Development and Content Validation of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi-EAT)

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Thoyre ◽  
Britt F. Pados ◽  
Jinhee Park ◽  
Hayley Estrem ◽  
Eric A. Hodges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eating Behaviors ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Feeding Behaviors ◽  
Feeding Difficulties ◽  
Validity Indices ◽  
Problematic Eating Behaviors ◽  
5Th Grade ◽  
Report Measure

Purpose In this article, the authors describe the development and content validation of a parent-report measure of problematic eating behaviors: the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi-EAT). Method In Phase I, items were generated from parents' descriptions of problematic feeding behaviors of children, review of literature, and review of existing eating-related instruments. In Phase II, interdisciplinary experts on pediatric eating behaviors rated the items for clarity and relevance using content validity indices (CVI) and provided feedback on the comprehensiveness of the instrument. In Phases III and IV, 2 groups of parents of children with and without feeding difficulties participated in cognitive interviews to gain respondent feedback on content, format, and item interpretation. The authors analyzed interviews using matrix display strategies. Results Experts rated the total scale CVI > .90 for both relevance and clarity; item CVI ranged from .67 to 1.0 for relevance and .5 to 1.0 for clarity. Analysis of each item with low scores, along with experts' and parents' feedback, resulted in refinement of the items, scoring options, and directions. Experts and parents added additional items. Readability after refinements was acceptable at less than a 5th-grade level. Conclusion The Pedi-EAT was systematically developed and content validated with input from researchers, clinicians, and parents.

Development and Content Validation of the Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt F. Pados ◽  
Suzanne M. Thoyre ◽  
Jinhee Park ◽  
Hayley H. Estrem ◽  
Cara McComish
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Cognitive Interviews ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Motor Proficiency ◽  
Reading Grade Level ◽  
Validity Indices

This article describes the development and content validation of the Child Oral and Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS), a parent-report assessment of eating, drinking, and related skills in children 6 months to 7 years of age. Initially, 69 items for the ChOMPS were generated from literature review. Nineteen professionals evaluated the ChOMPS using content validity indices (CVI). Significant revisions were made to items and directions based on professional feedback. CVI were acceptable for both the relevance and clarity of items. Cognitive interviews were then conducted with 19 parents to explore parent understanding of items. Additional revisions were made based on parent feedback. The reading grade level of the resulting ChOMPS was less than sixth grade. The 70-item ChOMPS has evidence of content validity, indicating the items are relevant and clear to professionals, and parents understand the directions and items as intended.

scholarly journals The Development and Content Validation of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-529
Author(s):  
Beth Fields ◽  
Richard Schulz ◽  
Lauren Terhorst ◽  
Madeline Carbery ◽  
Juleen Rodakowski
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Family Caregiving ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Conceptual Development ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Care Partners ◽  
Validity Indices ◽  
Aging Adults

Background/Objectives: When aging adults are hospitalized due to a major health event, they often turn to care partners (‘family members or friends’) for support. Assessment of care partners’ needs during hospital care may be important to inform and target information and skills training that will equip them to fulfill caregiving tasks for the aging adults. The objectives of this study were to develop and complete content validation of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT). Methods: Based on standard instrumentation methodology and an assessment framework recommended by the National Center on Caregiving at the Family Caregiving Alliance, three steps were followed to develop and validate CHAT: (1) generation of a 24-item tool grouped into three content domains (background, plans and preferences, skills and supports), and a survey by a multidisciplinary team, (2) administration of an online survey of care partners and experts, and (3) assessment of item and scale-content validity indices (I-CVI and S-CVI). Results: A total of four care partners that provide unpaid care to a family member or friend age 65 years or older with a chronic illness or disability either before or after a hospitalization, and 19 leading experts in gerontology, caregiving, and health services completed an online survey in English. Twenty-two items were accepted by having an I-CVI at or above the acceptable 78% cut point; the S-CVI for the tool was 85%. Most revisions to the tool were associated with modifying or clarifying language within each item. For example, participants shared the following open-ended suggestions for revising CHAT: (1) change the “do you prefer” sentence stem to “do you want” (n = 12), define “training” (n = 6), and (2) allow care partners to provide an unsure response (n = 5). Conclusion: CHAT may be a promising way to increase health care practitioner’s understanding of care partners’ backgrounds, preferences and plans, and potential information or training needs during a patient’s hospital stay. Initial evaluation of CHAT reveals strong conceptual development and content validity.

