Effect of topography and weather on delivery of automatic electrical defibrillator by drone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AbstractDelivery of automatic electrical defibrillator (AED) by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was suggested for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The goal of this study is to assess the effect of topographic and weather conditions on call to AED attach time by UAV-AED. We included OHCA patients from 2013 to 2016 in Seoul, South Korea. We developed a UAV-AED flight simulator using topographic information of Seoul for Euclidean and topographic flight pathway including vertical flight to overcome high-rise structures. We used 4 kinds of UAV flight scenarios according to weather conditions or visibility. Primary outcome was emergency medical service (EMS) call to AED attach time. Secondary outcome was pre-arrival rate of UAV-AED before current EMS based AED delivery. Call to AED attach time in topographic pathway was 7.0 min in flight and control advanced UAV and 8.0 min in basic UAV model. Pre-arrival rate in Euclidean pathway was 38.0% and 16.3% for flight and control advanced UAV and basic UAV. Pre-arrival rate in the topographic pathway was 27.0% and 11.7%, respectively. UAV-AED topographic flight took longer call to AED attach time than Euclidean pathway. Pre-arrival rate of flight and control advanced UAV was decreased in topographic flight pathway compared to Euclidean pathway.

Download Full-text

Effect of topography and weather on call to automatic electrical defibrillator attach time by drone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a virtual flight simulation study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-344053/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Dong Sun Choi ◽

Ki Jeong Hong ◽

Sang Do Shin ◽

Chang-Gun Lee ◽

Tae Han Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Arrival Rate ◽

Weather Conditions ◽

Flight Simulation ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

3 Dimensional ◽

Ground Ambulance ◽

And Control ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽

Electrical Defibrillator

Abstract Background Delivery of automatic electrical defibrillator (AED) by unmanned aerial vehicle like drones was suggested to improve early defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We developed a drone-AED flight virtual simulator using 3-dimensional topographic and meteorological information. The goal of this study is to assess the effect of topography and weather on call to AED attach time in drone-AED program. Methods We included patients from 2013 to 2016 in Seoul, South Korea, registered in the Korean out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry. We developed a drone-AED flight simulation using topographic information of Seoul for Euclidean flight pathway and topographic flight pathway including vertical flight to overcome high-rise structures. We used 4 drone flight scenarios according to weather conditions or visibility: flight and control advanced drone, flight advanced drone, control advanced drone and basic drone. Primary outcome was emergency medical service call to AED attach time. Secondary outcome was success rate of call to AED attachment within 5 or 10 minutes, and pre-arrival rate of drone-AED before AED delivery by ground ambulance. Results 16,596 patients were included. Median flight time of drone-AED was 2.6 and 1.0 minute for topographic flight simulation and Euclidean pathway. Call to AED attach time in topographic pathway was 7.0 minutes in flight and control advanced drone and 8.0 minutes in basic drone. The time in Euclidean pathway was 6.5 minutes in flight and control advanced drone and 7.0 minutes in basic drone. Pre-arrival rate of drone-AED in Euclidean pathway was 38.0% and 16.3% for flight and control advanced drone and basic drone. whereas, pre-arrival rate in the topographic pathway was 27.0% and 11.7%, respectively. Conclusions Drone-AED took longer call to AED attach time in basic drone than flight and control advanced drone. Pre-arrival rate of flight and control advanced drone was decreased in topographic flight pathway compared to Euclidean pathway. Trial registration This study used cases retrospectively registered in the Korean out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry.

