Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Patrick N. Plyler ◽  
Jennifer Hausladen ◽  
Micaela Capps ◽  
Mary Alice Cox
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Large Group ◽  
Listening Environments ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Technology Level

Purpose The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of hearing aid technology level on listener outcome measures. In addition, we aimed to determine if individual characteristics such as noise acceptance and the demands of the listening environment impacted performance and preference. Method A repeated-measures, single-blinded research design was utilized. Twenty-four adults recruited by mail from The University of Tennessee Health Science Center Audiology Clinic participated in this experiment (15 men and nine women). Participants completed two 2-week trial periods using Unitron T Moxi Fit FLEX:TRIAL devices programmed as basic or premium technology levels. A data-logging feature, Log It All (LIA), quantified the demands of the listening environment. At the end of each trial, outcome measures were obtained using Pascoe's High-Frequency Word List, the Hearing in Noise Test, the Quick Speech-in-Noise Test, the Acceptable Noise Level (ANL), the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing short form, satisfaction ratings, and preference. Results Results for ANL, satisfaction in large groups, and LIA total coverage were significantly improved for the premium devices. Participants who preferred the premium devices received significant improvement with premium devices on the ANL and the speech in small group and speech in large group satisfaction ratings, whereas participants who preferred the basic devices did not receive significant improvement with premium devices on any outcome measure. Participants in more demanding listening environments received significant improvement with premium devices on the ANL, whereas participants in less demanding listening environments did not receive significant improvement with premium devices on any outcome measure. Conclusions Group data revealed similar outcomes between technology levels on most measures; however, noise acceptance and satisfaction for speech in a large group were significantly improved when using the premium devices. Individual characteristics such as noise acceptance and listening demands may be useful when comparing hearing aid technology levels for a given patient.

A Clinical Perspective on Cochlear Dead Regions: Intelligibility of Speech and Subjective Hearing Aid Benefit

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 600-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill E. Preminger ◽  
Ryan Carpenter ◽  
Craig H. Ziegler
Keyword(s):  
Background Noise ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Clinical Perspective ◽  
Listening Environments ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Cochlear Dead Regions ◽  
Hearing Aid Benefit

Using the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test, 49 subjects with at least two pure-tone thresholds per ear greater than 50 dB HL and none greater than 80 dB HL were evaluated for the presence or absence of dead regions. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the prevalence of cochlear dead regions in this clinical population, (2) measure whether listeners with dead regions performed differently than listeners without dead regions on a speech intelligibility in noise test, and (3) determine whether cochlear dead regions are associated with reduced subjective hearing aid performance. The results showed that (1) twenty-nine percent of the subjects tested positive for dead regions, (2) listeners with dead regions had poorer sentence understanding in noise than listeners without dead regions and (3) listeners with dead regions perceived poorer subjective hearing aid performance in listening environments with reverberation or background noise as compared to those without dead regions.

scholarly journals Factors Associated With Improvements in Mortality and Morbidity Rates of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2333794X1876536
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Mari ◽  
Zoran Bursac ◽  
Patricia Jean Goedecke ◽  
Ramasubbareddy Dhanireddy
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Very Low Birth Weight ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Vlbw Infants ◽  
Antenatal Steroids

Objective. The objective of this study was to determine factors contributing to improvements in infant mortality rates (IMR) and composite morbidity-mortality in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants after initiating a new perinatal program in 2009 at Regional One Health (ROH). VLBW infants account for 67% of infant deaths. Design. This is a pre-/postintervention cohort study of prospectively gathered data. Population. VLBW infants delivered at ROH during the 2004 to 2015 study period. Setting. ROH is a Regional Perinatal Center affiliated with the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. Methods. We studied 2364 consecutive VLBW infants. Multivariate models were applied to determine factors contributing significantly to the reduction in the outcome measures as well as trends over time. Main Outcome Measures. Primary outcomes were IMR and composite morbidity-mortality rates. Standardized, risk-adjusted mortality and composite morbidity ratios were also reported as defined by the Vermont Oxford Network. Results. Mortality declined from 15.5% in Pre-Implementation to 13.1% in Post-Implementation ( P = .093), corresponding to an 18% reduction in odds. The combined factors of composite morbidity-mortality rate decreased from 55.7% in Pre-Implementation to 43.9% in Post-Implementation ( P < .0001), representing a 38% reduction in odds. Standardized, risk-adjusted mortality and composite morbidity ratios improved during the study period from 20% above to 20% below the expected rate. Increases in the administration of antenatal steroids, surfactant administration, cesarean delivery, and perhaps other programmatic changes that were observational and unaccounted in the model were associated with improvements in outcome measures. Conclusions. Decreased mortality and composite morbidity-mortality in VLBW infants delivered at ROH were found following the initiation of a new perinatal program.

Can Behavioral Speech-In-Noise Tests Improve the Quality of Hearing Aid Fittings?

