scholarly journals NPMCanWork: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1305-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorin Dan ◽  
Christopher Pollitt
Societies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Margaret Hodgins ◽  
Patricia Mannix McNamara

New managerialism and the pervasive neoliberalisation of universities is by now a well-established phenomenon. Commentaries explore the political and economic drivers and effects of neoliberal ideology, and critique the impact on higher education and academic work. The impact on the health and well-being of academic staff has had less attention, and it is to that we turn in this paper. Much academic interest in neoliberalism stems from the UK, Australia and the United States. We draw particularly on studies of public Irish universities, where neoliberalism, now well entrenched, but something of a late-comer to the new public management party, is making its presence felt. This conceptual paper explores the concept of neoliberalism in higher education, arguing that the policies and practices of new public management as exercised in universities are a form of bullying; what we term institutional bullying. The authors are researchers of workplace culture, workplace bullying and incivility. Irish universities are increasingly challenged in delivering the International Labour Organisation (ILO) principles of decent work, i.e., dignity, equity, fair income and safe working conditions. They have become exposed in terms of gender imbalance in senior positions, precariat workforce, excessive workload and diminishing levels of control. Irish universities are suffering in terms of both the health and well-being of staff and organisational vibrancy. The authors conclude by cautioning against potential neoliberal intensification as universities grapple with the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper reviews neoliberalism in higher education and concludes with insight as to how the current pandemic could act as a necessary catalyst to stem the tide and ‘call out’ bullying at the institutional level.


Author(s):  
Colin Knox ◽  
Saltanat Janenova

The concept of one-stop shops started as a relatively modest idea of providing information to public service users under one roof and helping citizens to navigate the complexities of multiple providers. Over time a business sector model accelerated the development of one-stop shops into a new phase of digitization influenced by the emergence of New Public Management with its emphasis on putting users at the center of public services provision. Technological progress afforded citizens access to the state and, in turn, promoted state-to-citizens interactions through multiple channels, both digital and physical. One-shop shops became inextricably linked to e-government which impacted both the developed and developing world, including authoritarian states. Although evidence of the impact of one-shop shops is still limited, not least because the concept has morphed over time, key improvements are listed as increased citizen satisfaction, reduced corruption, and greater efficiency. The pace of development has been such that the future suggests a move from one-stop shops to “no-stop shops.”


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schneider ◽  
Dieter Sadowski

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Dupont

Through the example of the Australian police services, this article examines the impact of the New Public Management tools on strengthening administrative accountability. Governments, faced with increasing social demand for security, have launched into political auctions on the themes of police activity and social control. Relationships between the authorities and the police administrators have been redefined, mainly through more rigorous budgetary control. After a rapid examination of the administrative context that led to the implementation of programme budgeting — the main government tool in this area — the article examines the tensions that resulted from its introduction. Particular emphasis is placed upon the limitations of such a tool in the field of security, which is undergoing profound reconfiguration as a result of increasingly frequent cooperation between public, private and hybrid actors.


2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Christensen ◽  
Dong Lisheng ◽  
Martin Painter

The prevailing interpretation in the scholarly literature is that public sector reform in China during the period of marketization has been driven primarily by internal, contextual factors rather than being under the sway of particular global reform models or theories such as New Public Management. The aim of this article is to move beyond arguing from inference that `Chinese characteristics' continue to be dominant and to inquire into the manner and extent of external influences on central government reform actors. We assume a `multi-causal' model in which both internal and external factors are present. From a survey of the literature on the reforms, we conclude that, while there are some `unique' features, most of the themes (and even the results) of modern Chinese reforms are not unique and have parallels in Western countries. Moreover, aside from the similarities in the content and substance of administrative reforms, the patterns and styles of reform in China and in the West in the past 20 years show marked similarities and parallels. Thus, external reform ideas and influences are being diffused through reform processes. Further empirical and theoretical analysis is required to establish the more specific nature of scanning and dissemination, or other forms of diffusion; the kind of learning that is taking place; and the impact that any imported models or templates actually have on reform proposals and outcomes in particular reform episodes. Points for practitioners • Whereas many scholars tend to believe the lip service the Chinese leaders pay to the `uniqueness' of China's public sector reforms and their `Chinese characteristics', their leaders have been very eager to `learn from the West'. • Emulation and learning at a global level are key aspects of contemporary public sector innovation and reform, even between jurisdictions that are seemingly very different from each other. • The development of sophisticated mechanisms for scanning and selective learning are key requirements for a rapidly developing public sector such as China's.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Balle Hansen ◽  
Trui Steen ◽  
Marsha de Jong

