Performance of a new preloaded fiducial needle to guide radiation therapy of upper gastrointestinal cancers

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (05) ◽  
pp. 463-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinh-An Phan ◽  
Raymond Dalfsen ◽  
Hien Le ◽  
Nam Q. Nguyen

Abstract Background Insertion of fiducials to outline the targeted lesion allows image-guided radiotherapy, and is best achieved by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This study is a performance comparison of the new EUS-guided preloaded fiducial needle against Visicoil fiducials. Methods Technical success, visibility score, procedural time, costs, and complications for patients who underwent EUS-guided fiducial placement in upper gastrointestinal malignancies were prospectively collected. Results 60 patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers had fiducials (14 Visicoil; 46 preloaded fiducials) inserted for image-guided radiotherapy. Technical success was 100 %, with a shorter mean (standard deviation) insertion time of 0.94 minutes (0.28 minutes) vs. 5.5 minutes (1.9 minutes; P < 0.001) and higher visibility score on fluoroscopy of 2 vs. 1.18 (P < 0.001) in the preloaded group. Neither group had major complications related to fiducial insertion. The cost of consumables per patient was lower in the preloaded group at US$480 (US$124) vs. US$643 (US$123; P < 0.001). Conclusion Fiducial insertion for image-guided radiotherapy using the new preloaded needle is associated with 100 % technical success, shorter insertion time, and higher visibility, and is more cost-effective than the Visicoil system.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 526-530
Author(s):  
Monica Kumar

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were introduced in the 1980s. They are now one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in general practice. They are cost-effective when used correctly; however, PPIs are often used beyond accepted clinical indications. Recent published studies performed outside the UK have suggested that adverse effects are associated with long-term use of PPIs; in particular, an increased risk of gastric cancer. This article will aim to systematically assess the evidence and discuss its application to our clinical practice.


BJR|Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20190001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Gabelloni ◽  
Lorenzo Faggioni ◽  
Emanuele Neri

In parallel with the increasingly widespread availability of high performance imaging platforms and recent progresses in pathobiological characterisation and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, imaging biomarkers have become a major research topic due to their potential to provide additional quantitative information to conventional imaging modalities that can improve accuracy at staging and follow-up, predict outcome, and guide treatment planning in an individualised manner. The aim of this review is to briefly examine the status of current knowledge about imaging biomarkers in the field of upper gastrointestinal cancers, highlighting their potential applications and future perspectives in patient management from diagnosis onwards.


2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Slovak ◽  
Hyun S. Kim

AbstractThe reinfusion of autologous or allogeneic immune cells that have been educated and/or engineered ex vivo to respond to tumor-specific antigens is termed “adoptive cell therapy.” While adoptive cell therapy has made tremendous strides in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, its utilization for solid tumors has lagged somewhat behind. The purpose of this article is to concisely review the clinical research that has been done to investigate adoptive cell therapy as a treatment for gastrointestinal malignancies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (14) ◽  
pp. 1302-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharareh Gholamin ◽  
Hamid Fiuji ◽  
Mina Maftouh ◽  
Reza Mirhafez ◽  
Fatemeh Shandiz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Nikki P. Lee ◽  
Zhi Xu ◽  
Sarwat Fatima ◽  
Timothy T. Yung ◽  
Raymond W. Y. Sun ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1083-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Lavely ◽  
Christopher Scarfone ◽  
Hakan Cevikalp ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Daniel W. Byrne ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 101912
Author(s):  
Shria Kumar ◽  
Nadim Mahmud ◽  
David S. Goldberg ◽  
Jashodeep Datta ◽  
David E. Kaplan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document