Systolic blood pressure is a better predictor of cardio-vascular disease risk than diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive men

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 162-163
Author(s):  
José R. Banegas
Author(s):  
Aurobinda Chinara ◽  
Prasanta Purohit ◽  
Bibhupada Mahapatra

Background: The prevalence of hypertension is increasing globally as well as in Indian subcontinent. Exercise leads to an increase in the blood pressure especially systolic blood pressure. However, an increase in the diastolic blood pressure after exercise remarks for a risk of cardio-vascular disease. This study was undertaken to evaluate the exercise hypertension among the healthy young adults.Methods: This prospective study was undertaken in a tertiary health care facility. A total of 150 healthy students were finally included in this study for analysis. The study subjects were belonging to 18-22 years old of both genders. The blood pressure was measured by sphygmomanometer. Author used two stair equipment for exercise in which students are allowed to step-up and step down for 5 minutes without any rest. The statistical analyses were carried out by using Graph-Pad Instate. Results: The mean age of the students was 19.8±1.3 years and 92(61.33%) being males. The mean systolic blood pressure was 117.1±7.74 mmHg in resting condition which was significantly increased to 140.0±13.9 mm Hg after exercise (p<0.0001). In contrast, the diastolic blood pressure in resting condition was 78.3±7.89 mm Hg which was significantly reduced to 71.85±7.96 mm Hg after exercise (p<0.0001). The decrease in the diastolic blood pressure was inconsistence and 9 students had increased value after exercise which was found to be normal.Conclusions: Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured during resting condition and after exercise was significantly differs. These differences were found to be normal which remarks for a better cardio-logical status in healthy young students. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Ferreira ◽  
Maria Carvalho ◽  
Helton Reis ◽  
Karina Gomes ◽  
Marinez Sousa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Stevan R. Emmett ◽  
Nicola Hill ◽  
Federico Dajas-Bailador

Hypertension (HTN) is the most common condition man¬aged in primary care and a major risk factor for cardio-vascular disease. Numerous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the use of antihypertensives to manage blood pressure (BP) helps reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Prevalence of HTN increases with age so that around 33% of men and 25% of women aged 45– 54 years have a clinical diagnosis. It is generally defined as a raised blood pressure exceeding 140/ 90 mmHg, divided into two types: ● Essential (or primary) hypertension: accounts for 95% of cases and is where no secondary cause is identified. ● Secondary hypertension: the result of an underlying disease (e.g. renal, pulmonary, endocrine, or drug/ toxin). Pre- HTN is defined as systolic BP (SBP) 120– 139 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) 80– 89 mmHg. BP is the product of cardiac output (heart stroke volume and heart rate) and the total peripheral resistance of ves­sels supplied by the heart. Thus, three main systems are responsible for generating BP: the heart (pumping pres­sure), vessel tone (being the systemic resistance), and the kidney (regulating intravascular volume). Three main physiological systems regulate heart, ves­sels, and kidney with respect to blood pressure: 1. The sympathetic nervous system: changes in BP are sensed by a feedback mechanism mediated by baro­receptors in the walls of the aortic arch and carotid sinuses. Increasing BP causes firing of glossopha­ryngeal and vagus nerves, inhibiting sympathetic outflow via the medulla (tractus solitarius). This, in turn, leads to parasympathetic dominance and a reduction in peripheral resistance (vasodilation through β1- adrenoceptors) and cardiac output (by reduced heart rate and reduced contractility through α1- adrenoceptors). Centrally acting antihypertensive drugs act at the nucleus tractus solitarius (e.g. clonidine/ methyldopa) or ventrolateral medulla (e.g. moxonidine). 2. The renin- angiotensin- aldosterone system: this system regulates blood volume and systemic vascular resistance, thus influencing cardiac output and arterial pressure. This feedback mechanism starts in the kidney with the release of renin into the peripheral circula­tion. Renin release, from juxtaglomerular cells (JC), is stimulated by sympathetic mechanisms (involving α1- receptors on JC themselves), decreased afferent ar­teriole pressure (from systemic hypotension or renal artery stenosis) or declining Na<sup>+</sup> levels in the distal tu­bules of the kidney. Prostaglandins, such as PGE2 and PGI2 (prostacyclin), also cause release of renin sec­ondary to reduced NaCl transport in the macular densa (see Topic 5.2 ‘Acute kidney injury’).


Author(s):  
Biswadeep Choudhury ◽  
Manidip Chakraborty ◽  
Nabiha Mayanaz Karim

Background:It is an established fact that dyslipidemia is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases like myocardial infarction. Major well-known alterations in lipid profile include high serum cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride and low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Recently, it has been found that atherogenic index of plasma (AIP); which is a logarithmically transformed ratio of triglyceride and HDL-C; can predict cardio-vascular disease risk and can also be used for cardio-vascular disease risk stratification. In this study we have calculated the AIP from fasting lipid profile of patients suffering from myocardial infarction and tried to assess the correlation between AIP and myocardial infarction.Methods: The study comprised of fifty patients suffering from myocardial infarction aged more than 18 with no prior history of cardiovascular diseases. We measured fasting lipid profile using Vitros 5600 full auto analyzer and calculated AIP using online AIP calculator. Statistical analysis was done using “Microsoft excel 2019” with add on. A significant percentage (66%) of myocardial infarction patients had higher AIP (>0.21) and fell in the high-risk group. We also got a significant relationship between AIP-triglyceride and AIP-HDL-C (p<0.05 considered as statistically significant).Conclusions: AIP is high in myocardial infarction patients. In this group, besides high AIP, they also have low HDL-C and high triglycerides which are significant. So, AIP can be used as a tool for cardio-vascular disease risk stratification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document