Distribution and abundance of spectacled hare-wallabies and euros on Barrow Island, Western Australia

1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 421 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Short ◽  
B Turner
Keyword(s):  
Population Size ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Empirical Measure ◽  
Habitat Types ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Viable Population ◽  
Population Sizes ◽  
Minimum Viable Population Size

Spectacled hare-wallabies (Lagorchestes conspicillatus) and euros (Macropus robustus isabellinus) occur on Barrow I. at densities of 42 and 8 km-2, respectively, which result in estimates of total population sizes of c. 10000 and 1800, respectively. Spectacled hare-wallabies occur throughout the island in all habitat types; euros tend to be concentrated in the deeply dissected country in the central-west of the island. Limited areas of floodout flats are important feeding areas for euros, being the only major habitat on the island dominated by grasses other than Triodia. There was no significant difference between density of either species on the two halves of the island (one half is dominated by a commercial oilfield; the other is relatively undisturbed). Barrow I. is the smallest island off the Australian coast to have successfully supported a population of large macropods for the 8000-10000 years since separation from the mainland by rising sea-level. Hence, the population estimate of euros on Barrow I. provides an empirical measure of the viable population size necessary for the long-term survival of large macropods. This estimate is nearly two orders of magnitude less than that estimated from a theoretical model of minimum viable population size (Belovsky 1987).

scholarly journals Genetic Diversity, Inbreeding Level, and Genetic Load in Endangered Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weimin Kuang ◽  
Jingyang Hu ◽  
Hong Wu ◽  
Xiaotian Fen ◽  
Qingyan Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Genetic Load ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Population Sizes ◽  
Genomic Inbreeding ◽  
Inbreeding Level

The snub-nosed monkey genus (Rhinopithecus) comprises five closely related species (R. avunculus, R. bieti, R. brelichi, R. roxellana, and R. strykeri). All are among the world's rarest and most endangered primates. However, the genomic impact associated with their population decline remains unknown. We analyzed population genomic data of all five snub-nosed monkey species to assess their genetic diversity, inbreeding level, and genetic load. For R. roxellana, R. bieti, and R. strykeri, population size is positively correlated with genetic diversity and negatively correlated with levels of inbreeding. Other species, however, which possess small population sizes, such as R. brelichi and R. avunculus, show high levels of genetic diversity and low levels of genomic inbreeding. Similarly, in the three populations of R. roxellana, the Shennongjia population, which possesses the lowest population size, displays a higher level of genetic diversity and lower level of genomic inbreeding. These findings suggest that although R. brelichi and R. avunculus and the Shennongjia population might be at risk, it possess significant genetic diversity and could thus help strengthen their long-term survival potential. Intriguingly, R. roxellana with large population size possess high genetic diversity and low level of genetic load, but they show the highest recent inbreeding level compared with the other snub-nosed monkeys. This suggests that, despite its large population size, R. roxellana has likely been experiencing recent inbreeding, which has not yet affected its mutational load and fitness. Analyses of homozygous-derived deleterious mutations identified in all snub-nosed monkey species indicate that these mutations are affecting immune, especially in smaller population sizes, indicating that the long-term consequences of inbreeding may be resulting in an overall reduction of immune capability in the snub-nosed monkeys, which could provide a dramatic effect on their long-term survival prospects. Altogether, our study provides valuable information concerning the genomic impact of population decline of the snub-nosed monkeys. We revealed multiple counterintuitive and unexpected patterns of genetic diversity in small and large population, which will be essential for conservation management of these endangered species.

scholarly journals Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.