Download Full-text

Abstract 13292: Comparison of Outcomes Between Pulseless Electrical Activity by Electrocardiography and Pulseless Myocardial Activity by Echocardiography in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.144.suppl_2.13292 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Romolo Gaspari ◽

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Electrical Activity ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Cardiac Activity ◽

Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Cardiac Electrical Activity ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: To measure prevalence of discordance between electrical activity recorded by electrocardiography (ECG) and myocardial activity visualized by echocardiography (echo) in patients presenting after cardiac arrest and to compare survival outcomes in cohorts defined by ECG and echo. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously published prospective study at twenty hospitals. Patients presenting after out-of-hospital arrest were included. The cardiac electrical activity was defined by ECG and contemporaneous myocardial activity was defined by bedside echo. Myocardial activity by echo was classified as myocardial asystole- -the absence of myocardial movement, pulseless myocardial activity (PMA)--visible myocardial movement but no pulse, and myocardial fibrillation- -visualized fibrillation. Primary outcome was the prevalence of discordance between electrical activity and myocardial activity. Secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: 793 patients and 1943 pauses in CPR were included. 28.6% of CPR pauses demonstrated a difference in electrical activity (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo), 5.0% with asystole (ECG) and PMA (echo), and 22.1% with PEA (ECG) and myocardial asystole (echo). Survival to hospital admission for patients with PMA (echo) was 29.1% (95%CI-23.9-34.9) compared to those with PEA (ECG) (21.4%, 95%CI-17.7-25.6). Twenty-five percent of the 32 pauses in CPR with a shockable rhythm by echo demonstrated a non-shockable rhythm by ECG and were not defibrillated. One of these patients survived, a patient with asystole on ECG and vfib by echo survived because vfib was identified on ECG during a subsequent pause and was defibrillated. Conclusion: Patients in cardiac arrest commonly demonstrate different electrical (ECG) and myocardial activity (echo). Further research is needed to better define cardiac activity during cardiac arrest and to explore outcome between groups defined by electrical and myocardial activity.

Download Full-text

Association of ambient temperature with the outcomes in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a population-based observational study

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-019-50074-7 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Chiwon Ahn ◽

Jihoon Kim ◽

Wonhee Kim ◽

In Young Kim ◽

Hyun Young Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Ambient Temperature ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Meteorological Data ◽

Population Based ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Metropolitan Cities ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract This study aimed to identify the association between ambient temperature (AT) and patient outcome of witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring outdoors. This retrospective nationwide, population-based cohort study recruited witnessed adult OHCA patients in South Korea from January 2012 to December 2016. Meteorological data of 17 metropolitan cities and provinces were retrieved from the Korea Meteorological Administration database. Primary outcome was sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in hospital. Secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. By the standard of quartile categories of AT (Q1 = 7.1 °C; Q2 = 17.7 °C; Q3 = 23.5 °C), three comparative analyses for ROSC and survival were performed between low and high AT groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for both AT groups. Among the 142,906 OHCA patients, 1,295 were included. In the multivariate analysis for matched groups by the standard of 7.1 °C (Q1), proportion of ROSC was significantly higher in the high AT-Q1 group than in the low AT-Q1 group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–3.44). No significant difference in survival was shown between both AT-Q1 groups (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 0.61–2.52). In the standard of 17.7 °C (Q2) and 23.5 °C (Q3), no significant differences in ROSC and survival were found between the low and high AT groups. In conclusion, no obvious correlation existed between AT and patient outcomes such as sustained ROSC or survival to discharge in this study.

Download Full-text

Effect of prehospital intraosseous combined with in-hospital intravenous access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

10.22514/sv.2021.046 ◽

2021 ◽

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Epinephrine Administration ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Study Population ◽

