Meat and bone meals incorporated at two levels in grower-pig rations based on either sorghum of wheat

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (44) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
RM Beames ◽  
LJ Daniels

Two experiments are reported in which a total of 96 Large White pigs were individually fed from 21 to 74 kg bodyweight on rations based on either sorghum or wheat. In the first experiment the protein supplement consisted of 20 per cent of one of two meat and bone meals or 15 per cent soybean meal. The ration containing soybean meal was presented with or without added calcium and phosphorus to provide levels of these elements equal to those in one of the meat and bone meal rations. Pigs fed the wheat-based rations had 13 per cent (P<0.05) greater growth rates and utilized feed 7 per cent more efficiently than those fed the sorghum-based rations. The rations containing the meat and bone meals produced 10 per cent lower growth rates and were utilized less efficiently (P<0.05) than those containing soybean meal. The addition of calcium and phosphorus to the soybean meal rations had no significant effect on growth. Ration composition had no effect on carcase measurements. In the second experiment the rations were based on either sorghum or wheat and were supplemented with either 15 per cent or 20 per cent of one of two meat and bone meals. Pigs fed the wheat-based rations had 11 per cent (P<0.05) greater growth rates and utilized feed 11 per cent more efficiently than those fed the sorghum-based rations. The efficiency of feed utilization for pigs fed the 20 per cent level of meat and bone meal was 5 per cent greater than that of pigs fed the 15 per cent level below 45 kg bodyweight but not above this weight. Growth rate was not significantly affected by level of meat and bone meal. Feed efficiency was greater for rations containing the, meat and bone meal with the lower ash content. The only treatment that affected carcase measurements was the level of meat and bone meal in the ration. Pigs fed the rations with 20 per cent meat and bone meal produced carcases with 11 mm of backfat (not including the skin) above the last rib, whereas those fed the 15 per cent level had 13 mm of backfat.


1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (40) ◽  
pp. 482 ◽  
Author(s):  
RM Beames ◽  
JO Sewell

Two experiments are reported. In the first experiment, 48 Large White pigs were individually fed from 22.2 to 86.5 kg bodyweight, with rations containing either sorghum or barley in combination with 16.6, 13.8, 10.7, or 7.4 per cent soybean meal. Type of grain did not affect growth rate or feed efficiency but carcase measurements indicated that the barley-fed pigs were leaner. There were no significant differences in growth rate or feed efficiency between the 16.6 per cent and 13.8 per cent soybean meal rations before 45 kg bodyweight or between the 16.6 per cent, 13.8 per cent, or 10.7 per cent soybean meal rations after 45 kg bodyweight, but all rations containing the three higher levels of soybean meal gave significantly better growth rate and feed efficiency than the rations containing 7.4 per cent soybean meal for both bodyweight ranges. Final results showed no significant differences between the 16.6 per cent and the 13.8 per cent soybean meal rations in growth rate, feed efficiency, or carcase measurements of pigs receiving these rations, but growth data and carcase measurements were poorer with the two lower levels of soybean meal supplementation. In the second experiment, 40 Berkshire pigs were individually fed barley or sorghum grain with 15 per cent soybean meal or 20 per cent of one of three meat and bone meals. Pigs were fed from 25.8 to 74.0 kg bodyweight. The sorghum-based rations gave significantly better growth rates and feed efficiencics than the barley-based rations after 45 kg bodyweight, but carcase appraisal indicated greater lean content in the barley-fed pigs. Growth rates and feed efficiencies obtained with rations containing two of the meat and bone meals were significantly (P<0.05) less than values obtained with the rations containing soybean meal. Pigs fed the third meat and bone meal grew only slightly more slowly than those fed soybean meal. Type of supplement had no effect on carcase measurements.



1963 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
ACE Todd

Queensland whale meat meal and whale meat and bone meal were compared with South African fish meal as a protein supplement to a sorghum meal diet for pigs. Results were assessed & the growth of Large White pigs over a four month period. Whale meat meal was as efficient in promoting growth at a slightly lower cost than the fish meal. Whale meat and bone meal produced lower gains at a higher cost.



1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1098-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. ANGKANAPORN ◽  
V. RAVINDRAN ◽  
W.L. BRYDEN


1984 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 926-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jørgensen ◽  
W. C. Sauer ◽  
P. A. Thacker


2014 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 420-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Adedokun ◽  
P. Jaynes ◽  
M.E. Abd El-Hack ◽  
R.L. Payne ◽  
T.J. Applegate




1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (65) ◽  
pp. 630
Author(s):  
KW Entwistle

Three experiments are reported in which formaldehyde treatment of various components of survival rations was examined. In experiment 1, Merino weaner ewes were fed survival diets composed of either wheat or sorghum grain with meat and bone meal and low quality roughage. The grain and the meat and bone meal components were treated or untreated with formaldehyde (HCHO), and half the animals were treated with vitamin A. Both HCHO treatment of the grain and vitamin A treatment significantly increased liveweight gains over the 20-week experimental period. There was no wool growth response to HCHO treatment but wool growth rates were higher in sheep on the wheat based diets. Vitamin A treatment had no effect on survival rates, which were, however, lower in sheep on wheat diets. In experiment 2, similar sheep, maintained on a basal diet of low quality sorghum silage, were supplemented with meat and bone meal treated or untreated with HCHO and half the sheep were treated with vitamin A. HCHO treatment resulted in a lower rate of liveweight loss but only for the first 30 days of the experiment. Neither wool growth rates nor survival rates were affected by HCHO or by vitamin A treatment. In experiment 3, Merino wethers were used and the effectiveness of HCHO treatment of either wheat or sorghum grain diets was further examined. HCHO treatment had no effect on either liveweight or clean wool production, which was, however, higher in sheep on wheat based diets.



2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Lazzari ◽  
João Radünz Neto ◽  
Fabio de Araújo Pedron ◽  
Vania Lucia Loro ◽  
Alexandra Pretto ◽  
...  

Digestive enzymes activity influence feed utilization by fish, and its understanding is important to optimize diet formulation. This study reports the digestive enzyme activities of jundiá juveniles fed diets with protein sources. Fish were fed six experimental diets for 90 days: MBY (meat and bone meal + sugar cane yeast), SY (soybean meal + sugar cane yeast), S (soybean meal), MBS (meat and bone meal + soybean meal), FY (fish meal + sugar cane yeast) and FS (fish meal + soybean meal), and then sampled every 30 days and assayed in two intestine sections for digestive enzymes - trypsin, chymotrypsin and amylase - activities; gastric protease was assayed in the stomach. Digestive and hepatosomatic index, intestinal quotient, digestive tract length and weight gain were also measured. Trypsin and chymotrypsin activities were higher (p < 0.0001) in fish fed diets containing animal protein sources (MBY, MBS, FY and FS diets). Alkaline proteases were negatively affected by dietary soybean meal in the SY and S diets. Amylase activity had greater variation between diets and intestine sections. Fish fed MBY and MBS diets showed higher gastric protease activity (p < 0.0001). Weight gains were higher in fish fed the MBS and FS diets (p < 0.05). Highest values (p < 0.05) of digestive tract length were observed in fish fed MBS and FY diets, but no correlation with enzymes activities was found. Hepatosomatic index (HSI) was affected by diet composition. Dietary composition influenced digestive enzymes activities of jundiá.



1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1037-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Loerch ◽  
L. L. Berger ◽  
S. D. Plegge ◽  
G. C. Fahey


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Corzo ◽  
W.A. Dozier ◽  
R.E. Loar ◽  
M.T. Kidd ◽  
P.B. Tillman


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document