‘Getting them Early’: The Impact of Early Exposure to Primary Care on Career Choices of A-Level Students – a Qualitative Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Curtis ◽  
Joy Main ◽  
Paul Main ◽  
John Pitts
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachelle Ashcroft ◽  
Catherine Donnelly ◽  
Maya Dancey ◽  
Sandeep Gill ◽  
Simon Lam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Integrated primary care teams are ideally positioned to support the mental health care needs arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how COVID-19 has affected mental health care delivery within primary care settings will be critical to inform future policy and practice decisions during the later phases of the pandemic and beyond. The objective of our study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care teams’ delivery of mental health care. Methods A qualitative study using focus groups conducted with primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Focus group data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results We conducted 11 focus groups with 10 primary care teams and a total of 48 participants. With respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in primary care teams, we identified three key themes: i) the high demand for mental health care, ii) the rapid transformation to virtual care, and iii) the impact on providers. Conclusions From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care quickly responded to the rising mental health care demands of their patients. Despite the numerous challenges they faced with the rapid transition to virtual care, primary care teams have persevered. It is essential that policy and decision-makers take note of the toll that these demands have placed on providers. There is an immediate need to enhance primary care’s capacity for mental health care for the duration of the pandemic and beyond.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliéren Honório Oliveira ◽  
Antonio Germane Alves Pinto ◽  
Maria do Socorro Vieira Lopes ◽  
Tânia Maria Ribeiro Monteiro de Figueiredo ◽  
Edilma Gomes Rocha Cavalcante

Abstract Objective: To describe the therapeutic itinerary of people with tuberculosis in face of their health needs. Method: Descriptive, qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with ten patients. Hermeneutic-dialectic method of analysis and concept of therapeutic itinerary as driver of the analysis. Results: Most had classic symptoms at the beginning, however there was a case with coughing for more than one year. Entrance door, access to diagnosis and treatment were predominant in Primary Care, through smear microscopy and X-ray; patients had to pay for exams. Decentralization of treatment for other services when necessary or by link with the professional. The patient followed the decisions of the professionals and the support of relatives; prejudice regarding the disease was noted. Conclusions and implications for practice: Fragility in disease management, importance of bonding and family. It should be considered the impact of the disease and the need to support patients to ensure continuity of care.


BJGP Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen19X101659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Lecouturier ◽  
Jason Scott ◽  
Nikki Rousseau ◽  
Gerard Stansby ◽  
Andrew Sims ◽  
...  

BackgroundPatients diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at an increased risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, heart attack, and PAD progression. If diagnosed early, cardiovascular risk factors can be treated and the risk of other cardiovascular diseases can be reduced. There are clear guidelines on PAD diagnosis and management, but little is known about the issues faced in primary care with regards adherence to these, and about the impact of these issues on patients.AimTo identify the issues for primary care health professionals (HPs) and patients in PAD diagnosis and management, and to explore the impact of these on HPs and PAD patients.Design & settingQualitative study conducted in a primary care setting in the North East of England. Data was collected between December 2014 and July 2017.MethodSemi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with PAD register patients (n = 17), practice nurses ([PNs], n = 17), district nurses (DNs], n = 20), tissue viability nurses (n = 21), and GPs (n = 21).ResultsHPs’ attitudes to PAD, difficulty accessing tests, and patient delays impacted upon diagnosis. Some HPs had a reactive approach to PAD identification. Patients lacked understanding about PAD and some reported a delay consulting their GP after the onset of PAD symptoms. After diagnosis, few were attending for regular GP follow-up.ConclusionPatient education about PAD symptoms and risks, and questioning about exercise tolerance, could address the problem of under-reporting. Annual reviews could provide an opportunity to probe for PAD symptoms and highlight those requiring further investigation. Improved information when PAD is diagnosed and, considering the propensity for patients to tolerate worsening symptoms, the introduction of annual follow-up (at minimum) is warranted.


2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Moffatt ◽  
Martin White ◽  
Rosie Stacy ◽  
Dawn Downey ◽  
Eve Hudson

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsie E. Gulick ◽  
June Halper ◽  
Marie Namey

Nurse certification became available to nurses working in the practice area of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2002. However, the impact of certification on the MS nurse's role and both satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the certified role have not yet been determined, which was the purpose of this study. With a qualitative study design and an international sample of 168 certified MS nurses, data from open-ended questions were analyzed regarding role change, job satisfaction, and job dissatisfaction. Findings indicated enhanced role change and job satisfaction regarding increased autonomy, colleagueship, leadership roles, and primary care nursing. Dissatisfaction for some was attributed to insufficient resources and benefits, along with administrator failure to recognize the value and importance of certified nurses.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L Hersh ◽  
Michael D Cabana ◽  
Ralph Gonzales ◽  
Budd N Shenkin ◽  
Christine S Cho

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e015083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morhaf Al Achkar ◽  
Debra Revere ◽  
Barbara Dennis ◽  
Palmer MacKie ◽  
Sumedha Gupta ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe misuse and abuse of prescription opioids (POs) is an epidemic in the USA today. Many states have implemented legislation to curb the use of POs resulting from inappropriate prescribing. Indiana legislated opioid prescribing rules that went into effect in December 2013. The rules changed how chronic pain is managed by healthcare providers. This qualitative study aims to evaluate the impact of Indiana’s opioid prescription legislation on the patient experiences around pain management.SettingThis is a qualitative study using interviews of patient and primary care providers to obtain triangulated data sources. The patients were recruited from an integrated pain clinic to which chronic pain patients were referred from federally qualified health clinics (FQHCs). The primacy care providers were recruited from the same FQHCs. The study used inductive, emergent thematic analysis.ParticipantsNine patient participants and five primary care providers were included in the study.ResultsLiving with chronic pain is disruptive to patients’ lives on multiple dimensions. The established pain management practices were disrupted by the change in prescription rules. Patient–provider relationships, which involve power dynamics and decision making, shifted significantly in parallel to the rule change.ConclusionsAs a result of the changes in pain management practice, some patients experienced significant challenges. Further studies into the magnitude of this change are necessary. In addition, exploring methods for regulating prescribing while assuring adequate access to pain management is crucial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Braillard ◽  
Anbreen Slama-Chaudhry ◽  
Catherine Joly ◽  
Nicolas Perone ◽  
David Beran

BJGP Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. BJGPO.2021.0172
Author(s):  
Marta Wanat ◽  
Melanie Eugenie Hoste ◽  
Nina Helene Gobat ◽  
Marilena Anastasaki ◽  
Femke Böhmer ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of healthcare-seeking behaviour and delivery of care is unclear. The pandemic accelerated the use of remote care and understanding its benefits and drawbacks may inform its implementation during this and future healthcare emergencies.AimTo explore patients’ and primary care professionals’ (PCPs) experiences of primary care delivery in the first wave of the pandemic.Design & settingQualitative study using semi-structured interviews in primary care in eight European countriesResultsWe conducted 146 interviews with 80 PCPs and 66 patients consulting for respiratory tract infection (RTI) symptoms, in eight European countries (England, Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Poland, Sweden and Germany). Data was collected between April and July 2020 and analysed using thematic analysis. We found that patients accepted telemedicine when PCPs spent time to understand and address their concerns, but a minority preferred in-person consultations. PCPs felt that remote consultations created emotional distance between themselves and patients, and they reported having to manage diverse COVID-19-related medical and social concerns.ConclusionRemote consultations for RTI symptoms may be acceptable long-term if both groups are happy to use this format but it is important that PCPs take time to address patients’ concerns and provide safety-netting advice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document