scholarly journals Play in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Psychometric Properties of a Parent Report Measure ‘My Child’s Play’

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Dulce Romero-Ayuso ◽  
María Ruiz-Salcedo ◽  
Sabina Barrios-Fernández ◽  
José Triviño-Juárez ◽  
Donald Maciver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Intervention Programs ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
English Version ◽  
Child's Play ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Report Measure

Play is essential in childhood, allowing for a positive trend in development and learning. Health professionals need useful tools to assess it, especially in the case of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. The aim of this study was to validate and cross-culturally adapt the My Child’s Play questionnaire and to find out if this instrument allows us to differentiate the play of children with neurodevelopmental disorders from the play of children with neurotypical development. A total of 594 parents completed the questionnaire. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, which showed a similar structure to the English version: (1) executive functions; (2) environmental context; (3) play characteristics; and (4) play preferences and interpersonal interactions. The reliability of the analysis was high, both for the whole questionnaire and for the factors it comprises. The results provide evidence of the potential usefulness of the My Child’s Play questionnaire for determining play needs and difficulties of children; moreover, this tool can also be used to plan intervention programs according to the needs of each child and family.

Responding to Children’s Diverse Gender Expression: Validation of a Parent-Report Measure of Gender-Related Conditional Regard

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Ilana Seager van Dyk ◽  
Jianmin Shao ◽  
Lucas Sohn ◽  
Patricia A. Smiley ◽  
Kristina R. Olson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parent Report ◽  
Gender Expression ◽  
Report Measure ◽  
Conditional Regard

scholarly journals The Gastrointestinal and Gastroesophageal Reflux (GIGER) Scale for Infants and Toddlers

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2110331
Author(s):  
Britt F. Pados ◽  
Christine Repsha ◽  
Rebecca R. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Infants And Toddlers ◽  
Item Scale ◽  
Report Measure

The purpose of this study was to describe the development of the Gastrointestinal and Gastroesophageal Reflux (GIGER) Scale for Infants and Toddlers, and determine its factor structure and psychometric properties. Items were developed to comprehensively assess gastrointestinal (GI) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms observable by a parent. Exploratory factor analysis on 391 responses from parents of children under 2 years old resulted in a 36-item scale with 3 subscales. Internal consistency reliability was acceptable (α = .78-.94). The GIGER total score and all 3 subscales were correlated with the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire-Revised (I-GERQ-R) ( P < .05) and Infant Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire (IGSQ) ( P < .05). GIGER total score was higher in infants with a diagnosis of GER ( P < .05) or constipation ( P < .05) compared to those without. The GIGER is a parent-report measure of GI and GER symptoms in children under 2 years old with adequate psychometric properties.

scholarly journals Improving the Quality of Children’s Mental Health Care with Progress Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study of PCIT Therapist Attitudes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna C. Klein ◽  
B. Erika Luis Sanchez ◽  
Miya L. Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Behavioral Observation ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Therapist Attitudes ◽  
Child Interaction ◽  
Report Measure

