Effect of Guided Vs. Discovery Learning Strategies on Initial Motor Task Learning, Transfer, and Retention

Author(s):  
Robert N. Singer ◽  
Dale Pease
NeuroImage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 118373
Author(s):  
Joris van der Cruijsen ◽  
Mana Manoochehri ◽  
Zeb D. Jonker ◽  
Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou ◽  
Maarten A. Frens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Joshua L Haworth ◽  
Srikant Vallabhajosula ◽  
George Tzetzis ◽  
Nicholas Stergiou

Management seeks to provoke system optimization throughout ever changing environmental and internal conditions. Typically, perturbations to stable organizations are unpredictable and difficult to define, except from within a chaos perspective. How should management staff set up their workforce to be best responsive to these changes? It is proposed that a dynamic systems theoretical approach to the organization of the management system would foster the ideal scenario. This approach lends well to the inclusion of discovery learning strategies that promote the valuable use of optimal variability in the exploration and self-discovery of optimal solutions to existent and novel problems. In this text, the authors walk the reader through a brief history of the development of the systems perspective on human movement optimization. Next, they extend the related discoveries to applications within management systems. It is hoped that a new appreciation for complexity and beneficial aspects of variability is conveyed.


1979 ◽  
Vol 48 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1243-1248
Author(s):  
S. E. Moxley ◽  
F. P. Covey

Three groups of 25 matched subjects (aged 10 to 12 yr.) took part in this study. In the practice condition one group performed the solution of the Tinkertoy Motorcycle Model in a problem-solving manner, while the other two groups performed in a guided manner. One guided group performed the same number of trials as the problem-solving group, while the other group had the same total time performing each trial as the problem-solving group. Their relative effectiveness was compared on the six initial practice trials and on six trials after a period of no practice. The problem-solving group received no direct assistance. The guided groups saw two demonstrations of the assembling procedure along with verbal feedback as to the selection and placement of pieces on the figure. The guided groups performed the task significantly faster than the problem-solving group on all practice trials. When measured for retention there were no significant differences among groups. The two guided groups however did maintain a slight advantage over the problem-solving group. It was concluded the practice of the perceptual motor task was facilitated by a guided discovery, while retention was not significantly different. The results are discussed in relation to learning strategies and type of task.


1959 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-234
Author(s):  
John A. Wittenburg ◽  
Sherman Ross ◽  
T. G. Andrews
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-74
Author(s):  
Ya’aman Gulo ◽  
Talizaro Tafonao ◽  
Rita Evimalinda

Abstract: The purpose of writing this article is to explain learning strategies that are relevant in the 5.0 era of society in learning Christian religious education. The author observes that the learning strategy is a means to achieve the learning objectives that have been set. Because one of the challenges faced by teachers today is the development of technology. The era of society 5.0 demands a teacher to be more creative, innovative and informative. That's why, the author reviews this paper to provide some tricks and tips so that teachers are able to compete and use appropriate learning strategies in the era of society 5.0. The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative research method by examining the learning strategies of Christian religious education in the era of society 5.0. The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative research method by examining the learning strategies of Christian religious education in the era of society 5.0. The results obtained in this study show that one of the learning strategies for Christian religious education in the era of society 5.0 that are still relevant are participatory strategies, inquiry strategies, discovery learning strategies, cooperative strategies, and blended learning strategies. Thus, the era of society 5.0 is a community concept that was developed to apply and balance the use of technology in everyday life so that access occurs in virtual space and physical space to solve social problems in order to create super smart humans.Abstrak: Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah menjelaskan strategi pembelajaran yang relevan di era society 5.0 dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Penulis mengamati bahwa strategi pembelajaran merupakan sarana untuk mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang sudah ditetapkan. Karena salah satu tantangan yang dihadapi oleh guru saat ini adalah perkembangan teknologi. Era society 5.0 menuntut seorang guru untuk lebih kreatif, inovatif dan informatif. Oleh karena itu, penulis mengkaji tulisan ini untuk memberi beberapa trik dan tips agar guru-guru mampu bersaing dan menggunakan strategi pembelajaran yang tepat di era society 5.0. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan mengkaji strategi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen di era society 5.0. Hasil yang dapatkan dalam kajian ini menunjukan bahwa salah satu strategi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen di era society 5.0 yang masih relevan adalah strategi partisipatif, strategi inkuiri, strategi discovery learning, strategi koorperatif, dan strategi blended learning. Dengan demikian  bahwa era society 5.0 adalah sebuah konsep masyarakat yang dikembangkan untuk mengaplikasikan dan menyeimbangkan penggunaan teknologi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari sehingga terjadinya akses dalam ruang virtual dan ruang fisik untuk memecahkan masalah sosial agar terciptanya manusia yang super smart.


Author(s):  
Robby Nur ◽  
Akmal Sholah

The learning model that is still teacher-centered causes low activity and student learning outcomes in the classroom, many students do not understand the material taught in the classroom especially if the teacher does not provide additional assignments. This writing aims to improve the activities and student learning outcomes by analyzing the combination of Think Talk Write (TTW) learning models with forced and task learning strategies. To provide a motivation for teachers to package learning that is creative and innovative, making learning activities interesting and not monotonous. The results of this modification indicate that learning with the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model through forced and task strategies can improve the learning process so that students become more disciplined and do not waste time doing tasks. The advantages of modification of the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model with forced and task learning strategies is to increase student learning motivation, improve the quality of learning, train students' understanding by giving assignments continuously, teach discipline to students in order to be accountable for tasks assigned, and reduce laziness in students. It is recommended to modify the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model with forced and forced learning strategies both applied in the classroom so that the application becomes more effective while still taking into account the conditions of the school environment, students and teachers


Author(s):  
Abd. Mukti ◽  
Zulheddi ◽  
Elfi Syahroini

This study aims to determine: (1) differences in student learning outcomes taught by using the discovery learning strategy with student learning outcomes taught by expository strategies, (2) differences in the learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation by using learning learning strategies , (3) differences in learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation using expository learning strategies, and (4) the interaction between the effects of learning strategies and motivation on student learning outcomes. The research method used is quantitative with a quasi-experimental model of factorial design 2 x 2. The research sample is 1 class for discovery learning strategy learning and 1 class is expository learning strategy. Data collection instruments are tests and questionnaires. The data analysis technique is a two-way analysis of variance. The difference in value between the experimental class and the control class is not significant enough so that it can be interpreted that there cannot be a significant difference in student learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class.


1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 553-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Ellis ◽  
Barbara L. Ludlow ◽  
Richard T. Walls

Although several investigators have used prompting and fading techniques to teach tasks with few or no errors, there has been disagreement about subsequent transfer and retention as compared with trial-and-error learning. Fourth grade students in an errorless fading condition learned a symbol discrimination task by a prompting and fading program in which relevant characteristics of the line drawings were emphasized. Another group learned the same discrimination by trial-and-error with right-and-wrong feedback. Findings indicated that percentage of errors was less for errorless fading than trial-and-error in initial learning but did not differ during transfer or retention. However, in terms of time, a history of prompting-fading learning did not transfer to trial-and-error learning as well as one of trial-and-error learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document