Long-Term Morbidity of Children with Brain Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S45
Author(s):  
S. Rutkowski
Keyword(s):  
Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (24) ◽  
pp. 5771-5779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hoon Phi ◽  
Seung-Ki Kim ◽  
Byung-Kyu Cho ◽  
Seo Young Lee ◽  
Su Yeon Park ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii461-iii461
Author(s):  
Shigeru Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroaki Motegi ◽  
Yukitomo Ishi ◽  
Michinari Okamoto ◽  
Akihiro Iguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Pediatric and Young-Adult (AYA) brain tumors often present with hydrocephalus. As temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedure, we perform long-term indwelling external ventricular drainage (EVD) in the case of the management of CSF diversion more than two weeks presumably. The aim of this study is to investigate the initial management for hydrocephalus in pediatric /AYA patients with brain tumor, especially about long-term EVD. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patients less than 30 years of age diagnosed with brain tumor between 2005 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Procedures of long-term EVD were similar to that of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) operation. Using flow-control VPS system, peritoneal catheter passed out of the body at the anterior chest, and distal end of the catheter was connected to standard EVD system. RESULTS In total of 345 patients with brain tumor, 109 had hydrocephalus at presentation. Among them, 25 patients (23%) underwent long-term EVD. The main reasons for selecting long-term EVD were to avoid intraperitoneal dissemination (n=13), and to maintain longer period of CSF diversion for the treatment of tumor (n=12). The median of long-term EVD was 38 days (range: 12 – 222 days). Although one case suffered from drainage tube occlusion at 59 days, there were no other complications such as infection or accidental evulsion. Eventually, 3 cases required permanent VPS for persistent hydrocephalus. CONCLUSION Long-term EVD is safe and effective option for CSF diversion. This procedure should be taken into consideration if patients have a risk of dissemination and may elude permanent VPS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi27-vi28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Slavc ◽  
Andreas Peyrl ◽  
Amedeo A. Azizi ◽  
Johannes Gojo ◽  
Dominik Reisinger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lai Lei Lou

Although mobile phones have proved to be lifesaving in certain circumstances, wide concerns have been raised about brain tumors associated with their use. This article systematically reviews previous and current research in regards to mobile phone use and brain tumors. Recently, research (more than 10 years mobile phone use or cumulative mobile phone use more than 1640 hours) has been found that the amount of exposure to mobile phone radiation plays a key role in determining the significant associations between mobile phone use and gliomas, and acoustic neuroma. In general, those who use mobile phones for more than ten years, or cumulative call time for more than 1640 hours, have higher risks to develop brain tumors, especially glioma and acoustic neuroma, than those who use mobile phones for less than one year.


Author(s):  
Raymond K. Mulhern ◽  
Robert W. Butler

This chapter reviews neuropsychological late effects associated with childhood cancer and its treatment. The study of late effects presupposes that patients are long-term survivors, if not permanently cured, of their disease. Late effects are temporally defined as occurring after the successful completion of medical therapy, usually 2 or more years from the time of diagnosis, and it is generally assumed that late effects are chronic, if not progressive, in their course. This definition serves to separate late effects from those effects of disease and treatment that are acute or subacute and time limited, such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting or temporary cognitive changes induced by cancer therapy. Research interest in neuropsychological outcomes, as well as neurological and other functional late effects, has shown an increase commensurate with improvements in effective therapy. For example, 30 years ago when few children were cured of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), questions related to the ultimate academic or vocational performance of long-term survivors were trivial compared to the need for improved therapy. In contrast, today more than 80% of children diagnosed with ALL can be cured, and issues related to their quality of life as long-term survivors have now received increased emphasis. There is at least comparable attention to neuropsychological status in primary brain tumors. We first provide a brief medical background on the two most frequent forms of childhood cancer, ALL and malignant brain tumors, followed by a review of the current neuropsychological literature. The literature review provides an in-depth analysis of the types of cognitive impairments observed and known or suspected risk factors for impairments. When neurobiological substrates are known, particularly from neuroimaging studies, they are discussed. Finally, we conclude the review with sections that discuss current recommendations for a core battery of neuropsychological assessment of survivors and recommendations for future research. Approximately 20,000 children and adolescents under the age of 20 years were diagnosed with cancer in 1999 (Steen & Mirro, 2000). The most commonly diagnosed cancer in this age group is ALL, a malignant disorder of lymphoid cells found in the bone marrow that migrates to virtually every organ system, including the central nervous system (CNS), via the circulatory system. ALL accounts for one fourth of all childhood cancers and 75% of all cases of childhood leukemia (Margolin, Steuber, & Poplack, 2002).


Author(s):  
Angela M. Bohnen ◽  
Kaisorn L. Chaichana ◽  
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa

Having a general understanding of brain tumors is integral to mastering the oral board examination. For the general session, examinees should be able to identify both intra-axial and extra-axial tumors and provide a comprehensive understanding of the differential diagnosis and plan regarding treatment, while also verbalizing concepts behind the treatment modalities and articulating to a patient and family the alternative approaches as well as the complications related to management. Pathologies to familiarize oneself with include gliomas, meningiomas, metastatic lesions, and pituitary lesions. For subspecialty examinees, complex cases such as endonasal, endoscopic, keyhole, and skull base approaches should be mastered. For each case, a broad differential diagnosis should include infection, hematoma, infarction, thrombosed aneurysm, inflammation, and/or demyelinating disease. Discuss the preoperative workup the indications for surgery and surgical approach. Interpret the preoperative and postoperative imaging critically. Be prepared for potential intraoperative complications and discussion of postoperative management including adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy and long-term care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document