298 COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS FOR SUPERSTIMULATION OF DAIRY CATTLE

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Steel ◽  
J. F. Hasler

Traditionally, successful superstimulation of cattle depended on initiating injections of gonadotrophin at mid-cycle, approximately at second follicular wave emergence. This approach limited the convenience of scheduling donors for superstimulation. With the use of intravaginal progesterone-releasing devices and estradiol 17β, superstimulation can be initiated successfully at any time of the estrous cycle. However, because estradiol cannot be legally injected into cattle in an increasing number of countries, the efficacy of GnRH as an estradiol substitute was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected in a commercial bovine embryo transfer program over a period of several years. All donors were lactating dairy cows at least two years of age; approximately 75% were comprised of Holstein and the remainder of Jersey, Guernsey, or Brown Swiss breeds. The three treatments employed were (1) Controls injected twice daily for 4 days with a total of 240 to 400 mg of porcine FSH (Folltropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health, Inc.) in decreasing doses starting between day 7 and day 14 of diestrus, with PG (Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health) given at the time of FSH injections no. 5 (35 mg) and 6 (25 mg); (2) Estradiol females received a CIDR (Pfizer Animal Health), 5.0 mg estradiol 17β and 100 mg progesterone in oil on random days of the estrous cycle; FSH was initiated 4 days later as described for controls with CIDR removal at the time of FSH injection no. 6; (3) GnRH females received a CIDR on random days of the estrous cycle and 100 μg GnRH on day 1.5 following CIDR insertion; FSH was initiated 60 h after GnRH injection as described for controls with CIDR removal at the time of FSH injection no. 6. All donors were inseminated with one straw of frozen semen 12 and 24 h after the onset of estrus. Embryos were nonsurgically recovered 7 to 8 days after onset of estrus. Only embryos of grades 1 to 3 (IETS classification) were included in the data. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s hsd test was used to distinguish significance among means as shown in Table 1. Estradiol females produced approximately 2 more ova/embryos per procedure than Control and GnRH groups and an average of 0.8 more embryos per female than did the Control group, but there was no difference compared to the GnRH group. Similar to what has been shown in other commercial embryo transfer data sets, nearly 25% of the donors in each group failed to produce at least one good embryo. Clearly, all three treatments resulted in efficacious superstimulation. In light of the legality issues surrounding the use of estradiol, this study shows that GnRH can be used quite successfully to superstimulate dairy cattle at random times of the estrous cycle. Table 1.Average numbers of ova and embryos recovered from dairy cows superstimulated with three different protocols We thank G.E. Seidel, Jr. and S.C. Purcell for assistance with statistical analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
J. W. Thorne ◽  
C. R. Looney ◽  
J. F. Hasler ◽  
D. K. Hockley ◽  
D. W. Forrest

This study was performed to test the viability of administering Folltropin-V® (FSH, Bioniche Animal Health) diluted in hyaluronan (MAP-5 50 mg, sodium hyaluronate, Bioniche Animal Health) to beef cows enrolled in a recipient synchronization protocol to evaluate its effect on recipient fertility. All recipients were administered an estradiol 17β (2.5 mg, IM) and progesterone (50 mg, IM) combination injection on Day 0, a CIDR® (progesterone 1.34 g, Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA) was inserted for 7 days. Lutalyse® (dinoprost tromethamine, Pfizer Animal Health, 25 mg, IM) was administered at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, and estradiol 17β (1 mg, IM) was administered on Day 8. On Day 16, the presence of at least one corpus luteum, detected via ultrasound, resulted in the recipient receiving an embryo (both fresh and frozen–thawed embryos were used). Embryos were not transferred into cows that did not show ultrasonic evidence of a CL. Dependent variables for which data were collected included circulating progesterone levels at the time of transfer and CL diameter, area, and circumference; measured in millimeters. The total study (n = 274) consisted of both wet (n = 85) and dry (n = 189) cows and included both Bos indicus (Brahman-influenced) crossbred (n = 93) and Bos taurus (Angus-based) cows (n = 181). The experiment consisted of cows being placed in either the treated or control groups, with treated cows receiving a single 40 mg (1 mL) IM injection of Folltropin-V in hyaluronan on Day 5 and control cows receiving no additional injections. Results are shown in Table 1. Transfer rate, conception rate, and pregnancy rate were tested for significance with chi-square analysis and remaining statistics were analyzed with a t-test: two-sample assuming equal variances. There were no significant differences found between the treated and control groups for transfer rate, conception rate, or pregnancy rate. Corpus luteum diameter was shown to be larger in control cows (P < 0.05); however, CL area and circumference did not differ significantly. Folltropin-V given with hyaluronan at a 40-mg dose on Day 5 did not improve fertility, induce a larger CL, or increase circulating progesterone levels in synchronized beef recipients as hypothesized. Further work is needed with Folltropin-V in hyaluronan to determine if an alternative dose or timing of administration would be more appropriate for improving fertility in recipients. Table 1.Fertility data in beef recipients following synchronization for fixed-time embryo transfer with a protocol that included (Treated) or did not include (Control) FSH in hyaluronan


