scholarly journals Bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeong Hak Bang ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Sun Young Kim ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
Significant Disease

AbstractThere is an unmet medical need for later-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Considering that, beyond progression, co-treatment with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy showed less toxicity and a significant disease control rate, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of capecitabine and bevacizumab. This single-center retrospective study included 157 patients between May 2011 and February 2018, who received bevacizumab plus capecitabine as later-line chemotherapy after progressing with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. The study treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 orally (PO) twice daily on day 1 to 14, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9–5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.3–11.1). The overall response rate was 14% (22/157). Patients who had not received prior targeted agents showed better survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43–0.82, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.85, P = 0.004). Bevacizumab plus capecitabine could be a considerably efficacious option for patients with mCRC refractory to prior standard treatments.

Addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX4 and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 610-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Satoshi Matsusaka ◽  
Nobuyuki Mizunuma ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Mariko Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

610 Background: In our previous report, addition of bevacizumab (BV) to the FOLFOX4 regimen appeared to significantly improve response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Suenaga M, et al. ASCO-GI 2011 [abstr 588]). Update results met median overall survival, and statistical analysis of survival was performed. Methods: An observational cohort study was carried out on all eligible patients scheduled to receive FOLFOX4 (n = 128) or FOLFOX4+BV (n = 85) between 2005 and 2007, 2007 and 2009, with a median follow-up time of 20.4 months vs. 30.2 months, respectively. Predefined efficacy endpoints were treatment characteristics, response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival in the periods of time observed. Results: Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.4-11.4) in the FOLFOX4- and 17 months (95% CI, 11.8-22.3) in the FOLFOX4+BV-treated patients (p=0.002). Median overall survival times were 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.9-24) and 38.8 months (95% CI, 32.9-44.8) in the two groups, respectively (p<0.001). In the ECOG PS 0 population, progression-free survival in the FOLFOX4 and FOLFOX4+BV groups was 11 months and 17 months with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.44-0.89) in favour of FOLFOX4+BV, similarly in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.36-0.77). Subgroup population received 5-FU plus leucovorin (FL) as maintenance during oxaliplatin discontinuation due to adverse events had longer PFS or OS in both groups, though no significance. PFS were 14.7 and 21.6 months, and OS were 29 and 45.9 months, respectively. Secondary resection was performed more in FOLFOX4+BV (11.8%) than FOLFOX4 (3.9%) patients. Conclusions: These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to the FOLFOX4 regimen as first-line treatment for mCRC. Maintenance using FL after discontinuation of oxaliplatin due to adverse events appeared to be an essential factor for better survival.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals A comparison of FOLFIRI (Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil and Irinotecan) Plus Bevacizumab and FLOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Sang Lee ◽  
Yong-Pyo Lee ◽  
Hongsik Kim ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: To date, there are few clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab or aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) pretreated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the treatment outcomes of patients receiving FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab or aflibercept as second-line treatment for mCRC between October 2017 and March 2020. This analysis included 67 patients receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept and 83 receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.6% (95% CI: 4.85-22.34) in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group and 14.7% (95% CI: 6.68-22.71) in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group. This difference in ORR was not statistically significant. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group and 8.5 months in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group (P = 0.752) (Fig. 1). Patients in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group showed a median overall survival (OS) of 12.4 months, while patients in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group had a median OS of 13.7 months (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in survival between the two treatment groups. The adverse events were also largely similar between the two groups. However, hypertension of grade 3 or more was more frequent in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group. Conclusion: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept had similar anti-tumor activities and toxicity profiles when used as second-line therapy in mCRC patients. Based on these data, both aflibercept and bevacizumab are suitable anti-angiogenic agents when used in combination with FOLFIRI for mCRC.

Interim analysis of a single-arm, phase II study of bevacizumab (BV) with modified OPTIMOX1 as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): TCOG-GI0802.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 578-578
Author(s):  
M. Asano ◽  
S. Tanaka ◽  
A. Sato ◽  
N. Nakayama ◽  
K. Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Modified Folfox6