scholarly journals Female Sex and Outcomes after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Christian-Alexander Behrendt ◽  
Thea Kreutzburg ◽  
Jenny Kuchenbecker ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Mark Dankhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: Previous studies have showed a potential disadvantage of female patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The current study aims to determine sex-specific perioperative and long-term outcomes using propensity score matched unselected nationwide health insurance claims data. Methods: Insurance claims from a large German fund were used, covering around 8% of the insured German population. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for intact AAA from 1 January 2011 to 30 April 2017 were included in the cohort. A 1:2 female to male propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after 5 years were determined using matching and regression methods. Results: Among a total of 3736 patients (19.3% females, mean 75 years) undergoing EVAR for intact AAA, we identified 1863 matched patients. Before matching, females were more likely to be previously diagnosed with hypothyroidism, electrolyte disorders, rheumatoid disorders, and depression, while males were more often diabetics. In the matched sample, 23.4% of the females and 25.8% of the males died during a median follow-up of 776 and 792 days, respectively. Perioperatively, females were more likely to exhibit acute limb ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.031) and major bleeding (22.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.001) before they were discharged to rehabilitation (5.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) when compared to males. No statistically significant difference in perioperative (odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.54–2.16) or long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.76–1.08) was observed between sexes. This was also true regarding aortic reintervention rates after 1 year (2.0% vs. 2.9%) and 5 years (10.9% vs. 8.1%). Conclusion: The current retrospective matched analysis of insurance claims revealed high early access-related morbidity in females when compared to their male counterparts. Short-term or long-term survival and reintervention outcomes were similar between sexes.

Aggressive Treatment in Glioblastoma: What Determines the Survival of Patients?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Yu ◽  
Guozhong Zhang ◽  
Songtao Qi
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Background and Study Aims The exact reason of long-term survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients has remained uncertain. Molecular parameters in addition to histology to define malignant gliomas are hoped to facilitate clinical, experimental, and epidemiological studies. Material and Methods A population of GBM patients with similar clinical characteristics (especially similar resectability) was reviewed to compare the molecular variables between poor (overall survival [OS] < 18 months, control cohort) and long-term survivors (overall survival > 36 months, OS-36 cohort). Results Long-term GBM survivors were younger. In the OS-36 cohort, the positive rate of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was very low (7.69%, 3/39) and there was no statistical difference in OS between IDH mutant and wild-type patients. The results of 1p/19q codeletions are similar. Besides, there were no significant difference in MGMT promoter methylation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, and TP53 mutations between OS-36 cohort and control cohort. Conclusions No distinct markers consistently have been identified in long-term survivors of GBM patients, and great importance should be attached to further understand the biological characteristics of the invasive glioma cells because of the nature of diffuse tumor permeation.

scholarly journals Long-term outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sini Luoma ◽  
Raija Silvennoinen ◽  
Auvo Rauhala ◽  
Riitta Niittyvuopio ◽  
Eeva Martelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Relapse Group

AbstractThe role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in multiple myeloma is controversial. We analyzed the results of 205 patients transplanted in one center during 2000–2017. Transplantation was performed on 75 patients without a previous autologous SCT (upfront-allo), on 74 as tandem transplant (auto-allo), and on 56 patients after relapse. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 years for upfront-allo, 11.2 years for auto-allo, and 3.9 years for the relapse group (p = 0.015). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4, 2.4, and 0.9 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-relapse mortality at 5 years was 8% overall, with no significant difference between the groups. Post-relapse survival was 4.1 years for upfront-allo and auto-allo, and 2.6 years for the relapse group (p = 0.066). Survival of high-risk patients was reduced. In multivariate analysis, the auto-allo group had improved OS and chronic graft-versus-host disease was advantageous in terms of PFS, OS, and relapse incidence. Late relapses occurred in all groups. Allo-SCT resulted in long-term survival in a small subgroup of patients. Our results indicate that auto-allo-SCT is feasible and could be considered for younger patients in the upfront setting.