In this article we are interested in how the coordinating role of top civil servants is related to the argument that country-level differences in the adoption of New Public Management significantly alter the Public Service Bargains of top civil servants and consequently their capacity to accomplish interdepartmental coordination. A managerial PSB limits top civil servants’ role in interdepartmental coordination, as their focus will be on achieving goals set for their specific departments, rather than for the central government as a collective. We test our argument with empirical insights from a comparative analysis of five countries: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. We find that our argument is only partly valid and discuss the theoretical and empirical implications of the analysis. Points for practitioners Alongside the introduction of New Public Management, the relationships between ministers and their top civil servants in state administration have evolved. At the same time, societal issues are getting more complex and demand a holistic, cross-sector approach. The concept of a managerial Public Service Bargain is used to analyze changes in top civil servants’ role and the impact of reforms on the capacity of top civil servants to accomplish interdepartmental coordination. Practitioners can learn more about the close link between challenges for interdepartmental coordination and changes in the role and functioning of top civil servants.


Argumentum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-228
Author(s):  
Janine Vieira Teixeira ◽  
César Albenes de Mendonça Cruz ◽  
Rita de Cássia Duarte Lima

Percepção dos trabalhadores estatutários sobre a implantação da EBSERH no HUCAMPerceptions of statutarian workers about the EBSERH’s implementation in HUCAMRESUMO A nova abordagem da gestão pública traz consequências ruins para os trabalhadores. A pesquisa teve por objetivo analisar o impacto da implantação da Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares – EBSERH - na saúde dos trabalhadores contratados pelo Regime Jurídico Único – RJU - do Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Morais – HUCAM. O método qualitativo incluiu: entrevistas com trabalhadores e gestores, utilizando um instrumento semiestruturado; dados institucionais de atendimentos psicológicos e absenteísmo. Emergiram as categorias: Consolidação da EBSERH: Implantação, Principais Mudanças e Processo de (Des) integração; Trabalho: Processo de Trabalho, Metas Pactuadas com o SUS e Conflitos; Adoecimento no Trabalho: Insegurança, Desrespeito, Falta de Reconhecimento e Exclusão. Os trabalhadores desenvolveram diferentes estratégias de resistência: do embate, contestar, ao silêncio, só observar. Eles não conseguiram desenvolver uma resistência coletiva às imposições, o que gerou conflitos entre os trabalhadores contratados pela EBSERH e os do RJU, transformando o local de trabalho em um lugar adoecedor.   ABSTRACT The new public management approach brings bad consequences for the workers. The main objective of the research was to analyze the impact of the Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares – EBSERH – implementation, on the labour health of workers hired with “Regime Jurídico Único”,  from Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Morais.   The qualitative method included interviews of workers and managers with a semi-structured instrument, psychological counselling data and absenteeism data. The categories raised was: EBSERH’s Consolidation: Implementation, Main Changes, and the (Des)Integration Process; Work: Work Process, Goals contracted with the SUS, Conflict; Work Ilness: Insecure, Disrespect, Lack of Recognizing and Exclusion. The workers developed different resistances:  conflict, like contesting, silence, like only observing.  They didn’t develop a collective resistance against the requirements, and conflicts between EBSERH workers against RJU workers took place, changing the work space in a place of sickness.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document