Exploring the contribution of charge species at outer surface to ion current signal of nanopores: a theoretical study

The Analyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haowei Mao ◽  
Qun Ma ◽  
Hongquan Xu ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
Qiujiao Du ◽  
...  

Nanopores attached with charge species realize artificial regulation of ion transports by the electrostatic effect in nanoconfines, which produces sensitive ion current signal and plays a critical role in nanopore-based...

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunyu Tong ◽  
Zhaohui Yang ◽  
Xiaoyu He ◽  
Jun Deng ◽  
Zhijun Wu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. Christopher Wollgarten ◽  
Nikolaos Zarzalis ◽  
Fabio Turrini ◽  
Antonio Peschiulli

Due to strict emission legislation, the trend in the development of aero-engine gas turbine combustion is heading towards lean burning approaches. Lean combustion reduces the combustion temperatures and therefore also the nitrogen oxides emissions. Unfortunately, lean combustion suffers from instabilities and the operation close to the point of lean blowout increases the risk of imminent blowoff. Active stability control is therefore inevitable. The objective of this work is to evaluate the signal obtained from an ion current measurement technique to enable combustion control for aircraft propulsion applications in the near future. In the past ion current measurements have been used in several studies as flame turbulence analyzer and to detect the reaction rate. However, investigations in lean burning and swirl stabilized airblast injection combustors for future propulsion concepts are rare. The signal obtained from an ion current detector inside a combustor depends strongly on the measurement position. In this experimental investigation field measurements at atmospheric conditions of the ion concentration in a tubular combustor with a sampling rate of 8 kHz are compared with 4 kHz time resolved temperature and OH* chemiluminescence measurements in order to determine the position of the reaction inside the combustor. Variations were performed of the air to fuel ratio (AFR), the air preheating temperature and the pressure drop across the injection system to clarify the interpretation of the ion current signal. The results indicate a strong dependence of the ion current signal on the AFR and that the technique has distinct advantages compared to OH* chemiluminescence measurements: The measurement equipment is comparable non-expensive and the results reveal that the reaction rate is measured directly and are not interpreted from a 3D image. A transition in flame shape from a compact to a tornado flame can be clearly identified with the applied probe. Furthermore, regions with high temperature fluctuations do not necessarily reveal the reaction zone in a recirculating flow field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
Yintong Liu ◽  
Liguang Li ◽  
Junyu Ye ◽  
Zhijun Wu ◽  
Jun Deng

Fuel ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 469-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando A.M. Laganá ◽  
Leonardo L. Lima ◽  
João F. Justo ◽  
Benedito A. Arruda ◽  
Max M.D. Santos

2014 ◽  
Vol 1070-1072 ◽  
pp. 1831-1834
Author(s):  
Chang Qing Song ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Da Wei Qu

The spark plug ion current signal carries abundant information about the engine combustion process. Real-time acquisition of the spark plug ion current signal can effectively extract the characteristic parameters, then enhance the power, fuel economy and emissions of the engine. The paper analyzed the influence factors of ion current, designed an acquisition and analysis system of spark plug ion current signal, and mainly studied the influence of spark plug gap and bias voltage on ion current signal in a six-cylinder four-stroke gas engine. The results show that the bias voltage and the spark plug gap have a great impact on the spark plug ion current signal. The ion current signal intensity is directly proportional to the bias voltage applied cross the spark plug, and inversely proportional to the spark plug gap. Results also indicates that the ion current is directly proportional to the mobility and concentration of charged particles in burned gas plasma.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (45) ◽  
pp. 5988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviana Grosso ◽  
Carlos Previtali ◽  
Carlos A. Chesta ◽  
D. Mariano A. Vera ◽  
Adriana B. Pierini

2003 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Siwy ◽  
D. Dobrev ◽  
R. Neumann ◽  
C. Trautmann ◽  
K. Voss
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document