scholarly journals A Novel Class of RanGTP Binding Proteins

1997 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Görlich ◽  
Marylena Dabrowski ◽  
F. Ralf Bischoff ◽  
Ulrike Kutay ◽  
Peer Bork ◽  
...  

The importin-α/β complex and the GTPase Ran mediate nuclear import of proteins with a classical nuclear localization signal. Although Ran has been implicated also in a variety of other processes, such as cell cycle progression, a direct function of Ran has so far only been demonstrated for importin-mediated nuclear import. We have now identified an entire class of ∼20 potential Ran targets that share a sequence motif related to the Ran-binding site of importin-β. We have confirmed specific RanGTP binding for some of them, namely for two novel factors, RanBP7 and RanBP8, for CAS, Pse1p, and Msn5p, and for the cell cycle regulator Cse1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have studied RanBP7 in more detail. Similar to importin-β, it prevents the activation of Ran's GTPase by RanGAP1 and inhibits nucleotide exchange on RanGTP. RanBP7 binds directly to nuclear pore complexes where it competes for binding sites with importin-β, transportin, and apparently also with the mediators of mRNA and U snRNA export. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a Ran-dependent transport cycle of RanBP7 and demonstrate that RanBP7 can cross the nuclear envelope rapidly and in both directions. On the basis of these results, we propose that RanBP7 might represent a nuclear transport factor that carries an as yet unknown cargo, which could apply as well for this entire class of related RanGTP-binding proteins.

Author(s):  
Michela Galli ◽  
Chiara Frigerio ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese ◽  
Michela Clerici

The natural ends of linear chromosomes resemble those of accidental double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs induce a multifaceted cellular response that promotes the repair of lesions and slows down cell cycle progression. This response is not elicited at chromosome ends, which are organized in nucleoprotein structures called telomeres. Besides counteracting DSB response through specialized telomere-binding proteins, telomeres also prevent chromosome shortening. Despite of the different fate of telomeres and DSBs, many proteins involved in the DSB response also localize at telomeres and participate in telomere homeostasis. In particular, the DSB master regulators Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR contribute to telomere length maintenance and arrest cell cycle progression when chromosome ends shorten, thus promoting a tumor-suppressive process known as replicative senescence. During senescence, the actions of both these apical kinases and telomere-binding proteins allow checkpoint activation while bulk DNA repair activities at telomeres are still inhibited. Checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest also prevents further telomere erosion and deprotection that would favor chromosome rearrangements, which are known to increase cancer-associated genome instability. This review summarizes recent insights into functions and regulation of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR at telomeres both in the presence and in the absence of telomerase, focusing mainly on discoveries in budding yeast.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2571-2571
Author(s):  
Zhi Hong Lu ◽  
Jason T. Books ◽  
Timothy James Ley

Abstract Mammalian proteins containing “cold-shock” domains belong to the most evolutionarily conserved family of nucleic acid-binding proteins known in bacteria, plants, and animals. One of these proteins, YB-1, has been implicated in basic cellular functions such as cell proliferation and responses to environmental stresses. In mammalian cells, YB-1 has been shown to shuttle between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Within the nucleus, YB-1 interacts with several DNA-and pre-mRNA-binding proteins, and has been implicated in nuclear activities, including transcriptional regulation, chromatin remodeling, and pre-mRNA splicing. YB-1 is also abundant in the cytoplasm, where it binds nonspecifically to mRNA, and may act as a general regulator of mRNA stability, cytoplasmic localization, and translation. Thus, YB-1 has been proposed to function as a multifunctional regulator for the control of gene expression in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. YB-1 overexpression has been frequently detected in a variety of human cancers, often associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether YB-1 overexpression contributes directly to the malignant phenotype, or whether it is simply a non-causal “marker” associated with rapid cell growth (and poor prognostic outcomes). To further assess the role of this protein in health and disease, we created mice deficient for YB-1. Complete loss of function of this gene results in fully-penetrant late embryonic and perinatal lethality. Morphological and histological analyses revealed that YB-1−/− embryos displayed major developmental and functional defects, including neurological abnormalities, hemorrhage, and respiratory failure, which probably contributed to lethality. Growth retardation occurred in all late-stage embryos, and was the result of hypoplasia in multiple organ systems. Consistent with these in vivo results, fibroblasts isolated from YB-1−/− embryos (MEFs) grew slowly and entered senescence prematurely in vitro; these defects were rescued by ectopic expression of a GFP-tagged human YB-1 cDNA. This data suggests that YB-1 plays an important cell-autonomous role in cell proliferation and prevention of premature senescence. We further showed that loss of YB-1 in early passage MEFs resulted a delay in G0/G1 to S-phase progression, and a defect in a transcriptional mechanism that normally represses the expression of the G1-specific CDK inhibitor gene p16Ink4a, and the p53 target genes p21Cip1 and Mdm2. However, YB-1 does not cause “global” changes in the transcriptome, the proteome, or protein synthesis efficiency. As predicted, p16Ink4a and p21Cip1 double knockdown by siRNA treatment led to an increase in the rate of cell proliferation, and an extension of proliferative capacity during late passages in YB-1−/− cells. Furthermore, YB-1 deficiency reduced the ability of MEFs to proliferate normally in response to c-Myc overexpression. In conclusion, our data has revealed that YB-1 is required for normal mouse development and survival, and that it plays an important role in supporting rapid cellular proliferation both in vivo and in vitro. Our data further suggests that YB-1 is a cell cycle progression regulator that is important for preventing the early onset of senescence in cultured MEF cells. This data raises the possibility that disregulated expression of YB-1 may contribute to malignant phenotypes by supporting rapid cell cycle progression, and by protecting cells from cytotoxic stresses.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 763-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Fang Shen ◽  
Aysha H. Osmani ◽  
Meera Govindaraghavan ◽  
Stephen A. Osmani

