scholarly journals Selective gene expression using a DF3/MUC1 promoter in a human esophageal adenocarcinoma model

Gene Therapy ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
V K Gupta ◽  
J O Park ◽  
T Kurihara ◽  
A Koons ◽  
H J Mauceri ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260353
Author(s):  
Chengjiao Yao ◽  
Yilin Li ◽  
Lihong Luo ◽  
Qin Xiong ◽  
Xiaowu Zhong ◽  
...  

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is defined as any metaplastic columnar epithelium in the distal esophagus, which predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Yet, the mechanism through which BE develops to EAC still remain unclear. Moreover, the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in distinguishing BE from EAC still remains poorly understood. To identify differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) and genes (DEGs) between EAC and BE from tissue samples, gene expression microarray datasets GSE13898, GSE26886, GSE1420 and miRNA microarray datasets GSE16456, GSE20099 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. GEO2R was used to screen the DEMs and DEGs. Pathway and functional enrichment analysis were performed by DAVID database. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed by STRING and been visualized by Cytoscape software. Finnal, survival analysis was performed basing TCGA database. A total of 21 DEMs were identified. The enriched functions and pathways analysis inclued Epstein-Barr virus infection, herpesvirus infection and TRP channels. GART, TNFSF11, GTSE1, NEK2, ICAM1, PSMD12, CTNNB1, CDH1, PSEN1, IL1B, CTNND1, JAG1, CDH17, ITCH, CALM1 and ITGA6 were considered as the hub-genes. Hsa-miR-143 and hsa-miR-133b were the highest connectivity target gene. JAG1 was predicted as the largest number of target miRNAs. The expression of hsa-miR-181d, hsa-miR-185, hsa-miR-15b, hsa-miR-214 and hsa-miR-496 was significantly different between normal tissue and EAC. CDH1, GART, GTSE1, NEK2 and hsa-miR-496, hsa-miR-214, hsa-miR-15b were found to be correlated with survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Patrick James McLaren ◽  
Anthony P Barnes ◽  
Willy Z Terrell ◽  
Gina M. Vaccaro ◽  
Jack Wiedrick ◽  
...  

51 Background: Predicting prognosis in esophageal cancer remains an unrealized goal despite studies linking constellations of genes to therapeutic response. In this study, we analyzed specific predictor genes expressed in tumor specimens from our institutional repository. Our aim was to determine if specific gene expression profiles are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). Methods: We investigated eleven genes identified from prior studies (CCL28, SPARC, S100A2, SPRR3, SIRT2, NOV, PERP, PAPSS2, DCK, DKK3, ALDH1) that have significant association with esophageal cancer progression. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by esophagectomy at our institution between January 2011 and July 2015 were included. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was conducted on pre-treatment biopsy specimens to determine gene expression. Patients were classified into two groups: 1) pCR and, 2) no or poor response (NR) after CRT based on final pathology report. An omnibus test using Mahalanobis distance was applied to evaluate overall genetic expression differences between groups. Log-rank tests compared the differential expression of individual genes. Results: 29 patients (11 pCR and 18 NR) were analyzed. Overall, gene expression profiles were significantly different between pCR and NR patients (p < 0.01). In particular, CCL28 was over-expressed in pCR (Log-HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 0.46-2.59, p = 0.005), and DKK3-was under-expressed in pCR patients (Log-HR: -1.03 95%CI: -1.97, -0.10, p = 0.031). Conclusions: Esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with a pCR after neoadjuvant therapy have genetic profiles that are significantly different from typical NR profiles. In our population, the genes CCL28 and DKK3 are potential predictors of treatment response.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Kamal Khorfan ◽  
Jihad Aljabban ◽  
Saad Syed ◽  
Hussam Salhi ◽  
Aderinola Adejare ◽  
...  

71 Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It commonly arises in the setting of reflux disease and Barett’s esophagus. It remains incurable and holds a poor prognosis. Dissecting the genetic signature of EAC can pave new therapeutic avenues. Methods: We employed our Search Tag Analyze Resource (STARGEO) platform to conduct meta-analysis using the National Center for Biotechnology’s (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We tagged 151 tumor samples from EAC patients and 62 normal esophageal samples as a control. We then analyzed the signature in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, restricting genes that showed statistical significance (p < 0.05) and an absolute experimental log ratio greater than 0.15 between tumor and control. Results: Our analysis revealed granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis and FXR/RXR signaling as top canonical pathways. TGFB1, TNF, and beta-estradiol were top upstream regulators with predicted activation. TGFB1 and TNF expression have been correlated with poor prognosis in EAC. Also, beta-estradiol has tumorigenic activity in several cancers but has not been investigated in EAC. Among the top upregulated genes were oncogenic genes such as tetraspanin 8, the antiapoptotic factor OLFM4, and the protease cathepsin E (CTSE). SPINK1, a trypsin inhibitor with recently suggested role in cancer, and the choline transporter SLC44A4, a drug target for pancreatic cancer, were also upregulated. The most downregulated genes included alcohol dehydrogenase 7, associated with EAC in alcohol-drinkers, and the pro-apoptotic gene CRCT1. We also found downregulation of the serine peptidase inhibitor SPINK7. SPINK7 is involved in maintaining epithelial-barrier integrity and is implicated in eosinophilic esophagitis pathogenesis. Lastly, there was downregulation of the candidate tumor suppressor gene transglutaminase 3. Conclusions: Despite screening efforts, EAC incidence and mortality continues to increase as does the need for better treatment. This meta-analysis defines the significant gene expression changes within causal disease processes to provide markers for detection, prognostic insight, and therapeutic value for EAC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Pennathur ◽  
Liqiang Xi ◽  
Virginia R. Litle ◽  
William E. Gooding ◽  
Alyssa Krasinskas ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zane T. Hammoud ◽  
Sunil Badve ◽  
Qianqian Zhao ◽  
Lang Li ◽  
Romil Saxena ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. BBI.S311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florin M. Selaru ◽  
Suna Wang ◽  
Jing Yin ◽  
Karsten Schulmann ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
...  

