scholarly journals The Impact of the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis on Communication and Quality of Life: Insights From a Community of Stroke and Brain Trauma Survivors

Author(s):  
Mackenzie E. Fama ◽  
Brooke Hatfield ◽  
Suzanne Coyle ◽  
Melissa S. Richman ◽  
Amy C. Georgeadis

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has led to stay-at-home orders and social distancing guidelines that have the potential to greatly impact individuals' behavior and social engagement. Adults recovering from stroke or other brain trauma, who often have communication difficulties and other long-term challenges, are a population already at risk of isolation and lower quality of life. We investigated the impact of public health guidelines and related behavioral changes on self-perceptions of communication abilities and psychosocial factors in this population. Method The Stroke Comeback Center, a community-based center for stroke and other brain trauma survivors with communication impairments, disseminated an online survey to current members to investigate changes in communication, social engagement, and quality of life. Results Participants ( N = 50) reported a number of changes in their day-to-day activities that reflect the current social distancing guidelines, such as reduced outings into the community and fewer in-person conversations with those living outside one's home. Overall, feelings of connectedness to others and overall quality of life were reported to be decreased when compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas receptive language abilities and technology skills were reported to have improved. Perhaps most interestingly, certain behavioral changes (including healthy movement activities and participation in virtual programs) had specific relationships with perceived communication abilities and social engagement. Conclusions Changes in daily life resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have had a tangible impact on self-perceived psychosocial elements (e.g., quality of life) and communication abilities among stroke and other brain trauma survivors. Clinicians and researchers may consider these perceived changes when engaging with this population as the effects of the pandemic continue and in the period of community re-entry that may follow. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14830881

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelui Collinson ◽  
Joseph Timothy ◽  
Samuel K Zayay ◽  
Karsor K Kollie ◽  
Eglantine Lebas ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundScabies is known to be a public health problem in many settings but the majority of recent data is from rural settings in the Pacific. There is a need for high quality data from sub-Saharan Africa and peri-Urban settings to inform scale up of scabies control efforts. There have been anecdotal reports of scabies being a public health problem in Liberia but robust data are lacking.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional cluster-randomised prevalence survey for scabies in a peri-urban community in Monrovia, Liberia in February-March 2020. Participants underwent a standardised examination conducted by trained local health care workers. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using age-appropriate dermatology life quality indices (DLQIs). Prevalence estimates were calculated accounting for clustering at community and household levels and associations with key demographic variables assessed through multivariable random-effects logistic regression.Results1,318 participants from 477 households were surveyed. The prevalence of scabies prevalence was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.5-13.2%), across 75 (19.7%) households; impetigo or infected scabies prevalence was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4-1.9%). The majority (52%) of scabies cases were classified as severe. Scabies prevalence was lower in females and higher in the youngest age group; no associations were found with other collected demographic or socio-economic variables. DLQI scores indicated a very or extremely large effect on HRQoL in 29% of adults and 18% of children diagnosed with scabies.ConclusionsOur study indicates a substantial burden of scabies in this peri-Urban population in Liberia. This was associated with significant impact on quality of life, highlighting the need for action to control scabies in this population. Further work is needed to assess the impact of interventions in this context on both the prevalence of scabies and quality of life.Plain English summaryScabies is an infestation with a microscopic mite which affects many people living in low-resource tropical countries. It causes intense itching, which can lead to complications through bacterial infection and poor quality of life. To help develop global scabies control programmes, we need a better understanding of how common it is across different tropical settings. We conducted a survey to assess the burden of scabies and bacterial skin infection in a random sample of people living in a community in Monrovia, Liberia. Information about participants and their household were collected and their skin was examined; those with skin conditions were asked about its impact on quality of life.We examined 1,318 participants and found that almost 10% of people had scanies. Scabies was more common in young children, and was more common in male children than female children. We found that there was a large impact on quality of life due mostly to the itching that scabies causes and to people feeling embarrassed or sad because of their skin condition. This scabies survey is one of the first conducted across all age groups in recent years in sub-Saharan Africa and indicates a substantial burden and impact on quality of life. More work is needed to understand how common scabies is in different settings and the impact that different treatment strategies may have.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0008943
Author(s):  
Shelui Collinson ◽  
Joseph Timothy ◽  
Samuel K. Zayzay ◽  
Karsor K. Kollie ◽  
Eglantine Lebas ◽  
...  