Intercellular bridges are a conserved feature of multicellular organisms. In multicellular fungi, cells are connected directly via intercellular bridges called septal pores. Using Aspergillus nidulans, we demonstrate for the first time that septal pores are regulated to be opened during interphase but closed during mitosis. Septal pore–associated proteins display dynamic cell cycle–regulated locations at mature septa. Of importance, the mitotic NIMA kinase locates to forming septa and surprisingly then remains at septa throughout interphase. However, during mitosis, when NIMA transiently locates to nuclei to promote mitosis, its levels at septa drop. A model is proposed in which NIMA helps keep septal pores open during interphase and then closed when it is removed from them during mitosis. In support of this hypothesis, NIMA inactivation is shown to promote interphase septal pore closing. Because NIMA triggers nuclear pore complex opening during mitosis, our findings suggest that common cell cycle regulatory mechanisms might control septal pores and nuclear pores such that they are opened and closed out of phase to each other during cell cycle progression. The study provides insights into how and why cytoplasmically connected Aspergillus cells maintain mitotic autonomy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1346-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavol Cekan ◽  
Keisuke Hasegawa ◽  
Yu Pan ◽  
Emily Tubman ◽  
David Odde ◽  
...  

The coordination of cell cycle progression with the repair of DNA damage supports the genomic integrity of dividing cells. The function of many factors involved in DNA damage response (DDR) and the cell cycle depends on their Ran GTPase–regulated nuclear–cytoplasmic transport (NCT). The loading of Ran with GTP, which is mediated by RCC1, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ran, is critical for NCT activity. However, the role of RCC1 or Ran⋅GTP in promoting cell proliferation or DDR is not clear. We show that RCC1 overexpression in normal cells increased cellular Ran⋅GTP levels and accelerated the cell cycle and DNA damage repair. As a result, normal cells overexpressing RCC1 evaded DNA damage–induced cell cycle arrest and senescence, mimicking colorectal carcinoma cells with high endogenous RCC1 levels. The RCC1-induced inhibition of senescence required Ran and exportin 1 and involved the activation of importin β–dependent nuclear import of 53BP1, a large NCT cargo. Our results indicate that changes in the activity of the Ran⋅GTP–regulated NCT modulate the rate of the cell cycle and the efficiency of DNA repair. Through the essential role of RCC1 in regulation of cellular Ran⋅GTP levels and NCT, RCC1 expression enables the proliferation of cells that sustain DNA damage.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arantxa Agote-Arán ◽  
Stephane Schmucker ◽  
Katerina Jerabkova ◽  
Inès Jmel Boyer ◽  
Alessandro Berto ◽  
...  