Epinephrine Dose ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: Obtaining vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prehospital intraosseous infusion (IO) combined with in-hospital intravenous (IV) (pre-IO + in-IV) access versus the simple IV (pre-IV + in-IV) access in adult OHCA patients who do not achieve prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: This retrospective observational study included adults with OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology between October 1, 2017-October 1, 2020 at an academic emergency department in China. All of the OHCA patients included within the study had Emergency Medical Services cardiopulmonary resuscitation and received prehospital epinephrine administration, but did not achieve prehospital ROSC. The study population were classified as either pre-IO + in-IV or IV (pre-IV + in-IV) based on their epinephrine administration route. The prehospital epinephrine routes were the first and only attempted route. The primary outcome investigated was sustained ROSC following arrival at the emergency department. The secondary outcome considered was the time from dispatch to the first epinephrine dose. Results: Of 193 included adult OHCA subjects who did not have prehospital ROSC, 128 received IV access only. The 65 pre-IO + in-IV-treated patients received epinephrine faster compared to IV-treated patients in terms of the median time from dispatch to the first injection of epinephrine (14.5 vs. 16.0 min, P = 0.001). In the pre-IO + in-IV group, 34 of 65 patients (52.3%) achieved sustained ROSC compared with 65 of 128 (50.8%) patients in the IV group (χ2 = 0.031, P = 0.841). There was no significant difference in sustained ROSC (adjusted OR1.049, 95% CI: 0.425-2.591, P = 0.918) between the two groups. Conclusion: A similar sustained ROSC rate was achieved for both the pre-IO + in-IV access group and the simple IV access group. Our results suggested that an IV route should be established quickly for prehospital IO-treated OHCA patients who do not achieve prehospital ROSC.

Download Full-text

Echocardiographic parameters during prolonged targeted temperature Management in out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors to predict neurological outcome – a post-hoc analysis of the TTH48 trial

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s13049-021-00849-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Thomas Hvid Jensen ◽

Peter Juhl-Olsen ◽

Bent Roni Ranghøj Nielsen ◽

Johan Heiberg ◽

Christophe Henri Valdemar Duez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Global Longitudinal Strain ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Targeted Temperature Management ◽

Temperature Management ◽

Left Ventricular Ejection ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) indices of myocardial function among survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been related to neurological outcome; however, results are inconsistent. We hypothesized that changes in average peak systolic mitral annular velocity (s’) from 24 h (h) to 72 h following start of targeted temperature management (TTM) predict six-month neurological outcome in comatose OHCA survivors. Methods We investigated the association between peak systolic velocity of the mitral plane (s’) and six-month neurological outcome in a population of 99 patients from a randomised controlled trial comparing TTM at 33 ± 1 °C for 24 h (h) (n = 47) vs. 48 h (n = 52) following OHCA (TTH48-trial). TTE was conducted at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after reaching target temperature. The primary outcome was 180 days neurological outcome assessed by Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC180) and the primary TTE outcome measure was s’. Secondary outcome measures were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), e’, E/e’ and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Results Across all three scan time points s’ was not associated with neurological outcome (ORs: 24 h: 1.0 (95%CI: 0.7–1.4, p = 0.98), 48 h: 1.13 (95%CI: 0.9–1.4, p = 0.34), 72 h: 1.04 (95%CI: 0.8–1.4, p = 0.76)). LVEF, GLS, E/e’, and TAPSE recorded on serial TTEs following OHCA were neither associated with nor did they predict CPC180. Estimated median e’ at 48 h following TTM was 5.74 cm/s (95%CI: 5.27–6.22) in patients with good outcome (CPC180 1–2) vs. 4.95 cm/s (95%CI: 4.37–5.54) in patients with poor outcome (CPC180 3–5) (p = 0.04). Conclusions s’ assessed on serial TTEs in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with TTM was not associated with CPC180. Our findings suggest that serial TTEs in the early post-resuscitation phase during TTM do not aid the prognostication of neurological outcome following OHCA. Trial registration NCT02066753. Registered 14 February 2014 – Retrospectively registered,

Download Full-text

The Effect of Implementing Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in an Urban City of Taiwan

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18073636 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (7) ◽

pp. 3636

Author(s):

Yi-Rong Chen ◽

Chi-Jiang Liao ◽

Han-Chun Huang ◽

Cheng-Han Tsai ◽

Yao-Sing Su ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Medical Service ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

