Formulation characteristics of monodisperse structured lipid microparticles using microchannel emulsification

Author(s):  
Hanxiao Wang ◽  
Mitsutoshi Nakajima ◽  
Marcos A. Neves ◽  
Kunihiko Uemura ◽  
Setsuko Todoriki ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Chukwuebuka Umeyor ◽  
Uchechukwu Nnadozie ◽  
Anthony Attama

This study seeks to formulate and evaluate a solid lipid nanoparticle-based, solidified micellar carrier system for oral delivery of cefepime. Cefepime has enjoyed a lot of therapeutic usage in the treatment of susceptible bacterial infections; however, its use is limited due to its administration as an injection only with poor patient compliance. Since oral drug administration encourage high patient compliance with resultant effect in improved therapy, cefepime was formulated as solid lipid microparticles for oral delivery using the concept of solidified micellar carrier system. The carrier system was evaluated based on particle yield, particle size and morphology, encapsulation efficiency (EE %), and thermal analysis using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Preliminary microbiological studies were done using gram positive and negative bacteria. In vitro release study was performed using biorelevant media, while in vivo release study was performed in white albino rats. The yield of solid lipid microparticles (SLM) ranged from 84.2 – 98.0 %. The SLM were spherical with size ranges of 3.8 ± 1.2 to 42.0 ± 1.4 µm. The EE % calculated ranged from 83.6 – 94.8 %. Thermal analysis showed that SLM was less crystalline with high potential for drug entrapment. Microbial studies showed that cefepime retained its broad spectrum anti-bacterial activity. In vitro release showed sustained release of cefepime from SLM, and in vivo release study showed high concentration of cefepime released in the plasma of study rats. The study showed that smart engineering of solidified micellar carrier system could be used to improve oral delivery of cefepime.


2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Maschke ◽  
Christian Becker ◽  
Daniela Eyrich ◽  
Josef Kiermaier ◽  
Torsten Blunk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Eustáquio Matos-Jr ◽  
Marcello Di Sabatino ◽  
Nadia Passerini ◽  
Carmen Sílvia Favaro-Trindade ◽  
Beatrice Albertini

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Neves Rodrigues Ract ◽  
Fabiana Andreia Schäfer De Martini Soares ◽  
Hosana Gomes Rodrigues ◽  
José Ricardo Bortolon ◽  
Gilson Masahiro Murata ◽  
...  

<p>Two oil blends (sunflower/canola oils 85/15 (BL1) and canola/linseed oils 70/30 (BL2)), were prepared and enzymatically interesterified to be applied to surgically-induced wounds in rats. Following surgery, the animals were submitted to the Treatment with Physiological Saline (TPS) (control group), Blends (TBL), and Structured Lipids (TSL). The control group (TPS) received physiological saline solution for 15 days. In TBL, BL1 was administered during the inflammation phase (days 0-3) and BL2 in the tissue formation and remodeling phase (days 4-15). In TSL, Structured Lipid 1 (SL1) and Structured Lipid 2 (SL2) were used instead of BL1 and BL2, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare wound closure evolution among rats treated with the blends or structured lipids versus control rats treated with physiological saline. The wound healing process was evaluated by measuring the wound areas along the treatments and the concentrations of cytokines. An increase in the areas of wounds treated with the blends and structured lipids in the inflammatory phase was observed, followed by a steeper closure curve compared to wounds treated with physiological saline. The changes observed during the inflammatory phase suggest a potential therapeutic application in cutaneous wound healing which should be further investigated.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Ramalho Procopio ◽  
Vivian Boesso Oriani ◽  
Bruno Nicolau Paulino ◽  
Leonardo do Prado-Silva ◽  
Glaucia Maria Pastore ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document