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
R. Dupras ◽  
J. Dupras ◽  
Y. Chorfi

In cows, estradiol-17β is usually used to synchronize follicular wave emergence during superovulatory treatment. This approach, however, raises some concerns about the presence of estrogens in bovine products and their possible association with some human estrogen-sensitive cancers. The objective of this study was to determine estradiol-17β concentrations in blood and milk of dairy cows after i.m. injection of estradiol-17β and to compare these concentrations to those obtained during standard superovulation protocols. Six cows were used for this experiment. On Day 0, corresponding to Day 7 of their ensuing cycle, cows received 4.5 mg of estradiol-17β (Gentes et Bolduc, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada) via i.m. injection and a progesterone-releasing vaginal insert (1.9 g of progesterone, CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, Kirkland, Québec, Canada). Blood and milk samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection. From Day 4 evening to Day 8 evening, the cows received a total of 380 mg of NIH-FSH-P1 (Folltropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) administered i.m. through 9 injections of decreasing dose (from 70 to 20 mg) at 12-h intervals. On Day 7, the cows received 2 injections consisting of 500 μg of cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2 α analogue, Estrumate, Shering-Plough, Pointe-Claire, Québec, Canada) given approximately 12 h apart and vaginal inserts were removed 12 h after the last injection. Artificial insemination was performed on Day 9 and 10 after treatment with 100 μg of GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Baie Urfe, Québec, Canada). A second batch of blood and milk samples was taken at Day 8, 9, 10, and 11. Measurement of estradiol-17β was performed with an IMMULITE chemiluminescent counter using an IMMULITE Estradiol Kit (Siemens Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Concentrations of estradiol-17β in blood (37.1 ± 15.6 pg mL-1 at 24 h, 19.1 ± 14.2 pg mL-1 at 48 h) and milk (38.4 ± 29.5 pg mL-1 at 24 h, 9.3 ± 4.9 pg mL-1 at 48 h) were significantly higher after i.m. injection of 4.5 mg of estradiol-17β. In comparison, superovulation heat (Day 9 to 11) increased estradiol-17β concentrations in blood (20 ± 13.6 pg mL-1 at 24 h, 32.5 ± 16.3 pg mL-1 at 48 h) but not in milk.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
R. Dupras ◽  
Y. Chorfi