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Robert Moore ◽  
Susan Gordon-Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Speech Perception In Noise ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Acceptable Noise Level ◽  
Perceptual Performance ◽  
Noise Test

The purpose of this article is to propose 4 dimensions for consideration in hearing aid fittings and 4 tests to evaluate those dimensions. The 4 dimensions and tests are (a) working memory, evaluated by the Revised Speech Perception in Noise test (Bilger, Nuetzel, & Rabinowitz, 1984); (b) performance in noise, evaluated by the Quick Speech in Noise test (QSIN; Killion, Niquette, Gudmundsen, Revit, & Banerjee, 2004); (c) acceptance of noise, evaluated by the Acceptable Noise Level test (ANL; Nabelek, Tucker, & Letowski, 1991); and (d) performance versus perception, evaluated by the Perceptual–Performance test (PPT; Saunders & Cienkowski, 2002). The authors discuss the 4 dimensions and tests in the context of improving the quality of hearing aid fittings.

Factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers in the Medical and Health Sciences Center of Debrecen University, Hungary

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (13) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piroska Orosi ◽  
Ágnes Borbély ◽  
Judit Szidor ◽  
János Sándor
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Internal Communication ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Vaccine Uptake ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Care Workers

Influenza vaccination is the most effective way of influenza prevention. The vaccination rate is low worldwide. In Hungary, the vaccine is free of charge to health care workers and, therefore, the low vaccination rate is unaccountable. Aims: In this study, the authors wanted to explore those factors which influence the refusal of vaccination. Methods: The Health Science Center of Debrecen University has about 4000 employees. The authors adjusted a questionnaire with 45 questions and sent it to 525 randomly selected health care workers, 294 of whom responded (response rate, 56%). The Epiinfo software was used for statistical evaluation. Results: The respondents strongly agreed that the vaccine is free and easy to obtain at the workplace. Official recommendations of the occupational health, the Medical Association of Hungary and advice of the family doctors failed to influence the decision. However, a significant impact of communication with family members, friends and colleagues on the decision was documented. Conclusions: The results indicate that the most important tool in decision making of influenza vaccination is the internal communication, but this effect is not a permanent one. International data show highly variable vaccination rates (between 2.1% and 82%). A better vaccination rate (98% or above) may be achieved with a mandatory influenza vaccination program among health care workers. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 505–513.

Pulmonary Hypertension Roundtable: COPD, IPF, and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Clinician's Dilemma

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-151
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Puget Sound ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Disease ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Science Center ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Transplant Program

On October 9, 2013, a group of experts met by telephone to discuss PH in the setting of COPD and IPF. The group consisting of guest editor of this issue Jeffrey Edelman, MD, Head, Lung Transplant Program VA Puget Sound Health System, University of Washington; Deborah J. Levine, MD, Director, Pulmonary Hypertension Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; James Klinger, MD, Director, Rhode Island Hospital Pulmonary Hypertension Center; and Robert Schilz, DO, PhD, Director of Pulmonary Vascular Disease and Lung Transplantation, University Hospitals, Case Medical Center; provided perspective and insight into how clinicians can approach these patients most effectively.

Skeletal and Dental Correction and Stability Following LeFort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562199610
Author(s):  
Buddhathida Wangsrimongkol ◽  
Roberto L. Flores ◽  
David A. Staffenberg ◽  
Eduardo D. Rodriguez ◽  
Pradip. R. Shetye
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Maxillary Hypoplasia ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

Objective: This study evaluates skeletal and dental outcomes of LeFort I advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with varying degrees of maxillary skeletal hypoplasia. Design: Retrospective study. Method: Lateral cephalograms were digitized at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared to untreated unaffected controls. Based on the severity of cleft maxillary hypoplasia, the sample was divided into 3 groups using Wits analysis: mild: ≤0 to ≥−5 mm; moderate: <−5 to >−10 mm; and severe: ≤−10 mm. Participants: Fifty-one patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla who met inclusion criteria. Intervention: LeFort I advancement. Main Outcome Measure: Skeletal and dental stability post-LeFort I surgery at a 1-year follow-up. Results: At T2, LeFort I surgery produced an average correction of maxillary hypoplasia by 6.4 ± 0.6, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. There was a mean relapse of 1 to 1.5 mm observed in all groups. At T3, no statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical groups and controls at angle Sella, Nasion, A point (SNA), A point, Nasion, B point (ANB), and overjet outcome measures. Conclusions: LeFort I advancement produces a stable correction in mild, moderate, and severe skeletal maxillary hypoplasia. Overcorrection is recommended in all patients with CLP to compensate for the expected postsurgical skeletal relapse.