SP6.1.11 The Effect of the Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery on Long Term Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalaiyarasi Arujunan ◽  
Abdulwarith Shugaba ◽  
Harmony Uwadiae ◽  
Joel Lambert ◽  
Georgios Sgourakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Aims The Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery (ERPLS) has been shown to promote functional recovery and reduce hospital stay. However, its effect on long term survival has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the ERPLS on 5-year patient survival. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) between January 2011 and December 2016 at a regional hepatobiliary centre. The cohort comprised of 60 pre-ERPLS and 60 post-ERPLS patients. The primary outcome was 5-year patient survival. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and 90-day readmission rates. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of overall survival. Results There was no significant difference in the age (p = 0.960), gender (p = 0.332) and type of resection (p = 0.198) between both groups. ERPLS was not an independent predictor for overall survival (Gehan Wilcoxon Test, p = 0.828). There was no significant difference in the LOS (p = 0.874) and 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.349). Major postoperative complications (&gt;3a Clavien-Dindo classification) were significantly less in the ERPLS group (p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, positive resection margins and major postoperative complications were independent predictors for overall survival. Conclusions ERPLS does not seem to have an effect on long term patient survival. However, it appears to reduce the rate of major postoperative complications. LOS and 90-day readmission rates were not influenced by ERPLS.

Minimum viable population size: not magic, but necessary

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 619-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry W. Brook ◽  
Corey J.A. Bradshaw ◽  
Lochran W. Traill ◽  
Richard Frankham
Keyword(s):  
Population Size ◽  
Viable Population ◽  
Minimum Viable Population Size ◽  
Minimum Viable Population

Post-Discharge Outcomes After Pancreatic Necrosectomy: A Single Institution Experience Following Endoscopic vs Open Debridement

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110385
Author(s):  
Manuel Martinez ◽  
Steven Medeiros ◽  
James Dove ◽  
Mohsen Shabahang
Keyword(s):  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosectomy ◽  
Medical Comorbidities ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Pancreatic necrosectomy outcomes have been studied extensively; however, long-term results of these procedures have not been well characterized. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes at and after discharge for patients following necrosectomy. Methods Data from patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy at a single tertiary referral hospital from January 1, 2007, to June 1, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into an open pancreatic necrosectomy (OPN) and an endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy (EPN) group. Results Cohorts were composed of an OPN (n = 30) and EPN (n = 31) groups with a mean follow-up of 22 and 13.5 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the demographics or etiology of disease; however, the presence of severe sepsis and elevated BISAP scores was significantly higher in the OPN group (40% vs 13% p = .016, 37% vs 10% p = .012, respectively). There was no significant difference in discharge parameters or disposition other than a higher need for wound care in the OPN group (14% vs 0% p =< .0001). No significant difference in the number of patients who returned to baseline, 12-month ED visits, 12-month readmissions, medical comorbidities, or long-term survival was noted. Conclusions Previous studies have demonstrated that OPN patients have a higher severity of disease and higher inpatient mortality; however, this does not hold true once the acute phase of the illness has passed. Long-term medical comorbidities and survival of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis who endure the primary insult do not differ in long term, regardless of the debridement modality performed for source control.

Abstract 15741: Long Term Survival Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Single US High Volume Center

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo O Escarcega ◽  
Rebecca Torguson ◽  
Marco A Magalhaes ◽  
Nevin C Baker ◽  
Sa’ar Minha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction: Mortality following Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported up to 5 years. However, mortality after 5 years remains unclear. Hypothesis: We aim to determine the mortality in patients undergoing TAVR >5 years follow up. Methods: From our institution’s prospectively collected TAVR database we analyzed all patients undergoing TAVR to a maximum follow up of 8 years. We divided our population into transapical TAVR (TA-TAVR) and transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 511 patients who underwent TAVR were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TA-TAVR had higher rates of peripheral vascular disease compared with TF-TAVR (56% vs 29%, p<0.001) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (10.9 ± 4 vs 9.2 ± 4, p<0.001). TA-TAVR was associated with higher mortality at 1 year (32% vs 21%, p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in very-long term mortality of patients undergoing TA-TAVR vs TF-TAVR (Figure). Conclusions: Long-term mortality following TAVR surpasses 50%. While in the first 2 years TA-TAVR is associated with higher mortality rates after three years the survival rates are similar in both approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document