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a second flush for bovine embryo recovery. A total of 319 clinically healthy Holstein cows (247 lactating, 53 dry, 19 nulliparous) with an average age of 5.5 ± 2.5 years were used for this experiment. Superovulation was performed according to a modified method of Baracaldo et al. (2000). On Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), each cow received 3 mg of estradiol-17β intramuscularly (i.m.) and a progesterone-releasing vaginal insert (1.9 g of progesterone, CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, Kirkland, QC, Canada) at random stages of the estrous cycle. From Day 4 evening to Day 8 evening, the cows received a total of 380 mg of NIH-FSH-P1 (FolltropinV, Bioniche Animal Health) administered im through 9 injections of decreasing dose (from 70 to 20 mg) at 12-h intervals. On Day 7, the cows received 2 injections consisting of 500 μg of cloprostenol (prostaglandin F2α analogue Estrumate, Schering-Plough, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) given approximately 12 h apart and vaginal inserts were removed 12 h after the last injection. Artificial insemination was performed on Day 10 after treatment with 100 μg, GnRH im (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc, Baie d’Urfe, QC, Canada). Embryos were flushed from the uterus of donor cows 6 days after AI. The method consisted of using simultaneously 1 catheter (18Fr Silicone 2-way, Bioniche Animal Health) per uterine horn. Catheters were maintained in place to perform 2 flushes 1 h apart. A total of 1000 mL of flushing media (Complete flush, Bioniche Animal Health) were used, 700 mL and 300 mL for the first and the second flush, respectively. Embryos were assessed for viability immediately after collection using IETS classification. Data were analyzed using the SAS MIXED procedure (SAS Institue, Cary, NC). The mean (±SD) number of embryos collected at the first flushing was 5.87 ± 5.1, 0.92 ± 2.2 and 2.9 ± 4.4 for transferable, degenerate and unfertilized oocytes, respectively. The second flushing yielded 2.32 ± 2.6 transferable embryos, 0.28 ± 0.83 dead embryos and 1.2 ± 2.2 unfertilized oocytes. There was no significant effect of age, day in milk, or stage of lactation on transferable or degenerate embryos or nonfertilized oocytes in each flushing. The embryo recovery method used in this experiment could be used to recover more transferable embryos. The authors want to thank Dr Vincent Girard for his help in statistics.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 289 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Larkin ◽  
P. Chesta ◽  
C. Looney ◽  
G. Bo ◽  
D. Forrest

This experiment was designed to compare timing of ovulation and embryo production between traditional superstimulatory and AI methods and the use of additional treatments of Estradiol-17β and pLH (Lutropin; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) to facilitate timed AI in beef cows. A total of 31 mature cross-bred beef cows were randomly assigned three treatments. On Day 0, experimental cows were selected upon transrectal ultrasound evaluation for corpus leutum (>10 mm) prior to CIDR insertion plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17β and 50 mg Progesterone i.m. Superstimulatory treatments with Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health) began on Day 4 for 3.5 days (236 mg NIH-FSH-P10) in decreasing dosages (7 injections at 0700 and 1900). All cows received prostaglandin F (PGF) treatments of 625 mcg D-cloprostenol i.m. (Estrumate; Schering-Plough, Union, NJ, USA) in both AM and PM on Day 6, and CIDRs were removed in AM of Day 7, followed by the final injection of Folltropin. In addition, Heat Watch patches (Heat Watch; Cow Chips, Denver, CO, USA) were applied to optimize heat detection. Donors selected as control treatment were AI at 12 and 24 h post-onset of estrus (first mount) with frozen semen from the same bull. Donors selected on the Estradiol-17β treatment received 1 mg i.m. 12 h after CIDR removal and timed AI at 24 and 36 h. Donors selected for Lutropin treatment received 12.5 mg (5cc i.m.) 24 h after CIDR removal and were timed AI at 12 and 24 h. All AI procedures used 2 units from the same bull. All cows were examined by ultrasonography every 8 h beginning 24 h post-CIDR removal and ending at 60 h to determine the time and distribution of ovulation. Ovulation was determined by the disappearance of follicles (>12 mm) from the prior examination. All AI and ultrasound procedures were performed by the same technician. There were no differences detected between the three treatments as evaluated by all the variables we studied (Table 1). However, donors treated with Lutropin tended to produced more viable embryos per collection and had a tighter degree of distribution of ovulations. Donors treated with Estradiol-17β tended to have fewer viable embryos. More research is needed to determine if donors can be timed AI without regard to estrus. Table 1. Mean onset of estrus, distribution of ovulation, and embryo production in superstimulated beef donors treated with Estradiol-17β, and Lutropin