SummaryNucleoporins (Nups) build highly organized Nuclear Pore Complexes (NPCs) at the nuclear envelope (NE). Several Nups assemble into a sieve-like hydrogel within the central channel of the NPCs to regulate nucleocytoplasmic exchange. In the cytoplasm, a large excess of soluble Nups has been reported, but how their assembly is restricted to the NE is currently unknown. Here we show that Fragile X-related protein 1 (FXR1) can interact with several Nups and facilitate their localization to the NE during interphase through a microtubule and dynein-dependent mechanism. Downregulation of FXR1 or closely related orthologs FXR2 and Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) leads to the accumulation of cytoplasmic Nup protein condensates. Likewise, several models of Fragile X syndrome (FXS), characterized by a loss of FMRP, also accumulate cytoplasmic Nup aggregates. These aggregate-containing cells display aberrant nuclear morphology and a delay in G1 cell cycle progression. Our results reveal an unexpected role for the FXR protein family and dynein in the spatial regulation of nucleoporin assembly.HighlightsCytoplasmic nucleoporins are assembled by Fragile X-related (FXR) proteins and dyneinFXR-Dynein pathway downregulation induces aberrant cytoplasmic aggregation of nucleoporinsCellular models of Fragile X syndrome accumulate aberrant cytoplasmic nucleoporin aggregates.FXR-Dynein pathway regulates nuclear morphology and G1 cell cycle progressioneTOC BlurbNucleoporins (Nups) form Nuclear Pore Complexes (NPCs) at the nuclear envelope. Agote-Arán at al. show how cells inhibit aberrant assembly of Nups in the cytoplasm and identify Fragile X-related (FXR) proteins and dynein that facilitate localization of Nups to the nuclear envelope and control G1 cell cycle progression.Graphical abstract


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roisin M. McAvera ◽  
Lisa J. Crawford

Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer cells which results in excessive DNA damage. To counteract this, cells have evolved a tightly regulated DNA damage response (DDR) to rapidly sense DNA damage and promote its repair whilst halting cell cycle progression. The DDR functions predominantly within the context of chromatin and requires the action of chromatin-binding proteins to coordinate the appropriate response. TRIM24, TRIM28, TRIM33 and TRIM66 make up the transcriptional intermediary factor 1 (TIF1) family of chromatin-binding proteins, a subfamily of the large tripartite motif (TRIM) family of E3 ligases. All four TIF1 proteins are aberrantly expressed across numerous cancer types, and increasing evidence suggests that TIF1 family members can function to maintain genome stability by mediating chromatin-based responses to DNA damage. This review provides an overview of the TIF1 family in cancer, focusing on their roles in DNA repair, chromatin regulation and cell cycle regulation.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 2117-2124 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ren ◽  
A Villamarin ◽  
A Shih ◽  
E Coutavas ◽  
M S Moore ◽  
...  

The small Ras-related GTP binding and hydrolyzing protein Ran has been implicated in a variety of processes, including cell cycle progression, DNA synthesis, RNA processing, and nuclear-cytosolic trafficking of both RNA and proteins. Like other small GTPases, Ran appears to function as a switch: Ran-GTP and Ran-GDP levels are regulated both by guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase activating proteins, and Ran-GTP and Ran-GDP interact differentially with one or more effectors. One such putative effector, Ran-binding protein 1 (RanBP1), interacts selectively with Ran-GTP. Ran proteins contain a diagnostic short, acidic, carboxyl-terminal domain, DEDDDL, which, at least in the case of human Ran, is required for its role in cell cycle regulation. We show here that this domain is required for the interaction between Ran and RanBP1 but not for the interaction between Ran and a Ran guanine nucleotide exchange factor or between Ran and a Ran GTPase activating protein. In addition, Ran lacking this carboxyl-terminal domain functions normally in an in vitro nuclear protein import assay. We also show that RanBP1 interacts with the mammalian homolog of yeast protein RNA1, a protein involved in RNA transport and processing. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that Ran functions directly in at least two pathways, one, dependent on RanBP1, that affects cell cycle progression and RNA export, and another, independent of RanBP1, that affects nuclear protein import.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2474
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hampson ◽  
Elpida Tsonou ◽  
Martin J. Baker ◽  
David C. Hornigold ◽  
Roderick E. Hubbard ◽  
...  

P-Rex1 is a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that activates Rac-type small G proteins in response to the stimulation of a range of receptors, particularly G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), to control cytoskeletal dynamics and other Rac-dependent cell responses. P-Rex1 is mainly expressed in leukocytes and neurons. Whereas its roles in leukocytes have been studied extensively, relatively little is known about its functions in neurons. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated P-Rex1 deficiency in neuronal PC12 cells that stably overexpress the GPCR S1PR1, a receptor for sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), to investigate the role of P-Rex1 in neuronal GPCR signalling and cell responses. We show that P-Rex1 is required for the S1P-stimulated activation of Rac1 and Akt, basal Rac3 activity, and constitutive cAMP production in PC12-S1PR1 cells. The constitutive cAMP production was not due to increased expression levels of major neuronal adenylyl cyclases, suggesting that P-Rex1 may regulate adenylyl cyclase activity. P-Rex1 was required for maintenance of neurite protrusions and spreading in S1P-stimulated PC12-S1PR1 cells, as well as for cell-cycle progression and proliferation. In summary, we identified novel functional roles of P-Rex1 in neuronal Rac, Akt and cAMP signalling, as well as in neuronal cell-cycle progression and proliferation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document