Social Determinants of Health and Health Outcomes in Men and Fathers with Mental Health Issues

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Montgomery ◽  
Stephanie Brown ◽  
Cheryl Forchuk
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Mental Health Issues

scholarly journals Social Determinants of Health Among Those With and Without HIV Infection in NYC, the Epicenter of the U.S. Crisis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 424-425
Author(s):  
Tonya Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Ethnic Populations ◽  
Mental Health Issues ◽  
Ryan White ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic in NYC, the epicenter of the US crisis, revealed indisputable evidence that social determinants of health (SDoH, e.g., racism, crowded housing, employment risks) and disparities in comorbid health risk factors produce higher burdens of disease and death among racial and ethnic populations. We conducted a needs assessment of SDoH among 1400 patients in several ambulatory care clinics to explore the impact among older adults, across different clinical populations. Among older adults with HIV (OAH), we found lower rates of food and housing insecurity compared to older adults without HIV. Despite higher levels of COVID knowledge and prevention adherence, we also found significantly higher levels of isolation, loneliness, depressive symptoms, and anxiety among OAHs compared to those without HIV. Access to Ryan White entitlements did buffer some impacts but preexisting high burdens of mental health issues were exacerbated, perhaps due to heightened perceptions of increased vulnerability to COVID-19.

600 Social Determinants and Their Impact on Burn Surgery Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S151-S152
Author(s):  
Luis H Quiroga ◽  
Tomer Lagziel ◽  
Mohammed Asif ◽  
Raymond Fang ◽  
Grace F Rozycki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Abstract Introduction To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted assessing the social determinants of health and the impact on the outcomes for burn patients. Such studies are needed considering burn injuries are associated with high costs, severe psychological impact, and a high burden placed on the healthcare systems. The burden is hypothesized to be aggravated by the increasing amount of diabetes and obesity seen in the general population which put patients at increased risk for developing chronic wounds. Studies have shown that several socioeconomic status (SES) factors are associated with increased risk of burns, but none have documented the outcomes of burn patients based on their social determinants of health. In our study, we will be comparing patients in the burn ICU (BICU) to patients in the surgical ICU (SICU). The purpose of this comparison is to evaluate whether the same social determinants of health have similar influences in both groups. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of population group data from patients admitted to the BICU and SICU from January 1, 2016, to November 18, 2019. The primary outcomes were length-of-stay (LOS), mortality, 30-day-readmission, and hospital charges. Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables were used to compare population health groups. Results We analyzed a total of 487 burn and 510 surgical patients. When comparing BICU and SICU patients, we observed significantly higher mean hospital charges and LOS in burn patients with a history of mental health (mean difference: $42,756.04, p=0.013 and 7.12 days, p=0.0085), ESRD ($57,8124.7, p=0.0047 and 78.62 days, p=0.0104), sepsis ($168,825.19, p=< 0.001 and 20.68 days, p=0.0043), and VTE ($63,9924.1, p=< 0.001 and 72.9 days, p=0.002). Also, higher mortality was observed in burn patients with ESRD, STEMI, sepsis, VTE, and diabetes mellitus. Burn patients with a history of mental health, drug dependence, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus also had greater 30-day-readmissions rates. Conclusions This study sheds new knowledge on the considerable variability that exists between the different population health groups in terms of outcomes for each cohort of critically ill patients. It demonstrates the impacts of population health group on outcomes. These population groups and social determinants have different effects on BICU versus SICU patients and this study provides supporting evidence for the need to identify and develop new strategies to decrease overspending in healthcare. Further research to develop relevant and timely interventions that can improve these outcomes.

scholarly journals Frameworks and inequalities in healthcare: some applications

2021 ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Pietro Renzi ◽  
Alberto Franci
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Social Inequalities ◽  
Economic Status ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Health Determinants ◽  
Quadrant Analysis ◽  
Inequality Measures ◽  
Health Objectives

Background Social determinants of health (SDOH) have increasingly entered health policy conversations as a growing body of researches, reveal the direct relationship between social determinants and health outcome. In fact, the recent literature is moving from the traditional model that focus on how health affects economic status, to a new view that economic status affects health. Objectives To investigate the principal conceptual frameworks for action on social determinants of health. Another aim is to contribute on the ongoing discourse on feasible measures which could be used to alert regions to inequalities in the distribution of health. Methodology, Italian data are used as a demonstration. Quadrant charts illustrate associations between how much regions spend on health and how effectively health system functions. The relevant inequality measures are used to rank health inequalities. Main results Frameworks have been presented to help communities, health professionals and others begin to better understand and address a variety of factors that affects health. Quadrant analysis technique shows the extent to which spending more on health, translates into better health outcomes, higher quality of care and improve access to care across the Italian regions, whilst also recognition the importance of major risk factors. Conclusions The social inequalities in health and what this means for how we understand and reduce them, as not to date been compressively examined empirically. There is an urgent need to expand our knowledge with comparable data on health determinants and more refined health outcomes. Furthermore, there is a need for feasible inequality measures in the health information systems. The measures used in this study, provide a step to inform and guide the uptake of equity-sensitive policies.