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
A. Garcia Guerra ◽  
G. A. Bó ◽  
J. Villarreal ◽  
G. M. Brogliatti

Ovarian asynchrony and variability in response to superstimulation remain the most limiting factors in any embryo transfer program (Armstrong D 1993 Theriogenology 39, 7–24). Ovarian response can be increased and less variable if superstimulatory treatment is started at the time of follicular wave emergence (Bö GA et al. 1995 Theriogenology 43, 31–40). A combination of progesterone (P4) and estradiol have been used to synchronize follicular wave for superstimulation. A retrospective analysis was done to compare the ovarian response, superovulatory response and embryo production of cows in Argentina that received progesterone and estradol prior to superstimulation at different stages of the estrous cycle. This research was carried out using different breed of donors (n = 584, 88% Angus) during the last 4 years in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Heat detection was performed twice a day. At random stages of the estrous cycle, donors received an intravaginal progesterone device (DIB; Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina), 2 mg of estradiol benzoate and 50 mg of progesterone (Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) IM on the same day. On day 4 after DIB insertion, superestimulatory treatment was initiated on a decreasing dose regimen of FSH (Pluset; Callier, Spain, or Folltropin, Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) as IM injections every 12 h over 4 d. On day 6, DIBs were removed, and cows received two doses of 2 mL of cloprostenol 12 h apart. At heat detection, all donors received a dose of 2 mL of GnRH (Dalmarelin; Fatro Von Franken, Buenos Aires, Argentina) by IM injection and were inseminated 12 and 24 h later. Seven days later, embryo collection was performed and ovarian response was evaluated as number of CL + unovulated follicles by transrectal ultrasound using a 7.5-MHz transducer (Pie Medical, Maastricht, the Netherlands). Ova/embryos were evaluated and classified according to the IETS manual. Donors were assigned to receive DIB and estradiol during the following stages of the cycle: group 1: between days 4 and 7 post-estrus (dominant follicle period), group 2: between days 8 and 12 post-estrus (emergence of the second follicular wave), and group 3: between days 13 and 21 post-estrus (dominant follicle of the second wave). Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare variables among groups, and results are shown in Table 1. Ovarian response as CL + unovulated follicles and number of ovulations were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of fertilized ova or transferable embryos. Nevertheless, numeric differences that show that group 2 (started between days 8 and 12 post-estrus) was always superior for all variables. In conclusion, data suggest that estradiol may be more effective in synchronizing follicle wave emergence for superstimulation during the mid-part of the estrous cycle. Table 1. Superovulatory response in cows in which follicle wave emergence was synchronized with estradiol at different stages of the estrous cycle (mean ± SD) Research supported by Centro Genetico Bovino Eolia S.A.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
J. Villarreal ◽  
A. Garcia Guerra ◽  
G. M. Brogliatti

