Getting Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Suspected Opioid Diversion

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
Kristy Deep ◽  
Rebecca Bartley Yarrison
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 178-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Wee Jun Yan ◽  
Beverly Lim Tian Ying ◽  
Frank Brennan

Author(s):  
Michael E. Schatman

Even though the efficacy of interdisciplinary pain management programs is supported, their numbers have decreased and the vast majority of Americans with chronic pain do not have access to them. Insurance companies do not want to pay for these services, hospitals believe they are financial losers, and the opioid crisis has placed a pall over the practice of pain medicine. The demise of these programs has left pain medicine in a fragmented state. Few healthcare providers who treat chronic pain patients have the time to coordinate care by multiple professionals The opioid crisis seen in certain areas, such as Appalachia, may be related to the lack of these interdisciplinary programs. There should be concerted efforts to increase access to and funding of these programs. Although they are not a panacea for all types of chronic pain, they can improve patients’ well-being and function and reduce their need for opioid medications.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacinta M. Gau ◽  
Erika J. Brooke

The present research evaluates recent changes to Florida law and policy to reduce problematic pain clinics (pill mills) and criminal diversion of prescription opioids. These changes entailed a multipronged effort linking regulatory and criminal-law approaches. Quantitative data from the Florida Department of Health and qualitative data from in-depth interviews with law-enforcement officers assigned to pill-mill taskforces reveal steep declines in pain clinics and pill mills. Respondents credit some regulatory enhancements for the reduction, although they describe some interagency cooperation problems and emphasize that despite success, many troublesome establishments continue to operate. The results suggest that Florida’s effort to reduce opioid diversion by tightening regulatory restrictions and law-enforcement scrutiny illustrates a multiagency approach to a problem spanning public health and criminal justice. This could be an example for other states seeking to combat problems that cannot be effectively addressed using regulatory or criminal law alone.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S954-S955 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Cagle ◽  
Mary Lynn McPherson ◽  
Jodi Frey ◽  
Paul Sacco ◽  
Orrin Ware ◽  
...  

Abstract No national data exist on drug shortages, missing medications, opioid diversion, and opioid diversion prevention in hospice. We conducted a national survey of hospices (administered June-September, 2018). We randomly selected 600 hospices to survey representatives about: (1) care for patients/families with substance use disorder (SUD) (2) drug shortages; (3) instances of drug diversion; and, (4) drug disposal practices. Surveys were conducted by phone and online. Sample weights were used to adjust for non-response. A total of 371 hospices completed surveys (response rate=62%), 63% of which were administered by phone. Half (50%) of agencies were mid-sized (26-100 patients) and non-profit. Two thirds (66%) of hospices reporting that medications either “never” or “rarely” go missing. On average, there were 0.80 reported cases of confirmed diversion per agency within the past 90 days. Although a majority of hospices (78%) screen patients for SUD, only 43% screen informal caregivers. Just under half (42%) of hospices reported drug shortages over the past year. A minority (8%) of hospices stopped prescribing certain medications altogether due to concerns about diversion. 52% of hospices reported that employees are not allowed to dispose of medications after a home death. Agency representatives estimated that, after a home death, unused opioids were left in the home 32% of the time. On average, hospices have nearly one case of opioid diversion per quarter. Hospices are experiencing medication shortages and restrictions on medication disposal. Changes are needed in policy and practice to address these challenges.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanford M Silverman

Prescription drug abuse is the fastest growing problem in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), enough opioid pain relievers were sold in 2010 to provide every adult in the United States with the equivalent of a typical dose of 5 mg of hydrocodone every 4 hours for 1 month. Many solutions have been proposed to address this problem, including treatment guidelines, political solutions (statutory changes), Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), and technological innovations. Many opioid products are manipulated (crushed, snorted, injected, etc.) to facilitate abuse. Since extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioids contain a large amount of opioid contained in a single delivery system, they are a favorite target of abusers. In short, the goal of an abuser is to convert an ER/LA opioid into an immediate-release one. Abuse-deterrent formulations (ADFs) are intended to make manipulation more difficult or to make abuse of the manipulated product less attractive or less rewarding. One such technological solution is the development of ADFs for opioid pain medications. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guidelines for industry released in 2015 establish the rationale and methodology for the development of ER/LA opioids that contain abuse-deterrent properties. The goal is to deter abuse, realizing that it is impossible to prevent abuse. Key words: abuse-deterrent formulations, abuse-deterrent opioids, CDC guidelines, FDA opioid guidelines, opioid abuse, opioid deaths, opioid diversion, opioid overdose, prescription drug abuse, REMS 


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore J. Cicero ◽  
Steven P. Kurtz ◽  
Hilary L. Surratt ◽  
Gladys E. Ibanez ◽  
Matthew S. Ellis ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e69241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas C. McDonald ◽  
Kenneth E. Carlson

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebuwa T Ighodaro ◽  
Kenneth L McCall ◽  
Daniel Y Chung ◽  
Stephanie D Nichols ◽  
Brian J Piper

AbstractStudy ObjectiveThe US is experiencing an epidemic of opioid overdoses which may be at least partially due to an over-reliance on opioid analgesics in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain and subsequent escalation to heroin or illicit fentanyl. As Texas was reported to be among the lowest in the US for opioid use and misuse, further examination of this state is warranted.Study DesignThis study was conducted to quantify prescription opioid use in Texas.Data SourceData was obtained from the publically available US Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS) which monitors controlled substances transactions from manufacture to commercial distribution.Measurement and Main ResultsData for 2006-2017 from Texas for ten prescription opioids including eight primarily used to relieve pain (codeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone) and two (buprenorphine and methadone) for the treatment of an Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) were examined. The change in Morphine Mg Equivalent (MME) of all opioids (+23.3%) was only slightly greater than the state’s population gains (21.1%). Opioids used to treat an OUD showed pronounced gains (+90.8%) which were four-fold faster than population growth. Analysis of individual agents revealed pronounced elevations in codeine (+387.5%), hydromorphone (+106.7%), and oxycodone (+43.6%) and a reduction in meperidine (−80.3%) in 2017 relative to 2006. Methadone in 2017 accounted for a greater portion (39.5%) of the total MME than hydrocodone, oxycodone, morphine, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, and meperidine, combined. There were differences between urban and rural areas in the changes in hydrocodone and buprenorphine.ConclusionsCollectively, these findings indicate that continued vigilance is needed in Texas to appropriately treat pain and an OUD while minimizing the potential for prescription opioid diversion and misuse. Texas may lead the US in a return to pre opioid crisis prescription levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document