scholarly journals Social determinants of health in mental health care and research: a case for greater inclusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 895-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J Deferio ◽  
Scott Breitinger ◽  
Dhruv Khullar ◽  
Amit Sheth ◽  
Jyotishman Pathak
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Social determinants of health (SDOH) are known to influence mental health outcomes, which are independent risk factors for poor health status and physical illness. Currently, however, existing SDOH data collection methods are ad hoc and inadequate, and SDOH data are not systematically included in clinical research or used to inform patient care. Social contextual data are rarely captured prospectively in a structured and comprehensive manner, leaving large knowledge gaps. Extraction methods are now being developed to facilitate the collection, standardization, and integration of SDOH data into electronic health records. If successful, these efforts may have implications for health equity, such as reducing disparities in access and outcomes. Broader use of surveys, natural language processing, and machine learning methods to harness SDOH may help researchers and clinical teams reduce barriers to mental health care.

scholarly journals Call to Action: Rural Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Harrington ◽  
Robert M. Califf ◽  
Appathurai Balamurugan ◽  
Nancy Brown ◽  
Regina M. Benjamin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Rural Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Rural Populations ◽  
Call To Action

Understanding and addressing the unique health needs of people residing in rural America is critical to the American Heart Association’s pursuit of a world with longer, healthier lives. Improving the health of rural populations is consistent with the American Heart Association’s commitment to health equity and its focus on social determinants of health to reduce and ideally to eliminate health disparities. This presidential advisory serves as a call to action for the American Heart Association and other stakeholders to make rural populations a priority in programming, research, and policy. This advisory first summarizes existing data on rural populations, communities, and health outcomes; explores 3 major groups of factors underlying urban-rural disparities in health outcomes, including individual factors, social determinants of health, and health delivery system factors; and then proposes a set of solutions spanning health system innovation, policy, and research aimed at improving rural health.

Using Community-Level Mental Health Surveillance Data to Examine the Relationship of Depression Prevalence to Social Determinants of Health and Access to Mental Health Services

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn R. Currie ◽  
Kirsten Fiest ◽  
Lindsay Guyn
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Community Level ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Depression Prevalence

The effect of social determinants of health on depression prevalence and treatment access was examined using community survey and administrative data on mental health service users in the Calgary Health Region (CHR). Consistent with national prevalence data, depression was significantly associated with female gender, younger age, and health risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and obesity. The prevalence of depression causing interference in daily functioning across 19 social districts (subregions within the CHR) was significantly related to community-level indicators of single-parent status, low-income families, and low educational achievement in each district. Disparities in treatment access were also found with persons living in the most impoverished districts having the lowest rates of accessing professional mental health services.

Neighborhood Considerations for Social Determinants of Health and Risk

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holley A. Wilkin
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Social Networks ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Determinants Of Health ◽  
Social Determinants ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Communication Infrastructure ◽  
The Social ◽  
Action Context ◽  
Communication Infrastructure Theory

When it comes to health and risk, “place” matters. People who live in lower-income neighborhoods are disproportionately affected by obesity and obesity-related diseases like heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes; asthma; cancers; mental health issues; etc., compared to those that live in higher-income communities. Contributing to these disparities are individual-level factors (e.g., education level, health literacy, healthcare access) and neighborhood-level factors such as the socioeconomic characteristics of the neighborhood; crime, violence, and social disorder; the built environment; and the presence or absence of health-enhancing and health-compromising resources. Social determinants of health—for example, social support, social networks, and social capital—may improve or further complicate health outcomes in low-income neighborhoods. Social support is a type of transaction between two or more people intended to help the recipient in some fashion. For instance, a person can help provide someone who is grieving or dealing with a newly diagnosed health issue by providing emotional support. Informational support may be provided to someone trying to diagnose, manage, and/or treat a health problem. Instrumental support may come in the help of making meals for someone who is ill, running errands for them, or taking them to a doctor’s appointment. Unfortunately, those who may have chronic diseases and require a lot of support or who otherwise do not feel able to provide support may not seek it due to the expectation of reciprocity. Neighborhood features can enable or constrain people from developing social networks that can help provide social support when needed. There are different types of social networks: some can enhance health outcomes, while others may have a more limiting or even a detrimental effect on health. Social capital results in the creation of resources that may or may not improve health outcomes. Communication infrastructure theory offers an opportunity to create theoretically grounded health interventions that consider the social and neighborhood characteristics that influence health outcomes. The theory states that every neighborhood has a communication infrastructure that consists of a neighborhood storytelling network—which includes elements similar to the social determinants of health—embedded in a communication action context that enables or constrains neighborhood storytelling. People who are more engaged in their neighborhood storytelling networks are in a better position to reduce health disparities—for example, to fight to keep clinics open or to clean up environmental waste. The communication action context features are similar to the neighborhood characteristics that influence health outcomes. Communication infrastructure theory may be useful in interventions to address neighborhood health and risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document