The fertility of the recipient is one of the more important factors conditioning the success of an embryo transfer (ET) program. Selection and management of recipients is a very important contributing factor to achieve high pregnancy rates (Stroud and Hasler 2006 Theriogenology 65, 65–76). From a reproductive point of view, a good recipient is a cow capable of receiving an embryo and taking it to term (Palma et al. 2001 Biotecnologia de la reproduccion, INTA). In beef and dairy cattle, recipients are categorized according to number of births, age, and condition score (Stroud and Hasler 2006). A retrospective analysis was done to confirm a relationship between recipient category, based on their physiologic and reproductive stage, and pregnancy rates. The analysis was done during January and February (2006–2007) based on data recovered from an embryo transfer program done in Chubut province (Patagonia) for the project ‘Polo Genetico Angus’ (Angus Association – Chubut government agreement). Two hundred and seven morulas and/or blastocysts, quality 1 or 2 frozen in 1.5 m ethylene glycol (IETS manual), were transferred randomly in 10 different farms. Embryos were thawed for 10 s at room temperature and 30 s in a water bath at 35°C and transferred by one single technician. Angus, Hereford, or its breeds were used as recipients. A reproductive exam was performed before embryo transfer and, based on it, recipients were classified into 4 categories: heifer (3–4 years old), lactating cow, weaned cow, and dry old cow (Table 1). The synchronization protocol used for recipients consisted of a single administration of D-cloprostenol and heat detection twice a day for 5 days. Data were analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (chi-square). Results are shown in Table 1. There is a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) in pregnancy rates among categories. Recipients with higher pregnancy rates were lactating cows and weaned cows 61.6% and 56.9%, respectively, compared to heifers, 45.3%; a lower pregnancy rate was founded in the dry old cows group. Dry cows were animals that failed to get pregnant during the last season. Heifers also were animals that failed the artificial insemination program. In both groups, the reduced fertility may explain their lower pregnancy rates. In conclusion, selection toward fertility of recipients is a very important factor to take into account to design a successful embryo transfer program. Table 1. Pregnancy rates for recipient categories in an ET program in Chubut (Patagonia), Argentina This research was supported by Centro Genetico Bovino Eolia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
Martin G Maquivar ◽  
John Swain ◽  
Hannah Chiapetta ◽  
Tynnetta Stumvoll ◽  
Katelin Baker ◽  
...  

Abstract Estrus detection in dairy cattle is an important factor that contributes to the reproductive efficiency. Lack and inaccuracy of heat detection are associated with increased days open, calving interval, economic loss and culling due to infertility. Efforts have been made to identify methods to assist in estrus detection. The objective of this study was to examine if vaginal electrical resistance (VER) measured by a commercial probe throughout the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows aids to determine the onset of estrus. A total of 9 lactating Holstein cows were monitored for 2 – 3 estrous cycles, ultrasonography of the ovary, blood sample for progesterone and VER was assessed every other day during the luteal phase (LUT) and every day during the follicular phase (FOL). A total of 339 VER measurements were collected, 66 during the FOL phase and 273 corresponded to the LUT phase. Mean VER differed (P &lt; 0.001) between FOL (294.5 ± 51.3) and LUT (316.4 ± 46.2), similarly the progesterone concentration was different between the LUT and FOL phases (0.38 ± 0.24 ng/mL vs. 3.41 ± 2.08 ng/mL, respectively) (P &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed between the vaginal temperature of cows in LUT (38.2 ± 0.4 C°) or FOL phase (38.3 ± 0.3 C°). Cervix diameter differed (P &lt; 0.01) between FOL (35.9 ± 3.8 mm) and LUT (34.5 ± 3.4mm), VER has a significant relation (P &lt; 0.001) with the diameter of the Corpus luteum (279.8 + 1.54 x Cervix diameter). Similarly, VER had a significant relationship (P = 0.03) with diameter of the dominant follicle at estrus (355.2 + -3.9 x follicle diameter). These findings suggest that VER changes according to the phase of the estrous cycle, VER decreased during sexual receptivity and increased during the luteal phase. VER may improve the accuracy to diagnose heat in dairy cows.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nishisouzu ◽  
M. Sugawara ◽  
S. Aoki ◽  
K. Kishida ◽  
M. Moriyoshi ◽  
...  

