and prophylactic rasburicase in high-risk patients, hydration plus allopurinol or rasburicase for intermediate-risk patients, and close monitoring for low-risk patients. Primary management of established TLS involves similar recommendations, with the addition of aggressive hydration and diuresis, plus allopurinol or rasburicase for hyperuricemia. Alkalinization is not recommended. Although guidelines for rasburicase use in adults are provided, this agent is currently only approved for use in pediatric patients in the United States.ConclusionThe potential severity of complications resulting from TLS requires measures for prevention in high-risk patients and prompts treatment in the event that symptoms arise. Recognition of risk factors, monitoring of at-risk patients, and appropriate interventions are the key to preventing or managing TLS. These guidelines should assist in the prevention of TLS and improve the management of patients with established TLS.

scholarly journals Assessment of statin therapy, LDL-C levels, and cardiovascular events among high-risk patients in the United States

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir K. Unni ◽  
Ruben G.W. Quek ◽  
Joseph Biskupiak ◽  
Vinson C. Lee ◽  
Xiangyang Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
The United States ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Optimizing antiviral treatment for seasonal influenza in the United States: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matan Yechezkel ◽  
Martial Ndeffo-Mba ◽  
Dan Yamin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Seasonal Influenza ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Social Contact ◽  
Population Level ◽  
The United States ◽  
Transmission Model ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Seasonal influenza remains a major health burden in the United States. Despite recommendations of early antiviral treatment of high-risk patients, the effective treatment coverage remains very low. We developed an influenza transmission model that incorporates data on infectious viral load, social contact, and healthcare-seeking behavior, to evaluate the population-level impact of increasing antiviral treatment timeliness and coverage among high-risk patients in the US. We found that increasing the rate of early treatment among high-risk patients who received treatment more than 48 hours after symptoms onset, would substantially avert infections and influenza-induced hospitalizations. We found that treatment of the elderly has the highest impact on reducing hospitalizations, whereas treating high-risk individuals aged 5-19 years old has the highest impact on transmission. The population-level impact of increased timeliness and coverage of treatment among high-risk patients was observed regardless of seasonal influenza vaccination coverage and the severity of the influenza season.

Comparison of ColoPrint risk classification with clinical risk in the prospective PARSC trial.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 465-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Robert Rosenberg ◽  
Jan Willem de Waard ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

465 Background: The 18-gene expression profile, ColoPrint, has been developed and validated for identifying risk of recurrence in patients with early-stage colon cancer (CC). In a pooled stage II validation study ColoPrint identified 63% of patients as Low Risk with a 3-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 93% while High Risk patients had a 3-yr RFS of 82% with a HR of 2.7 (p=0.001). PARSC is a prospective study for the assessment of recurrence risk in stage II CC patients using ColoPrint. ColoPrint classification is compared to NCCN risk classification. Methods: The study enrolled 468 patients with histologically proven stage II CC from 31 institutes in Europe, the United States, and Asia between October 2008 and May 2013. Synchronous tumors were excluded. ColoPrint results were not disclosed to the physician and patient. Treatment was at the discretion of the physician, adhering to NCCN approved regimens or a recognized alternative. A McNemars test is performed to compare ColoPrint with NCCN risk classification. A p value ≤ 0.05 indicates the two tests differ significantly. Results: ColoPrint classified 320 (68%) patients as Low Risk and 148 (32%) as High Risk. 89 patients (19%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the ColoPrint Low Risk group, 57 (18%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 32 (22%) of ColoPrint High Risk patients received chemotherapy. According to NCCN high risk factors (T4, high grade (exclusive of MSI-H), lymphovascular/perineural invasion, perforation/obstruction, <12 nodes examined, positive margins) 234 (50%) patients were NCCN Low Risk and 234 were NCCN High Risk. 72 (31%) of the NCCN Low Risk patients are ColoPrint High Risk. 158 (68%) of the NCCN High Risk patients are ColoPrint Low Risk. MSI-status was assessed in 86 (18%) patients of which 29 were MSI high and 57 were MSS. All MSI high were classified as ColoPrint Low Risk. Conclusions: The PARSC study is the first prospective study to compare genomic and clinical risk assessment and we observed marked differences between NCCN risk classification and ColoPrint. The clinical validity of these methods will be based on the outcomes at 3 and 5 years. Clinical trial information: NCT00903565. [Table: see text]

Patterns of care in treating childhood neuroblastoma: Evidence from a population level study (SEER) in the United States.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22011-e22011
Author(s):  
Diarmuid Coughlan ◽  
Charles Lynch ◽  
Matthew Gianferante ◽  
Jennifer Stevens ◽  
Linda C Harlan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
The United States ◽  
Patterns Of Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

e22011 Background: Childhood neuroblastoma describes a heterogeneous group of extracranial solid tumors. This heterogeneity is reflected in the sequence and variety of treatment modalities administered. We describe the treatment pattern and survival of childhood neuroblastoma patients using population-based data in the United States. Methods: Using the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Patterns of Care data, we examined treatment provided to childhood neuroblastoma patients newly diagnosed in 2010 and 2011 and registered to one of 14 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Data were re-abstracted from hospital records and treating physicians were contacted to verify the treatment given. Stratifying by the Children’s Oncology Group (COG)’s 3-level (low, intermediate and high) neuroblastoma risk classification system for therapeutic decision-making, gave a snapshot of community-based treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were also performed. Results: The majority of 250 patients (76%) were enrolled on an open/active clinical trial. All low-risk patients received surgery with/without chemotherapy. The majority of intermediate-risk patients (77%) received chemotherapy regimen that included carboplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. High-risk patients received extensive, multimodal treatment consisting of chemotherapy, surgery, high dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue (transplant), radiation, immunotherapy (dinutuximab), and isotretinoin therapy. Cyclophosphamide was the most utilized chemotherapy agent (94%) in high-risk patients. Survival with a maximum follow-up of 48 months, was lowest (68%) for patients diagnosed with high-risk disease. Conclusions: The majority of childhood neuroblastoma patients are registered on a risk-based open/active clinical trial. Variation in modality, systemic agents and sequence of treatment reflects the heterogeneity of therapy for childhood neuroblastoma patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document