578 Background: BV is widely used for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Although BV was often administrated to mCRC patients in combination with oxaliplatin, optimal schedule remains unclear. Many mCRC patients cannot continue to use oxalipatin because of cumulative neurotoxity, which decreases patient's QOL and motivation.We postulated that modification of oxaliplatin schedule would improve TTF in intermittent oxaliplatin usage. Therefore, we planned to use BV with original OPTIMOX1 adiministration schedule; modified oxaliplatin dose (85 mg/m3). Methods: Patients were enrolled with the criteria excluding neuropathy, PS ≥ 1, or no previous usage of oxaliplatin and BV, and then were received modified FOLFOX6 regimen (L-OHP 85 mg/m2, l-LV 200 mg/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus, 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 46h continuous infusion) plus BV (5 mg/kg) q2wks x 6 cycles, followed sLV5FU2 (omit L-OHP) plus BV x 12 cycles regimen. After that, oxaliplatin reintroduction was done and mFOLFOX6 plus BV regimen was continued until PD. The evaluation of antitumor effect was done according to RECIST Criteria. Results: 40 patients accrued this trial. Median age was 65 years old. PS0: 89.5%, male: 75%, female: 25%, colon: 65.8%, rectal: 31.6%,colon + rectal: 2.6%. During initial 6 cycles of chemotherapy, 90% patients could continue chemotherapy. Response rate was 50%, and clinical benefit (including SD) was 92.1%. During Intial 6 cycles, G3 neuropathy occurred 2.6%, and G2 were 5%. Most frequent toxicity (≥G3) was neutropenia (30.8%) and anorexia (5.3%). One patient could complete the scheduled regimen. This patient continued mFOLFOX6+BV for 12 cycles after reintroduction keeping with PS 0, and was received FOLFIRI+BV regimen as second-line chemotherapy. Further information are under examination. Conclusions: This administration schedule was well tolerated and could continue chemotherapy longer than usual method. sLV5FU2+BV regimen was not affected reintroduction rate and progression free survival. BV with mOPTIMOX1 regimen can be expected to become a good treatment options for mCRC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of combined chemotherapy with irinotecan, S-1, and bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Update analysis—Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG) trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3593-3593
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Takuto Miyagishima ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
Kazuteru Hatanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

3593 Background: The FIRIS study (Muro K et al. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:853–860) previously demonstrated the non-inferiority of Irinotecan plus S-1(IRIS) to FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC), with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. We previously reported that IRIS plus bevacizumab(IRIS/bev) is very effective as first-line treatment (Komatsu Y et al. ESMO 2010). We now report the updated results of this study. Methods: Eligible patients had to have mCRC with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, an age of >20 years, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1, and no history of prior chemotherapy. S-1 40-60 mg twice daily p.o. was given on days 1-14 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg i.v. were given on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included overall response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The target number of 53 patients was enrolled as of March 2009. The results are reported for 52 patients with evaluable lesions. The clinical characteristics of the patients were as follows. The median age was 63.5 years (range, 48 to 82). The male:female ratio was 3:2. The performance status on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale was 0. In January 2012, on safety analysis, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 27%. The incidences of other grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were as follows: diarrhea, 17%; anorexia, 4%; stomatitis, 2%; hypertension, 21%; and gastrointestinal perforation, 0%. The overall response rate was 63.5%. Three patients had complete response. Thirty patients had partial response, 16 had stable disease, none had progressive disease, and 3 were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival was 17.0 months and median survival time was 39.6 months. Conclusions: IRIS/Bev is a remarkably active and generally well-tolerated first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Randomized control trial comparing this regimen with oxaliplatin containing regimen(XELOX or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab) is being planned.

Mathematization of risk and benefit for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A graphical decision aid for patients and physicians

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3627-3627
Author(s):  
M. S. Sanatani ◽  
M. Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Risk And Benefit

3627 Background: Advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have improved median overall survival (mOS) from 1yr with 5-fluorouracil (FU) therapy to >21 mos. This may come at cost of more toxicity. As the number of tested regimens increases, the question arises how to best present palliative treatment options. We present a simple way to compare treatment options in terms of risks & benefits. Methods: The literature was surveyed for reports of 1st-line systemic therapies for mCRC. The largest recent reports with detailed toxicity data were selected as representative for a regimen; if several comparable reports existed then all were selected. Toxicity sum (TS) of a regimen was calculated as % occurences in the study cohort of severe (≥ gr. 3) adverse effects: diarrhea+mucositis+neurocutaneous (excl. alopecia)+vomiting (or vomiting/nausea if not reported separately or nausea if no vomiting rep.)+febrile neutropenia (FN)(or infection if FN not rep. or leukopenia if infection not rep.)+toxic deathrate. Benefits (OS & progression-free survival PFS in months) were divided by TS to give a benefit/toxicity (B/T) ratio & plotted as benefit vs TS. Results: 30 regimens were found.OS, PFS & TS for the various regimens ranged from 8.9–24.7 and 4.9–9.2 mos, & 12–63 respectively. B/T ratios ranged from 0.1–0.53 (PFS) & 0.22–1.19 (OS); higher values more favorable. Regimens with similar B/T ratios may still differ - longer OS & PFS but at cost of more toxicity. Graphical presentation makes this clear. Intriguing & open to interpretation was a narrow range of PFS while OS varied greatly between regimens. Weaknesses of our study incl omission of some regimen-specific toxicities, & of symptom control benefit. Conclusions: Our comparative tool helps physicians discuss the large number of available options & their clinical differences easily with patients, improving informed consent & disclosure, in order to arrive at the treatment plan most appropriate to the individual. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Relationship of Circulating Tumor Cells to Tumor Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3213-3221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt ◽  
Nicholas Iannotti ◽  
Bruce H. Saidman ◽  
Kert D. Sabbath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immunomagnetic Separation ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeAs treatment options expand for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), a blood marker with a prognostic and predictive role could guide treatment. We tested the hypothesis that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC.Patients and MethodsIn a prospective multicenter study, CTCs were enumerated in the peripheral blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and after starting first-, second-, or third-line therapy. CTCs were measured using an immunomagnetic separation technique.ResultsPatients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of three or more or less than three CTCs/7.5 mL, respectively. Patients with unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.5 v 7.9 months; P = .0002) and overall survival (OS; 9.4 v 18.5 months; P < .0001). Differences persisted at 1 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 12, and 13 to 20 weeks after therapy. Conversion of baseline unfavorable CTCs to favorable at 3 to 5 weeks was associated with significantly longer PFS and OS compared with patients with unfavorable CTCs at both time points (PFS, 6.2 v 1.6 months; P = .02; OS, 11.0 v 3.7 months; P = .0002). Among nonprogressing patients, favorable compared with unfavorable CTCs within 1 month of imaging was associated with longer survival (18.8 v 7.1 months; P < .0001). Baseline and follow-up CTC levels remained strong predictors of PFS and OS after adjustment for clinically significant factors.ConclusionThe number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. CTCs provide prognostic information in addition to that of imaging studies.