Treatments with GnRH and PGF2α for synchronization of ovulation has resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates after fixed-time artificial insemination in dairy cows without estrus detection. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the practicability of ovulation synchronization (Ovsynch, Pursley JR et al. 1995 Theriogenology 44, 915–923) in dairy cattle using GnRH and PGF2α for the embryo transfer recipients. Dairy cattle (cows; n=100, heifers; n=88) were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The control group (cows; n=45, heifers; n=37) was composed of cows in natural estrus. The ovulation synchronization group (cows; n=55, heifers; n=51) was treated with an intramuscular injection of 100μg of GnRH at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Seven days later, the cattle received PGF2α (Cows; 25–30mg) or PGF2α analog (Heifers; 0.5mg) in order to regress the corpora lutea (CL). Forty-eight hours later, cows and heifers received a second injection of 100μg GnRH. Embryo transfer was carried out 7 days after the second injection of GnRH in the ovsynch group and 7 days after estrus in the control group. The cattle judged to have CL 17mm were classified as acceptable recipients. The size of the follicles and the CL were determined to be of estrus stage and embryo transfer by means of ultrasonography. The mean numbers of follicles and CL were analyzed by ANOVA, while pregnancy rates were analyzed by chi-square test. The results are presented in the Table. The proportion of cows and heifers determined to be acceptable embryo transfers was not different between the control group and the ovsynch group. There were no differences in the proportion of acceptable embryo transfers between the control group and the ovsynch group. Follicle diameter at the time of estrus in the control group (cows; 20.7±0.7mm, heifers; 16.8±0.5mm) were significantly larger than that of the ovsynch group (cows; 18.0±1.0mm, heifers; 14.7±0.2mm) (P&lt;0.05). Although CL diameter at the time of embryo transfer in heifers showed no differences between the control group and the ovsynch group (25.0±1.0mm v. 22.8±1.5mm), The CL diameter of the control cow group was larger than that of the ovsynch group (29.8±0.7mm v. 26.1±1.0mm, P&lt;0.05). However, no differences in pregnancy rate were seen between the control group and the ovsynch group. These results suggest that ovsynch can be effectively applied in an embryo transfer program for cattle. Table 1 Proportion of acceptable embryo transfer recipients and pregnancy rate in dairy cattle in the control ovsynch groups


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
D. Romero ◽  
G. Romero ◽  
G. Veneranda ◽  
L. Filippi ◽  
D. Racca ◽  
...  

An experiment was designed to compare pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows synchronized with a 7-day CIDR-Synch or a 5-day CIDR-Synch program and to determine if the addition of a second prostaglandin F2α (PGF) injection to the 7-day CIDR-Synch program would improve pregnancy rates following fixed-time AI (FTAI). The experiments were performed on 2 dairy farms in Argentina, with year-round calving and a mixed feeding system (35% grazing plus 65% corn silage and grain). Cows (n = 621) were 39.3 ± 6.5 days in milk (DIM, mean ± SD) when they were enrolled in the program, had 2.4 ± 1.5 lactations and a body condition score (BCS) of 3.1 ± 0.2 (range: 2.7 to 4.0). All cows received a pre-synchronization treatment with 2 doses of prostaglandin (PGF, 25 mg of dinoprost, Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health, Argentina) 14 days apart, and 11 days after the second PGF (Day 0) received 10 µg of Buserelin (GnRH, Receptal, MSD-Intervet, Argentina) and a CIDR device (1.9 g of progesterone, Pfizer Animal Health). Cows were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups. The CIDR devices were removed and PGF was administered to cows in Groups 1 and 2 on Day 7. A second GnRH was given 56 h later and cows experienced FTAI 16 h after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection (i.e. 72 h after CIDR removal). Cows in Group 2 also received a second PGF injection on the afternoon of Day 7. Cows in Group 3 had the CIDR removed and received 2 PGF injections 12 h apart on Day 5. A second dose of GnRH was given and FTAI was performed at the same time, on Day 8 (i.e. 72 h after CIDR removal). All cows were examined by ultrasonography (Aloka 500V, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) on the day of the first PGF injection and at CIDR removal to determine the presence and number of corpora lutea (CL), and 30 days after FTAI to determine pregnancy status. Data were analyzed by logistic regression to determine the effects of treatment, parity, days postpartum, milk production, BCS, presence of a CL at enrollment, and number of CL at the time of CIDR removal on pregnancy rates. Overall pregnancy rates did not differ among groups: 32.9% (68/207), 38.2% (78/204), and 38.3% (80/209) for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.2). Although the number of CL present at CIDR removal did not significantly affect pregnancy rates (P = 0.4), pregnancy rates in cows with 1 CL in Groups 1 and 2 tended to differ [29.0% (11/38) v. 48.9% (21/43); P < 0.07], but neither differed from that in Group 3 [37.2% (16/43)]. No differences were detected among groups in cows without a CL at CIDR removal [overall pregnancy rate: 29.4% (5/17)] and those with ≥2 CL [overall pregnancy rate: 36.1% (173/479)]. Among the other variables evaluated, first-parity cows had 1.96 (1.38–2.78) times more chance of getting pregnant than second-or-more-parity cows (P = 0.002) and cows with BCS >3 had 1.63 (1.16–2.28) times more chance of getting pregnant than those with BCS <3 (P = 0.003). Finally, herd, days postpartum, milk production, and presence of a CL at enrollment did not significantly affect pregnancy rates. We concluded that the 3 treatments resulted in similar pregnancy rates for lactating dairy cows and that the benefit of adding a second PGF injection to the 7-day protocol was only marginal in cows with 1 CL at CIDR removal.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Carwell ◽  
J. A. Pitchford ◽  
G. T. Gentry Jr ◽  
H. Blackburn ◽  
K. R. Bondioli ◽  
...  

