MicroRNA-217: a therapeutic and diagnostic tumor marker

Author(s):  
Amir Abbas Hamidi ◽  
Malihe Zangoue ◽  
Daniel Kashani ◽  
Amir Sadra Zangouei ◽  
Hamid Reza Rahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A299-A299
Author(s):  
D KAZANOV ◽  
B STERN ◽  
W PYERIN ◽  
O BOECHER ◽  
H STRUL ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 232-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Klapdor ◽  
B. Kremer ◽  
B. Rothe ◽  
R Montz ◽  

ZusammenfassungAuf der Basis ermutigender Veröffentlichungen über die Immunszintigraphie bei kolorektalen Karzinomen sowie eigener immunhistochemischer und immunszintigraphischer Befunde an Pankreaskarzinom-Transplantaten auf der Nacktmaus untersuchten wir die diagnostischen Möglichkeiten mit 131J-markierten Antikörpern gegen die Tumor-Marker CA 19-9 und CEA bei 21 Patienten mit Pankreaskarzinom. Zum Vergleich dienten die Untersuchungsergebnisse von weiteren 10 Patienten mit kolorektalem Karzinom, 2 Patienten mit Gallengangs- und 1 mit Magen-Karzinom. Planare Szintigramme der Verdachtsregionen in 2-4 Sichten wurden mehrfach bis 6 Tage nach i.v. Infusion von 2 mCi eines Cocktails aus 131J-anti-CA 19-9 und -anti-CEA aufgenommen. SPECT wurde außerdem 3-4 Tage p.i., zuletzt auch früher, durchgeführt. Primäre Tumoren und Metastasen im Oberbauch waren wegen geringerer Tumor/Umgebungs-Relation der Traceraktivität schwieriger nachzuweisen und zu lokalisieren als kolorektale Karzinome im Unterbauch. Die Tumorabgrenzung wurde in planaren Szintigrammen meist erst 5-6 Tage p.i. oder später erkennbar. SPECT wies dieselben Befunde bereits 3 Tage p. i. oder früher nach. Die Lokalisation und die topographische Zuordnung gelang mit SPECT leichter und häufiger, somit der Nachweis sicherer und empfindlicher. Größere Tumoren stellten sich auch in Fällen ohne erhöhte Serumkonzentration der Tumormarker dar. Der Immunszintigraphie des Pankreaskarzinoms und anderer Karzinommanifestationen im Oberbauch kommt gegenwärtig eine eingeschränkte diagnostische Bedeutung zu; methodische Verbesserungen erscheinen notwendig und möglich.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Yong Ju Lee ◽  
Yoon Woo Koh ◽  
Sun Och Yoon ◽  
Hyang Joo Ryu ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. М. Obukhova ◽  
Е. I. Murach ◽  
N. Yu. Orlinskaya ◽  
K. N. Kontorshchikova ◽  
I. А. Medyanik ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A372-A373
Author(s):  
Ira Winer ◽  
Lucy Gilbert ◽  
Ulka Vaishampayan ◽  
Seth Rosen ◽  
Christopher Hoimes ◽  
...  