A retrospective study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15066-e15066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijian Guo ◽  
Zhenhua Wu ◽  
Mingzhu Huang ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3

e15066 Background: The FOLFOX regimen consisting of fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin, and the FOLFIRI regimen consisting of 5-FU and irinotecan serve as either first- or second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and there is no third-line chemotherapy regimen after failure of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Studies have shown that raltitrexed or S-1 has no complete cross-resistance with 5-FU and may be used for mCRC after failure of 5-FU. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combined with S-1 in the treatment of mCRC after failure of conventional chemotherapy. Methods: Eighteen patients with mCRC treated with raltitrexed combined with S-1 after failure of fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan between February 2014 and August 2016 were included in this study. Raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) intravenous infusion was given on the first day, and the administration of S-1 (daily dose according to body surface area (BSA): 100 mg/day when BSA ≥1.25 m2 to < 1.5 m2; 120 mg/day when BSA≥1.5 m2) continued for 2 weeks, and stopped for one week. The regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC 4.0 version. Results: Among 18 patients, 2 had PR, 8 had SD, and 8 had PD. The ORR (objective response rate) was 11.1%, and the DCR (disease control rate) was 55.6%. The median PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival) were 2.5 months and 7.0 months respectively. Adverse reactions included fatigue, abnormal liver enzymes, neutropenia, stomatitis, pyrexia, arrhythmia, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea and most of these were grade 1-2. Only one patient had grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: The combination of raltitrexed and S-1, both of which targeting TS, preliminarily showed promising effects for metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard chemotherapyand may be used as third-line treatment regimen.

Outcomes in the second line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from 6,462 patients (pts) in the ARCAD database.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 757-757
Author(s):  
Alexis Diane Leal ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Aimery De Gramont ◽  
Levi Pederson ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Vegf Inhibitor ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Multivariable Adjustment

757 Background: Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) appear to differ across trials, even when pts receive the same regimen (REG). This analysis aimed to benchmark the clinical outcomes in the 2nd line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Individual patient (pt) data was available on 6,462 pts with mCRC enrolled in 7 2ndline clinical trials (8 REGs) in the ARCAD database. Regimens used in at least two trials included FOLFIRI +/- an EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi), FOLFOX +/- a VEGF inhibitor (VEGFi), and irinotecan (IRI). Descriptive statistics were used to describe pt demographics. Multivariable Cox models were used to assess differences (DIFFs) in PFS and OS, while p-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant (SS). Results: 500-1400 pts received each REG (see Table). Median OS and PFS differed by 0.2 to 4.6 months (mo) and 0.8 to 2.5 mo across trials within the same REG. These DIFFs were SS except for PFS in REGs containing FOLFIRI +/- EGFRi. After multivariable adjustment, all DIFFs in OS were attenuated and non-significant. DIFFs in PFS attenuated for most REGs but remained SS for FOLFOX and IRI. Conclusions: After multivariable adjustment, there were no SS DIFFs in outcomes across trials within the same REG, with the exception of PFS in FOLFOX and IRI. The initial observed DIFFs in outcomes could be due to confounding factors and the remaining SS DIFFs in PFS in FOLFOX and IRI may be due to variation in definition of progression across trials. Therefore, caution is warranted when using historical data to design future trials.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document