Background and Aims Because of the extremely low neoplastic progression rate in Barrett's esophagus, it is difficult to diagnose patients with concomitant adenocarcinoma early in their disease course. If biomarkers existed in normal squamous esophageal epithelium to identify patients with concomitant esophageal adenocarcinoma, potential applications would be far-reaching. The aim of the current study was to identify global gene expression patterns in normal esophageal epithelium capable of revealing simultaneous esophageal adenocarcinoma, even located remotely in the esophagus. Methods Tissues comprised normal esophageal epithelia from 9 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, 8 patients lacking esophageal adenocarcinoma or Barrett's, and 6 patients with Barrett's esophagus alone. cDNA microarrays were performed, and pattern recognition in each of these subgroups was achieved using shrunken nearest centroid predictors. Results Our method accurately discriminated normal esophageal epithelia of 8/8 patients without esophageal adenocarcinoma or Barrett's esophagus and of 6/6 patients with Barrett's esophagus alone from normal esophageal epithelia of 9/9 patients with Barrett's esophagus and concomitant esophageal adenocarcinoma. Moreover, we identified genes differentially expressed between the above subgroups. Thus, based on their corresponding normal esophageal epithelia alone, our method accurately diagnosed patients who had concomitant esophageal adenocarcinoma. Conclusions These global gene expression patterns, along with individual genes culled from them, represent potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma from normal esophageal epithelia. Genes discovered in normal esophagus that are differentially expressed in patients with vs. without esophageal adenocarcinoma merit further pursuit in molecular genetic, functional, and therapeutic interventional studies.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4540-4540
Author(s):  
I. Altomare ◽  
A. Pennathur ◽  
L. Xi ◽  
W. E. Gooding ◽  
V. R. Litle ◽  
...  

4540 Introduction: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive malignancy whose incidence is on the rise. Approximately 40% of patients with N0 disease will recur after theoretically curative surgery, suggesting that in early stage disease, metastatic spread is often undetected by routine pathology. Molecular techniques may more accurately detect micrometastatic spread of EAC, but the correlation between molecular analysis of nodes and prognosis is unknown. Our lab has previously identified and validated 4 markers whose gene expression levels are able to distinguish benign nodes from nodes with metastatic EAC: CK19, CK20, CEA and TACSTD1. We used quantitative real-time RT-PCR to evaluate the expression of these 4 markers in lymph nodes from 68 N0 and 62 N1 EAC patients to see if molecular staging is predictive of a worse clinical outcome. Methods: RNA was isolated from 1456 lymph nodes obtained from 130 patients who underwent resection of EAC. QRT-PCR was used to analyze gene expression for each of the 4 markers. Relative expression of each marker was compared with expression in 53 benign esophageal lymph nodes previously analyzed. Results: Analysis of 778 lymph nodes from 68 pN0 patients identified 71 nodes (9%) from 30 patients (44%) which showed positive expression of at least one marker, indicating occult metastases (and molecular upstaging). Analysis of 678 lymph nodes from 62 pN1 patients revealed 141 nodes (21%) from 40 patients (65%) which had positive expression of at least one marker in nodes that were pathologically negative. In the pathologically positive nodes from N1 patients, there was an encouraging 88% concordance between pathological and molecular analysis. After a median follow-up of 2 years, 13 N0 patients had recurrence of their cancer. Gene expression levels of 3 of the 4 markers (CK20, CEA and TACSTD1) correlated with significantly worse disease-free and overall survival among these N0 patients, with p values <0.05. Conclusion: We have shown that QRT-PCR of 3 independent genetic markers is predictive of significantly worse disease-free and overall survival among node-negative EAC patients by identifying lymph nodes with occult metastatic disease. Further analysis will reveal if the N1 patients with molecularly positive lymph nodes had significantly worse outcomes as well. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document