BackgroundALKS 4230 is a novel engineered cytokine that selectively targets the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 receptor complex to activate CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells.1 The ARTISTRY-1 trial (NCT02799095) has shown encouraging efficacy and acceptable tolerability of ALKS 4230 among patients with advanced solid tumors.2 We report a detailed analysis of ovarian cancer (OC) patients who received combination therapy in ARTISTRY-1.MethodsARTISTRY-1 is an ongoing multicohort phase 1/2 trial exploring intravenous ALKS 4230 as monotherapy and combined with pembrolizumab. OC patients were enrolled into a cohort with mixed anti PD 1/L1 unapproved tumor types who had progressed on prior chemotherapy. OC patients received ALKS 4230 (3 µg/kg) on days 1–5 and pembrolizumab (200 mg) on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Outcomes presented include antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1) and safety as of 7/24/2020. To evaluate changes in tumor microenvironment (TME), baseline and on-treatment biopsies were collected.ResultsFourteen heavily pretreated patients with OC were enrolled. Patients received a median of 5 (range, 2 11) prior regimens and all were previously treated with platinum based therapy. Among 13 evaluable patients with ≥1 assessment, 9 experienced disease control and 4 experienced disease progression; median treatment duration was approximately 7 weeks. Three patients experienced an objective response, including 1 complete response, 1 partial response (PR), and 1 unconfirmed PR; all were platinum resistant and negative for BRCA mutations. Five patients experienced tumor burden reductions (table 1). Treatment-related adverse events at the doses tested have generally been transient and manageable, with the majority being grade 1 and 2 in severity. Overall, based on preliminary data, the combination with ALKS 4230 did not demonstrate any additive toxicity to that already established with pembrolizumab alone. Additional safety and efficacy data are being collected in ongoing cohorts. In the monotherapy dose escalation portion of the study, ALKS 4230 alone increased markers of lymphocyte infiltration in 1 paired melanoma biopsy (1 of 1; on treatment at cycle 2); CD8+ T cell density and PD-L1 tumor proportion score increased 5.2- and 11 fold, respectively, supporting evidence that ALKS 4230 has immunostimulatory impact on the TME and providing rationale for combining ALKS 4230 with pembrolizumab (figure 1).Abstract 347 Table 1Summary of response observations among patients with ovarian cancerAbstract 347 Figure 1Increased markers of lymphocyte tumor infiltrationAn increase in CD3+CD8+ T cells (A, red = CD3; blue = CD8; purple = CD3+CD8+; teal = tumor marker), GranzymeB (B, red = CD8; green = granzymeB; yellow = granzymeB+CD8+; teal = tumor marker), and PD-L1 (C, red = PD-L1; blue = tumor marker) in the tumor microenvironment of a single patient was observed after the patient received monotherapy ALKS 4230ConclusionsThe combination of ALKS 4230, an investigational agent, and pembrolizumab demonstrates an acceptable safety profile and provides some evidence of tumor shrinkage and disease stabilization in some patients with heavily pretreated OC. This regimen could represent a new therapeutic option for these patients.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of the patients who are participating in this trial and their families. The trial is sponsored by Alkermes, Inc. Medical writing and editorial support was provided by Parexel and funded by Alkermes, Inc.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov NCT02799095Ethics ApprovalThis trial was approved by Ethics and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at all trial sites; IRB reference numbers 16–229 (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), MOD00003422/PH285316 (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center), 20160175 (Western IRB), i15-01394_MOD23 (New York University School of Medicine), TRIAL20190090 (Cleveland Clinic), and 0000097 (ADVARRA).ReferencesLopes JE, Fisher JL, Flick HL, Wang C, Sun L, Ernstoff MS, et al. ALKS 4230: a novel engineered IL-2 fusion protein with an improved cellular selectivity profile for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:e000673. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000673.Vaishampayan UN, Muzaffar J, Velcheti V, Winer I, Hoimes CJ, Rosen SD, et al. ALKS 4230 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors (ARTISTRY-1). Oral presentation at: European Society for Medical Oncology Annual Meeting; September 2020; virtual.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ferrari ◽  
E. Seregni ◽  
A. Martinetti ◽  
B Van Graafeiland ◽  
S. Nerini-Molteni ◽  
...  

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative index and, in some cases, a favorable prognosis. These tumors often overproduce and release biologically active substances that are responsible for severe syndromes. Tumor marker measurement provides the clinician with useful information for the management of NET patients. The substances released by overproducing tumors are currently used as biomarkers, but there is a need for sensitive markers also for the “biochemically silent” NETs. The most effective and reliable blood marker available today is chromogranin A (CgA). Because of its high sensitivity and specificity, this glycoprotein can be used for the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of NETs. Furthermore, CgA measurement can be used for monitoring those tumors not overproducing or releasing any hormones or biological amines. This paper is a synthetic review on the value of CgA in NET management and reports our experiences with CgA measurement in NET patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 111905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfeng Zhu ◽  
Zhengying Wang ◽  
Shaowei Lin ◽  
Shan Jiang ◽  
Xueying Liu ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1242-1243
Author(s):  
G V Melzi d'Eril ◽  
F Pavesi ◽  
M Lotzniker ◽  
R Moratti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document