scholarly journals PATH-19. MOLECULAR, HISTOLOGIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OLIGODENDROGLIOMAS: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii168-ii168
Author(s):  
Antonio Dono ◽  
Kristin Alfaro-Munoz ◽  
Yuanqing Yan ◽  
Carlos Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Zaid Soomro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Science ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract In the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors, oligodendrogliomas are molecularly defined by IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and 1p/19q co-deletion. Some reports suggest that PI3K pathway alterations may confer increased risk of progression and poor prognosis in oligodendroglioma. However, factors that influence prognosis in molecularly defined oligodendroglioma (mOGD) have not been thoroughly studied. Also, the benefits of adjuvant radiation and temozolomide in mOGDs remain to be determined. 107 mOGDs diagnosed between 2008-2018 at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (n= 39) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n= 68) were included. A retrospective review of the demographic, clinical, histologic, molecular, and outcomes were performed. Median age at diagnosis was 37 years and 61 (57%) patients were male. There were 64 (60%) WHO Grade 2 and 43 (40%) WHO Grade 3 tumors. Ninety-five (88.8%) tumors were IDH1-mutant and 12 (11.2%) were IDH2-mutant. Eighty-two (77%) patients were stratified as high-risk: older than 40-years and/or subtotal resection (RTOG 9802). Gross-total resection was achieved in 47 (45%) patients. Treatment strategies included observation (n= 15), temozolomide (n= 11), radiation (n= 13), radiation with temozolomide (n= 62) and other (n= 6). Our results show a benefit of temozolomide vs. observation in progression-free survival (PFS). However, no benefit in PFS or overall survival (OS) was observed when comparing radiation vs. radiation with temozolomide. PIK3CA mutations were detected in 15 (14%) cases, and patients with PIK3CA-mutant mOGDs showed worse OS (10.7-years vs 15.1-years, p= 0.009). Patients with WHO Grade 3 tumors had shorter PFS but no significant difference in OS was observed compared to grade 2. Our findings suggest that mOGDs harboring PIK3CA mutations have worse OS. Except for an advantage in PFS in temozolomide treated patients, adjuvant treatment with radiation or the combination of both, showed no significant advantage in terms of OS.

scholarly journals Development of a Remote Public Health Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Response to COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110048
Author(s):  
Tyler Marie Kiles ◽  
Tracy Hagemann ◽  
Brianna Felts ◽  
Catherine Crill
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Disaster Response ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
University Of Tennessee ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Phone Calls

Objectives: In order to meet the needs of the COVID-19 public health crisis and to actively engage students in patient care opportunities, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy in partnership with the Tennessee Health Department, developed a remote Public Health Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) Elective. The objectives of this paper are to describe the development of and students’ experiences and learning outcomes during the elective. Faculty preceptor and experiential administrator’s perspectives are also described. Methods: This month-long APPE was developed in mid-March and delivered in April and May of 2020. The students volunteered in-person with the State of Tennessee COVID-19 Hotline call centers and conducted topic discussions and assignments virtually with a remote preceptor. Results: A total of 16 students completed this rotation experience. Student ratings of the experience were positive, and their knowledge improved in all topic areas. Students collectively completed approximately 700 hours manning the COVID-19 hotline and logged over 1,000 phone calls. Conclusions: In a time of unprecedented disruption to experiential learning, the development of this unique public health APPE directly benefited the college, the students, and the citizens of our state. The APPE described in this paper could be replicated in additional waves of the pandemic or adapted for similar disaster response.

scholarly journals Enhancing Competency in Professionalism: Targeting Resident Advance Directive Education

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Y. Colbert ◽  
Curtis Mirkes ◽  
Paul E. Ogden ◽  
Mary Elizabeth Herring ◽  
Christian Cable ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Sufficient Knowledge ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
School Curricula

Abstract Background Education about advance directives typically is incorporated into medical school curricula and is not commonly offered in residency. Residents' experiences with advance directives are generally random, nonstandardized, and difficult to assess. In 2008, an advance directive curriculum was developed by the Scott & White/Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine (S&W/Texas A&M) internal medicine residency program and the hospital's legal department. A pilot study examining residents' attitudes and experiences regarding advance directives was carried out at 2 medical schools. Methods In 2009, 59 internal medicine and family medicine residents (postgraduate year 2–3 [PGY-2, 3]) completed questionnaires at S&W/Texas A&M (n  =  32) and The University of Texas Medical School at Houston (n  =  27) during a validation study of knowledge about advance directives. The questionnaire contained Likert-response items assessing attitudes and practices surrounding advance directives. Our analysis included descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare responses across categories. Results While 53% of residents agreed/strongly agreed they had “sufficient knowledge of advance directives, given my years of training,” 47% disagreed/strongly disagreed with that statement. Most (93%) agreed/strongly agreed that “didactic sessions on advance directives should be offered by my hospital, residency program, or medical school.” A test of responses across residency years with ANOVA showed a significant difference between ratings by PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents on 3 items: “Advance directives should only be discussed with patients over 60,” “I have sufficient knowledge of advance directives, given my years of training,” and “I believe my experience with advance directives is adequate for the situations I routinely encounter.” Conclusion Our study highlighted the continuing need for advance directive resident curricula. Medical school curricula alone do not appear to be sufficient for residents' needs in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document