AbstractProgress measures are an evidence-based technique for improving the quality of mental health care, however, clinicians rarely incorporate them into treatment. Research into how measure type impacts clinician preference has been recommended to help improve measure implementation. Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an assessment-driven treatment that serves as an ideal intervention through which to investigate measure preferences given its routine use of two types of assessments, a behavioral observation (the Dyadic Parent–Child Interaction Coding System) and a parent-report measure (the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory). This study investigated PCIT therapist attitudes towards progress measures used within PCIT and children’s mental health treatment generally. A mixed-method (QUAN + QUAL) study design examined PCIT therapist attitudes towards two types of progress measures and measures used in two contexts (PCIT and general practice). Multi-level modeling of a survey distributed to 324 PCIT therapists identified predictors of therapist attitudes towards measures, while qualitative interviews with 23 therapists expanded and clarified the rationale for differing perceptions. PCIT therapists reported more positive attitudes towards a behavioral observation measure, the DPICS, than a parent-report measure, the ECBI, and towards measures used in PCIT than in general practice. Clinician race/ethnicity was significantly related to measure-specific attitudes. Qualitative interviews highlighted how perceptions of measure reliability, type of data offered, ease of use, utility in guiding sessions and motivating clients, and embeddedness in treatment protocol impact therapist preferences. Efforts to implement progress monitoring should consider preferences for particular types of measures, as well as how therapists are trained to embed measures in treatment.

Problematic eating behaviors in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: Studying their relationship with psychopathology

2021 ◽  
pp. 135910532098688
Author(s):  
Marta de Lourdes ◽  
Ana Pinto-Bastos ◽  
Paulo PP Machado ◽  
Eva Conceição
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Binge Eating ◽  
Disordered Eating ◽  
Eating Behaviors ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Grazing Behavior ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Bariatric Patients ◽  
Problematic Eating ◽  
Problematic Eating Behaviors

This study explored the associations between individuals presenting different problematic eating behaviors (Objective/Subjective binge-eating—OBE/SBE—and Compulsive/Non-compulsive grazing—C_Grazing/NC_Grazing) and eating disorder related symptoms. About 163 pre- and 131 post-bariatric patients were assessed. Assessment included: Face-to-face clinical interview to assess binge-eating and grazing episodes, and self-report measures to assess eating disorder symptomatology, psychological distress, and negative urgency. OBE and NC_Grazing were the problematic eating behaviors most and least associated with psychopathology, respectively. OBE and C_Grazing uniquely accounted for the significant variance in the most disordered eating variables. Our findings emphasize the need for the conceptualization of grazing behavior in the spectrum of disordered eating.

Validation of a parent report measure of cognitive development in very preterm infants

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Johnson ◽  
Neil Marlow ◽  
Dieter Wolke ◽  
Leslie Davidson ◽  
Louise Marston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Development ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Very Preterm Infants ◽  
Very Preterm ◽  
Report Measure

Symptoms of problematic feeding in children with CHD compared to healthy peers

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt F. Pados
Keyword(s):  
Linear Models ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Bottle Feeding ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Validity And Reliability

AbstractChildren with CHD often experience difficulty with oral feeding, which contributes to growth faltering in this population. Few studies have explored symptoms of problematic feeding in children with CHD using valid and reliable measures of oral feeding. The purpose of this study was to describe symptoms of problematic feeding in children with CHD compared to healthy children without medical conditions, taking into account variables that may contribute to symptoms of problematic feeding. Oral feeding was measured by the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool, a parent report assessment of feeding with evidence of validity and reliability. This secondary analysis used data collected from web-based surveys completed by parents of 1093 children between 6 months and 7 years of age who were eating solid foods by mouth. General linear models were used to evaluate the differences between 94 children with CHD and 999 children without medical conditions based on the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool total score and four subscale scores. Covariates tested in the models included breathing tube duration, type of CHD, gastroesophageal reflux, genetic disorder, difficulty with breast- or bottle-feeding during infancy, cardiac surgery, and current child age. Children with CHD had significantly more symptoms of problematic feeding than healthy children on the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool total score, more physiologic symptoms, problematic mealtime behaviours, selective/restrictive eating, and oral processing dysfunction (p <0.001 for all), when taking into account relevant covariates. Additional research is needed in children with CHD to improve risk assessment and develop interventions to optimise feeding and growth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document