Vaccination Without Documentation: Influenza Immunization Among Medical Residents at a Tertiary-Care Medical Center

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 626-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Bearman ◽  
Linda Fuentes ◽  
Jaclyn Van Lieu Vorenkamp ◽  
Lewis M. Drusin
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Occupational Health ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
House Staff ◽  
Medical Residents ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Risk Patients

AbstractSixty-four percent of medical residents unimmunized by the Occupational Health Service were immunized elsewhere. Those unvaccinated lacked time to comply. An immune staff is critical to prevent transmission to high-risk patients and limit absenteeism. The hospital is implementing a program to deliver medical care to the house staff.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Clostridium difficile Infection Risk Prediction Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik R. Dubberke ◽  
Yan Yan ◽  
Kimberly A. Reske ◽  
Anne M. Butler ◽  
Joshua Doherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Risk Prediction Model ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center

Objective.To develop and validate a risk prediction model that could identify patients at high risk for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) before they develop disease.Design and Setting.Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care medical center.Patients.Patients admitted to the hospital for at least 48 hours during the calendar year 2003.Methods.Data were collected electronically from the hospital's Medical Informatics database and analyzed with logistic regression to determine variables that best predicted patients' risk for development of CDI. Model discrimination and calibration were calculated. The model was bootstrapped 500 times to validate the predictive accuracy. A receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate potential risk cutoffs.Results.A total of 35,350 admitted patients, including 329 with CDI, were studied. Variables in the risk prediction model were age, CDI pressure, times admitted to hospital in the previous 60 days, modified Acute Physiology Score, days of treatment with high-risk antibiotics, whether albumin level was low, admission to an intensive care unit, and receipt of laxatives, gastric acid suppressors, or antimotility drugs. The calibration and discrimination of the model were very good to excellent (C index, 0.88; Brier score, 0.009).Conclusions.The CDI risk prediction model performed well. Further study is needed to determine whether it could be used in a clinical setting to prevent CDI-associated outcomes and reduce costs.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH MORTALITY AMONGST PATIENTS ADMITTED TO A TERTIARY CARE MEDICAL CENTER FOR COVID-19 INFECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 3123
Author(s):  
Anish Samuel ◽  
Ashesha Mechineni ◽  
Robin Craven ◽  
Wilbert Aronow ◽  
Mourad Ismail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center

scholarly journals Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E888-E894
Author(s):  
Nichol S. Martinez ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Sheila N. Firoozan ◽  
Stephanie Izard ◽  
Calvin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stent

Abstract Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.

Utility of electroencephalography: Experience from a U.S. tertiary care medical center

2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (10) ◽  
pp. 3335-3340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kapil Gururangan ◽  
Babak Razavi ◽  
Josef Parvizi
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center

Nosocomial Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-SusceptibleStaphylococcus AureusPrimary Bacteremia: At What Costs?

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray A. Abramson ◽  
Daniel J. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Matching Criteria ◽  
Nested Case Control

Objective:To determine the attributable hospital stay and costs for nosocomial methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistantS aureus(MRSA) primary bloodstream infections (BSIs).Design:Pairwise-matched (1:1) nested case-control study.Setting:University-based tertiary-care medical center.Patients:Patients admitted between December 1993 and March 1995 were eligible. Cases were defined as patients with a primary nosocomialS aureusBSI; controls were selected according to a priori matching criteria.Measurements:Length of hospital stay and total and variable direct costs of hospitalization.Results:The median hospital stay attributable to primary nosocomial MSSA BSI was 4 days, compared with 12 days for MRSA (P=.023). Attributable median total cost for MSSA primary nosocomial BSIs was $9,661 versus $27,083 for MRSA nosocomial infections (P=.043).Conclusion:Nosocomial primary BSI due toS aureussignificantly prolongs the hospital stay. Primary nosocomial BSIs due to MRSA result in an approximate threefold increase in direct cost, compared with those due to MSSA.

scholarly journals Independent risk factors for surgical site infection after cesarean delivery in a rural tertiary care medical center

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel C. Vallejo ◽  
Ahmed F. Attaallah ◽  
Robert E. Shapiro ◽  
Osama M. Elzamzamy ◽  
Michael G. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

scholarly journals Quality of Hepatitis C Care at an Urban Tertiary Care Medical Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 705-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina A. Assoumou ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
C. Robert Horsburgh ◽  
Mus ◽  
Benjamin P. Linas
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center

The Compliance of Prescribed Activity Restriction in Women at High Risk for Preterm Birth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghamar Bitar ◽  
Anthony Sciscione
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Birth ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Activity Restriction ◽  
The Impact

Objective Despite lack of evidence to support efficacy, activity restriction is one of the most commonly prescribed interventions used for the prevention of preterm birth. We have a departmental policy against the use of activity restriction but many practitioners still prescribe it in an effort to prevent preterm birth. We sought to evaluate the rate and compliance of women who are prescribed activity restriction during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth. Study Design This was a single-site retrospective questionnaire study at a tertiary care, academic affiliated medical center. Women with a history of preterm delivery or short cervix were included. Once patients were identified, each patient was contacted and administered a questionnaire. We assessed the rates of activity restriction prescription and compliance. Secondary outcomes included details regarding activity restriction and treatment in pregnancy. Continuous variables were compared with t-test and categorical variables with Chi-square test. The value p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Among the 52 women who responded to the questionnaire, 18 reported being placed on activity restriction by a physician, with 1 self-prescribing activity restriction, giving a rate of our primary outcome of 19 of 52 (36.5%). All women reported compliance with prescribed activity restriction (100%). Gestational age at delivery was not different in women placed on activity restriction. Conclusion This questionnaire suggests that approximately one in three high-risk women were placed on activity restriction during their pregnancy despite a departmental policy against its use. The 100% compliance rate in patients placed on activity restriction is a strong reminder of the impact prescribing patterns of physicians can have on patients. Key Points

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document