High Quality ◽

Urban City ◽

Service Response Time ◽

Mechanical Cpr ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key element in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. Mechanical CPR devices have been developed to provide uninterrupted and high-quality CPR. Although human studies have shown controversial results in favor of mechanical CPR devices, their application in pre-hospital settings continues to increase. There remains scant data on the pre-hospital use of mechanical CPR devices in Asia. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 2018 and August 2020 in an urban city of Taiwan to analyze the effects of mechanical CPR devices on the outcomes of OHCA; the primary outcome was attainment of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Of 552 patients with OHCA, 279 received mechanical CPR and 273 received manual CPR, before being transferred to the hospital. After multivariate adjustment for the influencing factors, mechanical CPR was independently associated with achievement of any ROSC (OR = 1.871; 95%CI:1.195–2.930) and sustained (≥24 h) ROSC (OR = 2.353; 95%CI:1.427–3.879). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that mechanical CPR is beneficial in shorter emergency medical service response time (≤4 min), witnessed cardiac arrest, and non-shockable cardiac rhythm. These findings support the importance of early EMS activation and high-quality CPR in OHCA resuscitation.

Download Full-text

Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s13049-021-00858-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yu-Lin Hsieh ◽

Meng-Che Wu ◽

Jon Wolfshohl ◽

James d’Etienne ◽

Chien-Hua Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Vascular Access ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction This study is aimed to investigate the association of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from the database inception through April 2020. Our search strings included designed keywords for two concepts, i.e. vascular access and cardiac arrest. There were no limitations implemented in the search strategy. We selected studies comparing IO versus IV access in neurological or survival outcomes after OHCA. Favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was pre-specified as the primary outcome. We pooled the effect estimates in random-effects models and quantified the heterogeneity by the I2 statistics. Time to intervention, defined as time interval from call for emergency medical services to establishing vascular access or administering medications, was hypothesized to be a potential outcome moderator and examined in subgroup analysis with meta-regression. Results Nine retrospective observational studies involving 111,746 adult OHCA patients were included. Most studies were rated as high quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results demonstrated no significant association between types of vascular access and the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.33; I2, 95%). In subgroup analysis, time to intervention was noted to be positively associated with the pooled OR of achieving the primary outcome (OR: 3.95, 95% CI, 1.42–11.02, p: 0.02). That is, when the studies not accounting for the variable of “time to intervention” in the statistical analysis were pooled together, the meta-analytic results between IO access and favourable outcomes would be biased toward inverse association. No obvious publication bias was detected by the funnel plot. Conclusions The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between types of vascular access and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among OHCA patients. Time to intervention was identified to be an important outcome moderator in this meta-analysis of observation studies. These results call for the need for future clinical trials to investigate the unbiased effect of IO use on OHCA CPR.

Download Full-text

Abstract 184: AED Application in Non-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Does Not Reduce Survival

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.184 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Ross A Pollack ◽

Siobhan P Brown ◽

Thomas Rea ◽

Peter J Kudenchuk ◽

Myron L Weisfeldt

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Neurological Status ◽

Relative Safety ◽

Initial Rhythm ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Rhythm Analysis ◽

In Transit ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: It is well established that AEDs improve outcome in shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). An increasing proportion (now the majority) of OHCAs present with non-shockable rhythms. Survival from non-shockable OHCA depends on high-quality CPR in transit to definitive care. Studies of AED use in non-shockable in-hospital arrest (as opposed to OHCA) have shown reduced survival with AED application possibly due to CPR interruptions to apply pads and perform rhythm analysis. We sought to determine whether AED application in non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA has a significant association with survival to discharge. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of OHCA from 2010-2015 at 10 Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium centers. All adult, public, witnessed non-shockable OHCAs were included. Non-shockable arrest was defined as no shock delivered by the AED or by review of defibrillator tracings (10%). The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was used to confirm the rhythm. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological status (modified rankin score <3). The OR was adjusted for the Utstein variables. Results: During the study period there were 1,597 non-shockable public, witnessed OHCA, 9.8% of which had an AED applied. The initial rhythm on EMS arrival was PEA or asystole in 86% of cases. Significantly more OHCA in the AED applied group had CPR performed. 6.5% of those without an AED applied survived with favorable neurologic status compared to 9% with an AED. After adjustment for the Utstein variables including bystander CPR, the aOR for survival with favorable neurologic outcome was 1.38 (95% CI:0.72-2.65). Conclusion: After adjusting for patient characteristics and bystander CPR, the application of an AED in non-shockable public witnessed OHCA had no significant association with survival or neurological outcome supporting the relative safety and potential benefit of AED application in non-shockable OHCA.