Artificial insemination has proven to be a valuable asset to the cattle industry. It is assumed that once good quality semen is frozen in liquid nitrogen it should remain viable indefinitely; however, semen viability has not been systematically evaluated after being stored for several decades. In this experiment, frozen semen from 25 purebred Angus bulls processed during 3 time periods (1960-1975 = 5 bulls; 1976-1991 = 11; 1992-2002 = 9 bulls) was used to randomly inseminate purebred lactating Angus cows and heifers and lactating crossbred beef cows. In experiment 1, Angus cows (n = 24) and Angus heifers (n = 16) and in experiment 2, crossbred cattle (n = 88) of 5 breeds (Beefmaster, Romosinuano, Bons Mara, Brangus, Brangus F1) were artificially inseminated with frozen-thawed Angus bulls semen from the 3 time periods. All females were in good body condition and at least 45 days postpartum and were synchronized using the SelectSynch protocol. Briefly, on treatment Day 0, females received an Eazi-Breed CIDR (Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY, USA) implant and were administered GnRH (Factryl, 100 μg im), on Day 7, prostaglandin (Lutalyse, 25 mg im, Pfizer Animal Health) was administered and the CIDR removed. Cattle not responding to synchronization were subjected an additional prostaglandin treatment 8 to 10 days later. Estrus detection was conducted using the HeatWatch™ system for the Angus females and with Estrotect™ patches for the crossbred females. Females fitted with HeatWatch transponders that were successfully mounted 4 times within a 6-h period were considered to be in standing estrus and were inseminated 12 to 14 h later. Females fitted with Estrotect patches were observed twice daily (morning and evening) to identify females whose patch was scratched. Females were inseminated by an experienced technician 12 to 14h after the patch were observed as being scratched a minimum of 50%. Response to synchronization in Angus cows and heifers was 76% (n = 40), whereas in the crossbred cattle the response was 74% (n = 88). Cows and heifers were confirmed pregnant via transrectal ultrasonography 45 days postinsemination. Pregnancy rates confirmed by chi-square analysis were not different for Angus cows and heifers (58% and 43%, respectively). Also, pregnancy rates for the Angus females were not different across time periods 1, 2, and 3 (58, 43, and 53%, respectively). Pregnancy rates for crossbred females were not different across time periods 1, 2, and 3 (35, 60, and 44%, respectively). Overall pregnancy rates (experiments 1 and 2) were 47, 52, and 40% across time periods 1, 2, and 3 respectively. It is concluded from this study that semen units processed and frozen from Angus bulls from time periods 1, 2, and 3 (from the 1960s through to 2002) are still viable and produce similar pregnancy rates in artificially inseminated beef females. Thanks to Jared Pitchfordfor inseminating all of the cattle; Harvey Blackburn for providing the semen to make the project possible; and my advisors Dr. Gentry and Dr. Godkefor assisting throughout the entire project. I also thank all of the graduate students who have helped me throughout the project.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document