Psychometric Properties of the Taiwanese (Traditional Chinese) Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery: A Preliminary Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Lan Wang ◽  
Yi-Hsiang Hung ◽  
Chi-Cheng Yang
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hui Kim ◽  
Yoonseok Huh ◽  
Jin Yeong Choe ◽  
Ji Woon Jeong ◽  
Joon Hyuk Park ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Jardim de Paula ◽  
Samara Melo Moura ◽  
Matheus Bortolosso Bocardi ◽  
Edgar Nunes de Moraes ◽  
Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 156918612110323
Author(s):  
Sam Shih ◽  
Ashley Chan ◽  
Eva Yeung ◽  
Amily Tsang ◽  
Rose Chiu ◽  
...  

Background/objectives Several studies have indicated that stress is associated with common mental disorders, and work stress trebles the risk of developing them. However, a validated assessment tool for measuring and establishing psychological stress correlates in this group of clients remains unavailable. The objectives of the present study were to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (CPSS-10) on people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses and explore its correlates. Methods Two hundred and fifty-two participants with common mental disorders were recruited. The data were analysed through exploratory factor and confirmatory analyses to investigate construct validity. The convergent and discriminant validities were examined based on their correlation with other measures, while the internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach’s α coefficient. A t-test was used to detect differences between groups. The CPSS-10 correlates were explored using multiple linear regression analysis. Results Principal component analysis with varimax rotation yielded two factors, which accounted for 63.82% of the total variance, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed its factor structure. The CPSS-10 had a positively moderate to strong correlation with other measures, thereby indicating its acceptable convergent and discriminant validities. The internal consistency ranged from acceptable to good for the two subscales and ten overall items, while the item-total correlation was adequate except for the seventh item. There were no group differences in gender nor employment status. Finally, the CPSS-10 predictors were studied. Conclusion The CPSS-10 is a reliable and valid instrument for people with common mental disorders with different employment statuses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document