Download Full-text

A Practical Risk-Score for Early Prediction of Neurological Outcome after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest –MIRA2CLE2

10.1101/2020.04.12.20045146 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Nilesh Pareek ◽

Peter Kordis ◽

Nicholas Beckley-Hoelscher ◽

Dominic Pimenta ◽

Spela Tadel Kocjancic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Risk Score ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Heart Attack ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Cerebral Performance Category ◽

Epinephrine Administration ◽

Poor Outcome ◽

Poor Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AimsThe purpose of this study was to develop a practical risk−score to predict poor neurological outcome after out−of−hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) for use on arrival to a Heart Attack Centre.Methods and ResultsBetween May 2012 and December 2017, 1055 patients had OOHCA in our region, of whom 373 patients were included in the King's Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (KOCAR). We performed prediction modelling with multi-variable logistic regression to identify factors independently predictive of the primary outcome in order to derive a risk score. This was externally validated in two independent cohorts comprising 474 patients. The primary outcome was poor neurological function at 6−month follow−up (Cerebral Performance Category 3-−). Seven independent variables for prediction of outcome were identified: Missed (Unwitnessed) arrest, Initial non-shockable rhythm, non-Reactivity of pupils, Age, Changing intra-arrest rhythms, Low pH<;7.20 and Epinephrine administration. From these variables, the MIRA2CLE2 score was developed which had an AUC of 0.90 in the development and 0.85 and 0.89 in the validation cohorts. 3 risk groups of the MIRA2CLE2 were defined − Low risk (≤2−5.6% risk of poor outcome; Intermediate risk (3−4−55.4% of poor outcome) and high risk (≥5−92.3% risk of poor outcome). The risk-score performance was equivalent in a sub-group of patients referred for early angiography and revascularisation where appropriate.ConclusionsThe MIRA2CLE2 score is a practical risk score for early accurate prediction of poor neurological outcome after OOHCA, which has been developed for simplicity of use on admission to a Heart Attack Centre.

Download Full-text

PaRamEDIc assessment of laCTate in OHCA and survival to hospital (PREDICT protocol)

Journal of Paramedic Practice ◽

10.12968/jpar.2021.13.3.100 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 100-104

Author(s):

Karl Charlton ◽

Hayley Moore

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

Prognostic Role ◽

Single Centre ◽

Intravenous Access ◽

Secondary Outcomes ◽

Cardiac Arrest Survival ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Studies suggest that blood lactate differs between survivors and non-survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who are transported to hospital. The prognostic role of lactate taken during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains unexplored. Aims: To measure the association between lactate taken during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, survival to hospital and 30-day mortality. Methods: This is a feasibility, single-centre, prospective cohort study. Eligible for inclusion are patients aged ≥18 years suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in the catchment of Newcastle or Gateshead hospitals, who are attended to by a study-trained specialist paramedic. Exclusions are known/apparent pregnancy, blunt or penetrating injury as primary cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an absence of intravenous access. Between February 2020 and March 2021, 100 participants will be enrolled. Primary outcome is survival to hospital; secondary outcomes are return of spontaneous circulation at any time and 30-day mortality.

Download Full-text