Scabies is known to be a public health problem in many settings but the majority of recent data is from rural settings in the Pacific. There is a need for high quality data from sub-Saharan Africa and peri-urban settings to inform scale up of scabies control efforts. There have been anecdotal reports of scabies being a public health problem in Liberia but robust data are lacking. We conducted a cross-sectional cluster-randomised prevalence survey for scabies in a peri-urban community in Monrovia, Liberia in February-March 2020. Participants underwent a standardised examination conducted by trained local health care workers. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using age-appropriate versions of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Prevalence estimates were calculated accounting for clustering at community and household levels and associations with key demographic variables assessed through multivariable random-effects logistic regression. 1,318 participants from 477 households were surveyed. The prevalence of scabies was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.5–13.2%), across 75 (19.7%) households; impetigo or infected scabies prevalence was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4–1.9%). The majority (52%) of scabies cases were classified as severe. Scabies prevalence was lower in females and higher in the youngest age group; no associations were found with other collected demographic or socio-economic variables. DLQI scores indicated a very or extremely large effect on HRQoL in 29% of adults and 18% of children diagnosed with scabies. Our study indicates a substantial burden of scabies in this peri-urban population in Liberia. This was associated with significant impact on quality of life, highlighting the need for action to control scabies in this population. Further work is needed to assess the impact of interventions in this context on both the prevalence of scabies and quality of life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Made Mahaguna Putra ◽  
Kadek Siki Mariani ◽  
Ni Nyoman Ari Ratnadi

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue particularly in the elderly. Religion may affect the Quality of Life in such patients, mediated by factors such as religious coping and medication adherence. This study aimed to investigate the impact of religious coping and medication adherence on quality of life.Method: Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue particularly in the elderly. Religion may affect the Quality of Life in such patients, mediated by factors such as religious coping and medication adherence. This study aimed to investigate the impact of religious coping and medication adherence on quality of life.Result: there is a significant relationship between Religious Coping and adherence to treatment in Diabetes Mellitus patients with a value of r = 0.266 (p = 0.00) and quality of life (r = 0.216; p = 0.00).Conclusion: Religious coping has an important influence and relationship on treatment adherence to diabetes mellitus sufferers and can provide motivation for sufferers in carrying out medication.


Author(s):  
Claudia A Bargon CA ◽  
Marilot CT Batenburg ◽  
Lilianne E van Stam ◽  
Dieuwke R Mink van der Molen ◽  
Iris E van Dam ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTPurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting social distancing and lockdown measures are having a substantial impact on daily life and medical management of people with breast cancer. We evaluated to what extent these changes have affected quality of life and physical, and psychosocial wellbeing of people (being) treated for breast cancer.MethodsThis study was conducted within the prospective Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation (UMBRELLA). Shortly after the implementation of COVID-19 measures, extra questionnaires were sent to 1595 cohort participants, including standard UMBRELLA quality of life (EORTC) questionnaires. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared to the most recent PROs collected within UMBRELLA before COVID-19. The impact of COVID-19 on PROs was evaluated using mixed models analysis.ResultsIn total, 1051 patients (66%) completed the questionnaires. One third (n = 327, 31%) reported a higher threshold to contact their general practitioner due to COVID-19. A significant deterioration in emotional functioning was observed (82·6 to 77·9, p < 0.001) and 505 (48%, 95% CI 45-51) patients reported moderate to severe loneliness. Small significant improvements were observed in QoL, physical-, social- and role functioning scores. In the subgroup of 51 patients under active treatment, there was a strong deterioration in social functioning (69·8 to 5·0, p = 0·03).ConclusionDue to COVID-19, patients (being) treated for breast cancer are less likely to contact physicians, and experience a deterioration in emotional functioning. Patients undergoing active treatment report a strong drop in social functioning. One in two patients reports (severe) loneliness. Online applications facilitating peer contact and e-mental health interventions could support mental health and social interaction times of total lockdown or social distancing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 01018
Author(s):  
Anna Pepelyaeva ◽  
Yuliya Karpovich

