scholarly journals Endovascular Therapy for the Management of Acute Ilio-femoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Phlebologie ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mert Dumantepe
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Postthrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Acute Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Deep Vein

AbstractIlio-femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has a high rate of long-term morbidity in the form of the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Therefore, management of acute thrombosis should not only focus on the prevention of acute complications such as propagation or embolisation of the initial clot but also on preventing recurrent thrombosis and PTS. Contemporary catheter-based treatments of deep vein thrombosis have proven to be safe and effective in selected patients. Current guidelines recommend medical therapy with anticoagulation alone for all but the most severe, limb-threatening thrombosis. They additionally allow for consideration of endovascular catheter-based treatment in selected patients with acute proximal ilio-femoral DVT and low risk of bleeding complications to prevent PTS. Imaging-guided, catheter-based endovascular therapy has been used in selected patients to alleviate these sequelae, but important questions remain about their optimal use. In this article, we review the available evidence and summarize the rationale for use of catheter-based therapy in specific patient groups with acute iliofemoral DVT.

Catheter-based treatment of ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis - an update on current evidence

VASA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Fahrni ◽  
Rolf P. Engelberger ◽  
Nils Kucher ◽  
Torsten Willenberg ◽  
Iris Baumgartner
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Postthrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has a high rate of long-term morbidity in the form of the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Therefore, management of acute thrombosis should not only focus on the prevention of acute complications such as propagation or embolisation of the initial clot but also on preventing PTS and recurrent thrombosis. Contemporary catheter-based treatments of deep vein thrombosis have proven to be safe and effective in selected patients. Current guidelines recommend medical therapy with anticoagulation alone for all but the most severe, limb-threatening thrombosis. They additionally allow for consideration of catheter-based treatment in patients with acute DVT and low risk of bleeding complications to prevent PTS. Recent studies favoring interventional therapy have not been included in these guidelines. Data on long-term outcome is expected to be published soon, clarifying and very likely strengthening the role of catheter-based treatments in the management of acute ilio-femoral DVT.

scholarly journals Catheter-Based Therapies and Other Management Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddhant Thukral ◽  
Suresh Vedantham
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Deep Vein

Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) causes substantial short-term and long-term patient morbidity. Medical, lifestyle, and compressive therapies have been investigated for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) and recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, patient-centered outcomes such as resolution of presenting DVT symptoms and late occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) have not been prioritized to the same degree. Imaging-guided, catheter-based endovascular therapy has been used in selected patients to alleviate these sequelae, but important questions remain about their optimal use. In this article, we review the available evidence and summarize the rationale for use of catheter-based therapy in specific patient groups.

Outcome of Treatment of Deep-Vein Thrombosis with Urokinase: Relationship to Dosage, Duration of Therapy, Age of the Thrombus and Laboratory Changes

1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 236-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
A D’Angelo ◽  
P M Mannucci
Keyword(s):  
Degradation Products ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Laboratory Changes ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Higher Doses

SummaryForty-one patients with phlebographically proven DVT of the popliteal, femoral or iliac veins were treated with different regimens of urokinase (UK) given by continuous intravenous infusion. The four groups were comparable with respect to localization, extension and estimated age of the thrombi. Another phlebographic picture was taken within 48 hr after the end of UK infusion. Substantial lysis had occurred in 2 of 10 patients treated with 1500 U/kg/h for 2 days, in 4 of 11 treated with 2500/U/kg/h for 3 days, in 2 of 10 treated with 2500 U/kg/h for 7 days and in 4 of 10 treated with 4000 U/kg/h for 4 days. Only thrombi younger than 8 days could be lysed, with 61% (8/13) rate of lysis for thrombi less than 5 days old. Bleeding complications were observed more frequently with the higher doses and longer durations of therapy. The four treatment regimens all induced dose-dependent changes in fibrinogen, fibrin(ogen) degradation products, plasminogen and antiplasmin. Neither pre- nor postinfusion values of these parameters could differentiate patients with lysis from those without lysis. It is concluded that UK can provoke a high rate of thrombolysis of DVT treated early after the appearance of symptoms but that there is no relationship between UK-induced modifications of fibrinolysis and the outcome of therapy.

scholarly journals Postthrombotic Syndrome in Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Permesh Singh Dhillon ◽  
Asim Shah ◽  
Thomas Hall ◽  
Said Habib
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Postthrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014,1: CD002783.

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Sousa Nanji ◽  
André Torres Cardoso ◽  
João Costa ◽  
António Vaz-Carneiro
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

<p>The standard treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) targets to reduce immediate complications, however thrombolysis could reduce the long-term complications of post-thrombotic syndrome in the affected limb. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of thrombolytic therapy and anticoagulation <em>versus </em>anticoagulation in people with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb through the effects on pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding, post-thrombotic complications, venous patency and venous function. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last search in April 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 4). A total of 17 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1103 participants were included. In the experimental group receiving thrombolysis, complete clot lysis occurred more frequently and there was greater improvement in venous patency. The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome decreased by a 1/3 and venous ulcers were less frequent. There were more bleeding complications and 3 strokes occurred in less recent studies, yet there seemed to be no significant effect on mortality. Data on the occurrence of pulmonary embolism and recurrent deep vein thrombosis were inconclusive. There are advantages to thrombolysis, yet the application of rigorous criteria is warranted to reduce bleeding complications. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the current preferred method, as opposed to systemic thrombolysis in the past, and other studies comparing these procedures show that results are similar.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombolytic Therapy; Venous Thrombosis.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document