At present, the significance of the ecological component in the socio-economic development of the regions has grown significantly. Sustainable socio-economic development of the region is possible only with the improvement of the regional ecosystem and ensuring environmental security. The article proposes a methodology for assessing regional environmental factors and their impact on the health of the inhabitants of the territory, as well as assessing the impact of public health on the quality and standard of living of the population (GRP is used as a criterion for assessing the standard of living of the population in the region, and HDI is used as a criterion assessing quality of life in the region). Approbation of the methodology was carried out on the example of seven subjects of the Russian Federation (Perm region, Nizhny Novgorod region, Sverdlovsk, Samara and Chelyabinsk regions, Tatarstan and Bashkortostan Republics). All regions demonstrate a low level of functioning of the ecological component, in addition, three regions (Perm region, the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Sverdlovsk region) show negative dynamics. The regression analysis presented in the article showed a significant influence of the ecological component on the health status of the inhabitants of all the assessed regions. The proposed methodology can be applied not only for interregional, but also for intercountry analysis of environmental conditions. The development and implementation of measures to reduce the dysfunctions of the ecological component of the regional socio-economic system will mitigate the negative impact on the regional economy, improve the quality of life of the population of the regions.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4606-4606
Author(s):  
Hubert Wysoglad ◽  
Elzbieta Szczepanek ◽  
Ositadima Chukwu ◽  
Weronika Lebowa ◽  
Wiktor Nowak ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Introduction of imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dramatically improved the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the impact of Covid-19 on the QoL of patients with CML has not been measured so far. We aimed to investigate the QoL of CML patients during the Covid-19 pandemic, with a special focus on their personal beliefs on the pandemic, vaccinations, changes in their functioning and experience with the health service at this time. Methods Due to social distancing measures, we conducted a survey with 29 CML patients via the internet and telephone interview. 10 patients were female, 19 were male. The median age was 54. Responses were collected during and after the third wave of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic in Poland between 24 th March 2021 and 18 th July 2021. The survey was divided into three sections. Section 1 assessed patients' opinions on the pandemic, social distancing measures, and access to the health care system during the pandemic, as well as the impact of existing restrictions on their QoL. Section 2 assessed opinions on the functioning of the health care system during the pandemic, and the effect on transportation means to health care centers. Here, patients could choose more than one statement that best applied to the existing situation. Section 3 assessed patients' attitudes towards vaccinations against the influenza virus and SARS-COV-2 and their preferences for the type of vaccination. Results 72% of patients agreed that Covid-19 is a significant threat and disagreed that restrictions imposed during the pandemic were too severe. 69% commonly agreed that other people did not adequately obey social distancing measures while assessing that they comply with the existing guidelines (83%). 55% of patients agreed that the pandemic had a significantly negative impact on their QoL. 72% reported not losing control of CML during the pandemic, and nearly all (93%) stated that the pandemic did not impact their adherence to treatment with TKIs. In Section 2, the most commonly reported health care problem during the pandemic was long waiting times for medical consultations (19 replies). Difficulty with access to the lead physician and complicated, unclear procedures with hospital admission were also reported frequently (15 and 14 replies, respectively). 40% of patients were forced to change their means of transportation to healthcare facilities from public transport to a personal vehicle. In the last five years, only 34% of patients in the cohort received a vaccine against the influenza virus. Of these, 42% claimed this was due to medical personnel's inadequate information, and 37% deemed the influenza vaccine to be ineffective. 66% of patients reported to have already received the Covid-19 vaccination (45% patients had received two doses, 21% received one dose); 21% of patients did not receive the vaccination but reported that they intended to, and 14% (4 patients) of patients reported that they do not want to receive the vaccination against the SARS-COV-2 virus. Of these, 3 considered the vaccines insufficiently tested in clinical trials; 2 explained that they have contraindications to the vaccinations, and 1 patient was afraid of adverse effects related to the vaccinations. 2 of these patients had university-level degrees, 1 had a high school diploma, and 1 received vocational education. 2 lived in towns with &lt; 20 thousand inhabitants, 1 in a city of 20-50 thousand inhabitants and 1 in a city of 50-100.000 inhabitants. 3 were female, 1 was male. When asked to determine which Covid-19 vaccination they would prefer, had they been given a choice, 80% picked the Pfizer-Biontech vaccine, 8% the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, 4% the Moderna vaccine, 4% the Sputnik vaccine, and 4% claimed that the type of vaccine did not make a difference. 0% chose the Astra-Zeneca vaccine. Limitations A limitation of our study is the small cohort of patients. A larger group of patients could help provide a more accurate measurement of patients' opinions. Yet, given the lack of previous reports, this is a good foundation for the future. Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the QoL and access to healthcare for CML patients, although it did not impact adherence to treatment. Most patients were vaccinated against Covid-19 or prepared to receive the vaccine. More attention and time needs to be given to patients' education regarding vaccinations in the future. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sacha: Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Angelini: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Cleaton ◽  
Sabrina Raizada ◽  
Nick Barkham ◽  
Srinivasan Venkatachalam ◽  
Tom Sheeran ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242129
Author(s):  
André Moser ◽  
Maria Carlander ◽  
Simon Wieser ◽  
Oliver Hämmig ◽  
Milo A. Puhan ◽  
...  

Background The COVID-19 pandemic challenges societies in unknown ways, and individuals experience a substantial change in their daily lives and activities. Our study aims to describe these changes using population-based self-reported data about social and health behavior in a random sample of the Swiss population during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the present article is two-fold: First, we want to describe the study methodology. Second, we want to report participant characteristics and study findings of the first survey wave to provide some baseline results for our study. Methods Our study design is a longitudinal online panel of a random sample of the Swiss population. We measure outcome indicators covering general well-being, physical and mental health, social support, healthcare use and working state over multiple survey waves. Results From 8,174 contacted individuals, 2,026 individuals participated in the first survey wave which corresponds to a response rate of 24.8%. Most survey participants reported a good to very good general life satisfaction (93.3%). 41.4% of the participants reported a worsened quality of life compared to before the COVID-19 emergency and 9.8% feelings of loneliness. Discussion The COVID-19 Social Monitor is a population-based online survey which informs the public, health authorities, and the scientific community about relevant aspects and potential changes in social and health behavior during the COVID-19 emergency and beyond. Future research will follow up on the described study population focusing on COVID-19 relevant topics such as subgroup differences in the impact of the pandemic on well-being and quality of life or different dynamics of perceived psychological distress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document